Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India

[Display omitted] •Tropical agricultural wetlands maintained for human use can have high biodiversity.•Landscape scale patterns and processes driving diversity in such wetlands are poorly understood.•Species richness was high and birds showed scale-dependent wetland use.•Species turnover and not nes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 2013-12, Vol.168, p.49-56
Hauptverfasser: Sundar, K.S. Gopi, Kittur, Swati
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue
container_start_page 49
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 168
creator Sundar, K.S. Gopi
Kittur, Swati
description [Display omitted] •Tropical agricultural wetlands maintained for human use can have high biodiversity.•Landscape scale patterns and processes driving diversity in such wetlands are poorly understood.•Species richness was high and birds showed scale-dependent wetland use.•Species turnover and not nestedness was largely responsible for landscape-scale beta diversity.•Multiple conservation mechanisms can help maximise wetland biodiversity. Wetlands in tropical agricultural landscapes are maintained largely by local institutions explicitly for human use, which is assumed to deter biodiversity. Conservation efforts have been biased towards protecting large wetlands that are assumed to be adequate to conserve the majority of species of focal taxa, usually birds. These assumptions remain untested, and landscape-scale conservation planning for wetlands is largely absent, as is a generalised understanding of wetland use by focal taxa. We designed a landscape-scale survey to understand patterns and processes determining beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands in south-western Uttar Pradesh, India where wetlands have experienced prolonged and intensive human use for several centuries. Observed bird species richness (99 species in 28 wetlands) is the highest known for any agricultural landscape in south Asia signifying that even intensive human use of wetlands does not necessarily deter their ability to retain biodiversity. Birds exhibited strong scale dependent wetland use underscoring the need to conserve wetlands of varying sizes and at varying densities on the landscape. Beta diversity was due largely to species turnover (0.877) with minimal effect due to nestedness (0.055) suggesting that conserving a few large wetlands will not adequately meet goals of conserving the majority of wetland bird species. Prevailing assumptions regarding biodiversity conservation in tropical agricultural wetlands require being revised, and a landscape-scale approach that incorporates ecological realities is needed. Incorporating local institutions alongside formal protectionist methods offer a potential win–win situation to maximise conservation of biodiversity in tropical agricultural wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642286631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320713003339</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642286631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8a3b2cb129a220fb647c995447e6b0c765534831362ecf3375f2afd5491b90603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRSMEEs3AHyDhDRKbBL_iJBsQavEYqSUWMGvLccq0W2k72EmP5nv4USpkmCUs_CqfurdUVRQvGa0YZertqep9tDFUnDJR0a7C4KNix9pGlLxjzeNiRylVpeC0eVo8y_mEz0aoelf82ptAbmEeTRgyORsfZlwwEBcTOS5n_F0yEDPmSI4wTgRtMqQLELQc_AVS9vPde3JY862ZoMR9BDKZeYYUMokOyTT8UcH7g5UPBLXNj-TtMs5LMiMZ_2qsnyGm-Uiuw-DN8-KJwwLgxf15Vdx8-vh9_6U8fP18vf9wKK3s-Fy2RvTc9ox3hnPqeiUb23W1lA2ontpG1bWQrWBCcbBOiKZ23Lihlh3rO6qouCrebLpTij8XyLM--2xhxLogLlkzJTlvlUKJ_6O86WrFVY2o3FCbYs4JnJ6SP5t0pxnV6_j0SW_j0-v4NO00BjHt9b2DWTvqkgnW54dc3lIlKW-Re7VxzkS9tjPrm28oJHHEtWokR-LdRgD27uIh6Ww9BAuDT2BnPUT_71J-A-NPvSs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627956265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sundar, K.S. Gopi ; Kittur, Swati</creator><creatorcontrib>Sundar, K.S. Gopi ; Kittur, Swati</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Tropical agricultural wetlands maintained for human use can have high biodiversity.•Landscape scale patterns and processes driving diversity in such wetlands are poorly understood.•Species richness was high and birds showed scale-dependent wetland use.•Species turnover and not nestedness was largely responsible for landscape-scale beta diversity.•Multiple conservation mechanisms can help maximise wetland biodiversity. Wetlands in tropical agricultural landscapes are maintained largely by local institutions explicitly for human use, which is assumed to deter biodiversity. Conservation efforts have been biased towards protecting large wetlands that are assumed to be adequate to conserve the majority of species of focal taxa, usually birds. These assumptions remain untested, and landscape-scale conservation planning for wetlands is largely absent, as is a generalised understanding of wetland use by focal taxa. We designed a landscape-scale survey to understand patterns and processes determining beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands in south-western Uttar Pradesh, India where wetlands have experienced prolonged and intensive human use for several centuries. Observed bird species richness (99 species in 28 wetlands) is the highest known for any agricultural landscape in south Asia signifying that even intensive human use of wetlands does not necessarily deter their ability to retain biodiversity. Birds exhibited strong scale dependent wetland use underscoring the need to conserve wetlands of varying sizes and at varying densities on the landscape. Beta diversity was due largely to species turnover (0.877) with minimal effect due to nestedness (0.055) suggesting that conserving a few large wetlands will not adequately meet goals of conserving the majority of wetland bird species. Prevailing assumptions regarding biodiversity conservation in tropical agricultural wetlands require being revised, and a landscape-scale approach that incorporates ecological realities is needed. Incorporating local institutions alongside formal protectionist methods offer a potential win–win situation to maximise conservation of biodiversity in tropical agricultural wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; birds ; Community use wetlands ; Conservation ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Density ; Farmlands ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General aspects ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Human ; humans ; Indicator species analyses ; Landscapes ; nestedness ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; planning ; Scale dependent wetland use ; species diversity ; Species turnover ; surveys ; Synecology ; tropical agriculture ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wetlands ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2013-12, Vol.168, p.49-56</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8a3b2cb129a220fb647c995447e6b0c765534831362ecf3375f2afd5491b90603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8a3b2cb129a220fb647c995447e6b0c765534831362ecf3375f2afd5491b90603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28064028$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sundar, K.S. Gopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kittur, Swati</creatorcontrib><title>Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>[Display omitted] •Tropical agricultural wetlands maintained for human use can have high biodiversity.•Landscape scale patterns and processes driving diversity in such wetlands are poorly understood.•Species richness was high and birds showed scale-dependent wetland use.•Species turnover and not nestedness was largely responsible for landscape-scale beta diversity.•Multiple conservation mechanisms can help maximise wetland biodiversity. Wetlands in tropical agricultural landscapes are maintained largely by local institutions explicitly for human use, which is assumed to deter biodiversity. Conservation efforts have been biased towards protecting large wetlands that are assumed to be adequate to conserve the majority of species of focal taxa, usually birds. These assumptions remain untested, and landscape-scale conservation planning for wetlands is largely absent, as is a generalised understanding of wetland use by focal taxa. We designed a landscape-scale survey to understand patterns and processes determining beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands in south-western Uttar Pradesh, India where wetlands have experienced prolonged and intensive human use for several centuries. Observed bird species richness (99 species in 28 wetlands) is the highest known for any agricultural landscape in south Asia signifying that even intensive human use of wetlands does not necessarily deter their ability to retain biodiversity. Birds exhibited strong scale dependent wetland use underscoring the need to conserve wetlands of varying sizes and at varying densities on the landscape. Beta diversity was due largely to species turnover (0.877) with minimal effect due to nestedness (0.055) suggesting that conserving a few large wetlands will not adequately meet goals of conserving the majority of wetland bird species. Prevailing assumptions regarding biodiversity conservation in tropical agricultural wetlands require being revised, and a landscape-scale approach that incorporates ecological realities is needed. Incorporating local institutions alongside formal protectionist methods offer a potential win–win situation to maximise conservation of biodiversity in tropical agricultural wetlands.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>birds</subject><subject>Community use wetlands</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Indicator species analyses</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>nestedness</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Scale dependent wetland use</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Species turnover</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>tropical