Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals
Laboratory-made Al2O3 and spinel ceramics were investigated so as to enable ballistic tests with a variation of individual influences while keeping other factors constant. The study was aimed at answering the question about influences of different microstructures and of basic mechanical properties a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2014-03, Vol.597, p.422-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 430 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing |
container_volume | 597 |
creator | Krell, Andreas Strassburger, Elmar |
description | Laboratory-made Al2O3 and spinel ceramics were investigated so as to enable ballistic tests with a variation of individual influences while keeping other factors constant. The study was aimed at answering the question about influences of different microstructures and of basic mechanical properties and included also a systematic investigation of the effects of backing materials. Contradictive findings of the past are explained by the observation that the ballistic impact stability of ceramics and single crystals with different backings (steel, aluminum, glass) is governed by a strict hierarchy of few major influences: (1) Top priority is the mode of ceramic fragmentation governed by microstructural features and by the dynamic stiffness of the ceramic/backing target; these influences also affect the relative importance of dwell and penetration. (2a) On a lower rank, Young’s modulus of the ceramic is responsible for projectile damage during dwell but the importance of this influence depends on the priority of ceramic fragmentation. (2b) On penetration, the abrasive benefit of a high ceramic hardness depends on the size of the ceramic debris, i.e. on priority (1). In contrast, all average strength data are weakly correlated with the ballistic efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642263416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921509314000069</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642263416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-207758b4ca2502a11ec3a24e787b53ae90aec29b477ccf422d1058e5c4600cfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWKtfwFMugpeteWz2AV6k-IJCL_YcsrOzmrKPmtkK_fZmafHoaYaZ339CfozdSrGQQmYP20VH6BZKSL2QapqdsZkscp2kpc7O2UyUSiZGlPqSXRFthRAyFWbGNutQY-BDw33ftHvsAYkPPR-_kFeubT2NHnhAio2Ly4l0oRsCBwyu80Dc9TUn33-2yCEcItbSNbtoYsGbU52zzcvzx_ItWa1f35dPqwR0psdEiTw3RZWCU0YoJyWCdirFvMgrox2WwiGoskrzHKBJlaqlMAUaSDMhoKn1nN0f7-7C8L1HGm3nCbBtXY_DnqzMYijTqcwiqo4ohIEoYGN3wXcuHKwUdnJot3ZyaCeHVqppFkN3p_uOwLVNiAo8_SVVoTNVGBW5xyOH8bM_HoMl8JPL2geE0daD_--ZXydjh48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642263416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Krell, Andreas ; Strassburger, Elmar</creator><creatorcontrib>Krell, Andreas ; Strassburger, Elmar</creatorcontrib><description>Laboratory-made Al2O3 and spinel ceramics were investigated so as to enable ballistic tests with a variation of individual influences while keeping other factors constant. The study was aimed at answering the question about influences of different microstructures and of basic mechanical properties and included also a systematic investigation of the effects of backing materials. Contradictive findings of the past are explained by the observation that the ballistic impact stability of ceramics and single crystals with different backings (steel, aluminum, glass) is governed by a strict hierarchy of few major influences: (1) Top priority is the mode of ceramic fragmentation governed by microstructural features and by the dynamic stiffness of the ceramic/backing target; these influences also affect the relative importance of dwell and penetration. (2a) On a lower rank, Young’s modulus of the ceramic is responsible for projectile damage during dwell but the importance of this influence depends on the priority of ceramic fragmentation. (2b) On penetration, the abrasive benefit of a high ceramic hardness depends on the size of the ceramic debris, i.e. on priority (1). In contrast, all average strength data are weakly correlated with the ballistic efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-5093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4936</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Backing ; Ceramics ; Dwell ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure ; Fractures ; Fragmentation ; Hardness ; Mechanical characterization ; Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Microstructure ; Penetration ; Priorities ; Single crystals</subject><ispartof>Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2014-03, Vol.597, p.422-430</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-207758b4ca2502a11ec3a24e787b53ae90aec29b477ccf422d1058e5c4600cfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-207758b4ca2502a11ec3a24e787b53ae90aec29b477ccf422d1058e5c4600cfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28362852$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krell, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strassburger, Elmar</creatorcontrib><title>Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals</title><title>Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</title><description>Laboratory-made Al2O3 and spinel ceramics were investigated so as to enable ballistic tests with a variation of individual influences while keeping other factors constant. The study was aimed at answering the question about influences of different microstructures and of basic mechanical properties and included also a systematic investigation of the effects of backing materials. Contradictive findings of the past are explained by the observation that the ballistic impact stability of ceramics and single crystals with different backings (steel, aluminum, glass) is governed by a strict hierarchy of few major influences: (1) Top priority is the mode of ceramic fragmentation governed by microstructural features and by the dynamic stiffness of the ceramic/backing target; these influences also affect the relative importance of dwell and penetration. (2a) On a lower rank, Young’s modulus of the ceramic is responsible for projectile damage during dwell but the importance of this influence depends on the priority of ceramic fragmentation. (2b) On penetration, the abrasive benefit of a high ceramic hardness depends on the size of the ceramic debris, i.e. on priority (1). In contrast, all average strength data are weakly correlated with the ballistic efficiency.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Backing</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Dwell</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Mechanical characterization</subject><subject>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Single crystals</subject><issn>0921-5093</issn><issn>1873-4936</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWKtfwFMugpeteWz2AV6k-IJCL_YcsrOzmrKPmtkK_fZmafHoaYaZ339CfozdSrGQQmYP20VH6BZKSL2QapqdsZkscp2kpc7O2UyUSiZGlPqSXRFthRAyFWbGNutQY-BDw33ftHvsAYkPPR-_kFeubT2NHnhAio2Ly4l0oRsCBwyu80Dc9TUn33-2yCEcItbSNbtoYsGbU52zzcvzx_ItWa1f35dPqwR0psdEiTw3RZWCU0YoJyWCdirFvMgrox2WwiGoskrzHKBJlaqlMAUaSDMhoKn1nN0f7-7C8L1HGm3nCbBtXY_DnqzMYijTqcwiqo4ohIEoYGN3wXcuHKwUdnJot3ZyaCeHVqppFkN3p_uOwLVNiAo8_SVVoTNVGBW5xyOH8bM_HoMl8JPL2geE0daD_--ZXydjh48</recordid><startdate>20140312</startdate><enddate>20140312</enddate><creator>Krell, Andreas</creator><creator>Strassburger, Elmar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140312</creationdate><title>Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals</title><author>Krell, Andreas ; Strassburger, Elmar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-207758b4ca2502a11ec3a24e787b53ae90aec29b477ccf422d1058e5c4600cfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Backing</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Dwell</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Mechanical characterization</topic><topic>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Single crystals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krell, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strassburger, Elmar</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krell, Andreas</au><au>Strassburger, Elmar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals</atitle><jtitle>Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle><date>2014-03-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>597</volume><spage>422</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>422-430</pages><issn>0921-5093</issn><eissn>1873-4936</eissn><abstract>Laboratory-made Al2O3 and spinel ceramics were investigated so as to enable ballistic tests with a variation of individual influences while keeping other factors constant. The study was aimed at answering the question about influences of different microstructures and of basic mechanical properties and included also a systematic investigation of the effects of backing materials. Contradictive findings of the past are explained by the observation that the ballistic impact stability of ceramics and single crystals with different backings (steel, aluminum, glass) is governed by a strict hierarchy of few major influences: (1) Top priority is the mode of ceramic fragmentation governed by microstructural features and by the dynamic stiffness of the ceramic/backing target; these influences also affect the relative importance of dwell and penetration. (2a) On a lower rank, Young’s modulus of the ceramic is responsible for projectile damage during dwell but the importance of this influence depends on the priority of ceramic fragmentation. (2b) On penetration, the abrasive benefit of a high ceramic hardness depends on the size of the ceramic debris, i.e. on priority (1). In contrast, all average strength data are weakly correlated with the ballistic efficiency.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-5093 |
ispartof | Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2014-03, Vol.597, p.422-430 |
issn | 0921-5093 1873-4936 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642263416 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Applied sciences Backing Ceramics Dwell Exact sciences and technology Failure Fractures Fragmentation Hardness Mechanical characterization Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology Metals. Metallurgy Microstructure Penetration Priorities Single crystals |
title | Order of influences on the ballistic resistance of armor ceramics and single crystals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A32%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20of%20influences%20on%20the%20ballistic%20resistance%20of%20armor%20ceramics%20and%20single%20crystals&rft.jtitle=Materials%20science%20&%20engineering.%20A,%20Structural%20materials%20:%20properties,%20microstructure%20and%20processing&rft.au=Krell,%20Andreas&rft.date=2014-03-12&rft.volume=597&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=422-430&rft.issn=0921-5093&rft.eissn=1873-4936&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642263416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642263416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921509314000069&rfr_iscdi=true |