Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information
Environmental professionals are often tasked with projecting the cost to bring a contaminated site or portfolio of sites to regulatory closure. Fortunately, there are a number of useful guidance documents and industry publications available to assist in such cost projections. However, the usefulness...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remediation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.23 (4), p.43-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Remediation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Ram, Neil M. McTiernan, Larry Kinney, Lauren |
description | Environmental professionals are often tasked with projecting the cost to bring a contaminated site or portfolio of sites to regulatory closure. Fortunately, there are a number of useful guidance documents and industry publications available to assist in such cost projections. However, the usefulness of such tools is limited when adequate costing information is lacking, such as (a) the nature and extent of contamination; (b) regulatory requirements; (c) the remedial approach to be implemented; and/or (d) the duration of operation, maintenance, and monitoring activities. Despite the lack of such information, cost‐to‐closure estimates are nevertheless routinely needed and generated for internal assessments or audits, regulatory disclosures, property acquisitions, insurance claims, litigation, and other business transactions. Cost estimates are also often needed in bankruptcy proceedings where the trier of fact must estimate the total future costs associated with an environmental legacy portfolio to determine the overall value (or solvency in the case of evaluating the potential bankruptcy) of a company. This article presents a solution for developing cleanup costs for single sites or a portfolio of sites using a comprehensive, three‐tiered method that is effective over a wide range of site information. Real‐world examples of the successful application of this method are then provided, based on detailed environmental analyses that were completed for a recent bankruptcy proceeding and a case in which an estimated cleanup cost was needed in a legal proceeding. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rem.21365 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642302404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1443374866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-729c7b981263937e736bad6036141154ed32378e765b93a0bdc248bef11ec2ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUhS3UStBpF_yDSN20i4Cvn8lyNBooFbRo-mBpnOQGTJOY2p628-8xTGGBVFV3cc_iO0fXPoTsAz0AStlhwPGAAVdyh-yBZLRUFYcXWVMJpVSy2iWvYryhFPLwPXK5jMmNNrnpqljhiJ3L2k_FwscUC5uymJId3WQTdsUXlzAWFy5dF99t2Nyb5qNfTxn1fTH_Zd1gmwGLk6n3YXxIek1e9naI-ObvnpFvR8uviw_l6efjk8X8tGxFvrbUrG51U1fAFK-5Rs1VYztFuQIBIAV2nHFdoVayqbmlTdcyUTXYA2DLWstn5N029zb4n2uMyYwutjgMdkK_jgaUYJwyQcX_USE416JSKqNvn6E3fh2m_JBMcS1rYDl2Rt5vqTb4GAP25jbkTw0bA9Tc12JyLeahlswebtnfbsDNv0GzWp49Osqtw8WEf54cNvwwSucbzMWnY_NRrwScr7SR_A5osJv_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1437591242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ram, Neil M. ; McTiernan, Larry ; Kinney, Lauren</creator><creatorcontrib>Ram, Neil M. ; McTiernan, Larry ; Kinney, Lauren</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental professionals are often tasked with projecting the cost to bring a contaminated site or portfolio of sites to regulatory closure. Fortunately, there are a number of useful guidance documents and industry publications available to assist in such cost projections. However, the usefulness of such tools is limited when adequate costing information is lacking, such as (a) the nature and extent of contamination; (b) regulatory requirements; (c) the remedial approach to be implemented; and/or (d) the duration of operation, maintenance, and monitoring activities. Despite the lack of such information, cost‐to‐closure estimates are nevertheless routinely needed and generated for internal assessments or audits, regulatory disclosures, property acquisitions, insurance claims, litigation, and other business transactions. Cost estimates are also often needed in bankruptcy proceedings where the trier of fact must estimate the total future costs associated with an environmental legacy portfolio to determine the overall value (or solvency in the case of evaluating the potential bankruptcy) of a company. This article presents a solution for developing cleanup costs for single sites or a portfolio of sites using a comprehensive, three‐tiered method that is effective over a wide range of site information. Real‐world examples of the successful application of this method are then provided, based on detailed environmental analyses that were completed for a recent bankruptcy proceeding and a case in which an estimated cleanup cost was needed in a legal proceeding. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-5658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rem.21365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Bankruptcies ; Cleaning ; Contamination ; Cost estimates ; Costs ; Estimates ; Remediation ; Reproduction</subject><ispartof>Remediation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.23 (4), p.43-58</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-729c7b981263937e736bad6036141154ed32378e765b93a0bdc248bef11ec2ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-729c7b981263937e736bad6036141154ed32378e765b93a0bdc248bef11ec2ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frem.21365$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frem.21365$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ram, Neil M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTiernan, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Lauren</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information</title><title>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Remediation</addtitle><description>Environmental