Scatterometer and ECMWF‐derived wind vorticity over the Mediterranean Basin

This article investigates the spatial and temporal structures of the monthly mean vorticity fields \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm sc}}$ \end{document} and \doc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2013-04, Vol.139 (672), p.674-684
Hauptverfasser: Zecchetto, S., De Biasio, F., Accadia, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article investigates the spatial and temporal structures of the monthly mean vorticity fields \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm sc}}$ \end{document} and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm e}}$ \end{document} over the Mediterranean Basin, derived respectively from satellite scatterometers and ECMWF global atmospheric model (T799) wind fields from February 2006 to January 2010. Statistics show a mean difference between \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm sc}}$ \end{document} and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm e}}$ \end{document} over the whole Mediterranean Sea (relative bias \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\Delta \overline{\omega}}$ \end{document}) of 0.108×10−5 s−1. Furthermore, both the cyclonic and the anticyclonic components of \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm sc}}$ \end{document} are stronger than those of \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm e}}$ \end{document}. The analysis of the spatial features of \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm sc}}$ \end{document} and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\boldsymbol{\overline{\omega}^{\rm e}}$ \end{document} shows that the greatest discrepancies occur along coasts and in the Adriatic Sea, due to the ability of \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\b
ISSN:0035-9009
1477-870X
DOI:10.1002/qj.2001