Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels

Aim Biological invasions are among the main threats to biodiversity. To promote a mechanistic understanding of the ecological impacts of non-native seaweeds, we assessed how effects on resident organisms vary according to their trophic level. Location Global. Methods We performed meta-analytical com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Maggi, E., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Castelli, A., Chatzinikolaou, E., Crowe, T. P., Ghedini, G., Kotta, J., Lyons, D. A., Ravaglioli, C., Rilov, G., Rindi, L., Bulleri, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 21
creator Maggi, E.
Benedetti-Cecchi, L.
Castelli, A.
Chatzinikolaou, E.
Crowe, T. P.
Ghedini, G.
Kotta, J.
Lyons, D. A.
Ravaglioli, C.
Rilov, G.
Rindi, L.
Bulleri, F.
description Aim Biological invasions are among the main threats to biodiversity. To promote a mechanistic understanding of the ecological impacts of non-native seaweeds, we assessed how effects on resident organisms vary according to their trophic level. Location Global. Methods We performed meta-analytical comparisons of the effects of non-native seaweeds on both individual species and communities. We compared the results of analyses performed on the whole dataset with those obtained from experimental data only and, when possible, between rocky and soft bottoms. Results Meta-analyses of data from 100 papers revealed consistent negative effects of non-native seaweeds across variables describing resident primary producer communities. In contrast, negative effects of seaweeds on consumers emerged only on their biomass and, limited to rocky bottoms, diversity. At the species level, negative effects were consistent across primary producers' response variables, while only the survival of consumers other than herbivores or predators (e.g. deposit/suspension feeders or detritivores) decreased due to invasion. Excluding mensurative data, negative effects of seaweeds persisted only on resident macroalgal communities and consumer species survival, while switched to positive on the diversity of rocky-bottom consumers. However, negative effects emerged for biomass and, in rocky habitats, density of consumers other than herbivores or predators. Main conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that seaweeds' effects on resident biodiversity are generally more negative within the same trophic level than on higher trophic guilds. Finer trophic grouping of resident organisms revealed more complex impacts than previously detected. High heterogeneity in the responses of some consumer guilds suggests that impacts of non-native seaweeds at higher trophic levels may be more invader- and species-specific than competitive effects at the same trophic level. Features of invaded habitats may further increase variability in seaweeds' impacts. More experimental data on consumers' response to invasion are needed to disentangle the effects of non-native seaweeds from those of other environmental stressors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642618971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817681</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3904-88ba4721e64ef63723304dbb60469a4988ccaea11061b9c29e0122d101595fd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQhSMEEqVw4AcgWeICh7Se2HFibtCWUqkql6L2Zs06k9aLN97a3pb993gb6AGJucxI873Rm1dVb4EfQKnDYXAH0DRKPqv2QHZNLZVsnpdZKFXrFtTL6lVKS865EG2zV9GJDT7cOIueudUabU4sjMxN9zi46YYlwgeiIX1iyFaUscYJ_Ta5RyrfkouMxpF2MsxscGWONGWWY1jfOss83ZNPr6sXI_pEb_70_erH15PLo2_1-ffTs6PP57UVmsu67xdYPAMpSaMSXSMEl8NiobhUGqXue2uREIArWGjbaOLl1wE4tLodh17sVx_mu-sY7jaUslm5ZMl7nChskoEShoJed1DQ9_-gy7CJ5bkdJYQupNaF-jhTNoaUIo1mHd0K49YAN7vATQncPAZe2MOZfXCetv8HzfHx2V_Fu1mxTDnEJ0Uje-hUv_NYz3uXMv162mP8aVQnutZcXZyaK7j-cg3i0lyI33NZmXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1633964299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Maggi, E. ; Benedetti-Cecchi, L. ; Castelli, A. ; Chatzinikolaou, E. ; Crowe, T. P. ; Ghedini, G. ; Kotta, J. ; Lyons, D. A. ; Ravaglioli, C. ; Rilov, G. ; Rindi, L. ; Bulleri, F.</creator><contributor>MacIsaac, Hugh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maggi, E. ; Benedetti-Cecchi, L. ; Castelli, A. ; Chatzinikolaou, E. ; Crowe, T. P. ; Ghedini, G. ; Kotta, J. ; Lyons, D. A. ; Ravaglioli, C. ; Rilov, G. ; Rindi, L. ; Bulleri, F. ; MacIsaac, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Biological invasions are among the main threats to biodiversity. To promote a mechanistic understanding of the ecological impacts of non-native seaweeds, we assessed how effects on resident organisms vary according to their trophic level. Location Global. Methods We performed meta-analytical comparisons of the effects of non-native seaweeds on both individual species and communities. We compared the results of analyses performed on the whole dataset with those obtained from experimental data only and, when possible, between rocky and soft bottoms. Results Meta-analyses of data from 100 papers revealed consistent negative effects of non-native seaweeds across variables describing resident primary producer communities. In contrast, negative effects of seaweeds on consumers emerged only on their biomass and, limited to rocky bottoms, diversity. At the species level, negative effects were consistent across primary producers' response variables, while only the survival of consumers other than herbivores or predators (e.g. deposit/suspension feeders or detritivores) decreased due to invasion. Excluding mensurative data, negative effects of seaweeds persisted only on resident macroalgal communities and consumer species survival, while switched to positive on the diversity of rocky-bottom consumers. However, negative effects emerged for biomass and, in rocky habitats, density of consumers other than herbivores or predators. Main conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that seaweeds' effects on resident biodiversity are generally more negative within the same trophic level than on higher trophic guilds. Finer trophic grouping of resident organisms revealed more complex impacts than previously detected. High heterogeneity in the responses of some consumer guilds suggests that impacts of non-native seaweeds at higher trophic levels may be more invader- and species-specific than competitive effects at the same trophic level. Features of invaded habitats may further increase variability in seaweeds' impacts. More experimental data on consumers' response to invasion are needed to disentangle the effects of non-native seaweeds from those of other environmental stressors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY REVIEW ; Biological invasions ; effect size ; Herbivores ; mensurative and experimental data ; non-native seaweeds ; Nonnative species ; systematic review ; trophic groups</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3904-88ba4721e64ef63723304dbb60469a4988ccaea11061b9c29e0122d101595fd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3904-88ba4721e64ef63723304dbb60469a4988ccaea11061b9c29e0122d101595fd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24817681$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24817681$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12264$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>MacIsaac, Hugh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maggi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti-Cecchi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzinikolaou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, T. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghedini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaglioli, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rilov, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulleri, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Aim Biological invasions are among the main threats to biodiversity. To promote a mechanistic understanding of the ecological impacts of non-native seaweeds, we assessed how effects on resident organisms vary according to their trophic level. Location Global. Methods We performed meta-analytical comparisons of the effects of non-native seaweeds on both individual species and communities. We compared the results of analyses performed on the whole dataset with those obtained from experimental data only and, when possible, between rocky and soft bottoms. Results Meta-analyses of data from 100 papers revealed consistent negative effects of non-native seaweeds across variables describing resident primary producer communities. In contrast, negative effects of seaweeds on consumers emerged only on their biomass and, limited to rocky bottoms, diversity. At the species level, negative effects were consistent across primary producers' response variables, while only the survival of consumers other than herbivores or predators (e.g. deposit/suspension feeders or detritivores) decreased due to invasion. Excluding mensurative data, negative effects of seaweeds persisted only on resident macroalgal communities and consumer species survival, while switched to positive on the diversity of rocky-bottom consumers. However, negative effects emerged for biomass and, in rocky habitats, density of consumers other than herbivores or predators. Main conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that seaweeds' effects on resident biodiversity are generally more negative within the same trophic level than on higher trophic guilds. Finer trophic grouping of resident organisms revealed more complex impacts than previously detected. High heterogeneity in the responses of some consumer guilds suggests that impacts of non-native seaweeds at higher trophic levels may be more invader- and species-specific than competitive effects at the same trophic level. Features of invaded habitats may further increase variability in seaweeds' impacts. More experimental data on consumers' response to invasion are needed to disentangle the effects of non-native seaweeds from those of other environmental stressors.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY REVIEW</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>effect size</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>mensurative and experimental data</subject><subject>non-native seaweeds</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>trophic groups</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQhSMEEqVw4AcgWeICh7Se2HFibtCWUqkql6L2Zs06k9aLN97a3pb993gb6AGJucxI873Rm1dVb4EfQKnDYXAH0DRKPqv2QHZNLZVsnpdZKFXrFtTL6lVKS865EG2zV9GJDT7cOIueudUabU4sjMxN9zi46YYlwgeiIX1iyFaUscYJ_Ta5RyrfkouMxpF2MsxscGWONGWWY1jfOss83ZNPr6sXI_pEb_70_erH15PLo2_1-ffTs6PP57UVmsu67xdYPAMpSaMSXSMEl8NiobhUGqXue2uREIArWGjbaOLl1wE4tLodh17sVx_mu-sY7jaUslm5ZMl7nChskoEShoJed1DQ9_-gy7CJ5bkdJYQupNaF-jhTNoaUIo1mHd0K49YAN7vATQncPAZe2MOZfXCetv8HzfHx2V_Fu1mxTDnEJ0Uje-hUv_NYz3uXMv162mP8aVQnutZcXZyaK7j-cg3i0lyI33NZmXg</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Maggi, E.