Failure of Chauras bridge

•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering failure analysis 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346
Hauptverfasser: Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao, Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan, Singh, Pramod Kumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 346
container_issue
container_start_page 339
container_title Engineering failure analysis
container_volume 45
creator Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao
Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan
Singh, Pramod Kumar
description •Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested. Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642321919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S135063071400199X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642321919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwAXSho9llxl7b2RKteEmRaKC2HHscHG2ywc4i8fc4CgUl1Uxxz5XuYewGoUZAdbeuabsKNvZ2a_uaAzY1qBpQnrAJzrWosFV4Wn4hoVIC9Dm7yHkNAJq3OGHXj4UdE82GMOs-7Jhsni1T9Cu6ZGfB9pmufu-UvT8-vHXP1eL16aW7X1ROyGZfcR6E1Z5LaoOfK1g6QC1JyaBQBOu1Iq6EI_LLxjWh1XIeyBMGz5Fr5cSU3R57d2n4HCnvzSZmR31ZRMOYDaqGC44ttiXaHqMuDTknCmaX4samb4NgDjrM2vzRYQ46DChTdBS2O7JUtnxFSia7SFtHPiZye-OH-I-WH0GVbV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642321919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested. Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-6307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bridges (structures) ; Buckling ; Collapse ; Composite bridges ; Compressive strength ; Decks ; Endurance ; Limit states ; Load factor ; Strength ; Stresses</subject><ispartof>Engineering failure analysis, 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135063071400199X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><title>Engineering failure analysis</title><description>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested. Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</description><subject>Bridges (structures)</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Composite bridges</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Decks</subject><subject>Endurance</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Load factor</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><issn>1350-6307</issn><issn>1873-1961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwAXSho9llxl7b2RKteEmRaKC2HHscHG2ywc4i8fc4CgUl1Uxxz5XuYewGoUZAdbeuabsKNvZ2a_uaAzY1qBpQnrAJzrWosFV4Wn4hoVIC9Dm7yHkNAJq3OGHXj4UdE82GMOs-7Jhsni1T9Cu6ZGfB9pmufu-UvT8-vHXP1eL16aW7X1ROyGZfcR6E1Z5LaoOfK1g6QC1JyaBQBOu1Iq6EI_LLxjWh1XIeyBMGz5Fr5cSU3R57d2n4HCnvzSZmR31ZRMOYDaqGC44ttiXaHqMuDTknCmaX4samb4NgDjrM2vzRYQ46DChTdBS2O7JUtnxFSia7SFtHPiZye-OH-I-WH0GVbV4</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creator><creator>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creator><creator>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><author>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bridges (structures)</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Composite bridges</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Decks</topic><topic>Endurance</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Load factor</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</au><au>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</au><au>Singh, Pramod Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of Chauras bridge</atitle><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>339</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>339-346</pages><issn>1350-6307</issn><eissn>1873-1961</eissn><abstract>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested. Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-6307
ispartof Engineering failure analysis, 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346
issn 1350-6307
1873-1961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642321919
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bridges (structures)
Buckling
Collapse
Composite bridges
Compressive strength
Decks
Endurance
Limit states
Load factor
Strength
Stresses
title Failure of Chauras bridge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20Chauras%20bridge&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20failure%20analysis&rft.au=Birajdar,%20Harshad%20Subhashrao&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=339-346&rft.issn=1350-6307&rft.eissn=1873-1961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642321919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642321919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S135063071400199X&rfr_iscdi=true