Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets
This paper analyses how short-term operational efficiency and the CO 2 emissions of a power system depend on different subsidies for wind power and on the flexibility of the power system. This is analysed in the framework of a numerical power market model, calibrated to Danish data, where the start-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of regulatory economics 2014-12, Vol.46 (3), p.318-343 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 343 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 318 |
container_title | Journal of regulatory economics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Rosnes, Orvika |
description | This paper analyses how short-term operational efficiency and the
CO
2
emissions of a power system depend on different subsidies for wind power and on the flexibility of the power system. This is analysed in the framework of a numerical power market model, calibrated to Danish data, where the start-up costs and other constraints in fossil-fuelled power plants are taken into account. The main conclusion is that flexibility is crucial for the costs of integrating wind power in an existing system. If thermal power plants are inflexible, subsidies for wind power should strive to increase the flexibility of the market by passing market signals to wind power. A subsidy that conceals market signals from wind power producers (a production subsidy) or disconnects wind power incentives from the market signals altogether (a fixed price) increases costs considerably. An inflexible power system should aim to introduce optimal subsidies (an investment subsidy) instead of production subsidies or a fixed price. The design of the subsidy scheme should take into account both the characteristics of the existing system and the characteristics of renewables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642612620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3460906571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-3a757b982d317e1ba028df6a7c3cd7b7c53522b57aa391d5e3ca85ea5657b1c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8FL16imaTJpN5k8R8seFDBW0jTdOnabddki-63N0s9iCAIAzMMv_fgPUJOgV0AY3gZASAvKIOcFlxqintkAhIFZbnS-2TCCs6p0uz1kBzFuGSMFVrjhFw9DWVsqsbHrO5DFnznP2zZ-iwdYbHNmi5N3frPZvdc9x8-ZCsb3vwmHpOD2rbRn3zvKXm5vXme3dP5493D7HpOndRqQ4VFiWWheSUAPZSWcV3VyqITrsISnRSS81KitaKASnrhrJbeSpVk4LiYkvPRdx3698HHjVk10fm2tZ3vh2hA5VwBV5z9A-VSCImQJ_TsF7rsh9ClIIkCkAUiQqJgpFzoYwy-NuvQpPxbA8zsijdj8SYVb3bFG0waPmpiYruFDz-c_xR9AVfBhFI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611597771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rosnes, Orvika</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosnes, Orvika</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses how short-term operational efficiency and the
CO
2
emissions of a power system depend on different subsidies for wind power and on the flexibility of the power system. This is analysed in the framework of a numerical power market model, calibrated to Danish data, where the start-up costs and other constraints in fossil-fuelled power plants are taken into account. The main conclusion is that flexibility is crucial for the costs of integrating wind power in an existing system. If thermal power plants are inflexible, subsidies for wind power should strive to increase the flexibility of the market by passing market signals to wind power. A subsidy that conceals market signals from wind power producers (a production subsidy) or disconnects wind power incentives from the market signals altogether (a fixed price) increases costs considerably. An inflexible power system should aim to introduce optimal subsidies (an investment subsidy) instead of production subsidies or a fixed price. The design of the subsidy scheme should take into account both the characteristics of the existing system and the characteristics of renewables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-680X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Costs ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Energy market ; Environmental policy ; Industrial Organization ; Industrial plant emissions ; Market prices ; Microeconomics ; Original Article ; Power plants ; Public Finance ; Renewable energy sources ; Renewable resources ; Shutdowns ; Startups ; Subsidies ; Tariffs ; Wind energy ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Journal of regulatory economics, 2014-12, Vol.46 (3), p.318-343</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-3a757b982d317e1ba028df6a7c3cd7b7c53522b57aa391d5e3ca85ea5657b1c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-3a757b982d317e1ba028df6a7c3cd7b7c53522b57aa391d5e3ca85ea5657b1c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosnes, Orvika</creatorcontrib><title>Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets</title><title>Journal of regulatory economics</title><addtitle>J Regul Econ</addtitle><description>This paper analyses how short-term operational efficiency and the
CO
