Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study

The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. To examine differences in nursing practice en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing studies 2014-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1441-1449
Hauptverfasser: Choi, JiSun, Boyle, Diane K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1449
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1441
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 51
creator Choi, JiSun
Boyle, Diane K.
description The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. To examine differences in nursing practice environments among 11 unit types (critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, combined medical–surgical, obstetric, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric, perioperative, and emergency) and by Magnet status overall, as well as four specific aspects of the practice environment. Cross-sectional study. 5322 nursing units in 519 US acute care hospitals. The nursing practice environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level. Two statistical approaches (one-way analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of covariance analysis) were employed with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. In general, the nursing practice environment was favorable in all unit types. There were significant differences in the nursing practice environment among the 11 unit types and by Magnet status. Pediatric units had the most favorable practice environment and medical–surgical units had the least favorable. A consistent finding across all unit types except neonatal units was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support, and nurse–physician relations). Unit nursing practice environments were more favorable in Magnet than non-Magnet hospitals. Findings indicate that there are significant variations in unit nursing practice environments among 11 unit types and by hospital Magnet status. Both hospital-level and unit-specific strategies should be considered to achieve an excellent nursing practice environment in all hospital units.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1644473475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748914000558</els_id><sourcerecordid>3448166821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-9ad782d148b0fb99adb639467c2feb7da3aab2bc361c805d2d4ba91b9ab13e8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpSLZp_kIQ9NKLXcmSZbmnhvQTAjm0gd6EPsZFZi27kryw_z4ym_TQS05i0DPvjPQgdE1JTQkVH8baj2GNKa91QyivCasJoa_QjsqOVbynv1-jHSENqTou-wv0JqWRFEISeY4uGi6EkLTdIfXZDwNECBYS9gFvmT78wUvUNnsLGMLBxzlMEDLW01yuHn5ibdcM2OoIeA0-43xcIH3EN9hBstEv2R8Al93c8S06G_Q-wdXTeYkevn75dfu9urv_9uP25q6yrWhz1WvXycZRLg0ZTF9KI1jPRWebAUznNNPaNMYyQa0krWscN7qnpteGMpCWXaL3p9wlzn9XSFlNPlnY73WAeU2KCs55x3jXvoy2ggvCREcK-u4_dJzXGMpDNkoIxmlLCyVOlI1zShEGtUQ_6XhUlKjNlhrVsy212VKEqeKiNF4_xa9mAvev7VlPAT6dAChfd_AQVbJ-c-V8BJuVm_1LMx4B9LSqfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566634151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Choi, JiSun ; Boyle, Diane K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, JiSun ; Boyle, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><description>The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. To examine differences in nursing practice environments among 11 unit types (critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, combined medical–surgical, obstetric, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric, perioperative, and emergency) and by Magnet status overall, as well as four specific aspects of the practice environment. Cross-sectional study. 5322 nursing units in 519 US acute care hospitals. The nursing practice environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level. Two statistical approaches (one-way analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of covariance analysis) were employed with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. In general, the nursing practice environment was favorable in all unit types. There were significant differences in the nursing practice environment among the 11 unit types and by Magnet status. Pediatric units had the most favorable practice environment and medical–surgical units had the least favorable. A consistent finding across all unit types except neonatal units was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support, and nurse–physician relations). Unit nursing practice environments were more favorable in Magnet than non-Magnet hospitals. Findings indicate that there are significant variations in unit nursing practice environments among 11 unit types and by hospital Magnet status. Both hospital-level and unit-specific strategies should be considered to achieve an excellent nursing practice environment in all hospital units.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24666815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute care units ; Acute Disease ; Clinical outcomes ; Hospital Administration ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Multivariate analysis ; NDNQI ; Nursing ; Nursing Process ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Registered nurse ; Unit nursing practice environment ; United States</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2014-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1441-1449</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-9ad782d148b0fb99adb639467c2feb7da3aab2bc361c805d2d4ba91b9ab13e8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-9ad782d148b0fb99adb639467c2feb7da3aab2bc361c805d2d4ba91b9ab13e8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,30998,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, JiSun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. To examine differences in nursing practice environments among 11 unit types (critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, combined medical–surgical, obstetric, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric, perioperative, and emergency) and by Magnet status overall, as well as four specific aspects of the practice environment. Cross-sectional study. 5322 nursing units in 519 US acute care hospitals. The nursing practice environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level. Two statistical approaches (one-way analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of covariance analysis) were employed with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. In general, the nursing practice environment was favorable in all unit types. There were significant differences in the nursing practice environment among the 11 unit types and by Magnet status. Pediatric units had the most favorable practice environment and medical–surgical units had the least favorable. A consistent finding across all unit types except neonatal units was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support, and nurse–physician relations). Unit nursing practice environments were more favorable in Magnet than non-Magnet hospitals. Findings indicate that there are significant variations in unit nursing practice environments among 11 unit types and by hospital Magnet status. Both hospital-level and unit-specific strategies should be considered to achieve an excellent nursing practice environment in all hospital units.</description><subject>Acute care units</subject><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Hospital Administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>NDNQI</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Process</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Registered nurse</subject><subject>Unit nursing practice environment</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpSLZp_kIQ9NKLXcmSZbmnhvQTAjm0gd6EPsZFZi27kryw_z4ym_TQS05i0DPvjPQgdE1JTQkVH8baj2GNKa91QyivCasJoa_QjsqOVbynv1-jHSENqTou-wv0JqWRFEISeY4uGi6EkLTdIfXZDwNECBYS9gFvmT78wUvUNnsLGMLBxzlMEDLW01yuHn5ibdcM2OoIeA0-43xcIH3EN9hBstEv2R8Al93c8S06G_Q-wdXTeYkevn75dfu9urv_9uP25q6yrWhz1WvXycZRLg0ZTF9KI1jPRWebAUznNNPaNMYyQa0krWscN7qnpteGMpCWXaL3p9wlzn9XSFlNPlnY73WAeU2KCs55x3jXvoy2ggvCREcK-u4_dJzXGMpDNkoIxmlLCyVOlI1zShEGtUQ_6XhUlKjNlhrVsy212VKEqeKiNF4_xa9mAvev7VlPAT6dAChfd_AQVbJ-c-V8BJuVm_1LMx4B9LSqfg</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Choi, JiSun</creator><creator>Boyle, Diane K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study</title><author>Choi, JiSun ; Boyle, Diane K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-9ad782d148b0fb99adb639467c2feb7da3aab2bc361c805d2d4ba91b9ab13e8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acute care units</topic><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Hospital Administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>NDNQI</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Process</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Registered nurse</topic><topic>Unit nursing practice environment</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, JiSun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, JiSun</au><au>Boyle, Diane K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1441</spage><epage>1449</epage><pages>1441-1449</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>The hospital nursing practice environment has been found to be crucial for better nurse and patient outcomes. Yet little is known about the professional nursing practice environment at the unit level where nurses provide 24-hour bedside care to patients. To examine differences in nursing practice environments among 11 unit types (critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, combined medical–surgical, obstetric, neonatal, pediatric, psychiatric, perioperative, and emergency) and by Magnet status overall, as well as four specific aspects of the practice environment. Cross-sectional study. 5322 nursing units in 519 US acute care hospitals. The nursing practice environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level. Two statistical approaches (one-way analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of covariance analysis) were employed with a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. In general, the nursing practice environment was favorable in all unit types. There were significant differences in the nursing practice environment among the 11 unit types and by Magnet status. Pediatric units had the most favorable practice environment and medical–surgical units had the least favorable. A consistent finding across all unit types except neonatal units was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support, and nurse–physician relations). Unit nursing practice environments were more favorable in Magnet than non-Magnet hospitals. Findings indicate that there are significant variations in unit nursing practice environments among 11 unit types and by hospital Magnet status. Both hospital-level and unit-specific strategies should be considered to achieve an excellent nursing practice environment in all hospital units.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24666815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2014-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1441-1449
issn 0020-7489
1873-491X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1644473475
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Acute care units
Acute Disease
Clinical outcomes
Hospital Administration
Humans
Intensive care
Multivariate analysis
NDNQI
Nursing
Nursing Process
Nursing Staff, Hospital
Registered nurse
Unit nursing practice environment
United States
title Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A24%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20nursing%20practice%20environment%20among%20US%20acute%20care%20unit%20types:%20A%20descriptive%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Choi,%20JiSun&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1441&rft.epage=1449&rft.pages=1441-1449&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3448166821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566634151&rft_id=info:pmid/24666815&rft_els_id=S0020748914000558&rfr_iscdi=true