Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care
Abstract Context Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care. Objectives To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2014-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1108-1116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1108 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Sudore, Rebecca L., MD Casarett, David, MD, MA Smith, Dawn, MS Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN |
description | Abstract Context Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care. Objectives To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and without family involvement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 34,290 decedents from 146 acute and long-term care Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2011. Outcomes included: 1) palliative care consult, 2) chaplain visit, and 3) death in an inpatient hospice or palliative care unit. We also assessed “do not resuscitate” (DNR) orders. Family involvement was defined as documented discussions with the health care team in the last month of life. We used logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, and clustered by facility. For chaplain visit, hospice or palliative care unit death, and DNR, we additionally adjusted for palliative care consults. Results Mean (SD) age was 74 (±12) years, 98% were men, and 19% were nonwhite. Most decedents (94.2%) had involved family. Veterans with involved family were more likely to have had a palliative care consult, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.31 (95% CI 3.90–4.76); a chaplain visit, AOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07–1.31); and a DNR order, AOR 4.59 (95% CI 4.08–5.16) but not more likely to die in a hospice or palliative care unit. Conclusion Family involvement at the end of life is associated with receipt of palliative care consultation and a chaplain visit and a higher likelihood of a DNR order. Clinicians should support early advance care planning for vulnerable patients who may lack family or friends. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1644472951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392414002309</els_id><sourcerecordid>1644472951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-18ef70c243a7c3d43fbbf8a22c08f62a4b356922028e833a2be383218e6822e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6ReCN50PPlomt4Iy7CrCwPi13VI0xPM2KZj0g7035sy4wfeKBzIzXPOmzw5hLygsKVA5evD9nA0PqRlGEzYMqBiC7mAPiAbqmpeyoryh2QDSlUlb5i4Ik9SOgBAxSV_TK6YqBsOdb0hN3dm8P1S3IfT2J9wwDAVZiqmr1jchq4cXbn3DgsTuuIjWvTHqRhd8WE2vZ-WYmciPiWPnOkTPruc1-TL3e3n3bty__7t_e5mX1pJ5VRSha4GywQ3teWd4K5tnTKMWVBOMiNaXsmGMWAKFeeGtcgVZ7lNKsaQ82vy6jz3GMfvM6ZJDz5Z7HsTcJyTplIIUbMmP_3fKM8kB6Ey2pxRG8eUIjp9jH4wcdEU9CpbH_QfsvUqW0MuWGOeX2LmdsDuV-dPuxl4eQFMsqZ30QTr02-ugYo1ssnc7sxh9nfyGHWyHoPFzke0k-5G_1_XefPXFNv74HPwN1wwHcY5hvxBmurENOhP63asy0EFQJbR8B-d4LVj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634723048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD ; Casarett, David, MD, MA ; Smith, Dawn, MS ; Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS ; Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</creator><creatorcontrib>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD ; Casarett, David, MD, MA ; Smith, Dawn, MS ; Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS ; Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Context Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care. Objectives To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and without family involvement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 34,290 decedents from 146 acute and long-term care Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2011. Outcomes included: 1) palliative care consult, 2) chaplain visit, and 3) death in an inpatient hospice or palliative care unit. We also assessed “do not resuscitate” (DNR) orders. Family involvement was defined as documented discussions with the health care team in the last month of life. We used logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, and clustered by facility. For chaplain visit, hospice or palliative care unit death, and DNR, we additionally adjusted for palliative care consults. Results Mean (SD) age was 74 (±12) years, 98% were men, and 19% were nonwhite. Most decedents (94.2%) had involved family. Veterans with involved family were more likely to have had a palliative care consult, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.31 (95% CI 3.90–4.76); a chaplain visit, AOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07–1.31); and a DNR order, AOR 4.59 (95% CI 4.08–5.16) but not more likely to die in a hospice or palliative care unit. Conclusion Family involvement at the end of life is associated with receipt of palliative care consultation and a chaplain visit and a higher likelihood of a DNR order. Clinicians should support early advance care planning for vulnerable patients who may lack family or friends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24793077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chaplaincy Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; communication ; Decision Making ; End-of-life care ; Family ; Female ; Hospitals, Veterans ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pain Medicine ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; quality assessment ; Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Resuscitation Orders ; Retrospective Studies ; Terminal Care - methods ; Terminal Care - statistics & numerical data ; veterans</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2014-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1108-1116</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-18ef70c243a7c3d43fbbf8a22c08f62a4b356922028e833a2be383218e6822e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-18ef70c243a7c3d43fbbf8a22c08f62a4b356922028e833a2be383218e6822e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29052969$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24793077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casarett, David, MD, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dawn, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</creatorcontrib><title>Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Abstract Context Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care. Objectives To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and without family involvement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 34,290 decedents from 146 acute and long-term care Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2011. Outcomes included: 