Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities
Fruit and vegetable consumption of Native Americans was compared with that of non‐Native Americans and determinants of fruit and vegetable intake for both populations were found based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior. A one‐time survey was conducted as part of a larger research project funded by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of consumer studies 2015-01, Vol.39 (1), p.67-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 73 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | International journal of consumer studies |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Cho, Soo Hyun Chang, Kuo-Liang Yeo, Jeonghee Wounded Head, Lorna Zastrow, Marjorie Zdorovtsov, Christina Skjonsberg, Larissa Stluka, Suzanne |
description | Fruit and vegetable consumption of Native Americans was compared with that of non‐Native Americans and determinants of fruit and vegetable intake for both populations were found based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior. A one‐time survey was conducted as part of a larger research project funded by the South Dakota Department of Health. The survey was administered in local grocery stores and supermarkets in six South Dakota communities, including two located on Native American reservations. Of the 1000 distributed surveys, 499 were returned with 230 being usable, resulting in a response rate of 49.9%. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and two regression models were tested using SAS 9.2 software. Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable intake. Attitudes towards health, fruit and vegetable consumption, perceived difficulty, subjective norm and intention were also measured. Community size, family income, employment status and participation in food assistance programmes [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Women, Infants, and Children (SNAP or WIC)] were socio‐demographic control variables. Overall, Native American participants consumed more fruit and vegetables at home and had a more positive attitude towards healthy diets than non‐Native American participants. SNAP or WIC participation, family health, exercise, intention to live healthier than parents, buying healthy food, and fruit and vegetable consumption when eating out were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among Native Americans, while participation in the SNAP or WIC programme had a negative influence on consumption among non‐Native American participants. Family health, exercise, buying healthy food, fruit and vegetable when eating out, and intention to buy healthy food were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among the non‐Native American population. Theory of Planned Behavior variables (e.g. attitude towards healthy food) significantly contributed to the model explaining fruit and vegetable consumption. The fact that SNAP and WIC participation had an opposite influence on the two populations warrants further research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijcs.12153 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1646697561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3538024461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g3273-595a6ec99f131022bfb18257af1e95e79f46b63349d1c40258a5149786ae53f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhSMEEmW58AssceGS4om3-FhVLAVUDhQhcbHc1KlcEjvYCcu_J13UA3OZN9L3nkYvSS4AD6Gfa7sq4hAyYOQgGQAVOOWUwOFeZ-Q4OYlxhTHwnJFBEse-bnSw0TvkS1SGzrZIuwX6MkvT6nllUOFd7OqmtT2ia--WaKpb-2U2mPMu3Z2j2gRbaIca33SVXvMRWYdCF3TVp9R152xrTTxLjkpdRXO-26fJ6-3NbHyfPj3fTcajp3RJMkFSJpnmppCyBAI4y-blHPKMCV2CkcwIWVI-54RQuYCC4ozlmgGVIufaMFIKcppcbXOb4D87E1tV21iYqtLO-C4q4JRzKRiHHr38h658F1z_3ZrCnFJGcU_Blvq2lflVTbC1Dr8KsFqXr9blq035avIwftmo3pNuPTa25mfv0eFDcUEEU2_TO5XL2fvs5VEqIH-jsYln</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640644540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Cho, Soo Hyun ; Chang, Kuo-Liang ; Yeo, Jeonghee ; Wounded Head, Lorna ; Zastrow, Marjorie ; Zdorovtsov, Christina ; Skjonsberg, Larissa ; Stluka, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Hyun ; Chang, Kuo-Liang ; Yeo, Jeonghee ; Wounded Head, Lorna ; Zastrow, Marjorie ; Zdorovtsov, Christina ; Skjonsberg, Larissa ; Stluka, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Fruit and vegetable consumption of Native Americans was compared with that of non‐Native Americans and determinants of fruit and vegetable intake for both populations were found based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior. A one‐time survey was conducted as part of a larger research project funded by the South Dakota Department of Health. The survey was administered in local grocery stores and supermarkets in six South Dakota communities, including two located on Native American reservations. Of the 1000 distributed surveys, 499 were returned with 230 being usable, resulting in a response rate of 49.9%. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and two regression models were tested using SAS 9.2 software. Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable intake. Attitudes towards health, fruit and vegetable consumption, perceived difficulty, subjective norm and intention were also measured. Community size, family income, employment status and participation in food assistance programmes [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Women, Infants, and Children (SNAP or WIC)] were socio‐demographic control variables. Overall, Native American participants consumed more fruit and vegetables at home and had a more positive attitude towards healthy diets than non‐Native American participants. SNAP or WIC participation, family health, exercise, intention to live healthier than parents, buying healthy food, and fruit and vegetable consumption when eating out were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among Native Americans, while participation in the SNAP or WIC programme had a negative influence on consumption among non‐Native American participants. Family health, exercise, buying healthy food, fruit and vegetable when eating out, and intention to buy healthy food were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among the non‐Native American population. Theory of Planned Behavior variables (e.g. attitude towards healthy food) significantly contributed to the model explaining fruit and vegetable consumption. The fact that SNAP and WIC participation had an opposite influence on the two populations warrants further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Consumer behavior ; Consumption ; Determinants ; Diet ; Food ; Food stamps ; Fruits ; Fruits and vegetables ; Native American ; Native North Americans ; Native peoples ; Nutrition ; Regression analysis ; Rural communities ; South Dakota ; Studies ; Theory of Planned Behavior ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2015-01, Vol.39 (1), p.67-73</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcs.12153$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcs.12153$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,30997,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kuo-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Jeonghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wounded Head, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastrow, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdorovtsov, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skjonsberg, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stluka, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><addtitle>International Journal of Consumer Studies</addtitle><description>Fruit and vegetable consumption of Native Americans was compared with that of non‐Native Americans and determinants of fruit and vegetable intake for both populations were found based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior. A one‐time survey was conducted as part of a larger research project funded by the South Dakota Department of Health. The survey was administered in local grocery stores and supermarkets in six South Dakota communities, including two located on Native American reservations. Of the 1000 distributed surveys, 499 were returned with 230 being usable, resulting in a response rate of 49.9%. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and two regression models were tested using SAS 9.2 software. Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable intake. Attitudes towards health, fruit and vegetable consumption, perceived difficulty, subjective norm and intention were also measured. Community size, family income, employment status and participation in food assistance programmes [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Women, Infants, and Children (SNAP or WIC)] were socio‐demographic control variables. Overall, Native American participants consumed more fruit and vegetables at home and had a more positive attitude towards healthy diets than non‐Native American participants. SNAP or WIC participation, family health, exercise, intention to live healthier than parents, buying healthy food, and fruit and vegetable consumption when eating out were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among Native Americans, while participation in the SNAP or WIC programme had a negative influence on consumption among non‐Native American participants. Family health, exercise, buying healthy food, fruit and vegetable when eating out, and intention to buy healthy food were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among the non‐Native American population. Theory of Planned Behavior variables (e.g. attitude towards healthy food) significantly contributed to the model explaining fruit and vegetable consumption. The fact that SNAP and WIC participation had an opposite influence on the two populations warrants further research.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fruits and vegetables</subject><subject>Native American</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>South Dakota</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory of Planned Behavior</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhSMEEmW58AssceGS4om3-FhVLAVUDhQhcbHc1KlcEjvYCcu_J13UA3OZN9L3nkYvSS4AD6Gfa7sq4hAyYOQgGQAVOOWUwOFeZ-Q4OYlxhTHwnJFBEse-bnSw0TvkS1SGzrZIuwX6MkvT6nllUOFd7OqmtT2ia--WaKpb-2U2mPMu3Z2j2gRbaIca33SVXvMRWYdCF3TVp9R152xrTTxLjkpdRXO-26fJ6-3NbHyfPj3fTcajp3RJMkFSJpnmppCyBAI4y-blHPKMCV2CkcwIWVI-54RQuYCC4ozlmgGVIufaMFIKcppcbXOb4D87E1tV21iYqtLO-C4q4JRzKRiHHr38h658F1z_3ZrCnFJGcU_Blvq2lflVTbC1Dr8KsFqXr9blq035avIwftmo3pNuPTa25mfv0eFDcUEEU2_TO5XL2fvs5VEqIH-jsYln</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Cho, Soo Hyun</creator><creator>Chang, Kuo-Liang</creator><creator>Yeo, Jeonghee</creator><creator>Wounded Head, Lorna</creator><creator>Zastrow, Marjorie</creator><creator>Zdorovtsov, Christina</creator><creator>Skjonsberg, Larissa</creator><creator>Stluka, Suzanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities</title><author>Cho, Soo Hyun ; Chang, Kuo-Liang ; Yeo, Jeonghee ; Wounded Head, Lorna ; Zastrow, Marjorie ; Zdorovtsov, Christina ; Skjonsberg, Larissa ; Stluka, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g3273-595a6ec99f131022bfb18257af1e95e79f46b63349d1c40258a5149786ae53f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fruits and vegetables</topic><topic>Native American</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>South Dakota</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory of Planned Behavior</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kuo-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Jeonghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wounded Head, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastrow, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdorovtsov, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skjonsberg, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stluka, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Soo Hyun</au><au>Chang, Kuo-Liang</au><au>Yeo, Jeonghee</au><au>Wounded Head, Lorna</au><au>Zastrow, Marjorie</au><au>Zdorovtsov, Christina</au><au>Skjonsberg, Larissa</au><au>Stluka, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Consumer Studies</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>67-73</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Fruit and vegetable consumption of Native Americans was compared with that of non‐Native Americans and determinants of fruit and vegetable intake for both populations were found based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior. A one‐time survey was conducted as part of a larger research project funded by the South Dakota Department of Health. The survey was administered in local grocery stores and supermarkets in six South Dakota communities, including two located on Native American reservations. Of the 1000 distributed surveys, 499 were returned with 230 being usable, resulting in a response rate of 49.9%. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and two regression models were tested using SAS 9.2 software. Dependent variables were fruit and vegetable intake. Attitudes towards health, fruit and vegetable consumption, perceived difficulty, subjective norm and intention were also measured. Community size, family income, employment status and participation in food assistance programmes [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Women, Infants, and Children (SNAP or WIC)] were socio‐demographic control variables. Overall, Native American participants consumed more fruit and vegetables at home and had a more positive attitude towards healthy diets than non‐Native American participants. SNAP or WIC participation, family health, exercise, intention to live healthier than parents, buying healthy food, and fruit and vegetable consumption when eating out were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among Native Americans, while participation in the SNAP or WIC programme had a negative influence on consumption among non‐Native American participants. Family health, exercise, buying healthy food, fruit and vegetable when eating out, and intention to buy healthy food were positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among the non‐Native American population. Theory of Planned Behavior variables (e.g. attitude towards healthy food) significantly contributed to the model explaining fruit and vegetable consumption. The fact that SNAP and WIC participation had an opposite influence on the two populations warrants further research.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12153</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-6423 |
ispartof | International journal of consumer studies, 2015-01, Vol.39 (1), p.67-73 |
issn | 1470-6423 1470-6431 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1646697561 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Comparative analysis Consumer behavior Consumption Determinants Diet Food Food stamps Fruits Fruits and vegetables Native American Native North Americans Native peoples Nutrition Regression analysis Rural communities South Dakota Studies Theory of Planned Behavior U.S.A |
title | Comparison of fruit and vegetable consumption among Native and non-Native American populations in rural communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20fruit%20and%20vegetable%20consumption%20among%20Native%20and%20non-Native%20American%20populations%20in%20rural%20communities&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Cho,%20Soo%20Hyun&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=67-73&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3538024461%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640644540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |