Failure of Chauras bridge
•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load fac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering failure analysis 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 346 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Engineering failure analysis |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan Singh, Pramod Kumar |
description | •Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested.
Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642321919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S135063071400199X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642321919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwAXSho9llxl7b2RKteEmRaKC2HHscHG2ywc4i8fc4CgUl1Uxxz5XuYewGoUZAdbeuabsKNvZ2a_uaAzY1qBpQnrAJzrWosFV4Wn4hoVIC9Dm7yHkNAJq3OGHXj4UdE82GMOs-7Jhsni1T9Cu6ZGfB9pmufu-UvT8-vHXP1eL16aW7X1ROyGZfcR6E1Z5LaoOfK1g6QC1JyaBQBOu1Iq6EI_LLxjWh1XIeyBMGz5Fr5cSU3R57d2n4HCnvzSZmR31ZRMOYDaqGC44ttiXaHqMuDTknCmaX4samb4NgDjrM2vzRYQ46DChTdBS2O7JUtnxFSia7SFtHPiZye-OH-I-WH0GVbV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642321919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested.
Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-6307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bridges (structures) ; Buckling ; Collapse ; Composite bridges ; Compressive strength ; Decks ; Endurance ; Limit states ; Load factor ; Strength ; Stresses</subject><ispartof>Engineering failure analysis, 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135063071400199X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><title>Engineering failure analysis</title><description>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested.
Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</description><subject>Bridges (structures)</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Composite bridges</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Decks</subject><subject>Endurance</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Load factor</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><issn>1350-6307</issn><issn>1873-1961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwAXSho9llxl7b2RKteEmRaKC2HHscHG2ywc4i8fc4CgUl1Uxxz5XuYewGoUZAdbeuabsKNvZ2a_uaAzY1qBpQnrAJzrWosFV4Wn4hoVIC9Dm7yHkNAJq3OGHXj4UdE82GMOs-7Jhsni1T9Cu6ZGfB9pmufu-UvT8-vHXP1eL16aW7X1ROyGZfcR6E1Z5LaoOfK1g6QC1JyaBQBOu1Iq6EI_LLxjWh1XIeyBMGz5Fr5cSU3R57d2n4HCnvzSZmR31ZRMOYDaqGC44ttiXaHqMuDTknCmaX4samb4NgDjrM2vzRYQ46DChTdBS2O7JUtnxFSia7SFtHPiZye-OH-I-WH0GVbV4</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creator><creator>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creator><creator>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Failure of Chauras bridge</title><author>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao ; Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan ; Singh, Pramod Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-22f3a7d25e9fd860bc0175e65f613fad76e263ceedb4c4f9758fede1fd21276c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bridges (structures)</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Composite bridges</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Decks</topic><topic>Endurance</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Load factor</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Pramod Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birajdar, Harshad Subhashrao</au><au>Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan</au><au>Singh, Pramod Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of Chauras bridge</atitle><jtitle>Engineering failure analysis</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>339</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>339-346</pages><issn>1350-6307</issn><eissn>1873-1961</eissn><abstract>•Case study of collapse of Chauras bridge, Uttarakhand, India is presented.•The bridge collapsed while deck slab casting was in progress.•Buckling of a top chord compression member of the steel truss caused the failure.•It is recommended to check design at limit state of strength also.•2.25 Load factor for compression and 1.5 for tension members and joints is suggested.
Sudden collapse of 190m long Chauras bridge in Uttarakhand, India, which was a three span (40m+110m+40m) continuous deck type truss bridge, took place during casting of the deck slab after successful launching of the truss. The incidence occurred when 52.5m length of the deck slab was cast starting from middle of the 110m span towards the right pier. Whereas, collapse of I-35W bridge took place due to failure of one of its gusset plates, analysis results show that Chauras bridge collapsed due to buckling of its U13U14 top chord compression members when 173.8N/mm2 stress in the member occurred against calculated permissible compressive stress of 149.8N/mm2. Sudden collapse of the bridge claiming six lives with it, due to slight increase in stress beyond the permissible compressive stress indicates that steel girder bridges must also be checked for reserve strength at the limit state of strength. As per Indian and European Standards, in addition to 1.1 material safety factor and 1.5 load factor used for compression and tension members in limit state of serviceability for fatigue design, additional load factor of 1.5, both for dead and live loads, for laterally unsupported compression members should be used for checking the design at the limit state of strength. No such additional load factor for tension members and joints is required.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-6307 |
ispartof | Engineering failure analysis, 2014-10, Vol.45, p.339-346 |
issn | 1350-6307 1873-1961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642321919 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bridges (structures) Buckling Collapse Composite bridges Compressive strength Decks Endurance Limit states Load factor Strength Stresses |
title | Failure of Chauras bridge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20Chauras%20bridge&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20failure%20analysis&rft.au=Birajdar,%20Harshad%20Subhashrao&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=339-346&rft.issn=1350-6307&rft.eissn=1873-1961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642321919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642321919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S135063071400199X&rfr_iscdi=true |