Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array

In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth and planetary science letters 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126
Hauptverfasser: O'Rourke, C.T., Sheehan, A.F., Erslev, E.A., Miller, K.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue
container_start_page 120
container_title Earth and planetary science letters
container_volume 402
creator O'Rourke, C.T.
Sheehan, A.F.
Erslev, E.A.
Miller, K.C.
description In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known. •We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642313382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012821X13006055</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642313382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKccvSTu3zQBL1JqFSpeFHpbNptJszVN4k5S6Ld3Qz17GuY37w28R8g9owmjLH3cJ9Bjk3DKRAAJFeqCzJjIVBzI9pLMKGU8zjjbXpMbxD2lNFVpPiPvKxzcwQyu3UWFQddGQ-3sdwuI0YgTNVHtdnVcQotuOEW9QXRHiLEbvYVoB11fdy1ExntzuiVXlWkQ7v7mnHy9rD6Xr_HmY_22fN7ERmT5EAvBZJXThcgKI8vSUFFIuxBKSkkFVazkedgXKpyLUgWNkWAoVzLNK2WBizl5OP_tffczAg764NBC05gWuhE1SyUXTIhskvKz1PoO0UOlex8C-5NmVE_d6b2eutNTdxML3QXT09kEIcTRgddoHbQWSufBDrrs3H_2X1i7eGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642313382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known. •We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-821X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1385-013X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Basements ; basin thickness ; Basins ; Bighorn Basin ; Earthquakes ; Estimates ; Mountains ; Powder River Basin ; River basins ; Seismic phenomena ; seismology</subject><ispartof>Earth and planetary science letters, 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erslev, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><title>Earth and planetary science letters</title><description>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known. •We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Basements</subject><subject>basin thickness</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Bighorn Basin</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Powder River Basin</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>seismology</subject><issn>0012-821X</issn><issn>1385-013X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKccvSTu3zQBL1JqFSpeFHpbNptJszVN4k5S6Ld3Qz17GuY37w28R8g9owmjLH3cJ9Bjk3DKRAAJFeqCzJjIVBzI9pLMKGU8zjjbXpMbxD2lNFVpPiPvKxzcwQyu3UWFQddGQ-3sdwuI0YgTNVHtdnVcQotuOEW9QXRHiLEbvYVoB11fdy1ExntzuiVXlWkQ7v7mnHy9rD6Xr_HmY_22fN7ERmT5EAvBZJXThcgKI8vSUFFIuxBKSkkFVazkedgXKpyLUgWNkWAoVzLNK2WBizl5OP_tffczAg764NBC05gWuhE1SyUXTIhskvKz1PoO0UOlex8C-5NmVE_d6b2eutNTdxML3QXT09kEIcTRgddoHbQWSufBDrrs3H_2X1i7eGo</recordid><startdate>20140915</startdate><enddate>20140915</enddate><creator>O'Rourke, C.T.</creator><creator>Sheehan, A.F.</creator><creator>Erslev, E.A.</creator><creator>Miller, K.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140915</creationdate><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><author>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Basements</topic><topic>basin thickness</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Bighorn Basin</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Powder River Basin</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>seismology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erslev, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Rourke, C.T.</au><au>Sheehan, A.F.</au><au>Erslev, E.A.</au><au>Miller, K.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</atitle><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle><date>2014-09-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>402</volume><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>0012-821X</issn><eissn>1385-013X</eissn><abstract>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known. •We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-821X
ispartof Earth and planetary science letters, 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126
issn 0012-821X
1385-013X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642313382
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Arrays
Basements
basin thickness
Basins
Bighorn Basin
Earthquakes
Estimates
Mountains
Powder River Basin
River basins
Seismic phenomena
seismology
title Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20basin%20thickness%20using%20a%20high-density%20passive-source%20geophone%20array&rft.jtitle=Earth%20and%20planetary%20science%20letters&rft.au=O'Rourke,%20C.T.&rft.date=2014-09-15&rft.volume=402&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=0012-821X&rft.eissn=1385-013X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642313382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642313382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0012821X13006055&rfr_iscdi=true