Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review
•Negative effects of urbanization process on wildlife are well known.•We reviewed scientific articles looking for positive effects of roads and railways on birds.•Roads can provide foraging or scavenging habitat and warm surface for many bird species.•Bridges, powerlines, signboards, etc. can provid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment Transport and environment, 2014-07, Vol.30, p.21-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Morelli, Federico Beim, Michał Jerzak, Leszek Jones, Darryl Tryjanowski, Piotr |
description | •Negative effects of urbanization process on wildlife are well known.•We reviewed scientific articles looking for positive effects of roads and railways on birds.•Roads can provide foraging or scavenging habitat and warm surface for many bird species.•Bridges, powerlines, signboards, etc. can provide perches for hunting and nesting sites.•Our results constitute an useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders.
The urbanization process affects faunal distributions and movement patterns, contributing directly to biotic homogenization and representing an important threat to biodiversity. In particular, birds, which have been well studied as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance, are especially valuable in evaluating these impacts.
While the negative impact of these processes and structures, most notably road and railway networks, are now well appreciated (e.g. habitat loss, disturbance, noise, mortality by collisions, barrier effects), the potentially positive effects on wildlife are less appreciated (the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5). Here, were reviewed a total of 92 peer-reviewed publications for the period of 36years between 1978 and 2014, which reported positive effects of roads and associated anthropogenic structures on birds. Our results show that roads, railways and several associated constructions, commonly implicated in the decline of biodiversity, may also have positive effects on certain bird species or communities. The main types of positive effects on birds identified were classified as: (1) roads: providing foraging habitat; reducing the predation pressures; and providing a warm surface assists in conserving metabolic energy; (2) lights of streets: prolonging diurnal activity; (3) powerlines, fences, etc. along roads: providing perches for hunting activities; and (4) bridges, pylons, tree lines along roadsides, bases of powerline pylons: providing nesting sites and cover from predators. From this review, we provide a useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders engaged on conservation or landscape planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642261370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1361920914000327</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642261370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-a869d01449f1807295a16e8d763ff7cb26ade27beadb14310286e67d55ab42f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhiMEEqX0Abj5UqkHEsZObCfqAVUraJEqcQH1aE3ssfAqTbaebKveeAfekCfB1VYcEaeZw_f_M_qq6p2ERoI0H7bNmkOjQHYN6AbAvKiOZG-HWrUdvCx7a2Q9KBheV2-YtwCgtTZH1c0GZ5EXDPxeZEzTAz6ywDmITBOuFASvee_XfSYWP_CexG7htKayUIzkVxbLLMaUA38Uv3_-EhcleJ_o4W31KuLEdPI8j6vvnz9921zV118vv2wurmuvFaw19mYI5eluiLIHqwaN0lAfrGljtH5UBgMpOxKGUXatBNUbMjZojWOnom6Pq7ND7y4vd3vi1d0m9jRNONOyZydNp5SRrYX_QJUdbA9yKKg8oD4vzJmi2-V0i_nRSXBPvt3WFd_uybcD7Yrvkjl9rkf2OMWMs0_8N6h6bbVVsnDnB46KlqIqO_aJZk8h5SLUhSX948of4WiVIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627978019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morelli, Federico ; Beim, Michał ; Jerzak, Leszek ; Jones, Darryl ; Tryjanowski, Piotr</creator><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Federico ; Beim, Michał ; Jerzak, Leszek ; Jones, Darryl ; Tryjanowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><description>•Negative effects of urbanization process on wildlife are well known.•We reviewed scientific articles looking for positive effects of roads and railways on birds.•Roads can provide foraging or scavenging habitat and warm surface for many bird species.•Bridges, powerlines, signboards, etc. can provide perches for hunting and nesting sites.•Our results constitute an useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders.
The urbanization process affects faunal distributions and movement patterns, contributing directly to biotic homogenization and representing an important threat to biodiversity. In particular, birds, which have been well studied as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance, are especially valuable in evaluating these impacts.
While the negative impact of these processes and structures, most notably road and railway networks, are now well appreciated (e.g. habitat loss, disturbance, noise, mortality by collisions, barrier effects), the potentially positive effects on wildlife are less appreciated (the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5). Here, were reviewed a total of 92 peer-reviewed publications for the period of 36years between 1978 and 2014, which reported positive effects of roads and associated anthropogenic structures on birds. Our results show that roads, railways and several associated constructions, commonly implicated in the decline of biodiversity, may also have positive effects on certain bird species or communities. The main types of positive effects on birds identified were classified as: (1) roads: providing foraging habitat; reducing the predation pressures; and providing a warm surface assists in conserving metabolic energy; (2) lights of streets: prolonging diurnal activity; (3) powerlines, fences, etc. along roads: providing perches for hunting activities; and (4) bridges, pylons, tree lines along roadsides, bases of powerline pylons: providing nesting sites and cover from predators. From this review, we provide a useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders engaged on conservation or landscape planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1361-9209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2340</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Aves ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird species ; Birds ; Buildings. Public works ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General. Plotting ; Homogenizing ; Landscape planning ; Positive effects ; Pylons ; Railroads ; Railway engineering ; Railways ; Road structures ; Roads ; Scavenging ; Transportation infrastructure ; Urban development ; Urban ecology</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, 2014-07, Vol.30, p.21-31</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-a869d01449f1807295a16e8d763ff7cb26ade27beadb14310286e67d55ab42f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-a869d01449f1807295a16e8d763ff7cb26ade27beadb14310286e67d55ab42f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920914000327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27902,27903,65308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28575721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beim, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzak, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tryjanowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><title>Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review</title><title>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</title><description>•Negative effects of urbanization process on wildlife are well known.•We reviewed scientific articles looking for positive effects of roads and railways on birds.•Roads can provide foraging or scavenging habitat and warm surface for many bird species.•Bridges, powerlines, signboards, etc. can provide perches for hunting and nesting sites.•Our results constitute an useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders.
The urbanization process affects faunal distributions and movement patterns, contributing directly to biotic homogenization and representing an important threat to biodiversity. In particular, birds, which have been well studied as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance, are especially valuable in evaluating these impacts.
While the negative impact of these processes and structures, most notably road and railway networks, are now well appreciated (e.g. habitat loss, disturbance, noise, mortality by collisions, barrier effects), the potentially positive effects on wildlife are less appreciated (the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5). Here, were reviewed a total of 92 peer-reviewed publications for the period of 36years between 1978 and 2014, which reported positive effects of roads and associated anthropogenic structures on birds. Our results show that roads, railways and several associated constructions, commonly implicated in the decline of biodiversity, may also have positive effects on certain bird species or communities. The main types of positive effects on birds identified were classified as: (1) roads: providing foraging habitat; reducing the predation pressures; and providing a warm surface assists in conserving metabolic energy; (2) lights of streets: prolonging diurnal activity; (3) powerlines, fences, etc. along roads: providing perches for hunting activities; and (4) bridges, pylons, tree lines along roadsides, bases of powerline pylons: providing nesting sites and cover from predators. From this review, we provide a useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders engaged on conservation or landscape planning.