</creator><creator>Benedetti-Cecchi, L.</creator><creator>Castelli, A.</creator><creator>Chatzinikolaou, E.</creator><creator>Crowe, T. P.</creator><creator>Ghedini, G.</creator><creator>Kotta, J.</creator><creator>Lyons, D. A.</creator><creator>Ravaglioli, C.</creator><creator>Rilov, G.</creator><creator>Rindi, L.</creator><creator>Bulleri, F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels</title><author>Maggi, E. ; Benedetti-Cecchi, L. ; Castelli, A. ; Chatzinikolaou, E. ; Crowe, T. P. ; Ghedini, G. ; Kotta, J. ; Lyons, D. A. ; Ravaglioli, C. ; Rilov, G. ; Rindi, L. ; Bulleri, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3904-88ba4721e64ef63723304dbb60469a4988ccaea11061b9c29e0122d101595fd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY REVIEW</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>effect size</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>mensurative and experimental data</topic><topic>non-native seaweeds</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>trophic groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti-Cecchi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzinikolaou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, T. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghedini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaglioli, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rilov, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulleri, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggi, E.</au><au>Benedetti-Cecchi, L.</au><au>Castelli, A.</au><au>Chatzinikolaou, E.</au><au>Crowe, T. P.</au><au>Ghedini, G.</au><au>Kotta, J.</au><au>Lyons, D. A.</au><au>Ravaglioli, C.</au><au>Rilov, G.</au><au>Rindi, L.</au><au>Bulleri, F.</au><au>MacIsaac, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim Biological invasions are among the main threats to biodiversity. To promote a mechanistic understanding of the ecological impacts of non-native seaweeds, we assessed how effects on resident organisms vary according to their trophic level. Location Global. Methods We performed meta-analytical comparisons of the effects of non-native seaweeds on both individual species and communities. We compared the results of analyses performed on the whole dataset with those obtained from experimental data only and, when possible, between rocky and soft bottoms. Results Meta-analyses of data from 100 papers revealed consistent negative effects of non-native seaweeds across variables describing resident primary producer communities. In contrast, negative effects of seaweeds on consumers emerged only on their biomass and, limited to rocky bottoms, diversity. At the species level, negative effects were consistent across primary producers' response variables, while only the survival of consumers other than herbivores or predators (e.g. deposit/suspension feeders or detritivores) decreased due to invasion. Excluding mensurative data, negative effects of seaweeds persisted only on resident macroalgal communities and consumer species survival, while switched to positive on the diversity of rocky-bottom consumers. However, negative effects emerged for biomass and, in rocky habitats, density of consumers other than herbivores or predators. Main conclusions Our results support the hypothesis that seaweeds' effects on resident biodiversity are generally more negative within the same trophic level than on higher trophic guilds. Finer trophic grouping of resident organisms revealed more complex impacts than previously detected. High heterogeneity in the responses of some consumer guilds suggests that impacts of non-native seaweeds at higher trophic levels may be more invader- and species-specific than competitive effects at the same trophic level. Features of invaded habitats may further increase variability in seaweeds' impacts. More experimental data on consumers' response to invasion are needed to disentangle the effects of non-native seaweeds from those of other environmental stressors.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12264</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.1-12
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642618971
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Algae
Biodiversity
BIODIVERSITY REVIEW
Biological invasions
effect size
Herbivores
mensurative and experimental data
non-native seaweeds
Nonnative species
systematic review
trophic groups
title Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20impacts%20of%20invading%20seaweeds:%20a%20meta-analysis%20of%20their%20effects%20at%20different%20trophic%20levels&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Maggi,%20E.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12264&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817681%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1633964299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817681&rfr_iscdi=true