Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network

Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for mult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources management 2014-06, Vol.28 (8), p.2109-2128
Hauptverfasser: Latt, Zaw Zaw, Wittenberg, Hartmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2128
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2109
container_title Water resources management
container_volume 28
creator Latt, Zaw Zaw
Wittenberg, Hartmut
description Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for multi-step forecasting Chindwin River floods in northern Myanmar. Future river stages are modeled using past water levels and rainfall at the forecasting station as well as at the hydrologically connected upstream station. The developed models are calibrated with flood season data from 1990 to 2007 and validated with data from 2008 to 2011. Model performances are compared for 1- to 5-day ahead forecasts. With a high accuracy, both candidate models performed well for forecasting the full range of flood levels. The ANN models were superior to the SMLR models, particularly in predicting the extreme floods. Correlation analysis was found to be useful for determining the initial input variables. Contribution of upstream data to both models could improve the forecasting performance with higher R ² values and lower errors. Considering the commonly available data in the region as primary predictors, the results would be useful for real time flood forecasting, avoiding the complexity of physical processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642329939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642329939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-a4d26d3daa5f97735bb1c9531283725e823db156d2be0d7bfae1bd708d03f7733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVhhCSGxCfgndmJ2o6EDlQaQKF1bTnw9csnEwXammofoO9chFUIs6Ope29858vVxUbwk-B3BuH4fCaFClphUJRYYl82jYkV4zUoiOH5crLCkuKzqijwtnsV4jXFWSbwqbi8OY_BHN-zRtvfeoK0P0OmY5h03II0-whF6P87rjZ-GFE4f0Dq3h1EHndwR0GWazAl5mxsYb1wE9GXqkxt7QDs3gA7oO-wDxOh8NhwMWofkrOuc7tFXmMLvkm58-Pm8eGJ1H-HFfT0rrrbnPzafy923Txeb9a7sqlqmUleGCsOM1tzKuma8bUknOSO0YTXl0FBmWsKFoS1gU7dWA2lNjRuDmc08OyveLr559l8TxKQOLnbQ93oAP0VFREUZlZLJh1HOqqZiXMzo63_Qaz-FIQ-SKcopI1LQTJGF6oKPMYBVY3AHHU6KYDVnqZYsVc5SzVmqJmve3Dvr2OneBj10Lv4R0kYQhqnIHF24mI-GPYS_bvAf81eLyGqv9D5k46tLmoH5kzCW3-sOhXS36w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525231962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Latt, Zaw Zaw ; Wittenberg, Hartmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Latt, Zaw Zaw ; Wittenberg, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><description>Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for multi-step forecasting Chindwin River floods in northern Myanmar. Future river stages are modeled using past water levels and rainfall at the forecasting station as well as at the hydrologically connected upstream station. The developed models are calibrated with flood season data from 1990 to 2007 and validated with data from 2008 to 2011. Model performances are compared for 1- to 5-day ahead forecasts. With a high accuracy, both candidate models performed well for forecasting the full range of flood levels. The ANN models were superior to the SMLR models, particularly in predicting the extreme floods. Correlation analysis was found to be useful for determining the initial input variables. Contribution of upstream data to both models could improve the forecasting performance with higher R ² values and lower errors. Considering the commonly available data in the region as primary predictors, the results would be useful for real time flood forecasting, avoiding the complexity of physical processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WRMAEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Civil Engineering ; Comparative studies ; Correlation analysis ; Developing countries ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environment ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flood forecasting ; Floods ; Forecasting ; Forecasting techniques ; Freshwater ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; LDCs ; Learning theory ; linear models ; Mathematical models ; model validation ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Neural networks ; prediction ; Rain ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Rivers ; Stations ; Studies ; Upstream ; Water levels ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Water resources management, 2014-06, Vol.28 (8), p.2109-2128</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-a4d26d3daa5f97735bb1c9531283725e823db156d2be0d7bfae1bd708d03f7733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-a4d26d3daa5f97735bb1c9531283725e823db156d2be0d7bfae1bd708d03f7733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28613026$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latt, Zaw Zaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenberg, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network</title><title>Water resources management</title><addtitle>Water Resour Manage</addtitle><description>Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for multi-step forecasting Chindwin River floods in northern Myanmar. Future river stages are modeled using past water levels and rainfall at the forecasting station as well as at the hydrologically connected upstream station. The developed models are calibrated with flood season data from 1990 to 2007 and validated with data from 2008 to 2011. Model performances are compared for 1- to 5-day ahead forecasts. With a high accuracy, both candidate models performed well for forecasting the full range of flood levels. The ANN models were superior to the SMLR models, particularly in predicting the extreme floods. Correlation analysis was found to be useful for determining the initial input variables. Contribution of upstream data to both models could improve the forecasting performance with higher R ² values and lower errors. Considering the commonly available data in the region as primary predictors, the results would be useful for real time flood forecasting, avoiding the complexity of physical processes.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Forecasting techniques</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>linear models</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0920-4741</issn><issn>1573-1650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVhhCSGxCfgndmJ2o6EDlQaQKF1bTnw9csnEwXammofoO9chFUIs6Ope29858vVxUbwk-B3BuH4fCaFClphUJRYYl82jYkV4zUoiOH5crLCkuKzqijwtnsV4jXFWSbwqbi8OY_BHN-zRtvfeoK0P0OmY5h03II0-whF6P87rjZ-GFE4f0Dq3h1EHndwR0GWazAl5mxsYb1wE9GXqkxt7QDs3gA7oO-wDxOh8NhwMWofkrOuc7tFXmMLvkm58-Pm8eGJ1H-HFfT0rrrbnPzafy923Txeb9a7sqlqmUleGCsOM1tzKuma8bUknOSO0YTXl0FBmWsKFoS1gU7dWA2lNjRuDmc08OyveLr559l8TxKQOLnbQ93oAP0VFREUZlZLJh1HOqqZiXMzo63_Qaz-FIQ-SKcopI1LQTJGF6oKPMYBVY3AHHU6KYDVnqZYsVc5SzVmqJmve3Dvr2OneBj10Lv4R0kYQhqnIHF24mI-GPYS_bvAf81eLyGqv9D5k46tLmoH5kzCW3-sOhXS36w</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Latt, Zaw Zaw</creator><creator>Wittenberg, Hartmut</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network</title><author>Latt, Zaw Zaw ; Wittenberg, Hartmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-a4d26d3daa5f97735bb1c9531283725e823db156d2be0d7bfae1bd708d03f7733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Forecasting techniques</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>linear models</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latt, Zaw Zaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenberg, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latt, Zaw Zaw</au><au>Wittenberg, Hartmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network</atitle><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour Manage</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2109</spage><epage>2128</epage><pages>2109-2128</pages><issn>0920-4741</issn><eissn>1573-1650</eissn><coden>WRMAEJ</coden><abstract>Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for multi-step forecasting Chindwin River floods in northern Myanmar. Future river stages are modeled using past water levels and rainfall at the forecasting station as well as at the hydrologically connected upstream station. The developed models are calibrated with flood season data from 1990 to 2007 and validated with data from 2008 to 2011. Model performances are compared for 1- to 5-day ahead forecasts. With a high accuracy, both candidate models performed well for forecasting the full range of flood levels. The ANN models were superior to the SMLR models, particularly in predicting the extreme floods. Correlation analysis was found to be useful for determining the initial input variables. Contribution of upstream data to both models could improve the forecasting performance with higher R ² values and lower errors. Considering the commonly available data in the region as primary predictors, the results would be useful for real time flood forecasting, avoiding the complexity of physical processes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-4741
ispartof Water resources management, 2014-06, Vol.28 (8), p.2109-2128
issn 0920-4741
1573-1650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642329939
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Civil Engineering
Comparative studies
Correlation analysis
Developing countries
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environment
Exact sciences and technology
Flood forecasting
Floods
Forecasting
Forecasting techniques
Freshwater
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Hydrology/Water Resources
LDCs
Learning theory
linear models
Mathematical models
model validation
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Neural networks
prediction
Rain
Regression
Regression analysis
Rivers
Stations
Studies
Upstream
Water levels
Water resources
title Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Flood%20Forecasting%20in%20a%20Developing%20Country:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Stepwise%20Multiple%20Linear%20Regression%20and%20Artificial%20Neural%20Network&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20management&rft.au=Latt,%20Zaw%20Zaw&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2109&rft.epage=2128&rft.pages=2109-2128&rft.issn=0920-4741&rft.eissn=1573-1650&rft.coden=WRMAEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642329939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525231962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true