Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making
This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Bamford, Vicki |
description | This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642624247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16426242473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73CjCwmUCjgZYzTGxcXBjZR6IFp6yJUY397FF3D6lm8kgjiR6zDP8utETJkfUZSscpUH4nTu0AH1YCwx3jawdaCZkblF54EquNMbSks1g9EODDnfN-XgETxBR7Yxn7DVz8bVczGutGVc_JyJ5WF_2R3DrqfXgOyLtmGD1mqHNHARp0qmUkmVJX_UL9WfQBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642624247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bamford, Vicki</creator><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1329-878X</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Australia ; Digital technology ; Government ; Internet ; Media ; Policy making ; Public sphere</subject><ispartof>Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy, 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><title>Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy</title><description>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public sphere</subject><issn>1329-878X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73CjCwmUCjgZYzTGxcXBjZR6IFp6yJUY397FF3D6lm8kgjiR6zDP8utETJkfUZSscpUH4nTu0AH1YCwx3jawdaCZkblF54EquNMbSks1g9EODDnfN-XgETxBR7Yxn7DVz8bVczGutGVc_JyJ5WF_2R3DrqfXgOyLtmGD1mqHNHARp0qmUkmVJX_UL9WfQBY</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Bamford, Vicki</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><author>Bamford, Vicki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16426242473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public sphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bamford, Vicki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</atitle><jtitle>Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>151</volume><spage>21</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>21-30</pages><issn>1329-878X</issn><abstract>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1329-878X |
ispartof | Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy, 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30 |
issn | 1329-878X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624247 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Australia Digital technology Government Internet Media Policy making Public sphere |
title | Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T07%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20or%20closed?%20An%20assessment%20of%20how%20blogs%20can%20contribute%20to%20policy-making&rft.jtitle=Media%20international%20Australia%20incorporating%20Culture%20&%20policy&rft.au=Bamford,%20Vicki&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=151&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=21-30&rft.issn=1329-878X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1642624247%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642624247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |