Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times

The present laboratory study tests the hypothesis that straw–bark mulch bioreactors are capable of concurrently retaining nitrate (NO3−) and the herbicides atrazine or bentazone at short hydraulic residence times (HRT). In a 1 year column experiment at HRT of ∼4h three organic carbon sources, straw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological engineering 2013-06, Vol.55, p.101-113
Hauptverfasser: Krause Camilo, B., Matzinger, A., Litz, N., Tedesco, L.P., Wessolek, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue
container_start_page 101
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 55
creator Krause Camilo, B.
Matzinger, A.
Litz, N.
Tedesco, L.P.
Wessolek, G.
description The present laboratory study tests the hypothesis that straw–bark mulch bioreactors are capable of concurrently retaining nitrate (NO3−) and the herbicides atrazine or bentazone at short hydraulic residence times (HRT). In a 1 year column experiment at HRT of ∼4h three organic carbon sources, straw of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), bark mulch of pine tree (Pinus sp.) and a mixture of both materials, showed high reduction of continuously dosed NO3− (100mgL−1) with average denitrification rates of 23.4g-Nd−1m−3, 8.4g-Nd−1m−3 and 20.5g-Nd−1m−3, respectively. Under denitrifying conditions, fast and substantial retention of continuously dosed atrazine (20μgL−1) was observed with estimated dissipation times (DT50) between 0.12 and 0.49 days in the straw–bark mulch bioreactor. In parallel batch experiments, it could be confirmed that atrazine retention is based on adsorption to bark mulch and on degradation processes supplied by the organic materials as continual sources of carbon. In contrast, bentazone was not significantly reduced under the experimental conditions. While aging of materials was clearly observed in a reduction of denitrification by 60–70% during the experiment, systems still worked very well until the end of the experiment. The results indicate that the combined use of straw and bark mulch could increase the efficiency of mitigation systems, which are installed to improve the quality of drainage water before its release to surface waters. Further, the addition of these materials has the potential of parallel retention of NO3− and less mobile herbicides like atrazine, even during high flow events, as expected at the outlet of agricultural drainage systems. High removal is expected for mitigation system designed to remain saturated most of the time, whereas bioreactors that run periodically dry are not covered by this study. However, further experiments with the tested materials at technical or field scale under more realistic climate conditions need to be carried out.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642285427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857413000888</els_id><sourcerecordid>1492627015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5f13eba4d8697bc8822a00fd246309c81f03ebfa87a2ba26b01b15361fa21dc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P1DAMxSsEEsPAR0DkgsSlxXGbtjkhNOLPSitxgD1HbprsZOgkS5IuWj49GWbEdU-25N97tvyq6jWHhgPv3x8ao8Ni_G2DwNsGsAEOT6oNHweseynxabUBiaIexdA9r16kdACAAYXcVGkXvF5jND4z73KkbBj5mVFp_zhvWDS5zFzwzHk2uRAN6RxiYsGyVKDf__CJ4k92XBe9L0qW9iFmtn-YI62L08Ujudl4bVh2R5NeVs8sLcm8utRtdfP504_d1_r625er3cfrWncocy0sb81E3Tz2cpj0OCISgJ2x61uQeuQWytzSOBBOhP0EfOKi7bkl5LOW7bZ6d_a9i-HXalJWR5e0WRbyJqxJ8b5DHEWHw-NoJ7HHAYr_thJnVMeQUjRW3UV3pPigOKhTHuqgLnmoUx4KUJU8iu7tZQUlTYuN5LVL_8XlCI4wtoV7c-YsBUW3sTA334uRAEAuhTg5fTgTpjzv3pmoknan984uGp3VHNwjt_wFLDSt9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492627015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Krause Camilo, B. ; Matzinger, A. ; Litz, N. ; Tedesco, L.P. ; Wessolek, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krause Camilo, B. ; Matzinger, A. ; Litz, N. ; Tedesco, L.P. ; Wessolek, G.</creatorcontrib><description>The present laboratory study tests the hypothesis that straw–bark mulch bioreactors are capable of concurrently retaining nitrate (NO3−) and the herbicides atrazine or bentazone at short hydraulic residence times (HRT). In a 1 year column experiment at HRT of ∼4h three organic carbon sources, straw of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), bark mulch of pine tree (Pinus sp.) and a mixture of both materials, showed high reduction of continuously dosed NO3− (100mgL−1) with average denitrification rates of 23.4g-Nd−1m−3, 8.4g-Nd−1m−3 and 20.5g-Nd−1m−3, respectively. Under denitrifying conditions, fast and substantial retention of continuously dosed atrazine (20μgL−1) was observed with estimated dissipation times (DT50) between 0.12 and 0.49 days in the straw–bark mulch bioreactor. In parallel batch experiments, it could be confirmed that atrazine retention is based on adsorption to bark mulch and on degradation processes supplied by the organic materials as continual sources of carbon. In contrast, bentazone was not significantly reduced under the experimental conditions. While aging of materials was clearly observed in a reduction of denitrification by 60–70% during the experiment, systems still worked very well until the end of the experiment. The results indicate that the combined use of straw and bark mulch could increase the efficiency of mitigation systems, which are installed to improve the quality of drainage water before its release to surface waters. Further, the addition of these materials has the potential of parallel retention of NO3− and less mobile herbicides like atrazine, even during high flow events, as expected at the outlet of agricultural drainage systems. High removal is expected for mitigation system designed to remain saturated most of the time, whereas bioreactors that run periodically dry are not covered by this study. However, further experiments with the tested materials at technical or field scale under more realistic climate conditions need to be carried out.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>adsorption ; Atrazine ; Bark ; Bark mulch ; bark mulches ; bentazon ; Bentazone ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Carbon ; climate ; Denitrification ; drainage systems ; drainage water ; Fluid flow ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicide retention ; Hydraulics ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; nitrates ; Pinus ; Reduction ; Short hydraulic residence time ; Straw ; surface water ; Triticum aestivum ; Various methods and equipments ; wheat</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2013-06, Vol.55, p.101-113</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5f13eba4d8697bc8822a00fd246309c81f03ebfa87a2ba26b01b15361fa21dc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5f13eba4d8697bc8822a00fd246309c81f03ebfa87a2ba26b01b15361fa21dc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27312083$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krause Camilo, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzinger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litz, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedesco, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessolek, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>The present laboratory study tests the hypothesis that straw–bark mulch bioreactors are capable of concurrently retaining nitrate (NO3−) and the herbicides atrazine or bentazone at short hydraulic residence times (HRT). In a 1 year column experiment at HRT of ∼4h three organic carbon sources, straw of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), bark mulch of pine tree (Pinus sp.) and a mixture of both materials, showed high reduction of continuously dosed NO3− (100mgL−1) with average denitrification rates of 23.4g-Nd−1m−3, 8.4g-Nd−1m−3 and 20.5g-Nd−1m−3, respectively. Under denitrifying conditions, fast and substantial retention of continuously dosed atrazine (20μgL−1) was observed with estimated dissipation times (DT50) between 0.12 and 0.49 days in the straw–bark mulch bioreactor. In parallel batch experiments, it could be confirmed that atrazine retention is based on adsorption to bark mulch and on degradation processes supplied by the organic materials as continual sources of carbon. In contrast, bentazone was not significantly reduced under the experimental conditions. While aging of materials was clearly observed in a reduction of denitrification by 60–70% during the experiment, systems still worked very well until the end of the experiment. The results indicate that the combined use of straw and bark mulch could increase the efficiency of mitigation systems, which are installed to improve the quality of drainage water before its release to surface waters. Further, the addition of these materials has the potential of parallel retention of NO3− and less mobile herbicides like atrazine, even during high flow events, as expected at the outlet of agricultural drainage systems. High removal is expected for mitigation system designed to remain saturated most of the time, whereas bioreactors that run periodically dry are not covered by this study. However, further experiments with the tested materials at technical or field scale under more realistic climate conditions need to be carried out.</description><subject>adsorption</subject><subject>Atrazine</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Bark mulch</subject><subject>bark mulches</subject><subject>bentazon</subject><subject>Bentazone</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>drainage systems</subject><subject>drainage water</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicide retention</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>nitrates</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Short hydraulic residence time</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>surface water</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><subject>wheat</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU-P1DAMxSsEEsPAR0DkgsSlxXGbtjkhNOLPSitxgD1HbprsZOgkS5IuWj49GWbEdU-25N97tvyq6jWHhgPv3x8ao8Ni_G2DwNsGsAEOT6oNHweseynxabUBiaIexdA9r16kdACAAYXcVGkXvF5jND4z73KkbBj5mVFp_zhvWDS5zFzwzHk2uRAN6RxiYsGyVKDf__CJ4k92XBe9L0qW9iFmtn-YI62L08Ujudl4bVh2R5NeVs8sLcm8utRtdfP504_d1_r625er3cfrWncocy0sb81E3Tz2cpj0OCISgJ2x61uQeuQWytzSOBBOhP0EfOKi7bkl5LOW7bZ6d_a9i-HXalJWR5e0WRbyJqxJ8b5DHEWHw-NoJ7HHAYr_thJnVMeQUjRW3UV3pPigOKhTHuqgLnmoUx4KUJU8iu7tZQUlTYuN5LVL_8XlCI4wtoV7c-YsBUW3sTA334uRAEAuhTg5fTgTpjzv3pmoknan984uGp3VHNwjt_wFLDSt9A</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Krause Camilo, B.