Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops

Presently, the federal regulation of genetically modified crops is limited. Federal agencies have struggled to properly interpret and execute the broad and outdated congressional mandates in an era of immense development and rapid innovation of agricultural biotechnology. While these advances offer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology law quarterly 2014-01, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347
1. Verfasser: Heckman, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 2
container_start_page 325
container_title Ecology law quarterly
container_volume 41
creator Heckman, Christopher
description Presently, the federal regulation of genetically modified crops is limited. Federal agencies have struggled to properly interpret and execute the broad and outdated congressional mandates in an era of immense development and rapid innovation of agricultural biotechnology. While these advances offer the potential for many benefits, this Note addresses the inability or unwillingness of federal agencies to interpret the relevant federal statutes in a way that enables the agencies to oversee the progress and expansion of this technology. In addition, this Note addresses the difficulty of challenging the agencies' inaction through litigation given the lack of explicit direction from Congress. As a result, unless Congress enacts new legislation to address these modern issues, federal agencies will continue to struggle with the uncertainty as to what level of oversight is mandated or permissible under existing law. Despite the lack of clarity from Congress, however, the agencies can still oversee and regulate agricultural biotechnology by recognizing that the existing congressional mandates, while outdated, are broad enough to authorize federal agency oversight in this emerging and flourishing technological sector.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44321204</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44321204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j210t-5169f28ef72b3e55128f14b345f6f55e1798f60273403dc32c5ce93dd0df11e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LwzAcQHtQcE4_gpCbXgr539bbKLoWNiY6zyVtfhkpWVqbFOm3dzBP7_J4h3eTrDDmMiWEkrvkPoQeY0wxz1bJ_rhYf0J1DOjw61GlvA6vaPNR1V_PAdVetdbZuKA4oE84zU5FQFvwEG2nnFvQftDWWNConIYxPCS3RrkAj_9cJ9_vb8eySneHbV1udmlPCY6pILIwNAeT0ZaBEITmhvCWcWGkEQJIVuRGYpoxjpnuGO1EBwXTGmtDCDC2Tl6u3XEafmYIsTnb0IFzysMwh4ZITiXlWNKL-nRV-xCHqRkne1bT0nDOKLksYH8lZ1Jz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642624062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Heckman, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Heckman, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Presently, the federal regulation of genetically modified crops is limited. Federal agencies have struggled to properly interpret and execute the broad and outdated congressional mandates in an era of immense development and rapid innovation of agricultural biotechnology. While these advances offer the potential for many benefits, this Note addresses the inability or unwillingness of federal agencies to interpret the relevant federal statutes in a way that enables the agencies to oversee the progress and expansion of this technology. In addition, this Note addresses the difficulty of challenging the agencies' inaction through litigation given the lack of explicit direction from Congress. As a result, unless Congress enacts new legislation to address these modern issues, federal agencies will continue to struggle with the uncertainty as to what level of oversight is mandated or permissible under existing law. Despite the lack of clarity from Congress, however, the agencies can still oversee and regulate agricultural biotechnology by recognizing that the existing congressional mandates, while outdated, are broad enough to authorize federal agency oversight in this emerging and flourishing technological sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of California</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Alfalfa ; Aphis ; Crop protection ; Crops ; Noxious weeds ; Organic farming ; Pests ; Plants ; Sustainable agriculture ; Transgenic plants</subject><ispartof>Ecology law quarterly, 2014-01, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Regents of the University of California</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44321204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44321204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heckman, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops</title><title>Ecology law quarterly</title><description>Presently, the federal regulation of genetically modified crops is limited. Federal agencies have struggled to properly interpret and execute the broad and outdated congressional mandates in an era of immense development and rapid innovation of agricultural biotechnology. While these advances offer the potential for many benefits, this Note addresses the inability or unwillingness of federal agencies to interpret the relevant federal statutes in a way that enables the agencies to oversee the progress and expansion of this technology. In addition, this Note addresses the difficulty of challenging the agencies' inaction through litigation given the lack of explicit direction from Congress. As a result, unless Congress enacts new legislation to address these modern issues, federal agencies will continue to struggle with the uncertainty as to what level of oversight is mandated or permissible under existing law. Despite the lack of clarity from Congress, however, the agencies can still oversee and regulate agricultural biotechnology by recognizing that the existing congressional mandates, while outdated, are broad enough to authorize federal agency oversight in this emerging and flourishing technological sector.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Aphis</subject><subject>Crop protection</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Noxious weeds</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Transgenic plants</subject><issn>0046-1121</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LwzAcQHtQcE4_gpCbXgr539bbKLoWNiY6zyVtfhkpWVqbFOm3dzBP7_J4h3eTrDDmMiWEkrvkPoQeY0wxz1bJ_rhYf0J1DOjw61GlvA6vaPNR1V_PAdVetdbZuKA4oE84zU5FQFvwEG2nnFvQftDWWNConIYxPCS3RrkAj_9cJ9_vb8eySneHbV1udmlPCY6pILIwNAeT0ZaBEITmhvCWcWGkEQJIVuRGYpoxjpnuGO1EBwXTGmtDCDC2Tl6u3XEafmYIsTnb0IFzysMwh4ZITiXlWNKL-nRV-xCHqRkne1bT0nDOKLksYH8lZ1Jz</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Heckman, Christopher</creator><general>University of California</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops</title><author>Heckman, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j210t-5169f28ef72b3e55128f14b345f6f55e1798f60273403dc32c5ce93dd0df11e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Aphis</topic><topic>Crop protection</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Noxious weeds</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Transgenic plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heckman, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology law quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heckman, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops</atitle><jtitle>Ecology law quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>325-347</pages><issn>0046-1121</issn><abstract>Presently, the federal regulation of genetically modified crops is limited. Federal agencies have struggled to properly interpret and execute the broad and outdated congressional mandates in an era of immense development and rapid innovation of agricultural biotechnology. While these advances offer the potential for many benefits, this Note addresses the inability or unwillingness of federal agencies to interpret the relevant federal statutes in a way that enables the agencies to oversee the progress and expansion of this technology. In addition, this Note addresses the difficulty of challenging the agencies' inaction through litigation given the lack of explicit direction from Congress. As a result, unless Congress enacts new legislation to address these modern issues, federal agencies will continue to struggle with the uncertainty as to what level of oversight is mandated or permissible under existing law. Despite the lack of clarity from Congress, however, the agencies can still oversee and regulate agricultural biotechnology by recognizing that the existing congressional mandates, while outdated, are broad enough to authorize federal agency oversight in this emerging and flourishing technological sector.</abstract><pub>University of California</pub><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-1121
ispartof Ecology law quarterly, 2014-01, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347
issn 0046-1121
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642624062
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Administrative agencies
Alfalfa
Aphis
Crop protection
Crops
Noxious weeds
Organic farming
Pests
Plants
Sustainable agriculture
Transgenic plants
title Tying Its Own Hands: APHIS's Inability to Regulate Genetically Modified Crops
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tying%20Its%20Own%20Hands:%20APHIS's%20Inability%20to%20Regulate%20Genetically%20Modified%20Crops&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20law%20quarterly&rft.au=Heckman,%20Christopher&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=325-347&rft.issn=0046-1121&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44321204%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642624062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44321204&rfr_iscdi=true