Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system
A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The phy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1277 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Robles, A. Ruano, M.V. Ribes, J. Ferrer, J. |
description | A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants.
[Display omitted]
► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651379500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135412008676</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651379500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0sFu1DAQBuAIgehSeAMEviCVQxaPEyf2BalULEUqQqL0bE2ccetVsl7sLNW-PV6ywA04eQ7feGz_LornwJfAoXmzXt7jFCktBQexBFhyKR8UC1CtLkVdq4fFgvO6KqGS9UnxJKU151yISj8uTkQlGg6tXhT7FdopxMSmO5wYOkd2yjWxLcWRsPODn_YsOGbDOFK0Hgd2F4Yh3JfOd5HYSGMXcUOJ-Q1DlnZdZrfUM9wgxdB5yz69-8LOLlfl9fkml69Z2qeJxqfFI4dDomfH9bS4Wb3_enFZXn3-8PHi_Kq0UqipdLauJCIJp2pV8b5rJCmosedc2ZZUo3mPPSAI2SkFPdRAmrcSm166FmR1WpzN-25j-LajNJnRJ0vDkA8ddslAI6FqteT831QoybUCpf-HCgk11yLTeqY2hpQiObONfsS4N8DNIUqzNnOU5hClATA5ytz24jjh8KT976Zf2WXw6ggwWRxcTsH69Mc1SgJoyO7l7BwGg7cxm5vrPCnfmHNd_RRvZ0E5h--eoknW08ZS72P-D6YP_u9n_QGAJ8Yn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282514092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><description>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants.
[Display omitted]
► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23260179</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Applied sciences ; Back-flush frequency ; Biogas sparging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Chemical cleaning ; cleaning ; Commercial hollow-fibre membranes ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtration ; Flux ; fouling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Membrane permeability ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Permeability ; Pollution ; Sparging ; Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor ; total solids ; Ultrafiltration ; Waste water ; wastewater ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26851191$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23260179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robles, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants.
[Display omitted]
► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Back-flush frequency</subject><subject>Biogas sparging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical cleaning</subject><subject>cleaning</subject><subject>Commercial hollow-fibre membranes</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>fouling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Membrane permeability</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sparging</subject><subject>Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>total solids</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0sFu1DAQBuAIgehSeAMEviCVQxaPEyf2BalULEUqQqL0bE2ccetVsl7sLNW-PV6ywA04eQ7feGz_LornwJfAoXmzXt7jFCktBQexBFhyKR8UC1CtLkVdq4fFgvO6KqGS9UnxJKU151yISj8uTkQlGg6tXhT7FdopxMSmO5wYOkd2yjWxLcWRsPODn_YsOGbDOFK0Hgd2F4Yh3JfOd5HYSGMXcUOJ-Q1DlnZdZrfUM9wgxdB5yz69-8LOLlfl9fkml69Z2qeJxqfFI4dDomfH9bS4Wb3_enFZXn3-8PHi_Kq0UqipdLauJCIJp2pV8b5rJCmosedc2ZZUo3mPPSAI2SkFPdRAmrcSm166FmR1WpzN-25j-LajNJnRJ0vDkA8ddslAI6FqteT831QoybUCpf-HCgk11yLTeqY2hpQiObONfsS4N8DNIUqzNnOU5hClATA5ytz24jjh8KT976Zf2WXw6ggwWRxcTsH69Mc1SgJoyO7l7BwGg7cxm5vrPCnfmHNd_RRvZ0E5h--eoknW08ZS72P-D6YP_u9n_QGAJ8Yn</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Robles, A.</creator><creator>Ruano, M.V.</creator><creator>Ribes, J.</creator><creator>Ferrer, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><author>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Back-flush frequency</topic><topic>Biogas sparging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical cleaning</topic><topic>cleaning</topic><topic>Commercial hollow-fibre membranes</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>fouling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Membrane permeability</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sparging</topic><topic>Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>total solids</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robles, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robles, A.</au><au>Ruano, M.V.</au><au>Ribes, J.</au><au>Ferrer, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1277</spage><epage>1288</epage><pages>1277-1288</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants.
[Display omitted]
► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23260179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651379500 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Anaerobiosis Applied sciences Back-flush frequency Biogas sparging Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of waters Bioreactors Biotechnology Chemical cleaning cleaning Commercial hollow-fibre membranes Environment and pollution Exact sciences and technology Filtration Flux fouling Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General purification processes Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Membrane permeability Membranes Membranes, Artificial Permeability Pollution Sparging Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor total solids Ultrafiltration Waste water wastewater Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution |
title | Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20that%20affect%20the%20permeability%20of%20commercial%20hollow-fibre%20membranes%20in%20a%20submerged%20anaerobic%20MBR%20(HF-SAnMBR)%20system&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Robles,%20A.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1277&rft.epage=1288&rft.pages=1277-1288&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651379500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282514092&rft_id=info:pmid/23260179&rft_els_id=S0043135412008676&rfr_iscdi=true |