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird species</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General. Plotting</subject><subject>Homogenizing</subject><subject>Landscape planning</subject><subject>Positive effects</subject><subject>Pylons</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Railway engineering</subject><subject>Railways</subject><subject>Road structures</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Scavenging</subject><subject>Transportation infrastructure</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban ecology</subject><issn>1361-9209</issn><issn>1879-2340</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhiMEEqX0Abj5UqkHEsZObCfqAVUraJEqcQH1aE3ssfAqTbaebKveeAfekCfB1VYcEaeZw_f_M_qq6p2ERoI0H7bNmkOjQHYN6AbAvKiOZG-HWrUdvCx7a2Q9KBheV2-YtwCgtTZH1c0GZ5EXDPxeZEzTAz6ywDmITBOuFASvee_XfSYWP_CexG7htKayUIzkVxbLLMaUA38Uv3_-EhcleJ_o4W31KuLEdPI8j6vvnz9921zV118vv2wurmuvFaw19mYI5eluiLIHqwaN0lAfrGljtH5UBgMpOxKGUXatBNUbMjZojWOnom6Pq7ND7y4vd3vi1d0m9jRNONOyZydNp5SRrYX_QJUdbA9yKKg8oD4vzJmi2-V0i_nRSXBPvt3WFd_uybcD7Yrvkjl9rkf2OMWMs0_8N6h6bbVVsnDnB46KlqIqO_aJZk8h5SLUhSX948of4WiVIg</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Morelli, Federico</creator><creator>Beim, Michał</creator><creator>Jerzak, Leszek</creator><creator>Jones, Darryl</creator><creator>Tryjanowski, Piotr</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review</title><author>Morelli, Federico ; Beim, Michał ; Jerzak, Leszek ; Jones, Darryl ; Tryjanowski, Piotr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-a869d01449f1807295a16e8d763ff7cb26ade27beadb14310286e67d55ab42f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird species</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General. Plotting</topic><topic>Homogenizing</topic><topic>Landscape planning</topic><topic>Positive effects</topic><topic>Pylons</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Railway engineering</topic><topic>Railways</topic><topic>Road structures</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Scavenging</topic><topic>Transportation infrastructure</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beim, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzak, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tryjanowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morelli, Federico</au><au>Beim, Michał</au><au>Jerzak, Leszek</au><au>Jones, Darryl</au><au>Tryjanowski, Piotr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>21</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>21-31</pages><issn>1361-9209</issn><eissn>1879-2340</eissn><abstract>•Negative effects of urbanization process on wildlife are well known.•We reviewed scientific articles looking for positive effects of roads and railways on birds.•Roads can provide foraging or scavenging habitat and warm surface for many bird species.•Bridges, powerlines, signboards, etc. can provide perches for hunting and nesting sites.•Our results constitute an useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders.
The urbanization process affects faunal distributions and movement patterns, contributing directly to biotic homogenization and representing an important threat to biodiversity. In particular, birds, which have been well studied as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance, are especially valuable in evaluating these impacts.
While the negative impact of these processes and structures, most notably road and railway networks, are now well appreciated (e.g. habitat loss, disturbance, noise, mortality by collisions, barrier effects), the potentially positive effects on wildlife are less appreciated (the number of documented negative effects of roads on animal abundance outnumbered the number of positive effects by a factor of 5). Here, were reviewed a total of 92 peer-reviewed publications for the period of 36years between 1978 and 2014, which reported positive effects of roads and associated anthropogenic structures on birds. Our results show that roads, railways and several associated constructions, commonly implicated in the decline of biodiversity, may also have positive effects on certain bird species or communities. The main types of positive effects on birds identified were classified as: (1) roads: providing foraging habitat; reducing the predation pressures; and providing a warm surface assists in conserving metabolic energy; (2) lights of streets: prolonging diurnal activity; (3) powerlines, fences, etc. along roads: providing perches for hunting activities; and (4) bridges, pylons, tree lines along roadsides, bases of powerline pylons: providing nesting sites and cover from predators. From this review, we provide a useful tool for ecologists, road planners and other stakeholders engaged on conservation or landscape planning.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1361-9209 |
ispartof | Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, 2014-07, Vol.30, p.21-31 |
issn | 1361-9209 1879-2340 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642261370 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Applied sciences Aves Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Bird species Birds Buildings. Public works Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on vertebrates Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General. Plotting Homogenizing Landscape planning Positive effects Pylons Railroads Railway engineering Railways Road structures Roads Scavenging Transportation infrastructure Urban development Urban ecology |
title | Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A15%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20roads,%20railways%20and%20related%20structures%20have%20positive%20effects%20on%20birds?%20%E2%80%93%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20D,%20Transport%20and%20environment&rft.au=Morelli,%20Federico&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=21-31&rft.issn=1361-9209&rft.eissn=1879-2340&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642261370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627978019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1361920914000327&rfr_iscdi=true |