agriculture</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRSMEEs3AHyDhDRKbBL_iJBsQavEYqSUWMGvLccq0W2k72EmP5nv4USpkmCUs_CqfurdUVRQvGa0YZertqep9tDFUnDJR0a7C4KNix9pGlLxjzeNiRylVpeC0eVo8y_mEz0aoelf82ptAbmEeTRgyORsfZlwwEBcTOS5n_F0yEDPmSI4wTgRtMqQLELQc_AVS9vPde3JY862ZoMR9BDKZeYYUMokOyTT8UcH7g5UPBLXNj-TtMs5LMiMZ_2qsnyGm-Uiuw-DN8-KJwwLgxf15Vdx8-vh9_6U8fP18vf9wKK3s-Fy2RvTc9ox3hnPqeiUb23W1lA2ontpG1bWQrWBCcbBOiKZ23Lihlh3rO6qouCrebLpTij8XyLM--2xhxLogLlkzJTlvlUKJ_6O86WrFVY2o3FCbYs4JnJ6SP5t0pxnV6_j0SW_j0-v4NO00BjHt9b2DWTvqkgnW54dc3lIlKW-Re7VxzkS9tjPrm28oJHHEtWokR-LdRgD27uIh6Ww9BAuDT2BnPUT_71J-A-NPvSs</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Sundar, K.S. Gopi</creator><creator>Kittur, Swati</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India</title><author>Sundar, K.S. Gopi ; Kittur, Swati</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8a3b2cb129a220fb647c995447e6b0c765534831362ecf3375f2afd5491b90603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>birds</topic><topic>Community use wetlands</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Indicator species analyses</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>nestedness</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Scale dependent wetland use</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Species turnover</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>tropical agriculture</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sundar, K.S. Gopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kittur, Swati</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sundar, K.S. Gopi</au><au>Kittur, Swati</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>168</volume><spage>49</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>49-56</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>[Display omitted] •Tropical agricultural wetlands maintained for human use can have high biodiversity.•Landscape scale patterns and processes driving diversity in such wetlands are poorly understood.•Species richness was high and birds showed scale-dependent wetland use.•Species turnover and not nestedness was largely responsible for landscape-scale beta diversity.•Multiple conservation mechanisms can help maximise wetland biodiversity. Wetlands in tropical agricultural landscapes are maintained largely by local institutions explicitly for human use, which is assumed to deter biodiversity. Conservation efforts have been biased towards protecting large wetlands that are assumed to be adequate to conserve the majority of species of focal taxa, usually birds. These assumptions remain untested, and landscape-scale conservation planning for wetlands is largely absent, as is a generalised understanding of wetland use by focal taxa. We designed a landscape-scale survey to understand patterns and processes determining beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands in south-western Uttar Pradesh, India where wetlands have experienced prolonged and intensive human use for several centuries. Observed bird species richness (99 species in 28 wetlands) is the highest known for any agricultural landscape in south Asia signifying that even intensive human use of wetlands does not necessarily deter their ability to retain biodiversity. Birds exhibited strong scale dependent wetland use underscoring the need to conserve wetlands of varying sizes and at varying densities on the landscape. Beta diversity was due largely to species turnover (0.877) with minimal effect due to nestedness (0.055) suggesting that conserving a few large wetlands will not adequately meet goals of conserving the majority of wetland bird species. Prevailing assumptions regarding biodiversity conservation in tropical agricultural wetlands require being revised, and a landscape-scale approach that incorporates ecological realities is needed. Incorporating local institutions alongside formal protectionist methods offer a potential win–win situation to maximise conservation of biodiversity in tropical agricultural wetlands.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2013-12, Vol.168, p.49-56
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642286631
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects agricultural land
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aves
Beta diversity of birds using agricultural wetlands
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
birds
Community use wetlands
Conservation
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Density
Farmlands
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
General aspects
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Human
humans
Indicator species analyses
Landscapes
nestedness
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
planning
Scale dependent wetland use
species diversity
Species turnover
surveys
Synecology
tropical agriculture
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Wetlands
Wildlife conservation
title Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20wetlands%20maintained%20for%20human%20use%20also%20help%20conserve%20biodiversity?%20Landscape-scale%20patterns%20of%20bird%20use%20of%20wetlands%20in%20an%20agricultural%20landscape%20in%20north%20India&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Sundar,%20K.S.%20Gopi&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=168&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=49-56&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642286631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627956265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320713003339&rfr_iscdi=true