2
emissions of a power system depend on different subsidies for wind power and on the flexibility of the power system. This is analysed in the framework of a numerical power market model, calibrated to Danish data, where the start-up costs and other constraints in fossil-fuelled power plants are taken into account. The main conclusion is that flexibility is crucial for the costs of integrating wind power in an existing system. If thermal power plants are inflexible, subsidies for wind power should strive to increase the flexibility of the market by passing market signals to wind power. A subsidy that conceals market signals from wind power producers (a production subsidy) or disconnects wind power incentives from the market signals altogether (a fixed price) increases costs considerably. An inflexible power system should aim to introduce optimal subsidies (an investment subsidy) instead of production subsidies or a fixed price. The design of the subsidy scheme should take into account both the characteristics of the existing system and the characteristics of renewables.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy market</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Shutdowns</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Wind energy</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0922-680X</issn><issn>1573-0468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8FL16imaTJpN5k8R8seFDBW0jTdOnabddki-63N0s9iCAIAzMMv_fgPUJOgV0AY3gZASAvKIOcFlxqintkAhIFZbnS-2TCCs6p0uz1kBzFuGSMFVrjhFw9DWVsqsbHrO5DFnznP2zZ-iwdYbHNmi5N3frPZvdc9x8-ZCsb3vwmHpOD2rbRn3zvKXm5vXme3dP5493D7HpOndRqQ4VFiWWheSUAPZSWcV3VyqITrsISnRSS81KitaKASnrhrJbeSpVk4LiYkvPRdx3698HHjVk10fm2tZ3vh2hA5VwBV5z9A-VSCImQJ_TsF7rsh9ClIIkCkAUiQqJgpFzoYwy-NuvQpPxbA8zsijdj8SYVb3bFG0waPmpiYruFDz-c_xR9AVfBhFI</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Rosnes, Orvika</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets</title><author>Rosnes, Orvika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-3a757b982d317e1ba028df6a7c3cd7b7c53522b57aa391d5e3ca85ea5657b1c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy market</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Shutdowns</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Wind energy</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosnes, Orvika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of regulatory economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosnes, Orvika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of regulatory economics</jtitle><stitle>J Regul Econ</stitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>318-343</pages><issn>0922-680X</issn><eissn>1573-0468</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses how short-term operational efficiency and the
CO
2
emissions of a power system depend on different subsidies for wind power and on the flexibility of the power system. This is analysed in the framework of a numerical power market model, calibrated to Danish data, where the start-up costs and other constraints in fossil-fuelled power plants are taken into account. The main conclusion is that flexibility is crucial for the costs of integrating wind power in an existing system. If thermal power plants are inflexible, subsidies for wind power should strive to increase the flexibility of the market by passing market signals to wind power. A subsidy that conceals market signals from wind power producers (a production subsidy) or disconnects wind power incentives from the market signals altogether (a fixed price) increases costs considerably. An inflexible power system should aim to introduce optimal subsidies (an investment subsidy) instead of production subsidies or a fixed price. The design of the subsidy scheme should take into account both the characteristics of the existing system and the characteristics of renewables.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-680X |
ispartof | Journal of regulatory economics, 2014-12, Vol.46 (3), p.318-343 |
issn | 0922-680X 1573-0468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642612620 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Costs Economics Economics and Finance Electricity Emissions Energy market Environmental policy Industrial Organization Industrial plant emissions Market prices Microeconomics Original Article Power plants Public Finance Renewable energy sources Renewable resources Shutdowns Startups Subsidies Tariffs Wind energy Wind power |
title | Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A37%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subsidies%20for%20renewable%20energy%20in%20inflexible%20power%20markets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20regulatory%20economics&rft.au=Rosnes,%20Orvika&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=318-343&rft.issn=0922-680X&rft.eissn=1573-0468&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3460906571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611597771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |