Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management

We investigated two adjacent wetlands in the Lake Pontchartrain basin, one of which receives periodic input of Mississippi River water and one which does not, to gain insight into how isolation from river input impacts wetland loss in the Mississippi delta. The LaBranche (LB) wetlands bordering Lake...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological engineering 2012-09, Vol.46, p.57-67
Hauptverfasser: Day, John, Hunter, Rachael, Keim, Richard F., DeLaune, Ronald, Shaffer, Gary, Evers, Elaine, Reed, Denise, Brantley, Christopher, Kemp, Paul, Day, Jason, Hunter, Montgomery
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue
container_start_page 57
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 46
creator Day, John
Hunter, Rachael
Keim, Richard F.
DeLaune, Ronald
Shaffer, Gary
Evers, Elaine
Reed, Denise
Brantley, Christopher
Kemp, Paul
Day, Jason
Hunter, Montgomery
description We investigated two adjacent wetlands in the Lake Pontchartrain basin, one of which receives periodic input of Mississippi River water and one which does not, to gain insight into how isolation from river input impacts wetland loss in the Mississippi delta. The LaBranche (LB) wetlands bordering Lake Pontchartrain are severely degraded due to saltwater intrusion, subsidence, leveeing of the river, and hydrologic alterations including partial impoundment. Directly adjacent is the Bonnet Carré (BC) spillway, a geomorphically similar area that contains healthy baldcypress swamp. The spillway carries river water to the lake during high discharge years and has been opened eleven times in 80 years, with flows as high as 9000m3s−1. The primary hydrologic difference between the two areas is the regular input of River water to the BC wetlands while the LB wetlands are isolated from the river. The interior of the LB wetlands is also isolated from sediment originating from Lake Pontchartrain. Long-term accretion, tree growth, and elevation were measured in these two wetland areas to determine impacts of riverine input. 137Cs accretion rates in the BC wetlands were 2.6–2.7cmyr−1, compared to 0.43 and 1.4cmyr−1, respectively, in the LB wetlands in areas without and with sediment input from Lake Pontchartrain. Baldypress growth in the BC averaged about 2.3mmringwidthyr−1, compared to 1.4mmyr−1 in LB. Trees are of relatively the same age due to lack of recruitment and widespread logging. Tree height, an indicator of site quality, is about 20% less at the LB sites compared to BC, even though the trees are approximately the same ages. The average wetland elevation in the BC wetlands was about one meter with some areas higher than two meters, and was significantly higher than elevations in the LB (average sea level and 0.3m, respectively, in areas with and without input from Lake Pontchartrain).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642285036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857412001644</els_id><sourcerecordid>1492625894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b8aba5ff049e1369fd20051cf0de76d61bc569d40c50ee58227baca3ef593c693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpods0P6FUx17sjmRLtnopJaRtYEuhSc5CK49cLbblStqE5NdH2809MDAj-N4bRo-QDwxqBkx-3tdow4TLWHNgvIa2hqZ7RTas73glleKvyQYUF1UvuvYteZfSHgA6LtSGPF4WaRi9NRONmNawJKTBURfKK-NA7zFPZhkSvff5Ly3T_yEcMt2aOGJ1XZRIf_mUjrWunv7xdxipX9ZD_kKv5nUq5tkX46Mpnc1iRpxxye_JG2emhOfP_Yzcfr-8ufhZbX__uLr4tq1so1Sudr3ZGeEctApZI5UbOIBg1sGAnRwk21kh1dCCFYAoes67nbGmQSdUY6Vqzsink-8aw79DuUrPPlmcylkYDkkz2XLeC2jky2iruOSiV21BxQm1MaQU0ek1-tnEB81AH2PRe_0ciz7GoqHVJZai-3jSORO0GaNP-va6AAKAM8UVK8TXE4HlU-48Rp2sx8Xi4CParIfgX9jxBIX6pIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492625894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Day, John ; Hunter, Rachael ; Keim, Richard F. ; DeLaune, Ronald ; Shaffer, Gary ; Evers, Elaine ; Reed, Denise ; Brantley, Christopher ; Kemp, Paul ; Day, Jason ; Hunter, Montgomery</creator><creatorcontrib>Day, John ; Hunter, Rachael ; Keim, Richard F. ; DeLaune, Ronald ; Shaffer, Gary ; Evers, Elaine ; Reed, Denise ; Brantley, Christopher ; Kemp, Paul ; Day, Jason ; Hunter, Montgomery</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated two adjacent wetlands in the Lake Pontchartrain basin, one of which receives periodic input of Mississippi River water and one which does not, to gain insight into how isolation from river input impacts wetland loss in the Mississippi delta. The LaBranche (LB) wetlands bordering Lake Pontchartrain are severely degraded due to saltwater intrusion, subsidence, leveeing of the river, and hydrologic alterations including partial impoundment. Directly adjacent is the Bonnet Carré (BC) spillway, a geomorphically similar area that contains healthy baldcypress swamp. The spillway carries river water to the lake during high discharge years and has been opened eleven times in 80 years, with flows as high as 9000m3s−1. The primary hydrologic difference between the two areas is the regular input of River water to the BC wetlands while the LB wetlands are isolated from the river. The interior of the LB wetlands is also isolated from sediment originating from Lake Pontchartrain. Long-term accretion, tree growth, and elevation were measured in these two wetland areas to determine impacts of riverine input. 137Cs accretion rates in the BC wetlands were 2.6–2.7cmyr−1, compared to 0.43 and 1.4cmyr−1, respectively, in the LB wetlands in areas without and with sediment input from Lake Pontchartrain. Baldypress growth in the BC averaged about 2.3mmringwidthyr−1, compared to 1.4mmyr−1 in LB. Trees are of relatively the same age due to lack of recruitment and widespread logging. Tree height, an indicator of site quality, is about 20% less at the LB sites compared to BC, even though the trees are approximately the same ages. The average wetland elevation in the BC wetlands was about one meter with some areas higher than two meters, and was significantly higher than elevations in the LB (average sea level and 0.3m, respectively, in areas with and without input from Lake Pontchartrain).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Baldcypress ; basins ; Bonnet Carré spillway ; Coastal wetlands ; Ecology ; Elevation ; Forested wetland ; Freshwater ; Hydrology ; Lakes ; logging ; Louisiana ; lowland forests ; Marine ; Meters ; river deltas ; River diversion ; river water ; Rivers ; saltwater intrusion ; sea level ; Sediment accretion ; sediments ; subsidence ; Swamp ; swamps ; tree growth ; Trees ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2012-09, Vol.46, p.57-67</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b8aba5ff049e1369fd20051cf0de76d61bc569d40c50ee58227baca3ef593c693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b8aba5ff049e1369fd20051cf0de76d61bc569d40c50ee58227baca3ef593c693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857412001644$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Day, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLaune, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brantley, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Montgomery</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>We investigated two adjacent wetlands in the Lake Pontchartrain basin, one of which receives periodic input of Mississippi River water and one which does not, to gain insight into how isolation from river input impacts wetland loss in the Mississippi delta. The LaBranche (LB) wetlands bordering Lake Pontchartrain are severely degraded due to saltwater intrusion, subsidence, leveeing of the river, and hydrologic alterations including partial impoundment. Directly adjacent is the Bonnet Carré (BC) spillway, a geomorphically similar area that contains healthy baldcypress swamp. The spillway carries river water to the lake during high discharge years and has been opened eleven times in 80 years, with flows as high as 9000m3s−1. The primary hydrologic difference between the two areas is the regular input of River water to the BC wetlands while the LB wetlands are isolated from the river. The interior of the LB wetlands is also isolated from sediment originating from Lake Pontchartrain. Long-term accretion, tree growth, and elevation were measured in these two wetland areas to determine impacts of riverine input. 137Cs accretion rates in the BC wetlands were 2.6–2.7cmyr−1, compared to 0.43 and 1.4cmyr−1, respectively, in the LB wetlands in areas without and with sediment input from Lake Pontchartrain. Baldypress growth in the BC averaged about 2.3mmringwidthyr−1, compared to 1.4mmyr−1 in LB. Trees are of relatively the same age due to lack of recruitment and widespread logging. Tree height, an indicator of site quality, is about 20% less at the LB sites compared to BC, even though the trees are approximately the same ages. The average wetland elevation in the BC wetlands was about one meter with some areas higher than two meters, and was significantly higher than elevations in the LB (average sea level and 0.3m, respectively, in areas with and without input from Lake Pontchartrain).</description><subject>Baldcypress</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Bonnet Carré spillway</subject><subject>Coastal wetlands</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Forested wetland</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>lowland forests</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meters</subject><subject>river deltas</subject><subject>River diversion</subject><subject>river water</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>saltwater intrusion</subject><subject>sea level</subject><subject>Sediment accretion</subject><subject>sediments</subject><subject>subsidence</subject><subject>Swamp</subject><subject>swamps</subject><subject>tree growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpods0P6FUx17sjmRLtnopJaRtYEuhSc5CK49cLbblStqE5NdH2809MDAj-N4bRo-QDwxqBkx-3tdow4TLWHNgvIa2hqZ7RTas73glleKvyQYUF1UvuvYteZfSHgA6LtSGPF4WaRi9NRONmNawJKTBURfKK-NA7zFPZhkSvff5Ly3T_yEcMt2aOGJ1XZRIf_mUjrWunv7xdxipX9ZD_kKv5nUq5tkX46Mpnc1iRpxxye_JG2emhOfP_Yzcfr-8ufhZbX__uLr4tq1so1Sudr3ZGeEctApZI5UbOIBg1sGAnRwk21kh1dCCFYAoes67nbGmQSdUY6Vqzsink-8aw79DuUrPPlmcylkYDkkz2XLeC2jky2iruOSiV21BxQm1MaQU0ek1-tnEB81AH2PRe_0ciz7GoqHVJZai-3jSORO0GaNP-va6AAKAM8UVK8TXE4HlU-48Rp2sx8Xi4CParIfgX9jxBIX6pIQ</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Day, John</creator><creator>Hunter, Rachael</creator><creator>Keim, Richard F.</creator><creator>DeLaune, Ronald</creator><creator>Shaffer, Gary</creator><creator>Evers, Elaine</creator><creator>Reed, Denise</creator><creator>Brantley, Christopher</creator><creator>Kemp, Paul</creator><creator>Day, Jason</creator><creator>Hunter, Montgomery</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management</title><author>Day, John ; Hunter, Rachael ; Keim, Richard F. ; DeLaune, Ronald ; Shaffer, Gary ; Evers, Elaine ; Reed, Denise ; Brantley, Christopher ; Kemp, Paul ; Day, Jason ; Hunter, Montgomery</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b8aba5ff049e1369fd20051cf0de76d61bc569d40c50ee58227baca3ef593c693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Baldcypress</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Bonnet Carré spillway</topic><topic>Coastal wetlands</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Forested wetland</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>lowland forests</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meters</topic><topic>river deltas</topic><topic>River diversion</topic><topic>river water</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>saltwater intrusion</topic><topic>sea level</topic><topic>Sediment accretion</topic><topic>sediments</topic><topic>subsidence</topic><topic>Swamp</topic><topic>swamps</topic><topic>tree growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Day, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLaune, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brantley, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Montgomery</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Day, John</au><au>Hunter, Rachael</au><au>Keim, Richard F.</au><au>DeLaune, Ronald</au><au>Shaffer, Gary</au><au>Evers, Elaine</au><au>Reed, Denise</au><au>Brantley, Christopher</au><au>Kemp, Paul</au><au>Day, Jason</au><au>Hunter, Montgomery</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>57-67</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>We investigated two adjacent wetlands in the Lake Pontchartrain basin, one of which receives periodic input of Mississippi River water and one which does not, to gain insight into how isolation from river input impacts wetland loss in the Mississippi delta. The LaBranche (LB) wetlands bordering Lake Pontchartrain are severely degraded due to saltwater intrusion, subsidence, leveeing of the river, and hydrologic alterations including partial impoundment. Directly adjacent is the Bonnet Carré (BC) spillway, a geomorphically similar area that contains healthy baldcypress swamp. The spillway carries river water to the lake during high discharge years and has been opened eleven times in 80 years, with flows as high as 9000m3s−1. The primary hydrologic difference between the two areas is the regular input of River water to the BC wetlands while the LB wetlands are isolated from the river. The interior of the LB wetlands is also isolated from sediment originating from Lake Pontchartrain. Long-term accretion, tree growth, and elevation were measured in these two wetland areas to determine impacts of riverine input. 137Cs accretion rates in the BC wetlands were 2.6–2.7cmyr−1, compared to 0.43 and 1.4cmyr−1, respectively, in the LB wetlands in areas without and with sediment input from Lake Pontchartrain. Baldypress growth in the BC averaged about 2.3mmringwidthyr−1, compared to 1.4mmyr−1 in LB. Trees are of relatively the same age due to lack of recruitment and widespread logging. Tree height, an indicator of site quality, is about 20% less at the LB sites compared to BC, even though the trees are approximately the same ages. The average wetland elevation in the BC wetlands was about one meter with some areas higher than two meters, and was significantly higher than elevations in the LB (average sea level and 0.3m, respectively, in areas with and without input from Lake Pontchartrain).</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.037</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2012-09, Vol.46, p.57-67
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642285036
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Baldcypress
basins
Bonnet Carré spillway
Coastal wetlands
Ecology
Elevation
Forested wetland
Freshwater
Hydrology
Lakes
logging
Louisiana
lowland forests
Marine
Meters
river deltas
River diversion
river water
Rivers
saltwater intrusion
sea level
Sediment accretion
sediments
subsidence
Swamp
swamps
tree growth
Trees
Wetlands
title Ecological response of forested wetlands with and without Large-Scale Mississippi River input: Implications for management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20response%20of%20forested%20wetlands%20with%20and%20without%20Large-Scale%20Mississippi%20River%20input:%20Implications%20for%20management&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Day,%20John&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=57-67&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492625894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492625894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857412001644&rfr_iscdi=true