Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet
In this paper, a comparison between two particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems, one based on a standard cross-correlation charge coupled device (CCD) camera with pulsed laser and another using high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera with continuous laser is performed. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experiments in fluids 2009-09, Vol.47 (3), p.509-526 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 526 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Experiments in fluids |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Falchi, M. Romano, G. P. |
description | In this paper, a comparison between two particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems, one based on a standard cross-correlation charge coupled device (CCD) camera with pulsed laser and another using high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera with continuous laser is performed. The objective of the paper is to point out advantages and disadvantages of the two systems when computing large and small flow scale statistics. The comparison is performed on velocity measurements in the near and far fields of a circular water jet: on this flow several experimental data and empirical self-similarity laws are available for comparisons. The results show that both systems are suitable for measurements with a preference for the standard one when investigating small-scale statistics. This result depends on the lower number of effectively independent samples acquired by a high-speed system and on the higher noise levels of CMOS sensors in comparison to CCDs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642229051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642229051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c973f7e9395d37b967e25ecf511e74caa02446517e46f6ba0745347cd3b5755b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1P5DAQhi3ESSwcP4DODRKND48_4qRECLiVVoICrrnCcryT3ayycbAdxP37yyqIEqrRzPvMWzyEXAD_BZyb68S5VCXjvGK8KAV7PyILUFIwAFDHZMGNkEyVhTohpyntOAdd8XJB_t69uW50uQ09DQ3NW6QDxibEves9Hk7bdrNlaUBc06flH-rDfnBxWnKgKbt-7eIctD11NI-xHjvsM91h_kl-NK5LeP4xz8jL_d3z7W-2enxY3t6smJelysxXRjYGK1nptTR1VRgUGn2jAdAo7xwXShUaDKqiKWrHjdJSGb-WtTZa1_KMXM29QwyvI6Zs923y2HWuxzAmC4USQlRcw_eoBiGlApATCjPqY0gpYmOH2O5d_GeB24NzOzu3k3N7cG7fp5_Lj3qXvOuaOEls0-ejgNIUQuuJEzOXpqjfYLS7MMZ-kvRF-X8hoJAF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512334113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Falchi, M. ; Romano, G. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falchi, M. ; Romano, G. P.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a comparison between two particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems, one based on a standard cross-correlation charge coupled device (CCD) camera with pulsed laser and another using high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera with continuous laser is performed. The objective of the paper is to point out advantages and disadvantages of the two systems when computing large and small flow scale statistics. The comparison is performed on velocity measurements in the near and far fields of a circular water jet: on this flow several experimental data and empirical self-similarity laws are available for comparisons. The results show that both systems are suitable for measurements with a preference for the standard one when investigating small-scale statistics. This result depends on the lower number of effectively independent samples acquired by a high-speed system and on the higher noise levels of CMOS sensors in comparison to CCDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-4864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXFLDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Cameras ; Charge coupled devices ; CMOS ; Engineering ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fluid- and Aerodynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; High speed ; Instrumentation for fluid dynamics ; Jets ; Physics ; Research Article ; Statistics ; Turbulent flow ; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer</subject><ispartof>Experiments in fluids, 2009-09, Vol.47 (3), p.509-526</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c973f7e9395d37b967e25ecf511e74caa02446517e46f6ba0745347cd3b5755b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c973f7e9395d37b967e25ecf511e74caa02446517e46f6ba0745347cd3b5755b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21876255$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falchi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet</title><title>Experiments in fluids</title><addtitle>Exp Fluids</addtitle><description>In this paper, a comparison between two particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems, one based on a standard cross-correlation charge coupled device (CCD) camera with pulsed laser and another using high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera with continuous laser is performed. The objective of the paper is to point out advantages and disadvantages of the two systems when computing large and small flow scale statistics. The comparison is performed on velocity measurements in the near and far fields of a circular water jet: on this flow several experimental data and empirical self-similarity laws are available for comparisons. The results show that both systems are suitable for measurements with a preference for the standard one when investigating small-scale statistics. This result depends on the lower number of effectively independent samples acquired by a high-speed system and on the higher noise levels of CMOS sensors in comparison to CCDs.</description><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Charge coupled devices</subject><subject>CMOS</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>High speed</subject><subject>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Jets</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer</subject><issn>0723-4864</issn><issn>1432-1114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1P5DAQhi3ESSwcP4DODRKND48_4qRECLiVVoICrrnCcryT3ayycbAdxP37yyqIEqrRzPvMWzyEXAD_BZyb68S5VCXjvGK8KAV7PyILUFIwAFDHZMGNkEyVhTohpyntOAdd8XJB_t69uW50uQ09DQ3NW6QDxibEves9Hk7bdrNlaUBc06flH-rDfnBxWnKgKbt-7eIctD11NI-xHjvsM91h_kl-NK5LeP4xz8jL_d3z7W-2enxY3t6smJelysxXRjYGK1nptTR1VRgUGn2jAdAo7xwXShUaDKqiKWrHjdJSGb-WtTZa1_KMXM29QwyvI6Zs923y2HWuxzAmC4USQlRcw_eoBiGlApATCjPqY0gpYmOH2O5d_GeB24NzOzu3k3N7cG7fp5_Lj3qXvOuaOEls0-ejgNIUQuuJEzOXpqjfYLS7MMZ-kvRF-X8hoJAF</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Falchi, M.</creator><creator>Romano, G. P.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet</title><author>Falchi, M. ; Romano, G. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c973f7e9395d37b967e25ecf511e74caa02446517e46f6ba0745347cd3b5755b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Charge coupled devices</topic><topic>CMOS</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>High speed</topic><topic>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Jets</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falchi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Experiments in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falchi, M.</au><au>Romano, G. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet</atitle><jtitle>Experiments in fluids</jtitle><stitle>Exp Fluids</stitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>509-526</pages><issn>0723-4864</issn><eissn>1432-1114</eissn><coden>EXFLDU</coden><abstract>In this paper, a comparison between two particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems, one based on a standard cross-correlation charge coupled device (CCD) camera with pulsed laser and another using high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera with continuous laser is performed. The objective of the paper is to point out advantages and disadvantages of the two systems when computing large and small flow scale statistics. The comparison is performed on velocity measurements in the near and far fields of a circular water jet: on this flow several experimental data and empirical self-similarity laws are available for comparisons. The results show that both systems are suitable for measurements with a preference for the standard one when investigating small-scale statistics. This result depends on the lower number of effectively independent samples acquired by a high-speed system and on the higher noise levels of CMOS sensors in comparison to CCDs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0723-4864 |
ispartof | Experiments in fluids, 2009-09, Vol.47 (3), p.509-526 |
issn | 0723-4864 1432-1114 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642229051 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Cameras Charge coupled devices CMOS Engineering Engineering Fluid Dynamics Engineering Thermodynamics Exact sciences and technology Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Fluid- and Aerodynamics Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Heat and Mass Transfer High speed Instrumentation for fluid dynamics Jets Physics Research Article Statistics Turbulent flow Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer |
title | Evaluation of the performance of high-speed PIV compared to standard PIV in a turbulent jet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20performance%20of%20high-speed%20PIV%20compared%20to%20standard%20PIV%20in%20a%20turbulent%20jet&rft.jtitle=Experiments%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Falchi,%20M.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=509-526&rft.issn=0723-4864&rft.eissn=1432-1114&rft.coden=EXFLDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00348-009-0682-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642229051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512334113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |