Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones
•We simulated artisanal incineration of four component categories of cellphones.•We identified metals and organic chemicals in the resulting electronic waste ash.•We used USETox model to demonstrate potential ecotoxicity and human health impacts.•We identify targets for risk reduction for hazardous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hazardous materials 2014-08, Vol.278, p.1-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of hazardous materials |
container_volume | 278 |
creator | Hibbert, Kathleen Ogunseitan, Oladele A. |
description | •We simulated artisanal incineration of four component categories of cellphones.•We identified metals and organic chemicals in the resulting electronic waste ash.•We used USETox model to demonstrate potential ecotoxicity and human health impacts.•We identify targets for risk reduction for hazardous chemicals in cellphones.
The potential environmental and human health impacts of artisanal mining of electronic waste through open incineration were investigated. A market-representative set of cellphones was dismantled into four component categories—batteries, circuit boards, plastics and screens. The components were shredded, sieved and incinerated at 743–818°C. The concentrations of 17 metals were determined using U.S. EPA methods 6010C (inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; 6020A (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, or 7471B and 7470A (cold-vapor atomic absorption). EPA Method 8270 (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) was used to identify polyaromatic hydrocarbon compounds and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. EPA Method 8082A was used to measure polychlorinated biphenyls and EPA Method 8290 was used for dioxin/furans in the residue ash. The life cycle assessment model USEtox® was used to estimate impacts of the ash residue chemicals on human health and the ecosystem. Among metals, copper in printed circuit boards had the highest ecotoxicity impact (1610–1930PAFm3/kg); Beryllium in plastics had the highest impact on producing non-cancer diseases (0.14–0.44 cases/kg of ash); and Nickel had the largest impact on producing cancers (0.093–0.35 cases/kg of ash). Among organic chemicals, dioxins from incinerated batteries produced the largest ecotoxicological impact (1.07E−04 to 3.64E−04PAFm3/kg). Furans in incinerated batteries can generate the largest number of cancers and non-cancer diseases, representing 8.12E−09 to 2.28E−08 and 8.96E−10 and 2.52E−09 cases/kg of ash, respectively. The results reveal hazards of burning discarded cellphones to recover precious metals, and pinpoints opportunities for manufacturers to reduce toxic materials used in specific electronic components marketed globally. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.089 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642308540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304389414004440</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642308540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-bb8074e64809c70ba2804bb57838dd7944465a4e97ed40c34147d6a92b1e7a6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEurFDEQRoMo3nH0Jyi9Edx0W-lUHr3Sy8UXXBBE1yGdVDsZ-zEmPaL-ejPMqEtdFLU5X9XHYewxh4YDV8_3zX7nfk5ubVrg2IBswHR32IYbLWohhLrLNiAAa2E6vGIPct4DANcS77OrFjuhldQb9vJDzF9ytQzVunyPvnJ5Vw1pmSqX1pjd7MZqinOcP5-QELN3KVCoPI3jYbfMlB-ye4MbMz267C379PrVx5u39e37N-9urm9rr7hc6743oJEUGui8ht61BrDvpTbChKA7RFTSIXWaAoIXyFEH5bq256SdIrFlz853D2n5eqS82qm0KTXcTMsxW66wFWAkwn-gre60aMtsmTyjPi05JxrsIcXJpR-Wgz15tnt78WxPni1IWzyX3JPLi2M_UfiT-i22AE8vgCvOxiG52cf8lzNKnwwU7sWZo-LuW6Rks480ewoxkV9tWOI_qvwCZPmcng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627973297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hibbert, Kathleen ; Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hibbert, Kathleen ; Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</creatorcontrib><description>•We simulated artisanal incineration of four component categories of cellphones.•We identified metals and organic chemicals in the resulting electronic waste ash.•We used USETox model to demonstrate potential ecotoxicity and human health impacts.•We identify targets for risk reduction for hazardous chemicals in cellphones.
The potential environmental and human health impacts of artisanal mining of electronic waste through open incineration were investigated. A market-representative set of cellphones was dismantled into four component categories—batteries, circuit boards, plastics and screens. The components were shredded, sieved and incinerated at 743–818°C. The concentrations of 17 metals were determined using U.S. EPA methods 6010C (inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; 6020A (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, or 7471B and 7470A (cold-vapor atomic absorption). EPA Method 8270 (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) was used to identify polyaromatic hydrocarbon compounds and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. EPA Method 8082A was used to measure polychlorinated biphenyls and EPA Method 8290 was used for dioxin/furans in the residue ash. The life cycle assessment model USEtox® was used to estimate impacts of the ash residue chemicals on human health and the ecosystem. Among metals, copper in printed circuit boards had the highest ecotoxicity impact (1610–1930PAFm3/kg); Beryllium in plastics had the highest impact on producing non-cancer diseases (0.14–0.44 cases/kg of ash); and Nickel had the largest impact on producing cancers (0.093–0.35 cases/kg of ash). Among organic chemicals, dioxins from incinerated batteries produced the largest ecotoxicological impact (1.07E−04 to 3.64E−04PAFm3/kg). Furans in incinerated batteries can generate the largest number of cancers and non-cancer diseases, representing 8.12E−09 to 2.28E−08 and 8.96E−10 and 2.52E−09 cases/kg of ash, respectively. The results reveal hazards of burning discarded cellphones to recover precious metals, and pinpoints opportunities for manufacturers to reduce toxic materials used in specific electronic components marketed globally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24937657</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHMAD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Artisanal mining ; Ashes ; Cancer ; Cell Phone ; Cell phones ; Chemical engineering ; E-waste ; Electronic components ; Electronic Waste - adverse effects ; Electronic Waste - analysis ; Environmental Pollutants - analysis ; Environmental Pollutants - toxicity ; Exact sciences and technology ; Furans ; Global environmental pollution ; Humans ; Hydrocarbons - analysis ; Hydrocarbons - toxicity ; Incineration ; Life cycle assessment ; Metals - analysis ; Metals - toxicity ; Mining ; Models, Theoretical ; Pollution ; Residues ; Risk Assessment ; Safety ; Spectrometry ; Toxic</subject><ispartof>Journal of hazardous materials, 2014-08, Vol.278, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-bb8074e64809c70ba2804bb57838dd7944465a4e97ed40c34147d6a92b1e7a6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-bb8074e64809c70ba2804bb57838dd7944465a4e97ed40c34147d6a92b1e7a6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389414004440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28672804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24937657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hibbert, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</creatorcontrib><title>Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones</title><title>Journal of hazardous materials</title><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><description>•We simulated artisanal incineration of four component categories of cellphones.•We identified metals and organic chemicals in the resulting electronic waste ash.•We used USETox model to demonstrate potential ecotoxicity and human health impacts.•We identify targets for risk reduction for hazardous chemicals in cellphones.
The potential environmental and human health impacts of artisanal mining of electronic waste through open incineration were investigated. A market-representative set of cellphones was dismantled into four component categories—batteries, circuit boards, plastics and screens. The components were shredded, sieved and incinerated at 743–818°C. The concentrations of 17 metals were determined using U.S. EPA methods 6010C (inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; 6020A (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, or 7471B and 7470A (cold-vapor atomic absorption). EPA Method 8270 (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) was used to identify polyaromatic hydrocarbon compounds and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. EPA Method 8082A was used to measure polychlorinated biphenyls and EPA Method 8290 was used for dioxin/furans in the residue ash. The life cycle assessment model USEtox® was used to estimate impacts of the ash residue chemicals on human health and the ecosystem. Among metals, copper in printed circuit boards had the highest ecotoxicity impact (1610–1930PAFm3/kg); Beryllium in plastics had the highest impact on producing non-cancer diseases (0.14–0.44 cases/kg of ash); and Nickel had the largest impact on producing cancers (0.093–0.35 cases/kg of ash). Among organic chemicals, dioxins from incinerated batteries produced the largest ecotoxicological impact (1.07E−04 to 3.64E−04PAFm3/kg). Furans in incinerated batteries can generate the largest number of cancers and non-cancer diseases, representing 8.12E−09 to 2.28E−08 and 8.96E−10 and 2.52E−09 cases/kg of ash, respectively. The results reveal hazards of burning discarded cellphones to recover precious metals, and pinpoints opportunities for manufacturers to reduce toxic materials used in specific electronic components marketed globally.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Artisanal mining</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell Phone</subject><subject>Cell phones</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>E-waste</subject><subject>Electronic components</subject><subject>Electronic Waste - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electronic Waste - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Furans</subject><subject>Global environmental pollution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons - toxicity</subject><subject>Incineration</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Metals - analysis</subject><subject>Metals - toxicity</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Spectrometry</subject><subject>Toxic</subject><issn>0304-3894</issn><issn>1873-3336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEurFDEQRoMo3nH0Jyi9Edx0W-lUHr3Sy8UXXBBE1yGdVDsZ-zEmPaL-ejPMqEtdFLU5X9XHYewxh4YDV8_3zX7nfk5ubVrg2IBswHR32IYbLWohhLrLNiAAa2E6vGIPct4DANcS77OrFjuhldQb9vJDzF9ytQzVunyPvnJ5Vw1pmSqX1pjd7MZqinOcP5-QELN3KVCoPI3jYbfMlB-ye4MbMz267C379PrVx5u39e37N-9urm9rr7hc6743oJEUGui8ht61BrDvpTbChKA7RFTSIXWaAoIXyFEH5bq256SdIrFlz853D2n5eqS82qm0KTXcTMsxW66wFWAkwn-gre60aMtsmTyjPi05JxrsIcXJpR-Wgz15tnt78WxPni1IWzyX3JPLi2M_UfiT-i22AE8vgCvOxiG52cf8lzNKnwwU7sWZo-LuW6Rks480ewoxkV9tWOI_qvwCZPmcng</recordid><startdate>20140815</startdate><enddate>20140815</enddate><creator>Hibbert, Kathleen</creator><creator>Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140815</creationdate><title>Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones</title><author>Hibbert, Kathleen ; Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-bb8074e64809c70ba2804bb57838dd7944465a4e97ed40c34147d6a92b1e7a6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Artisanal mining</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell Phone</topic><topic>Cell phones</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>E-waste</topic><topic>Electronic components</topic><topic>Electronic Waste - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electronic Waste - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Furans</topic><topic>Global environmental pollution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons - toxicity</topic><topic>Incineration</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Metals - analysis</topic><topic>Metals - toxicity</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Spectrometry</topic><topic>Toxic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hibbert, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hibbert, Kathleen</au><au>Ogunseitan, Oladele A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><date>2014-08-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>278</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0304-3894</issn><eissn>1873-3336</eissn><coden>JHMAD9</coden><abstract>•We simulated artisanal incineration of four component categories of cellphones.•We identified metals and organic chemicals in the resulting electronic waste ash.•We used USETox model to demonstrate potential ecotoxicity and human health impacts.•We identify targets for risk reduction for hazardous chemicals in cellphones.
The potential environmental and human health impacts of artisanal mining of electronic waste through open incineration were investigated. A market-representative set of cellphones was dismantled into four component categories—batteries, circuit boards, plastics and screens. The components were shredded, sieved and incinerated at 743–818°C. The concentrations of 17 metals were determined using U.S. EPA methods 6010C (inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; 6020A (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, or 7471B and 7470A (cold-vapor atomic absorption). EPA Method 8270 (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) was used to identify polyaromatic hydrocarbon compounds and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. EPA Method 8082A was used to measure polychlorinated biphenyls and EPA Method 8290 was used for dioxin/furans in the residue ash. The life cycle assessment model USEtox® was used to estimate impacts of the ash residue chemicals on human health and the ecosystem. Among metals, copper in printed circuit boards had the highest ecotoxicity impact (1610–1930PAFm3/kg); Beryllium in plastics had the highest impact on producing non-cancer diseases (0.14–0.44 cases/kg of ash); and Nickel had the largest impact on producing cancers (0.093–0.35 cases/kg of ash). Among organic chemicals, dioxins from incinerated batteries produced the largest ecotoxicological impact (1.07E−04 to 3.64E−04PAFm3/kg). Furans in incinerated batteries can generate the largest number of cancers and non-cancer diseases, representing 8.12E−09 to 2.28E−08 and 8.96E−10 and 2.52E−09 cases/kg of ash, respectively. The results reveal hazards of burning discarded cellphones to recover precious metals, and pinpoints opportunities for manufacturers to reduce toxic materials used in specific electronic components marketed globally.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24937657</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.089</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3894 |
ispartof | Journal of hazardous materials, 2014-08, Vol.278, p.1-7 |
issn | 0304-3894 1873-3336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642308540 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Artisanal mining Ashes Cancer Cell Phone Cell phones Chemical engineering E-waste Electronic components Electronic Waste - adverse effects Electronic Waste - analysis Environmental Pollutants - analysis Environmental Pollutants - toxicity Exact sciences and technology Furans Global environmental pollution Humans Hydrocarbons - analysis Hydrocarbons - toxicity Incineration Life cycle assessment Metals - analysis Metals - toxicity Mining Models, Theoretical Pollution Residues Risk Assessment Safety Spectrometry Toxic |
title | Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risks%20of%20toxic%20ash%20from%20artisanal%20mining%20of%20discarded%20cellphones&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hazardous%20materials&rft.au=Hibbert,%20Kathleen&rft.date=2014-08-15&rft.volume=278&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0304-3894&rft.eissn=1873-3336&rft.coden=JHMAD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642308540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627973297&rft_id=info:pmid/24937657&rft_els_id=S0304389414004440&rfr_iscdi=true |