Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada
Various fluvial geomorphic models have been developed to characterize the relationships between planform and bedform features of large alluvial channels; however, little information exists for meadow channel morphology. Field investigation of seven narrow, low-energy meadow stream reaches in the nor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-08, Vol.219, p.103-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 219 |
creator | Slocombe, Michelle L. Davis, Jerry D. |
description | Various fluvial geomorphic models have been developed to characterize the relationships between planform and bedform features of large alluvial channels; however, little information exists for meadow channel morphology. Field investigation of seven narrow, low-energy meadow stream reaches in the northern Sierra Nevada range of California revealed similarities and differences to larger alluvial channels. The average radius of curvature to channel width ratio (5.54) of the meadow streams was almost double that of larger alluvial streams (3.1), with a standard deviation of 4.66. Average meander wavelength to channel width ratio (22.43) was almost triple that of typical alluvial streams (8.5), with a standard deviation of 16.80. Bedform features occurred at an average of 6.72 channel widths, similar to typical pool–riffle spacing of 5-7 channel widths. Grass sod connected a series of scour pools, providing the same energy drop function as riffles or steps. Results suggest that bedform regularity is similar to typical pool–riffle systems, especially as we move to larger watersheds and higher precipitation and runoff, but planform features are less developed and highly influenced by vegetation. Restoration efforts can benefit from considering how planform and bedform channel patterns develop in these meadows. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642294964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X1400244X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1627947176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-f1b29221ff89ba2f3d47b5df1b1ae215ff6a3c48e347fddbdd396037d033437f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LHDEUhkOx0NX2L5TcCF4403xNsrmzLNoW1vVChb0L2cmJZpmZbJNZxX_fDKu9VTiQEJ435-VB6DslNSVU_tjWDxD7mHaPNSNU1GQa8gnN6FyxSupmfYRmBdRV0zTrL-g45y0hRChNZmh1PQVjFx9ecPQ497brzrELuY3DGIZ93Gfcl6sdAPdgXXzGeUxg-4zDgMdHwLcBUrJ4BU_W2a_os7ddhm-v5wm6v7q8W_yulje__ix-LisrOB0rTzdMM0a9n-uNZZ47oTaNK8_UAqON99LyVsyBC-Wd2zjHtSRcOcK54MrzE3R2-HeX4t895NH0pTJ0XelZKhsqBWNaaCk-gDKlhaJKFlQe0DbFnBN4s0uht-nFUGIm12Zr3lybybUh05ASPH3dYXNrO5_s0Ib8P83mUjaMqsJdHDgobp6KOJPbAEMLLiRoR-NieG_VP2rNmQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627947176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Slocombe, Michelle L. ; Davis, Jerry D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Slocombe, Michelle L. ; Davis, Jerry D.</creatorcontrib><description>Various fluvial geomorphic models have been developed to characterize the relationships between planform and bedform features of large alluvial channels; however, little information exists for meadow channel morphology. Field investigation of seven narrow, low-energy meadow stream reaches in the northern Sierra Nevada range of California revealed similarities and differences to larger alluvial channels. The average radius of curvature to channel width ratio (5.54) of the meadow streams was almost double that of larger alluvial streams (3.1), with a standard deviation of 4.66. Average meander wavelength to channel width ratio (22.43) was almost triple that of typical alluvial streams (8.5), with a standard deviation of 16.80. Bedform features occurred at an average of 6.72 channel widths, similar to typical pool–riffle spacing of 5-7 channel widths. Grass sod connected a series of scour pools, providing the same energy drop function as riffles or steps. Results suggest that bedform regularity is similar to typical pool–riffle systems, especially as we move to larger watersheds and higher precipitation and runoff, but planform features are less developed and highly influenced by vegetation. Restoration efforts can benefit from considering how planform and bedform channel patterns develop in these meadows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alluvial channels ; Biogeomorphology ; Channels ; Discontinuous channels ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Geomorphology ; Geomorphology, landform evolution ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Meadow stream ; Meanders ; Morphology ; Planforms ; Pools and riffles ; Restoration ; Standard deviation ; Stream geomorphology ; Streams ; Surficial geology</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-08, Vol.219, p.103-113</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-f1b29221ff89ba2f3d47b5df1b1ae215ff6a3c48e347fddbdd396037d033437f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-f1b29221ff89ba2f3d47b5df1b1ae215ff6a3c48e347fddbdd396037d033437f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28665217$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slocombe, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jerry D.