Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison

The standard 8 double prime nonrecording precipitation gauge has been used historically by the National Weather Service (NWS) as the official precipitation measurement instrument of the U.S. climate station network. From 1986 to 1992, the accuracy and performance of this gauge (unshielded or with an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 1998-02, Vol.15 (1, pt. 1), p.54-68
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Daqing, Goodison, B E, Metcalfe, J R, Golubev, V S, Bates, R, Pangburn, T, Hanson, CL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1, pt. 1
container_start_page 54
container_title Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology
container_volume 15
creator Yang, Daqing
Goodison, B E
Metcalfe, J R
Golubev, V S
Bates, R
Pangburn, T
Hanson, CL
description The standard 8 double prime nonrecording precipitation gauge has been used historically by the National Weather Service (NWS) as the official precipitation measurement instrument of the U.S. climate station network. From 1986 to 1992, the accuracy and performance of this gauge (unshielded or with an Alter shield) were evaluated during the WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison at three stations in the United States and Russia, representing a variety of climate, terrain, and exposure. The double-fence intercomparison reference (DFIR) was the reference standard used at all the intercomparison stations in the Intercomparison project. The Intercomparison data collected at different sites are compatible with respect to the catch ratio (gauge measured/DFIR) for the same gauges, when compared using wind speed at the height of gauge orifice during the observation period. The effects of environmental factors, such as wind speed and temperature, on the gauge catch were investigated. Wind speed was found to be the most important factor determining gauge catch when precipitation was classified into snow, mixed, and rain. The regression functions of the catch ratio versus wind speed at the gauge height on a daily time step were derived for various types of precipitation. Independent checks of the equations have been conducted at these intercomparison stations and good agreement was obtained. Application of the correction procedures for wind, wetting loss, and trace amounts was made on a daily basis at Barrow, Alaska, for 1982 and 1983, and, on average, the gauge-measured precipitation was increased by 20% for rain and 90% for snow.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16472500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16472500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_164725003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFOAjEQhnvABBTeYU7cSLqssOqNGI0XMQETjmToDpsx3U7ptIm-vZvIA3j6Dt_3_yMzsU39uLCrZjk2t6pf1tqqrtYT871xriR0PyBn2B728ACtlJMniIl7As0YWkwtBAmJnKSWQzc4chw5Y2YJ0GHp6Al2pMVnhWEAGKNn96eH48P7B3DIlJz0EROrhKm5OaNXml15Z-avL5_Pb4uY5FJI87FndeQ9BpKix2p93yxX1tb_Dn8B0bpQgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16472500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yang, Daqing ; Goodison, B E ; Metcalfe, J R ; Golubev, V S ; Bates, R ; Pangburn, T ; Hanson, CL</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Daqing ; Goodison, B E ; Metcalfe, J R ; Golubev, V S ; Bates, R ; Pangburn, T ; Hanson, CL</creatorcontrib><description>The standard 8 double prime nonrecording precipitation gauge has been used historically by the National Weather Service (NWS) as the official precipitation measurement instrument of the U.S. climate station network. From 1986 to 1992, the accuracy and performance of this gauge (unshielded or with an Alter shield) were evaluated during the WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison at three stations in the United States and Russia, representing a variety of climate, terrain, and exposure. The double-fence intercomparison reference (DFIR) was the reference standard used at all the intercomparison stations in the Intercomparison project. The Intercomparison data collected at different sites are compatible with respect to the catch ratio (gauge measured/DFIR) for the same gauges, when compared using wind speed at the height of gauge orifice during the observation period. The effects of environmental factors, such as wind speed and temperature, on the gauge catch were investigated. Wind speed was found to be the most important factor determining gauge catch when precipitation was classified into snow, mixed, and rain. The regression functions of the catch ratio versus wind speed at the gauge height on a daily time step were derived for various types of precipitation. Independent checks of the equations have been conducted at these intercomparison stations and good agreement was obtained. Application of the correction procedures for wind, wetting loss, and trace amounts was made on a daily basis at Barrow, Alaska, for 1982 and 1983, and, on average, the gauge-measured precipitation was increased by 20% for rain and 90% for snow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-0572</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 1998-02, Vol.15 (1, pt. 1), p.54-68</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Daqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodison, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubev, V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pangburn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, CL</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison</title><title>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</title><description>The standard 8 double prime nonrecording precipitation gauge has been used historically by the National Weather Service (NWS) as the official precipitation measurement instrument of the U.S. climate station network. From 1986 to 1992, the accuracy and performance of this gauge (unshielded or with an Alter shield) were evaluated during the WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison at three stations in the United States and Russia, representing a variety of climate, terrain, and exposure. The double-fence intercomparison reference (DFIR) was the reference standard used at all the intercomparison stations in the Intercomparison project. The Intercomparison data collected at different sites are compatible with respect to the catch ratio (gauge measured/DFIR) for the same gauges, when compared using wind speed at the height of gauge orifice during the observation period. The effects of environmental factors, such as wind speed and temperature, on the gauge catch were investigated. Wind speed was found to be the most important factor determining gauge catch when precipitation was classified into snow, mixed, and rain. The regression functions of the catch ratio versus wind speed at the gauge height on a daily time step were derived for various types of precipitation. Independent checks of the equations have been conducted at these intercomparison stations and good agreement was obtained. Application of the correction procedures for wind, wetting loss, and trace amounts was made on a daily basis at Barrow, Alaska, for 1982 and 1983, and, on average, the gauge-measured precipitation was increased by 20% for rain and 90% for snow.</description><issn>0739-0572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMFOAjEQhnvABBTeYU7cSLqssOqNGI0XMQETjmToDpsx3U7ptIm-vZvIA3j6Dt_3_yMzsU39uLCrZjk2t6pf1tqqrtYT871xriR0PyBn2B728ACtlJMniIl7As0YWkwtBAmJnKSWQzc4chw5Y2YJ0GHp6Al2pMVnhWEAGKNn96eH48P7B3DIlJz0EROrhKm5OaNXml15Z-avL5_Pb4uY5FJI87FndeQ9BpKix2p93yxX1tb_Dn8B0bpQgg</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Yang, Daqing</creator><creator>Goodison, B E</creator><creator>Metcalfe, J R</creator><creator>Golubev, V S</creator><creator>Bates, R</creator><creator>Pangburn, T</creator><creator>Hanson, CL</creator><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison</title><author>Yang, Daqing ; Goodison, B E ; Metcalfe, J R ; Golubev, V S ; Bates, R ; Pangburn, T ; Hanson, CL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_164725003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Daqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodison, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubev, V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pangburn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, CL</creatorcontrib><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Daqing</au><au>Goodison, B E</au><au>Metcalfe, J R</au><au>Golubev, V S</au><au>Bates, R</au><au>Pangburn, T</au><au>Hanson, CL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison</atitle><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1, pt. 1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>54-68</pages><issn>0739-0572</issn><abstract>The standard 8 double prime nonrecording precipitation gauge has been used historically by the National Weather Service (NWS) as the official precipitation measurement instrument of the U.S. climate station network. From 1986 to 1992, the accuracy and performance of this gauge (unshielded or with an Alter shield) were evaluated during the WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison at three stations in the United States and Russia, representing a variety of climate, terrain, and exposure. The double-fence intercomparison reference (DFIR) was the reference standard used at all the intercomparison stations in the Intercomparison project. The Intercomparison data collected at different sites are compatible with respect to the catch ratio (gauge measured/DFIR) for the same gauges, when compared using wind speed at the height of gauge orifice during the observation period. The effects of environmental factors, such as wind speed and temperature, on the gauge catch were investigated. Wind speed was found to be the most important factor determining gauge catch when precipitation was classified into snow, mixed, and rain. The regression functions of the catch ratio versus wind speed at the gauge height on a daily time step were derived for various types of precipitation. Independent checks of the equations have been conducted at these intercomparison stations and good agreement was obtained. Application of the correction procedures for wind, wetting loss, and trace amounts was made on a daily basis at Barrow, Alaska, for 1982 and 1983, and, on average, the gauge-measured precipitation was increased by 20% for rain and 90% for snow.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0739-0572
ispartof Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 1998-02, Vol.15 (1, pt. 1), p.54-68
issn 0739-0572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16472500
source American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Accuracy of NWS 8 double prime standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: Results and application of WMO intercomparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20NWS%208%20double%20prime%20standard%20nonrecording%20precipitation%20gauge:%20Results%20and%20application%20of%20WMO%20intercomparison&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20atmospheric%20and%20oceanic%20technology&rft.au=Yang,%20Daqing&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1,%20pt.%201&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=54-68&rft.issn=0739-0572&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E16472500%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16472500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true