professionals are often tasked with projecting the cost to bring a contaminated site or portfolio of sites to regulatory closure. Fortunately, there are a number of useful guidance documents and industry publications available to assist in such cost projections. However, the usefulness of such tools is limited when adequate costing information is lacking, such as (a) the nature and extent of contamination; (b) regulatory requirements; (c) the remedial approach to be implemented; and/or (d) the duration of operation, maintenance, and monitoring activities. Despite the lack of such information, cost‐to‐closure estimates are nevertheless routinely needed and generated for internal assessments or audits, regulatory disclosures, property acquisitions, insurance claims, litigation, and other business transactions. Cost estimates are also often needed in bankruptcy proceedings where the trier of fact must estimate the total future costs associated with an environmental legacy portfolio to determine the overall value (or solvency in the case of evaluating the potential bankruptcy) of a company. This article presents a solution for developing cleanup costs for single sites or a portfolio of sites using a comprehensive, three‐tiered method that is effective over a wide range of site information. Real‐world examples of the successful application of this method are then provided, based on detailed environmental analyses that were completed for a recent bankruptcy proceeding and a case in which an estimated cleanup cost was needed in a legal proceeding. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Bankruptcies</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><issn>1051-5658</issn><issn>1520-6831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUhS3UStBpF_yDSN20i4Cvn8lyNBooFbRo-mBpnOQGTJOY2p628-8xTGGBVFV3cc_iO0fXPoTsAz0AStlhwPGAAVdyh-yBZLRUFYcXWVMJpVSy2iWvYryhFPLwPXK5jMmNNrnpqljhiJ3L2k_FwscUC5uymJId3WQTdsUXlzAWFy5dF99t2Nyb5qNfTxn1fTH_Zd1gmwGLk6n3YXxIek1e9naI-ObvnpFvR8uviw_l6efjk8X8tGxFvrbUrG51U1fAFK-5Rs1VYztFuQIBIAV2nHFdoVayqbmlTdcyUTXYA2DLWstn5N029zb4n2uMyYwutjgMdkK_jgaUYJwyQcX_USE416JSKqNvn6E3fh2m_JBMcS1rYDl2Rt5vqTb4GAP25jbkTw0bA9Tc12JyLeahlswebtnfbsDNv0GzWp49Osqtw8WEf54cNvwwSucbzMWnY_NRrwScr7SR_A5osJv_</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Ram, Neil M.</creator><creator>McTiernan, Larry</creator><creator>Kinney, Lauren</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information</title><author>Ram, Neil M. ; McTiernan, Larry ; Kinney, Lauren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-729c7b981263937e736bad6036141154ed32378e765b93a0bdc248bef11ec2ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bankruptcies</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ram, Neil M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTiernan, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Lauren</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ram, Neil M.</au><au>McTiernan, Larry</au><au>Kinney, Lauren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information</atitle><jtitle>Remediation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Remediation</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>43-58</pages><issn>1051-5658</issn><eissn>1520-6831</eissn><abstract>Environmental professionals are often tasked with projecting the cost to bring a contaminated site or portfolio of sites to regulatory closure. Fortunately, there are a number of useful guidance documents and industry publications available to assist in such cost projections. However, the usefulness of such tools is limited when adequate costing information is lacking, such as (a) the nature and extent of contamination; (b) regulatory requirements; (c) the remedial approach to be implemented; and/or (d) the duration of operation, maintenance, and monitoring activities. Despite the lack of such information, cost‐to‐closure estimates are nevertheless routinely needed and generated for internal assessments or audits, regulatory disclosures, property acquisitions, insurance claims, litigation, and other business transactions. Cost estimates are also often needed in bankruptcy proceedings where the trier of fact must estimate the total future costs associated with an environmental legacy portfolio to determine the overall value (or solvency in the case of evaluating the potential bankruptcy) of a company. This article presents a solution for developing cleanup costs for single sites or a portfolio of sites using a comprehensive, three‐tiered method that is effective over a wide range of site information. Real‐world examples of the successful application of this method are then provided, based on detailed environmental analyses that were completed for a recent bankruptcy proceeding and a case in which an estimated cleanup cost was needed in a legal proceeding. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/rem.21365</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-5658 |
ispartof | Remediation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.23 (4), p.43-58 |
issn | 1051-5658 1520-6831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642302404 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bankruptcies Cleaning Contamination Cost estimates Costs Estimates Remediation Reproduction |
title | Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites With Varying Amounts of Available Information |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A38%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Remediation%20Costs%20at%20Contaminated%20Sites%20With%20Varying%20Amounts%20of%20Available%20Information&rft.jtitle=Remediation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Ram,%20Neil%20M.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=43-58&rft.issn=1051-5658&rft.eissn=1520-6831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rem.21365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443374866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1437591242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |