Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation

The geometry, kinematics, and mode of back‐arc extension along the Andaman Sea plate boundary are refined using a new set of significantly improved hypocenters, global centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions, and high‐resolution bathymetry. By applying cross‐correlation and double‐difference (DD) alg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2206-2224
Hauptverfasser: Diehl, T., Waldhauser, F., Cochran, J. R., Kamesh Raju, K. A., Seeber, L., Schaff, D., Engdahl, E. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2224
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2206
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 118
creator Diehl, T.
Waldhauser, F.
Cochran, J. R.
Kamesh Raju, K. A.
Seeber, L.
Schaff, D.
Engdahl, E. R.
description The geometry, kinematics, and mode of back‐arc extension along the Andaman Sea plate boundary are refined using a new set of significantly improved hypocenters, global centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions, and high‐resolution bathymetry. By applying cross‐correlation and double‐difference (DD) algorithms to regional and teleseismic waveforms and arrival times from International Seismological Centre and National Earthquake Information Center bulletins (1964–2009), we resolve the fine‐scale structure and spatiotemporal behavior of active faults in the Andaman Sea. The new data reveal that back‐arc extension is primarily accommodated at the Andaman Back‐Arc Spreading Center (ABSC) at ~10°, which hosted three major earthquake swarms in 1984, 2006, and 2009. Short‐term spreading rates estimated from extensional moment tensors account for less than 10% of the long‐term 3.0–3.8 cm/yr spreading rate, indicating that spreading by intrusion and the formation of new crust make up for the difference. A spatiotemporal analysis of the swarms and Coulomb‐stress modeling show that dike intrusions are the primary driver for brittle failure in the ABSC. While spreading direction is close to ridge normal, it is oblique to the adjacent transforms. The resulting component of E‐W extension across the transforms is expressed by deep basins on either side of the rift and a change to extensional faulting along the West Andaman fault system after the Mw = 9.2 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake of 2004. A possible skew in slip vectors of earthquakes in the eastern part of the ABSC indicates an en‐echelon arrangement of extensional structures, suggesting that the present segment geometry is not in equilibrium with current plate‐motion demands, and thus the ridge experiences ongoing re‐adjustment. Key Points Deficit in seismic strain‐rate indicates intrusions at back‐arc spreading ridgeDike intrusions seen as the primary driver for earthquake swarms along the ridgeSkew in slip vectors suggests ongoing re‐adjustment of the spreading ridge
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgrb.50192
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642278562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3547623031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4972-3830c5109b8debd09295999588d4f36b42f142263e733735874eb5441de2c6903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXphiewxAYhpfg_Mbv-0CloRKVSxNJynJsZzyT21E5E5zn6wnVn2i5Y9G58ffWdo2ufovhI8DHBmH5dLWJzLDBR9E1xQIlUpWJCvn3pCXtfHKW0wrnqPCL8oLg_NXZdmmgR3I3gkwseOY_GJaAT35rBePQbzDd0A3YM3llkfIsGsxjMmC-bGCykBAm5PIMWNVu0dItluYlg3c5shB4SuDRkvA1T00PZuq6DCN4CAhPH5e1k1oAi9MFm1-A_FO860yc4ejoPiz8X32_OLsv51ezH2cm8NFxVtGQ1w1YQrJq6habFiiqhlBJ13fKOyYbTjnBKJYOKsYqJuuLQCM5JC9RKhdlh8Xnvm59xO0Ea9eCShb43HsKUNJFZXtVC0ox--g9dhSn6vN2OklzWlGXqy56yMaQUodObmD8mbjXB-jEi_RiR3kWUYbKH_7ketq-Q-ufs-vRZU-41Lo1w96Ixca1lxSqh__6a6fPrOb4UM6kv2APm8KLT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642646823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Diehl, T. ; Waldhauser, F. ; Cochran, J. R. ; Kamesh Raju, K. A. ; Seeber, L. ; Schaff, D. ; Engdahl, E. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diehl, T. ; Waldhauser, F. ; Cochran, J. R. ; Kamesh Raju, K. A. ; Seeber, L. ; Schaff, D. ; Engdahl, E. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The geometry, kinematics, and mode of back‐arc extension along the Andaman Sea plate boundary are refined using a new set of significantly improved hypocenters, global centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions, and high‐resolution bathymetry. By applying cross‐correlation and double‐difference (DD) algorithms to regional and teleseismic waveforms and arrival times from International Seismological Centre and National Earthquake Information Center bulletins (1964–2009), we resolve the fine‐scale structure and spatiotemporal behavior of active faults in the Andaman Sea. The new data reveal that back‐arc extension is primarily accommodated at the Andaman Back‐Arc Spreading Center (ABSC) at ~10°, which hosted three major earthquake swarms in 1984, 2006, and 2009. Short‐term spreading rates estimated from extensional moment tensors account for less than 10% of the long‐term 3.0–3.8 cm/yr spreading rate, indicating that spreading by intrusion and the formation of new crust make up for the difference. A spatiotemporal analysis of the swarms and Coulomb‐stress modeling show that dike intrusions are the primary driver for brittle failure in the ABSC. While spreading direction is close to ridge normal, it is oblique to the adjacent transforms. The resulting component of E‐W extension across the transforms is expressed by deep basins on either side of the rift and a change to extensional faulting along the West Andaman fault system after the Mw = 9.2 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake of 2004. A possible skew in slip vectors of earthquakes in the eastern part of the ABSC indicates an en‐echelon arrangement of extensional structures, suggesting that the present segment geometry is not in equilibrium with current plate‐motion demands, and thus the ridge experiences ongoing re‐adjustment. Key Points Deficit in seismic strain‐rate indicates intrusions at back‐arc spreading ridgeDike intrusions seen as the primary driver for earthquake swarms along the ridgeSkew in slip vectors suggests ongoing re‐adjustment of the spreading ridge</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Andaman Sea ; back-arc extension ; Bathymetry ; earthquake relocation ; earthquake swarms ; Earthquakes ; Geophysics ; Information dissemination ; Intrusion ; Magma ; Mathematical analysis ; Plate tectonics ; Relocation ; Ridges ; Seismic activity ; Seismic phenomena ; Seismology ; Slip ; Spreading ; Tensors</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2206-2224</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4972-3830c5109b8debd09295999588d4f36b42f142263e733735874eb5441de2c6903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4972-3830c5109b8debd09295999588d4f36b42f142263e733735874eb5441de2c6903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgrb.50192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgrb.50192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diehl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldhauser, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamesh Raju, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaff, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engdahl, E. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>The geometry, kinematics, and mode of back‐arc extension along the Andaman Sea plate boundary are refined using a new set of significantly improved hypocenters, global centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions, and high‐resolution bathymetry. By applying cross‐correlation and double‐difference (DD) algorithms to regional and teleseismic waveforms and arrival times from International Seismological Centre and National Earthquake Information Center bulletins (1964–2009), we resolve the fine‐scale structure and spatiotemporal behavior of active faults in the Andaman Sea. The new data reveal that back‐arc extension is primarily accommodated at the Andaman Back‐Arc Spreading Center (ABSC) at ~10°, which hosted three major earthquake swarms in 1984, 2006, and 2009. Short‐term spreading rates estimated from extensional moment tensors account for less than 10% of the long‐term 3.0–3.8 cm/yr spreading rate, indicating that spreading by intrusion and the formation of new crust make up for the difference. A spatiotemporal analysis of the swarms and Coulomb‐stress modeling show that dike intrusions are the primary driver for brittle failure in the ABSC. While spreading direction is close to ridge normal, it is oblique to the adjacent transforms. The resulting component of E‐W extension across the transforms is expressed by deep basins on either side of the rift and a change to extensional faulting along the West Andaman fault system after the Mw = 9.2 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake of 2004. A possible skew in slip vectors of earthquakes in the eastern part of the ABSC indicates an en‐echelon arrangement of extensional structures, suggesting that the present segment geometry is not in equilibrium with current plate‐motion demands, and thus the ridge experiences ongoing re‐adjustment. Key Points Deficit in seismic strain‐rate indicates intrusions at back‐arc spreading ridgeDike intrusions seen as the primary driver for earthquake swarms along the ridgeSkew in slip vectors suggests ongoing re‐adjustment of the spreading ridge</description><subject>Andaman Sea</subject><subject>back-arc extension</subject><subject>Bathymetry</subject><subject>earthquake relocation</subject><subject>earthquake swarms</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Ridges</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Spreading</subject><subject>Tensors</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXphiewxAYhpfg_Mbv-0CloRKVSxNJynJsZzyT21E5E5zn6wnVn2i5Y9G58ffWdo2ufovhI8DHBmH5dLWJzLDBR9E1xQIlUpWJCvn3pCXtfHKW0wrnqPCL8oLg_NXZdmmgR3I3gkwseOY_GJaAT35rBePQbzDd0A3YM3llkfIsGsxjMmC-bGCykBAm5PIMWNVu0dItluYlg3c5shB4SuDRkvA1T00PZuq6DCN4CAhPH5e1k1oAi9MFm1-A_FO860yc4ejoPiz8X32_OLsv51ezH2cm8NFxVtGQ1w1YQrJq6habFiiqhlBJ13fKOyYbTjnBKJYOKsYqJuuLQCM5JC9RKhdlh8Xnvm59xO0Ea9eCShb43HsKUNJFZXtVC0ox--g9dhSn6vN2OklzWlGXqy56yMaQUodObmD8mbjXB-jEi_RiR3kWUYbKH_7ketq-Q-ufs-vRZU-41Lo1w96Ixca1lxSqh__6a6fPrOb4UM6kv2APm8KLT</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Diehl, T.</creator><creator>Waldhauser, F.</creator><creator>Cochran, J. R.</creator><creator>Kamesh Raju, K. A.</creator><creator>Seeber, L.</creator><creator>Schaff, D.</creator><creator>Engdahl, E. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation</title><author>Diehl, T. ; Waldhauser, F. ; Cochran, J. R. ; Kamesh Raju, K. A. ; Seeber, L. ; Schaff, D. ; Engdahl, E. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4972-3830c5109b8debd09295999588d4f36b42f142263e733735874eb5441de2c6903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Andaman Sea</topic><topic>back-arc extension</topic><topic>Bathymetry</topic><topic>earthquake relocation</topic><topic>earthquake swarms</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Ridges</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Spreading</topic><topic>Tensors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diehl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldhauser, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamesh Raju, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaff, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engdahl, E. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diehl, T.</au><au>Waldhauser, F.</au><au>Cochran, J. R.</au><au>Kamesh Raju, K. A.</au><au>Seeber, L.</au><au>Schaff, D.</au><au>Engdahl, E. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2206</spage><epage>2224</epage><pages>2206-2224</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>The geometry, kinematics, and mode of back‐arc extension along the Andaman Sea plate boundary are refined using a new set of significantly improved hypocenters, global centroid moment tensor (CMT) solutions, and high‐resolution bathymetry. By applying cross‐correlation and double‐difference (DD) algorithms to regional and teleseismic waveforms and arrival times from International Seismological Centre and National Earthquake Information Center bulletins (1964–2009), we resolve the fine‐scale structure and spatiotemporal behavior of active faults in the Andaman Sea. The new data reveal that back‐arc extension is primarily accommodated at the Andaman Back‐Arc Spreading Center (ABSC) at ~10°, which hosted three major earthquake swarms in 1984, 2006, and 2009. Short‐term spreading rates estimated from extensional moment tensors account for less than 10% of the long‐term 3.0–3.8 cm/yr spreading rate, indicating that spreading by intrusion and the formation of new crust make up for the difference. A spatiotemporal analysis of the swarms and Coulomb‐stress modeling show that dike intrusions are the primary driver for brittle failure in the ABSC. While spreading direction is close to ridge normal, it is oblique to the adjacent transforms. The resulting component of E‐W extension across the transforms is expressed by deep basins on either side of the rift and a change to extensional faulting along the West Andaman fault system after the Mw = 9.2 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake of 2004. A possible skew in slip vectors of earthquakes in the eastern part of the ABSC indicates an en‐echelon arrangement of extensional structures, suggesting that the present segment geometry is not in equilibrium with current plate‐motion demands, and thus the ridge experiences ongoing re‐adjustment. Key Points Deficit in seismic strain‐rate indicates intrusions at back‐arc spreading ridgeDike intrusions seen as the primary driver for earthquake swarms along the ridgeSkew in slip vectors suggests ongoing re‐adjustment of the spreading ridge</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jgrb.50192</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2206-2224
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642278562
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Andaman Sea
back-arc extension
Bathymetry
earthquake relocation
earthquake swarms
Earthquakes
Geophysics
Information dissemination
Intrusion
Magma
Mathematical analysis
Plate tectonics
Relocation
Ridges
Seismic activity
Seismic phenomena
Seismology
Slip
Spreading
Tensors
title Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back-arc%20extension%20in%20the%20Andaman%20Sea:%20Tectonic%20and%20magmatic%20processes%20imaged%20by%20high-precision%20teleseismic%20double-difference%20earthquake%20relocation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Diehl,%20T.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2206&rft.epage=2224&rft.pages=2206-2224&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgrb.50192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3547623031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642646823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true