1) palliative care consult, 2) chaplain visit, and 3) death in an inpatient hospice or palliative care unit. We also assessed “do not resuscitate” (DNR) orders. Family involvement was defined as documented discussions with the health care team in the last month of life. We used logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, and clustered by facility. For chaplain visit, hospice or palliative care unit death, and DNR, we additionally adjusted for palliative care consults. Results Mean (SD) age was 74 (±12) years, 98% were men, and 19% were nonwhite. Most decedents (94.2%) had involved family. Veterans with involved family were more likely to have had a palliative care consult, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.31 (95% CI 3.90–4.76); a chaplain visit, AOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07–1.31); and a DNR order, AOR 4.59 (95% CI 4.08–5.16) but not more likely to die in a hospice or palliative care unit. Conclusion Family involvement at the end of life is associated with receipt of palliative care consultation and a chaplain visit and a higher likelihood of a DNR order. Clinicians should support early advance care planning for vulnerable patients who may lack family or friends.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chaplaincy Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>End-of-life care</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Veterans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Resuscitation Orders</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Terminal Care - methods</subject><subject>Terminal Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>veterans</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6ReCN50PPlomt4Iy7CrCwPi13VI0xPM2KZj0g7035sy4wfeKBzIzXPOmzw5hLygsKVA5evD9nA0PqRlGEzYMqBiC7mAPiAbqmpeyoryh2QDSlUlb5i4Ik9SOgBAxSV_TK6YqBsOdb0hN3dm8P1S3IfT2J9wwDAVZiqmr1jchq4cXbn3DgsTuuIjWvTHqRhd8WE2vZ-WYmciPiWPnOkTPruc1-TL3e3n3bty__7t_e5mX1pJ5VRSha4GywQ3teWd4K5tnTKMWVBOMiNaXsmGMWAKFeeGtcgVZ7lNKsaQ82vy6jz3GMfvM6ZJDz5Z7HsTcJyTplIIUbMmP_3fKM8kB6Ey2pxRG8eUIjp9jH4wcdEU9CpbH_QfsvUqW0MuWGOeX2LmdsDuV-dPuxl4eQFMsqZ30QTr02-ugYo1ssnc7sxh9nfyGHWyHoPFzke0k-5G_1_XefPXFNv74HPwN1wwHcY5hvxBmurENOhP63asy0EFQJbR8B-d4LVj</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD</creator><creator>Casarett, David, MD, MA</creator><creator>Smith, Dawn, MS</creator><creator>Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS</creator><creator>Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care</title><author>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD ; Casarett, David, MD, MA ; Smith, Dawn, MS ; Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS ; Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-18ef70c243a7c3d43fbbf8a22c08f62a4b356922028e833a2be383218e6822e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chaplaincy Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>End-of-life care</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Veterans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Resuscitation Orders</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Terminal Care - methods</topic><topic>Terminal Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casarett, David, MD, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Dawn, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sudore, Rebecca L., MD</au><au>Casarett, David, MD, MA</au><au>Smith, Dawn, MS</au><au>Richardson, Diane M., PhD, MS</au><au>Ersek, Mary, PhD, RN, FAAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1108</spage><epage>1116</epage><pages>1108-1116</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Abstract Context Most patients will lose decision-making capacity at the end of life. Little is known about the quality of care received by patients who have family involved in their care. Objectives To evaluate differences in the receipt of quality end-of-life care for patients who died with and without family involvement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 34,290 decedents from 146 acute and long-term care Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2011. Outcomes included: 1) palliative care consult, 2) chaplain visit, and 3) death in an inpatient hospice or palliative care unit. We also assessed “do not resuscitate” (DNR) orders. Family involvement was defined as documented discussions with the health care team in the last month of life. We used logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, and clustered by facility. For chaplain visit, hospice or palliative care unit death, and DNR, we additionally adjusted for palliative care consults. Results Mean (SD) age was 74 (±12) years, 98% were men, and 19% were nonwhite. Most decedents (94.2%) had involved family. Veterans with involved family were more likely to have had a palliative care consult, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.31 (95% CI 3.90–4.76); a chaplain visit, AOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07–1.31); and a DNR order, AOR 4.59 (95% CI 4.08–5.16) but not more likely to die in a hospice or palliative care unit. Conclusion Family involvement at the end of life is associated with receipt of palliative care consultation and a chaplain visit and a higher likelihood of a DNR order. Clinicians should support early advance care planning for vulnerable patients who may lack family or friends.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24793077</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2014-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1108-1116 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1644472951 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Biological and medical sciences Chaplaincy Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data communication Decision Making End-of-life care Family Female Hospitals, Veterans Humans Male Medical sciences Pain Medicine Pharmacology. Drug treatments quality assessment Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Resuscitation Orders Retrospective Studies Terminal Care - methods Terminal Care - statistics & numerical data veterans |
title | Family Involvement at the End-of-Life and Receipt of Quality Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20Involvement%20at%20the%20End-of-Life%20and%20Receipt%20of%20Quality%20Care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Sudore,%20Rebecca%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1108&rft.epage=1116&rft.pages=1108-1116&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1644472951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634723048&rft_id=info:pmid/24793077&rft_els_id=S0885392414002309&rfr_iscdi=true |