Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array
In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in ad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth and planetary science letters 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Earth and planetary science letters |
container_volume | 402 |
creator | O'Rourke, C.T. Sheehan, A.F. Erslev, E.A. Miller, K.C. |
description | In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known.
•We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642313382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012821X13006055</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642313382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKccvSTu3zQBL1JqFSpeFHpbNptJszVN4k5S6Ld3Qz17GuY37w28R8g9owmjLH3cJ9Bjk3DKRAAJFeqCzJjIVBzI9pLMKGU8zjjbXpMbxD2lNFVpPiPvKxzcwQyu3UWFQddGQ-3sdwuI0YgTNVHtdnVcQotuOEW9QXRHiLEbvYVoB11fdy1ExntzuiVXlWkQ7v7mnHy9rD6Xr_HmY_22fN7ERmT5EAvBZJXThcgKI8vSUFFIuxBKSkkFVazkedgXKpyLUgWNkWAoVzLNK2WBizl5OP_tffczAg764NBC05gWuhE1SyUXTIhskvKz1PoO0UOlex8C-5NmVE_d6b2eutNTdxML3QXT09kEIcTRgddoHbQWSufBDrrs3H_2X1i7eGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642313382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known.
•We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-821X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1385-013X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Basements ; basin thickness ; Basins ; Bighorn Basin ; Earthquakes ; Estimates ; Mountains ; Powder River Basin ; River basins ; Seismic phenomena ; seismology</subject><ispartof>Earth and planetary science letters, 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erslev, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><title>Earth and planetary science letters</title><description>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known.
•We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Basements</subject><subject>basin thickness</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Bighorn Basin</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Powder River Basin</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>seismology</subject><issn>0012-821X</issn><issn>1385-013X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKccvSTu3zQBL1JqFSpeFHpbNptJszVN4k5S6Ld3Qz17GuY37w28R8g9owmjLH3cJ9Bjk3DKRAAJFeqCzJjIVBzI9pLMKGU8zjjbXpMbxD2lNFVpPiPvKxzcwQyu3UWFQddGQ-3sdwuI0YgTNVHtdnVcQotuOEW9QXRHiLEbvYVoB11fdy1ExntzuiVXlWkQ7v7mnHy9rD6Xr_HmY_22fN7ERmT5EAvBZJXThcgKI8vSUFFIuxBKSkkFVazkedgXKpyLUgWNkWAoVzLNK2WBizl5OP_tffczAg764NBC05gWuhE1SyUXTIhskvKz1PoO0UOlex8C-5NmVE_d6b2eutNTdxML3QXT09kEIcTRgddoHbQWSufBDrrs3H_2X1i7eGo</recordid><startdate>20140915</startdate><enddate>20140915</enddate><creator>O'Rourke, C.T.</creator><creator>Sheehan, A.F.</creator><creator>Erslev, E.A.</creator><creator>Miller, K.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140915</creationdate><title>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</title><author>O'Rourke, C.T. ; Sheehan, A.F. ; Erslev, E.A. ; Miller, K.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-3314f90738ba4dda03b4c73544403051d294c7758babd5ba4a4ea025469f5ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Basements</topic><topic>basin thickness</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Bighorn Basin</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Powder River Basin</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>seismology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erslev, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Rourke, C.T.</au><au>Sheehan, A.F.</au><au>Erslev, E.A.</au><au>Miller, K.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array</atitle><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle><date>2014-09-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>402</volume><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>0012-821X</issn><eissn>1385-013X</eissn><abstract>In 2010 an array of 834 single-component geophones was deployed across the Bighorn Mountain Range in northern Wyoming as part of the Bighorn Arch Seismic Experiment (BASE). The goal of this deployment was to test the capabilities of these instruments as recorders of passive-source observations in addition to active-source observations for which they are typically used. The results are quite promising, having recorded 47 regional and teleseismic earthquakes over a two-week deployment. These events ranged from magnitude 4.1 to 7.0 (mb) and occurred at distances up to 10°. Because these instruments were deployed at ca. 1000 m spacing we were able to resolve the geometries of two major basins from the residuals of several well-recorded teleseisms. The residuals of these arrivals, converted to basinal thickness, show a distinct westward thickening in the Bighorn Basin that agrees with industry-derived basement depth information. Our estimates of thickness in the Powder River Basin do not match industry estimates in certain areas, likely due to localized high-velocity features that are not included in our models. Thus, with a few cautions, it is clear that high-density single-component passive arrays can provide valuable constraints on basinal geometries, and could be especially useful where basinal geometry is poorly known.
•We present results of a novel USArray flexible array hybrid active/passive deployment.•We successfully record several dozen teleseismic earthquakes on a dense geophone array.•We use teleseismic body wave travel time residuals to calculate sedimentary basin thickness.•Our estimated basin depths match published borehole and active-seismic data.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-821X |
ispartof | Earth and planetary science letters, 2014-09, Vol.402, p.120-126 |
issn | 0012-821X 1385-013X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642313382 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Arrays Basements basin thickness Basins Bighorn Basin Earthquakes Estimates Mountains Powder River Basin River basins Seismic phenomena seismology |
title | Estimating basin thickness using a high-density passive-source geophone array |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20basin%20thickness%20using%20a%20high-density%20passive-source%20geophone%20array&rft.jtitle=Earth%20and%20planetary%20science%20letters&rft.au=O'Rourke,%20C.T.&rft.date=2014-09-15&rft.volume=402&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=0012-821X&rft.eissn=1385-013X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642313382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642313382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0012821X13006055&rfr_iscdi=true |