</creatorcontrib><title>Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>Various fluvial geomorphic models have been developed to characterize the relationships between planform and bedform features of large alluvial channels; however, little information exists for meadow channel morphology. Field investigation of seven narrow, low-energy meadow stream reaches in the northern Sierra Nevada range of California revealed similarities and differences to larger alluvial channels. The average radius of curvature to channel width ratio (5.54) of the meadow streams was almost double that of larger alluvial streams (3.1), with a standard deviation of 4.66. Average meander wavelength to channel width ratio (22.43) was almost triple that of typical alluvial streams (8.5), with a standard deviation of 16.80. Bedform features occurred at an average of 6.72 channel widths, similar to typical pool–riffle spacing of 5-7 channel widths. Grass sod connected a series of scour pools, providing the same energy drop function as riffles or steps. Results suggest that bedform regularity is similar to typical pool–riffle systems, especially as we move to larger watersheds and higher precipitation and runoff, but planform features are less developed and highly influenced by vegetation. Restoration efforts can benefit from considering how planform and bedform channel patterns develop in these meadows.</description><subject>Alluvial channels</subject><subject>Biogeomorphology</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Discontinuous channels</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Geomorphology, landform evolution</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Meadow stream</subject><subject>Meanders</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Planforms</subject><subject>Pools and riffles</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Stream geomorphology</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LHDEUhkOx0NX2L5TcCF4403xNsrmzLNoW1vVChb0L2cmJZpmZbJNZxX_fDKu9VTiQEJ435-VB6DslNSVU_tjWDxD7mHaPNSNU1GQa8gnN6FyxSupmfYRmBdRV0zTrL-g45y0hRChNZmh1PQVjFx9ecPQ497brzrELuY3DGIZ93Gfcl6sdAPdgXXzGeUxg-4zDgMdHwLcBUrJ4BU_W2a_os7ddhm-v5wm6v7q8W_yulje__ix-LisrOB0rTzdMM0a9n-uNZZ47oTaNK8_UAqON99LyVsyBC-Wd2zjHtSRcOcK54MrzE3R2-HeX4t895NH0pTJ0XelZKhsqBWNaaCk-gDKlhaJKFlQe0DbFnBN4s0uht-nFUGIm12Zr3lybybUh05ASPH3dYXNrO5_s0Ib8P83mUjaMqsJdHDgobp6KOJPbAEMLLiRoR-NieG_VP2rNmQw</recordid><startdate>20140815</startdate><enddate>20140815</enddate><creator>Slocombe, Michelle L.</creator><creator>Davis, Jerry D.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140815</creationdate><title>Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada</title><author>Slocombe, Michelle L. ; Davis, Jerry D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-f1b29221ff89ba2f3d47b5df1b1ae215ff6a3c48e347fddbdd396037d033437f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alluvial channels</topic><topic>Biogeomorphology</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Discontinuous channels</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Geomorphology, landform evolution</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Meadow stream</topic><topic>Meanders</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Planforms</topic><topic>Pools and riffles</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Stream geomorphology</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slocombe, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jerry D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slocombe, Michelle L.</au><au>Davis, Jerry D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2014-08-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>219</volume><spage>103</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>103-113</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>Various fluvial geomorphic models have been developed to characterize the relationships between planform and bedform features of large alluvial channels; however, little information exists for meadow channel morphology. Field investigation of seven narrow, low-energy meadow stream reaches in the northern Sierra Nevada range of California revealed similarities and differences to larger alluvial channels. The average radius of curvature to channel width ratio (5.54) of the meadow streams was almost double that of larger alluvial streams (3.1), with a standard deviation of 4.66. Average meander wavelength to channel width ratio (22.43) was almost triple that of typical alluvial streams (8.5), with a standard deviation of 16.80. Bedform features occurred at an average of 6.72 channel widths, similar to typical pool–riffle spacing of 5-7 channel widths. Grass sod connected a series of scour pools, providing the same energy drop function as riffles or steps. Results suggest that bedform regularity is similar to typical pool–riffle systems, especially as we move to larger watersheds and higher precipitation and runoff, but planform features are less developed and highly influenced by vegetation. Restoration efforts can benefit from considering how planform and bedform channel patterns develop in these meadows.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.040</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-555X |
ispartof | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014-08, Vol.219, p.103-113 |
issn | 0169-555X 1872-695X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642294964 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Alluvial channels Biogeomorphology Channels Discontinuous channels Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Freshwater Geomorphology Geomorphology, landform evolution Marine and continental quaternary Meadow stream Meanders Morphology Planforms Pools and riffles Restoration Standard deviation Stream geomorphology Streams Surficial geology |
title | Morphology of small, discontinuous montane meadow streams in the Sierra Nevada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphology%20of%20small,%20discontinuous%20montane%20meadow%20streams%20in%20the%20Sierra%20Nevada&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Slocombe,%20Michelle%20L.&rft.date=2014-08-15&rft.volume=219&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=103-113&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1627947176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627947176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X1400244X&rfr_iscdi=true |