On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis

We generate predictions for the fluctuating pressure field in turbulent pipe flow by reformulating the resolvent analysis of McKeon and Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) in terms of the so-called primitive variables. Under this analysis, the nonlinear convective terms in the Fouri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fluid mechanics 2014-07, Vol.751, p.38-70
Hauptverfasser: Luhar, M., Sharma, A. S., McKeon, B. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue
container_start_page 38
container_title Journal of fluid mechanics
container_volume 751
creator Luhar, M.
Sharma, A. S.
McKeon, B. J.
description We generate predictions for the fluctuating pressure field in turbulent pipe flow by reformulating the resolvent analysis of McKeon and Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) in terms of the so-called primitive variables. Under this analysis, the nonlinear convective terms in the Fourier-transformed Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are treated as a forcing that is mapped to a velocity and pressure response by the resolvent of the linearized Navier–Stokes operator. At each wavenumber–frequency combination, the turbulent velocity and pressure field are represented by the most-amplified (rank-1) response modes, identified via a singular value decomposition of the resolvent. We show that these rank-1 response modes reconcile many of the key relationships among the velocity field, coherent structure (i.e. hairpin vortices), and the high-amplitude wall-pressure events observed in previous experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). A Green’s function representation shows that the pressure fields obtained under this analysis correspond primarily to the fast pressure contribution arising from the linear interaction between the mean shear and the turbulent wall-normal velocity. Recovering the slow pressure requires an explicit treatment of the nonlinear interactions between the Fourier response modes. By considering the velocity and pressure fields associated with the triadically consistent mode combination studied by Sharma and McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 196–238), we identify the possibility of an apparent amplitude modulation effect in the pressure field, similar to that observed for the streamwise velocity field. However, unlike the streamwise velocity, for which the large scales of the flow are in phase with the envelope of the small-scale activity close to the wall, we expect there to be a $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}\pi /2$ phase difference between the large-scale wall-pressure and the envelope of the small-scale activity. Finally, we generate spectral predictions based on a rank-1 model assuming broadband forcing across all wavenumber–frequency combinations. Despite the significant simplifying assumptions, this approach reproduces trends observed in previous DNS for the wavenumber spectra of velocity and pressure, and for the scale-dependen
doi_str_mv 10.1017/jfm.2014.283
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642318890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_jfm_2014_283</cupid><sourcerecordid>1554955663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-e490be7204733ed07aec446d29427c717af067ae5eec99ff4c13249dcebfe6dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoJukt_4AQyn0EG9GH5ZWvZXQtIFALunZyPIo1aK1txo7Jf8-MruUUAo9CeZ95hnEy9h7DmsO3Fxtw24tgKu12Mg3bMWVtrXRqjlhKwAhas4FvGVnRFsALsGaFZvuh2r6iRVNefbTnLFyQ1-NOT7GoRpDtc9ItIxDWnI3xXGgqmS_XUpVWejmhIPHzwvZR3_IO0dYLAd1MYzpCYepqF16pkgX7DS4RPju-J6zHzdfH66_13f3326vv9zVvgEx1agsdGgEKCMl9mAceqV0L6wSxhtuXABdhg2itzYE5bkUyvYeu4C67-U5-3Tw7vP4a0aa2l0kjym5AceZWq6VkHyzsfB_tGmUbRqtZUE__IVuxzmXry2UbDQ3Vi3CywPl80iUMbT7HHcuP7cc2qWttrTVLm21pa2CfzxKHXmXQnaDj_RnR2w0lOOqcOuj1u26HPtHfHX9X-IXBsWlgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535617940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Luhar, M. ; Sharma, A. S. ; McKeon, B. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luhar, M. ; Sharma, A. S. ; McKeon, B. J.</creatorcontrib><description>We generate predictions for the fluctuating pressure field in turbulent pipe flow by reformulating the resolvent analysis of McKeon and Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) in terms of the so-called primitive variables. Under this analysis, the nonlinear convective terms in the Fourier-transformed Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are treated as a forcing that is mapped to a velocity and pressure response by the resolvent of the linearized Navier–Stokes operator. At each wavenumber–frequency combination, the turbulent velocity and pressure field are represented by the most-amplified (rank-1) response modes, identified via a singular value decomposition of the resolvent. We show that these rank-1 response modes reconcile many of the key relationships among the velocity field, coherent structure (i.e. hairpin vortices), and the high-amplitude wall-pressure events observed in previous experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). A Green’s function representation shows that the pressure fields obtained under this analysis correspond primarily to the fast pressure contribution arising from the linear interaction between the mean shear and the turbulent wall-normal velocity. Recovering the slow pressure requires an explicit treatment of the nonlinear interactions between the Fourier response modes. By considering the velocity and pressure fields associated with the triadically consistent mode combination studied by Sharma and McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 196–238), we identify the possibility of an apparent amplitude modulation effect in the pressure field, similar to that observed for the streamwise velocity field. However, unlike the streamwise velocity, for which the large scales of the flow are in phase with the envelope of the small-scale activity close to the wall, we expect there to be a $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}\pi /2$ phase difference between the large-scale wall-pressure and the envelope of the small-scale activity. Finally, we generate spectral predictions based on a rank-1 model assuming broadband forcing across all wavenumber–frequency combinations. Despite the significant simplifying assumptions, this approach reproduces trends observed in previous DNS for the wavenumber spectra of velocity and pressure, and for the scale-dependence of wall-pressure propagation speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.283</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFLSA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Boundary layer ; Boundary layer and shear turbulence ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fluid mechanics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Mathematical models ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Nonlinearity ; Physics ; Pipe flow ; Turbulence ; Turbulence simulation and modeling ; Turbulent flow ; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer ; Velocity ; Walls</subject><ispartof>Journal of fluid mechanics, 2014-07, Vol.751, p.38-70</ispartof><rights>2014 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-e490be7204733ed07aec446d29427c717af067ae5eec99ff4c13249dcebfe6dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-e490be7204733ed07aec446d29427c717af067ae5eec99ff4c13249dcebfe6dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022112014002833/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28605664$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luhar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeon, B. J.</creatorcontrib><title>On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis</title><title>Journal of fluid mechanics</title><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><description>We generate predictions for the fluctuating pressure field in turbulent pipe flow by reformulating the resolvent analysis of McKeon and Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) in terms of the so-called primitive variables. Under this analysis, the nonlinear convective terms in the Fourier-transformed Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are treated as a forcing that is mapped to a velocity and pressure response by the resolvent of the linearized Navier–Stokes operator. At each wavenumber–frequency combination, the turbulent velocity and pressure field are represented by the most-amplified (rank-1) response modes, identified via a singular value decomposition of the resolvent. We show that these rank-1 response modes reconcile many of the key relationships among the velocity field, coherent structure (i.e. hairpin vortices), and the high-amplitude wall-pressure events observed in previous experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). A Green’s function representation shows that the pressure fields obtained under this analysis correspond primarily to the fast pressure contribution arising from the linear interaction between the mean shear and the turbulent wall-normal velocity. Recovering the slow pressure requires an explicit treatment of the nonlinear interactions between the Fourier response modes. By considering the velocity and pressure fields associated with the triadically consistent mode combination studied by Sharma and McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 196–238), we identify the possibility of an apparent amplitude modulation effect in the pressure field, similar to that observed for the streamwise velocity field. However, unlike the streamwise velocity, for which the large scales of the flow are in phase with the envelope of the small-scale activity close to the wall, we expect there to be a $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}\pi /2$ phase difference between the large-scale wall-pressure and the envelope of the small-scale activity. Finally, we generate spectral predictions based on a rank-1 model assuming broadband forcing across all wavenumber–frequency combinations. Despite the significant simplifying assumptions, this approach reproduces trends observed in previous DNS for the wavenumber spectra of velocity and pressure, and for the scale-dependence of wall-pressure propagation speed.</description><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layer and shear turbulence</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pipe flow</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulence simulation and modeling</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>0022-1120</issn><issn>1469-7645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoJukt_4AQyn0EG9GH5ZWvZXQtIFALunZyPIo1aK1txo7Jf8-MruUUAo9CeZ95hnEy9h7DmsO3Fxtw24tgKu12Mg3bMWVtrXRqjlhKwAhas4FvGVnRFsALsGaFZvuh2r6iRVNefbTnLFyQ1-NOT7GoRpDtc9ItIxDWnI3xXGgqmS_XUpVWejmhIPHzwvZR3_IO0dYLAd1MYzpCYepqF16pkgX7DS4RPju-J6zHzdfH66_13f3326vv9zVvgEx1agsdGgEKCMl9mAceqV0L6wSxhtuXABdhg2itzYE5bkUyvYeu4C67-U5-3Tw7vP4a0aa2l0kjym5AceZWq6VkHyzsfB_tGmUbRqtZUE__IVuxzmXry2UbDQ3Vi3CywPl80iUMbT7HHcuP7cc2qWttrTVLm21pa2CfzxKHXmXQnaDj_RnR2w0lOOqcOuj1u26HPtHfHX9X-IXBsWlgg</recordid><startdate>20140725</startdate><enddate>20140725</enddate><creator>Luhar, M.</creator><creator>Sharma, A. S.</creator><creator>McKeon, B. J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140725</creationdate><title>On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis</title><author>Luhar, M. ; Sharma, A. S. ; McKeon, B. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-e490be7204733ed07aec446d29427c717af067ae5eec99ff4c13249dcebfe6dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layer and shear turbulence</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pipe flow</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulence simulation and modeling</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luhar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeon, B. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luhar, M.</au><au>Sharma, A. S.</au><au>McKeon, B. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><date>2014-07-25</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>751</volume><spage>38</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>38-70</pages><issn>0022-1120</issn><eissn>1469-7645</eissn><coden>JFLSA7</coden><abstract>We generate predictions for the fluctuating pressure field in turbulent pipe flow by reformulating the resolvent analysis of McKeon and Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) in terms of the so-called primitive variables. Under this analysis, the nonlinear convective terms in the Fourier-transformed Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are treated as a forcing that is mapped to a velocity and pressure response by the resolvent of the linearized Navier–Stokes operator. At each wavenumber–frequency combination, the turbulent velocity and pressure field are represented by the most-amplified (rank-1) response modes, identified via a singular value decomposition of the resolvent. We show that these rank-1 response modes reconcile many of the key relationships among the velocity field, coherent structure (i.e. hairpin vortices), and the high-amplitude wall-pressure events observed in previous experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). A Green’s function representation shows that the pressure fields obtained under this analysis correspond primarily to the fast pressure contribution arising from the linear interaction between the mean shear and the turbulent wall-normal velocity. Recovering the slow pressure requires an explicit treatment of the nonlinear interactions between the Fourier response modes. By considering the velocity and pressure fields associated with the triadically consistent mode combination studied by Sharma and McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 196–238), we identify the possibility of an apparent amplitude modulation effect in the pressure field, similar to that observed for the streamwise velocity field. However, unlike the streamwise velocity, for which the large scales of the flow are in phase with the envelope of the small-scale activity close to the wall, we expect there to be a $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}\pi /2$ phase difference between the large-scale wall-pressure and the envelope of the small-scale activity. Finally, we generate spectral predictions based on a rank-1 model assuming broadband forcing across all wavenumber–frequency combinations. Despite the significant simplifying assumptions, this approach reproduces trends observed in previous DNS for the wavenumber spectra of velocity and pressure, and for the scale-dependence of wall-pressure propagation speed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jfm.2014.283</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1120
ispartof Journal of fluid mechanics, 2014-07, Vol.751, p.38-70
issn 0022-1120
1469-7645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642318890
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Boundary layer
Boundary layer and shear turbulence
Computational fluid dynamics
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Fluid mechanics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Mathematical models
Navier-Stokes equations
Nonlinearity
Physics
Pipe flow
Turbulence
Turbulence simulation and modeling
Turbulent flow
Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer
Velocity
Walls
title On the structure and origin of pressure fluctuations in wall turbulence: predictions based on the resolvent analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T22%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20structure%20and%20origin%20of%20pressure%20fluctuations%20in%20wall%20turbulence:%20predictions%20based%20on%20the%20resolvent%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluid%20mechanics&rft.au=Luhar,%20M.&rft.date=2014-07-25&rft.volume=751&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=38-70&rft.issn=0022-1120&rft.eissn=1469-7645&rft.coden=JFLSA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jfm.2014.283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554955663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535617940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_jfm_2014_283&rfr_iscdi=true