</creator><creator>Matzinger, A.</creator><creator>Litz, N.</creator><creator>Tedesco, L.P.</creator><creator>Wessolek, G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times</title><author>Krause Camilo, B. ; Matzinger, A. ; Litz, N. ; Tedesco, L.P. ; Wessolek, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5f13eba4d8697bc8822a00fd246309c81f03ebfa87a2ba26b01b15361fa21dc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adsorption</topic><topic>Atrazine</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Bark mulch</topic><topic>bark mulches</topic><topic>bentazon</topic><topic>Bentazone</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>drainage systems</topic><topic>drainage water</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicide retention</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>nitrates</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Short hydraulic residence time</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>surface water</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><topic>wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krause Camilo, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzinger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litz, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedesco, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessolek, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krause Camilo, B.</au><au>Matzinger, A.</au><au>Litz, N.</au><au>Tedesco, L.P.</au><au>Wessolek, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>55</volume><spage>101</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>101-113</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>The present laboratory study tests the hypothesis that straw–bark mulch bioreactors are capable of concurrently retaining nitrate (NO3−) and the herbicides atrazine or bentazone at short hydraulic residence times (HRT). In a 1 year column experiment at HRT of ∼4h three organic carbon sources, straw of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), bark mulch of pine tree (Pinus sp.) and a mixture of both materials, showed high reduction of continuously dosed NO3− (100mgL−1) with average denitrification rates of 23.4g-Nd−1m−3, 8.4g-Nd−1m−3 and 20.5g-Nd−1m−3, respectively. Under denitrifying conditions, fast and substantial retention of continuously dosed atrazine (20μgL−1) was observed with estimated dissipation times (DT50) between 0.12 and 0.49 days in the straw–bark mulch bioreactor. In parallel batch experiments, it could be confirmed that atrazine retention is based on adsorption to bark mulch and on degradation processes supplied by the organic materials as continual sources of carbon. In contrast, bentazone was not significantly reduced under the experimental conditions. While aging of materials was clearly observed in a reduction of denitrification by 60–70% during the experiment, systems still worked very well until the end of the experiment. The results indicate that the combined use of straw and bark mulch could increase the efficiency of mitigation systems, which are installed to improve the quality of drainage water before its release to surface waters. Further, the addition of these materials has the potential of parallel retention of NO3− and less mobile herbicides like atrazine, even during high flow events, as expected at the outlet of agricultural drainage systems. High removal is expected for mitigation system designed to remain saturated most of the time, whereas bioreactors that run periodically dry are not covered by this study. However, further experiments with the tested materials at technical or field scale under more realistic climate conditions need to be carried out.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.010</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2013-06, Vol.55, p.101-113
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642285427
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects adsorption
Atrazine
Bark
Bark mulch
bark mulches
bentazon
Bentazone
Biological and medical sciences
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
Carbon
climate
Denitrification
drainage systems
drainage water
Fluid flow
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicide retention
Hydraulics
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
nitrates
Pinus
Reduction
Short hydraulic residence time
Straw
surface water
Triticum aestivum
Various methods and equipments
wheat
title Concurrent nitrate and atrazine retention in bioreactors of straw and bark mulch at short hydraulic residence times
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T04%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concurrent%20nitrate%20and%20atrazine%20retention%20in%20bioreactors%20of%20straw%20and%20bark%20mulch%20at%20short%20hydraulic%20residence%20times&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Krause%20Camilo,%20B.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=101-113&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492627015%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492627015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857413000888&rfr_iscdi=true