Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making

This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30
1. Verfasser: Bamford, Vicki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue
container_start_page 21
container_title Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy
container_volume 151
creator Bamford, Vicki
description This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642624247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16426242473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73CjCwmUCjgZYzTGxcXBjZR6IFp6yJUY397FF3D6lm8kgjiR6zDP8utETJkfUZSscpUH4nTu0AH1YCwx3jawdaCZkblF54EquNMbSks1g9EODDnfN-XgETxBR7Yxn7DVz8bVczGutGVc_JyJ5WF_2R3DrqfXgOyLtmGD1mqHNHARp0qmUkmVJX_UL9WfQBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642624247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bamford, Vicki</creator><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1329-878X</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Australia ; Digital technology ; Government ; Internet ; Media ; Policy making ; Public sphere</subject><ispartof>Media international Australia incorporating Culture &amp; policy, 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><title>Media international Australia incorporating Culture &amp; policy</title><description>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public sphere</subject><issn>1329-878X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73CjCwmUCjgZYzTGxcXBjZR6IFp6yJUY397FF3D6lm8kgjiR6zDP8utETJkfUZSscpUH4nTu0AH1YCwx3jawdaCZkblF54EquNMbSks1g9EODDnfN-XgETxBR7Yxn7DVz8bVczGutGVc_JyJ5WF_2R3DrqfXgOyLtmGD1mqHNHARp0qmUkmVJX_UL9WfQBY</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Bamford, Vicki</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</title><author>Bamford, Vicki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16426242473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public sphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bamford, Vicki</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Media international Australia incorporating Culture &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bamford, Vicki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making</atitle><jtitle>Media international Australia incorporating Culture &amp; policy</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>151</volume><spage>21</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>21-30</pages><issn>1329-878X</issn><abstract>This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1329-878X
ispartof Media international Australia incorporating Culture & policy, 2014-05, Vol.151, p.21-30
issn 1329-878X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624247
source Access via SAGE
subjects Australia
Digital technology
Government
Internet
Media
Policy making
Public sphere
title Open or closed? An assessment of how blogs can contribute to policy-making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T07%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20or%20closed?%20An%20assessment%20of%20how%20blogs%20can%20contribute%20to%20policy-making&rft.jtitle=Media%20international%20Australia%20incorporating%20Culture%20&%20policy&rft.au=Bamford,%20Vicki&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=151&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=21-30&rft.issn=1329-878X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1642624247%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642624247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true