Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?

Aim To examine: (i) if maturity‐related gender differences in moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) depend on how maturity status is defined and measured; and (ii) the influence of maturity level on compliance with PA recommendations. Methods The study involved 253 children (139 boys) aged 9...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child : care, health & development health & development, 2013-11, Vol.39 (6), p.835-844
Hauptverfasser: Guinhouya, B. C., Fairclough, S. J., Zitouni, D., Samouda, H., Vilhelm, C., Zgaya, H., de Beaufort, C., Lemdani, M., Hubert, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 844
container_issue 6
container_start_page 835
container_title Child : care, health & development
container_volume 39
creator Guinhouya, B. C.
Fairclough, S. J.
Zitouni, D.
Samouda, H.
Vilhelm, C.
Zgaya, H.
de Beaufort, C.
Lemdani, M.
Hubert, H.
description Aim To examine: (i) if maturity‐related gender differences in moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) depend on how maturity status is defined and measured; and (ii) the influence of maturity level on compliance with PA recommendations. Methods The study involved 253 children (139 boys) aged 9.9 ± 0.9 years, with mean stature and weight of 1.39 ± 0.08 m and 35.8 ± 8.8 kg respectively. Their PA was evaluated using an Actigraph accelerometer (Model 7164). Maturity was assessed using the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) and a standardized APHV by gender (i.e. centred APHV). Results Boys engaged in significantly more MVPA than girls (P < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the centred APHV and MVPA in boys (r = 0.20; P = 0.016), but not in girls (r = 0.13; P = 0.155). An ancova controlling for the estimated APHV showed no significant interactions between gender and APHV, and the main effect of gender on MVPA was negated. Conversely, there was a significant main effect of APHV on MVPA (F 1,249 = 6.12; P = 0.014; η p 2 = 0.024). Only 9.1% of children met the PA recommendations, including 14.4% of boys and 2.6% of girls (P < 0.01). This observation also applies in both pre‐APHV (12.7% of boys vs. 2.4% of girls, P < 0.001) and post‐APHV children (23.8% of boys vs. 3.4% of girls, P < 0.0001). No differences in PA guidelines were observed between pre‐APHV and post‐APHV children. Conclusions Among prepubescent children, the influence of biological maturity on gender differences in PA may be a function of how maturity status is determined. The most physically active prepubescent children were those who were on time according to APHV.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01407.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1647013318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3094154931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5517-72a1d339c8edc1c6be0ff8f3413b984839e68d097ed866cc16281e8c465635573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkePydA0Io0BapAiGBOFpeZ1Ky5GOxE9j8e5xu2QOXMhdb9vO-M6OXkAxoAale7QrgSuaMgSgYBVZQEFQXhwdkc_p4SDaUU5mDUeyMPIlxR1MpQR-TM8Y0MM1hQ_p3I8Zs247deNN612W9m-bQTkvm_DS7rlsyPw7NOA91doNDjSEP2LkJ66xumwYDDj4ZtEO2_77EW4ckbH-tDutjQFePHUa_cm-ekkeN6yI-uzvPydeL91-qq_z60-WH6u117qUEnWvmoOa89AZrD15tkTaNabgAvi2NMLxEZWpaaqyNUt6DYgbQeKGk4lJqfk5eHn33Yfw5Y5xs36YRus4NOM7RghKaAudg7kclMChZKeF-VIg0NNdGJfTFP-hunMOQdl4pKqQWQBNljpQPY4wBG7sPbe_CYoHaNWi7s2ueds3TrkHb26DtIUmf3zWYtz3WJ-HfZBPw-gj8bjtc_tvYVtXVekv6_Khv44SHk96FH1ZprqX99vEy7aI-VxcSktkf_r3EYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1440457410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Guinhouya, B. C. ; Fairclough, S. J. ; Zitouni, D. ; Samouda, H. ; Vilhelm, C. ; Zgaya, H. ; de Beaufort, C. ; Lemdani, M. ; Hubert, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guinhouya, B. C. ; Fairclough, S. J. ; Zitouni, D. ; Samouda, H. ; Vilhelm, C. ; Zgaya, H. ; de Beaufort, C. ; Lemdani, M. ; Hubert, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To examine: (i) if maturity‐related gender differences in moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) depend on how maturity status is defined and measured; and (ii) the influence of maturity level on compliance with PA recommendations. Methods The study involved 253 children (139 boys) aged 9.9 ± 0.9 years, with mean stature and weight of 1.39 ± 0.08 m and 35.8 ± 8.8 kg respectively. Their PA was evaluated using an Actigraph accelerometer (Model 7164). Maturity was assessed using the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) and a standardized APHV by gender (i.e. centred APHV). Results Boys engaged in significantly more MVPA than girls (P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the centred APHV and MVPA in boys (r = 0.20; P = 0.016), but not in girls (r = 0.13; P = 0.155). An ancova controlling for the estimated APHV showed no significant interactions between gender and APHV, and the main effect of gender on MVPA was negated. Conversely, there was a significant main effect of APHV on MVPA (F 1,249 = 6.12; P = 0.014; η p 2 = 0.024). Only 9.1% of children met the PA recommendations, including 14.4% of boys and 2.6% of girls (P &lt; 0.01). This observation also applies in both pre‐APHV (12.7% of boys vs. 2.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.001) and post‐APHV children (23.8% of boys vs. 3.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.0001). No differences in PA guidelines were observed between pre‐APHV and post‐APHV children. Conclusions Among prepubescent children, the influence of biological maturity on gender differences in PA may be a function of how maturity status is determined. The most physically active prepubescent children were those who were on time according to APHV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01407.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22712731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCHDDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accelerometry ; Accelerometry - methods ; Anthropometry - methods ; Behavior ; Boys ; Child ; Child Development - physiology ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Females ; France - epidemiology ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Humans ; Male ; Males ; maturation ; Maturity ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; movement behaviour ; Obesity - prevention &amp; control ; Physical activity ; prepubescent ; Sex Factors ; sexual dimorphism</subject><ispartof>Child : care, health &amp; development, 2013-11, Vol.39 (6), p.835-844</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5517-72a1d339c8edc1c6be0ff8f3413b984839e68d097ed866cc16281e8c465635573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5517-72a1d339c8edc1c6be0ff8f3413b984839e68d097ed866cc16281e8c465635573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2214.2012.01407.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2214.2012.01407.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guinhouya, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairclough, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitouni, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samouda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelm, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgaya, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Beaufort, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemdani, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?</title><title>Child : care, health &amp; development</title><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><description>Aim To examine: (i) if maturity‐related gender differences in moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) depend on how maturity status is defined and measured; and (ii) the influence of maturity level on compliance with PA recommendations. Methods The study involved 253 children (139 boys) aged 9.9 ± 0.9 years, with mean stature and weight of 1.39 ± 0.08 m and 35.8 ± 8.8 kg respectively. Their PA was evaluated using an Actigraph accelerometer (Model 7164). Maturity was assessed using the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) and a standardized APHV by gender (i.e. centred APHV). Results Boys engaged in significantly more MVPA than girls (P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the centred APHV and MVPA in boys (r = 0.20; P = 0.016), but not in girls (r = 0.13; P = 0.155). An ancova controlling for the estimated APHV showed no significant interactions between gender and APHV, and the main effect of gender on MVPA was negated. Conversely, there was a significant main effect of APHV on MVPA (F 1,249 = 6.12; P = 0.014; η p 2 = 0.024). Only 9.1% of children met the PA recommendations, including 14.4% of boys and 2.6% of girls (P &lt; 0.01). This observation also applies in both pre‐APHV (12.7% of boys vs. 2.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.001) and post‐APHV children (23.8% of boys vs. 3.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.0001). No differences in PA guidelines were observed between pre‐APHV and post‐APHV children. Conclusions Among prepubescent children, the influence of biological maturity on gender differences in PA may be a function of how maturity status is determined. The most physically active prepubescent children were those who were on time according to APHV.</description><subject>accelerometry</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Boys</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>maturation</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>movement behaviour</subject><subject>Obesity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>prepubescent</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>sexual dimorphism</subject><issn>0305-1862</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkePydA0Io0BapAiGBOFpeZ1Ky5GOxE9j8e5xu2QOXMhdb9vO-M6OXkAxoAale7QrgSuaMgSgYBVZQEFQXhwdkc_p4SDaUU5mDUeyMPIlxR1MpQR-TM8Y0MM1hQ_p3I8Zs247deNN612W9m-bQTkvm_DS7rlsyPw7NOA91doNDjSEP2LkJ66xumwYDDj4ZtEO2_77EW4ckbH-tDutjQFePHUa_cm-ekkeN6yI-uzvPydeL91-qq_z60-WH6u117qUEnWvmoOa89AZrD15tkTaNabgAvi2NMLxEZWpaaqyNUt6DYgbQeKGk4lJqfk5eHn33Yfw5Y5xs36YRus4NOM7RghKaAudg7kclMChZKeF-VIg0NNdGJfTFP-hunMOQdl4pKqQWQBNljpQPY4wBG7sPbe_CYoHaNWi7s2ueds3TrkHb26DtIUmf3zWYtz3WJ-HfZBPw-gj8bjtc_tvYVtXVekv6_Khv44SHk96FH1ZprqX99vEy7aI-VxcSktkf_r3EYQ</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Guinhouya, B. C.</creator><creator>Fairclough, S. J.</creator><creator>Zitouni, D.</creator><creator>Samouda, H.</creator><creator>Vilhelm, C.</creator><creator>Zgaya, H.</creator><creator>de Beaufort, C.</creator><creator>Lemdani, M.</creator><creator>Hubert, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?</title><author>Guinhouya, B. C. ; Fairclough, S. J. ; Zitouni, D. ; Samouda, H. ; Vilhelm, C. ; Zgaya, H. ; de Beaufort, C. ; Lemdani, M. ; Hubert, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5517-72a1d339c8edc1c6be0ff8f3413b984839e68d097ed866cc16281e8c465635573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>accelerometry</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Boys</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>maturation</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>movement behaviour</topic><topic>Obesity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>prepubescent</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>sexual dimorphism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guinhouya, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairclough, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitouni, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samouda, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelm, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgaya, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Beaufort, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemdani, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Child : care, health &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guinhouya, B. C.</au><au>Fairclough, S. J.</au><au>Zitouni, D.</au><au>Samouda, H.</au><au>Vilhelm, C.</au><au>Zgaya, H.</au><au>de Beaufort, C.</au><au>Lemdani, M.</au><au>Hubert, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?</atitle><jtitle>Child : care, health &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>835-844</pages><issn>0305-1862</issn><eissn>1365-2214</eissn><coden>CCHDDH</coden><abstract>Aim To examine: (i) if maturity‐related gender differences in moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) depend on how maturity status is defined and measured; and (ii) the influence of maturity level on compliance with PA recommendations. Methods The study involved 253 children (139 boys) aged 9.9 ± 0.9 years, with mean stature and weight of 1.39 ± 0.08 m and 35.8 ± 8.8 kg respectively. Their PA was evaluated using an Actigraph accelerometer (Model 7164). Maturity was assessed using the estimated age at peak height velocity (APHV) and a standardized APHV by gender (i.e. centred APHV). Results Boys engaged in significantly more MVPA than girls (P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the centred APHV and MVPA in boys (r = 0.20; P = 0.016), but not in girls (r = 0.13; P = 0.155). An ancova controlling for the estimated APHV showed no significant interactions between gender and APHV, and the main effect of gender on MVPA was negated. Conversely, there was a significant main effect of APHV on MVPA (F 1,249 = 6.12; P = 0.014; η p 2 = 0.024). Only 9.1% of children met the PA recommendations, including 14.4% of boys and 2.6% of girls (P &lt; 0.01). This observation also applies in both pre‐APHV (12.7% of boys vs. 2.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.001) and post‐APHV children (23.8% of boys vs. 3.4% of girls, P &lt; 0.0001). No differences in PA guidelines were observed between pre‐APHV and post‐APHV children. Conclusions Among prepubescent children, the influence of biological maturity on gender differences in PA may be a function of how maturity status is determined. The most physically active prepubescent children were those who were on time according to APHV.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22712731</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01407.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-1862
ispartof Child : care, health & development, 2013-11, Vol.39 (6), p.835-844
issn 0305-1862
1365-2214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1647013318
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects accelerometry
Accelerometry - methods
Anthropometry - methods
Behavior
Boys
Child
Child Development - physiology
Children
Children & youth
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Female
Females
France - epidemiology
Gender
Gender differences
Humans
Male
Males
maturation
Maturity
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
movement behaviour
Obesity - prevention & control
Physical activity
prepubescent
Sex Factors
sexual dimorphism
title Does biological maturity actually confound gender-related differences in physical activity in preadolescence?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20biological%20maturity%20actually%20confound%20gender-related%20differences%20in%20physical%20activity%20in%20preadolescence?&rft.jtitle=Child%20:%20care,%20health%20&%20development&rft.au=Guinhouya,%20B.%20C.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=835-844&rft.issn=0305-1862&rft.eissn=1365-2214&rft.coden=CCHDDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01407.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3094154931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1440457410&rft_id=info:pmid/22712731&rfr_iscdi=true