Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system

A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The phy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288
Hauptverfasser: Robles, A., Ruano, M.V., Ribes, J., Ferrer, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1288
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1277
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 47
creator Robles, A.
Ruano, M.V.
Ribes, J.
Ferrer, J.
description A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants. [Display omitted] ► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651379500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135412008676</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651379500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0sFu1DAQBuAIgehSeAMEviCVQxaPEyf2BalULEUqQqL0bE2ccetVsl7sLNW-PV6ywA04eQ7feGz_LornwJfAoXmzXt7jFCktBQexBFhyKR8UC1CtLkVdq4fFgvO6KqGS9UnxJKU151yISj8uTkQlGg6tXhT7FdopxMSmO5wYOkd2yjWxLcWRsPODn_YsOGbDOFK0Hgd2F4Yh3JfOd5HYSGMXcUOJ-Q1DlnZdZrfUM9wgxdB5yz69-8LOLlfl9fkml69Z2qeJxqfFI4dDomfH9bS4Wb3_enFZXn3-8PHi_Kq0UqipdLauJCIJp2pV8b5rJCmosedc2ZZUo3mPPSAI2SkFPdRAmrcSm166FmR1WpzN-25j-LajNJnRJ0vDkA8ddslAI6FqteT831QoybUCpf-HCgk11yLTeqY2hpQiObONfsS4N8DNIUqzNnOU5hClATA5ytz24jjh8KT976Zf2WXw6ggwWRxcTsH69Mc1SgJoyO7l7BwGg7cxm5vrPCnfmHNd_RRvZ0E5h--eoknW08ZS72P-D6YP_u9n_QGAJ8Yn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282514092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><description>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants. [Display omitted] ► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23260179</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Applied sciences ; Back-flush frequency ; Biogas sparging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Chemical cleaning ; cleaning ; Commercial hollow-fibre membranes ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtration ; Flux ; fouling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Membrane permeability ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Permeability ; Pollution ; Sparging ; Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor ; total solids ; Ultrafiltration ; Waste water ; wastewater ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26851191$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23260179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robles, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants. [Display omitted] ► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Back-flush frequency</subject><subject>Biogas sparging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical cleaning</subject><subject>cleaning</subject><subject>Commercial hollow-fibre membranes</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>fouling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Membrane permeability</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sparging</subject><subject>Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>total solids</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0sFu1DAQBuAIgehSeAMEviCVQxaPEyf2BalULEUqQqL0bE2ccetVsl7sLNW-PV6ywA04eQ7feGz_LornwJfAoXmzXt7jFCktBQexBFhyKR8UC1CtLkVdq4fFgvO6KqGS9UnxJKU151yISj8uTkQlGg6tXhT7FdopxMSmO5wYOkd2yjWxLcWRsPODn_YsOGbDOFK0Hgd2F4Yh3JfOd5HYSGMXcUOJ-Q1DlnZdZrfUM9wgxdB5yz69-8LOLlfl9fkml69Z2qeJxqfFI4dDomfH9bS4Wb3_enFZXn3-8PHi_Kq0UqipdLauJCIJp2pV8b5rJCmosedc2ZZUo3mPPSAI2SkFPdRAmrcSm166FmR1WpzN-25j-LajNJnRJ0vDkA8ddslAI6FqteT831QoybUCpf-HCgk11yLTeqY2hpQiObONfsS4N8DNIUqzNnOU5hClATA5ytz24jjh8KT976Zf2WXw6ggwWRxcTsH69Mc1SgJoyO7l7BwGg7cxm5vrPCnfmHNd_RRvZ0E5h--eoknW08ZS72P-D6YP_u9n_QGAJ8Yn</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Robles, A.</creator><creator>Ruano, M.V.</creator><creator>Ribes, J.</creator><creator>Ferrer, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</title><author>Robles, A. ; Ruano, M.V. ; Ribes, J. ; Ferrer, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fc435aae2f84830db65e814ad008c7e8690dad1a125b881d141e9075a6d5f7153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Back-flush frequency</topic><topic>Biogas sparging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical cleaning</topic><topic>cleaning</topic><topic>Commercial hollow-fibre membranes</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>fouling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Membrane permeability</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sparging</topic><topic>Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>total solids</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robles, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robles, A.</au><au>Ruano, M.V.</au><au>Ribes, J.</au><au>Ferrer, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1277</spage><epage>1288</epage><pages>1277-1288</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>A demonstration plant with two commercial HF ultrafiltration membrane modules (PURON®, Koch Membrane Systems, PUR-PSH31) was operated with urban wastewater. The effect of the main operating variables on membrane performance at sub-critical and supra-critical filtration conditions was tested. The physical operating variables that affected membrane performance most were gas sparging intensity and back-flush (BF) frequency. Indeed, low gas sparging intensities (around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2) and low BF frequencies (30-s back-flush for every 10 basic filtration–relaxation cycles) were enough to enable membranes to be operated sub-critically even when levels of mixed liquor total solids were high (up to 25 g L−1). On the other hand, significant gas sparging intensities and BF frequencies were required in order to maintain long-term operating at supra-critical filtration conditions. After operating for more than two years at sub-critical conditions (transmembrane flux between 9 and 13.3 LMH at gas sparging intensities of around 0.23 Nm3 h−1 m−2 and MLTS levels from around 10–30 g L−1) no significant irreversible/irrecoverable fouling problems were detected (membrane permeability remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and total filtration resistance remained below 1013 m−1), therefore no chemical cleaning was conducted. Membrane performance was similar to the aerobic HF membranes operated in full-scale MBR plants. [Display omitted] ► Membrane performance in SAnMBR treating urban wastewater was similar to aerobic MBRs. ► The main variables affecting K20 under sub/supra-critical conditions were tested. ► SGDm and BF are the physical variables that affect membrane performance most. ► No chemical cleaning was needed after two years operating sub-critically. ► K20 remained above 100 LMH bar−1 and RT below 1013 m−1.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23260179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2013-03, Vol.47 (3), p.1277-1288
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651379500
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Anaerobiosis
Applied sciences
Back-flush frequency
Biogas sparging
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
Chemical cleaning
cleaning
Commercial hollow-fibre membranes
Environment and pollution
Exact sciences and technology
Filtration
Flux
fouling
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General purification processes
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Membrane permeability
Membranes
Membranes, Artificial
Permeability
Pollution
Sparging
Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor
total solids
Ultrafiltration
Waste water
wastewater
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
title Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20that%20affect%20the%20permeability%20of%20commercial%20hollow-fibre%20membranes%20in%20a%20submerged%20anaerobic%20MBR%20(HF-SAnMBR)%20system&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Robles,%20A.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1277&rft.epage=1288&rft.pages=1277-1288&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651379500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282514092&rft_id=info:pmid/23260179&rft_els_id=S0043135412008676&rfr_iscdi=true