Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging
The sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has become a standard of care for patients with breast cancer and melanoma, yet its clinical application to other cancer types has been somewhat limited. This is mainly due to the reduced accuracy of conventional SLN mapping techniques (using blue dye and/or rad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biotechnology advances 2014-03, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 279 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Biotechnology advances |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Cousins, Aidan Thompson, Sarah K. Wedding, A. Bruce Thierry, Benjamin |
description | The sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has become a standard of care for patients with breast cancer and melanoma, yet its clinical application to other cancer types has been somewhat limited. This is mainly due to the reduced accuracy of conventional SLN mapping techniques (using blue dye and/or radiocolloids as lymphatic tracers) in cancer types where lymphatic drainage is more complex, and SLNs are within close proximity to other nodes or the tumour site. In recent years, many novel techniques for SLN mapping have been developed including fluorescence, x-ray, and magnetic resonant detection. Whilst each technique has its own advantages/disadvantages, the role of targeted contrast agents (for enhanced retention in the SLN, or for immunostaging) is increasing, and may represent the new standard for mapping the SLN in many solid organ tumours. This review article discusses current limitations of conventional techniques, limiting factors of nanoparticulate based contrast agents, and efforts to circumvent these limitations with modern tracer architecture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642265653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0734975013001882</els_id><sourcerecordid>1627952771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2baf3461bf5466b36b5aba9813864bd19278318368faab6e03b9f2b01c3cdb5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2PEyEYgInRuHX1LxguJl6m8jEwzFGb1TXZxIueCTAvXRoKFaZN9t8vY6t7XE8kL8_7-SCEKVlTQuWn3dqGPIO7N9NpzQjlLbwmlL5AK6oG3lE1ji_Rigy878ZBkCv0ptYdIVQQwV-jK9Y3goxihdwmhhScibhAhJNJDnD2OOUTRBz2ZhvSFi-dUo55G6BinwuukOaQGhEf9of7Rk-Aw7QEfas1h5ywSROu85_8t-iVN7HCu8t7jX59vfm5ue3ufnz7vvl817l-IHPHrPG8l9R60UtpubTCWDMqypXs7URHNihOFZfKG2MlEG5HzyyhjrvJCs-v0cdz3UPJv49QZ70P1UGMJkE-Vk1lz5gUUvD_QNkwCjYM9HlUUMX6toFqqDqjruRaC3h9KO2G5UFTohdxeqefxOlF3PLTxLXU95cuR7uH6V_iX1MN-HABTG26fGmqQn3iFCei7de4L2cO2qVPAYquLkDTOoUCbtZTDs9P8wh55bv7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518244708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cousins, Aidan ; Thompson, Sarah K. ; Wedding, A. Bruce ; Thierry, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Aidan ; Thompson, Sarah K. ; Wedding, A. Bruce ; Thierry, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>The sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has become a standard of care for patients with breast cancer and melanoma, yet its clinical application to other cancer types has been somewhat limited. This is mainly due to the reduced accuracy of conventional SLN mapping techniques (using blue dye and/or radiocolloids as lymphatic tracers) in cancer types where lymphatic drainage is more complex, and SLNs are within close proximity to other nodes or the tumour site. In recent years, many novel techniques for SLN mapping have been developed including fluorescence, x-ray, and magnetic resonant detection. Whilst each technique has its own advantages/disadvantages, the role of targeted contrast agents (for enhanced retention in the SLN, or for immunostaging) is increasing, and may represent the new standard for mapping the SLN in many solid organ tumours. This review article discusses current limitations of conventional techniques, limiting factors of nanoparticulate based contrast agents, and efforts to circumvent these limitations with modern tracer architecture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-9750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24189095</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIADDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cancer ; Cancer diagnostic ; Contrast agents ; Contrast Media ; Diagnostic Imaging - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lymph ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Mapping ; Metastasis ; Mice ; Molecular Imaging - methods ; MRI ; Nanomedicine - methods ; Nanostructure ; Nanotechnology ; Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology ; Nuclear medicine ; PET ; Prognostic ; Radioactive Tracers ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Swine ; Tracers ; Tumours</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology advances, 2014-03, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2baf3461bf5466b36b5aba9813864bd19278318368faab6e03b9f2b01c3cdb5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2baf3461bf5466b36b5aba9813864bd19278318368faab6e03b9f2b01c3cdb5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734975013001882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28305642$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24189095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wedding, A. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thierry, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging</title><title>Biotechnology advances</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Adv</addtitle><description>The sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has become a standard of care for patients with breast cancer and melanoma, yet its clinical application to other cancer types has been somewhat limited. This is mainly due to the reduced accuracy of conventional SLN mapping techniques (using blue dye and/or radiocolloids as lymphatic tracers) in cancer types where lymphatic drainage is more complex, and SLNs are within close proximity to other nodes or the tumour site. In recent years, many novel techniques for SLN mapping have been developed including fluorescence, x-ray, and magnetic resonant detection. Whilst each technique has its own advantages/disadvantages, the role of targeted contrast agents (for enhanced retention in the SLN, or for immunostaging) is increasing, and may represent the new standard for mapping the SLN in many solid organ tumours. This review article discusses current limitations of conventional techniques, limiting factors of nanoparticulate based contrast agents, and efforts to circumvent these limitations with modern tracer architecture.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer diagnostic</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lymph</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Molecular Imaging - methods</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Nanomedicine - methods</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Prognostic</subject><subject>Radioactive Tracers</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Tumours</subject><issn>0734-9750</issn><issn>1873-1899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2PEyEYgInRuHX1LxguJl6m8jEwzFGb1TXZxIueCTAvXRoKFaZN9t8vY6t7XE8kL8_7-SCEKVlTQuWn3dqGPIO7N9NpzQjlLbwmlL5AK6oG3lE1ji_Rigy878ZBkCv0ptYdIVQQwV-jK9Y3goxihdwmhhScibhAhJNJDnD2OOUTRBz2ZhvSFi-dUo55G6BinwuukOaQGhEf9of7Rk-Aw7QEfas1h5ywSROu85_8t-iVN7HCu8t7jX59vfm5ue3ufnz7vvl817l-IHPHrPG8l9R60UtpubTCWDMqypXs7URHNihOFZfKG2MlEG5HzyyhjrvJCs-v0cdz3UPJv49QZ70P1UGMJkE-Vk1lz5gUUvD_QNkwCjYM9HlUUMX6toFqqDqjruRaC3h9KO2G5UFTohdxeqefxOlF3PLTxLXU95cuR7uH6V_iX1MN-HABTG26fGmqQn3iFCei7de4L2cO2qVPAYquLkDTOoUCbtZTDs9P8wh55bv7</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Cousins, Aidan</creator><creator>Thompson, Sarah K.</creator><creator>Wedding, A. Bruce</creator><creator>Thierry, Benjamin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging</title><author>Cousins, Aidan ; Thompson, Sarah K. ; Wedding, A. Bruce ; Thierry, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-2baf3461bf5466b36b5aba9813864bd19278318368faab6e03b9f2b01c3cdb5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer diagnostic</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lymph</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Molecular Imaging - methods</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Nanomedicine - methods</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Prognostic</topic><topic>Radioactive Tracers</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Tumours</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wedding, A. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thierry, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cousins, Aidan</au><au>Thompson, Sarah K.</au><au>Wedding, A. Bruce</au><au>Thierry, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology advances</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Adv</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>269-279</pages><issn>0734-9750</issn><eissn>1873-1899</eissn><coden>BIADDD</coden><abstract>The sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has become a standard of care for patients with breast cancer and melanoma, yet its clinical application to other cancer types has been somewhat limited. This is mainly due to the reduced accuracy of conventional SLN mapping techniques (using blue dye and/or radiocolloids as lymphatic tracers) in cancer types where lymphatic drainage is more complex, and SLNs are within close proximity to other nodes or the tumour site. In recent years, many novel techniques for SLN mapping have been developed including fluorescence, x-ray, and magnetic resonant detection. Whilst each technique has its own advantages/disadvantages, the role of targeted contrast agents (for enhanced retention in the SLN, or for immunostaging) is increasing, and may represent the new standard for mapping the SLN in many solid organ tumours. This review article discusses current limitations of conventional techniques, limiting factors of nanoparticulate based contrast agents, and efforts to circumvent these limitations with modern tracer architecture.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24189095</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-9750 |
ispartof | Biotechnology advances, 2014-03, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279 |
issn | 0734-9750 1873-1899 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642265653 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Biotechnology Cancer Cancer diagnostic Contrast agents Contrast Media Diagnostic Imaging - methods Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Imaging Lymph Lymph Nodes - pathology Mapping Metastasis Mice Molecular Imaging - methods MRI Nanomedicine - methods Nanostructure Nanotechnology Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnosis Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology Nuclear medicine PET Prognostic Radioactive Tracers Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods Swine Tracers Tumours |
title | Clinical relevance of novel imaging technologies for sentinel lymph node identification and staging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20relevance%20of%20novel%20imaging%20technologies%20for%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20identification%20and%20staging&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20advances&rft.au=Cousins,%20Aidan&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=269-279&rft.issn=0734-9750&rft.eissn=1873-1899&rft.coden=BIADDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1627952771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518244708&rft_id=info:pmid/24189095&rft_els_id=S0734975013001882&rfr_iscdi=true |