Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective
Objective To study the value of a population view in assessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple-gestation infants. Design Descriptive comparison of ART treatment and population statistics in seven developed countries (United States [U.S.], South Korea, United Kingdom, the Netherlands,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2015, Vol.103 (1), p.179-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Scholten, Irma, M.D Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D |
description | Objective To study the value of a population view in assessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple-gestation infants. Design Descriptive comparison of ART treatment and population statistics in seven developed countries (United States [U.S.], South Korea, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Denmark) with varying ART utilization and single-embryo transfer (SET) rates. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Not applicable. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) The contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to the total number of multiple-gestation infants in a population was calculated in relation to utilization of ART and SET rates. Result(s) The number of ART treatments leading to embryo transfer varied from 304 per million inhabitants in the U.S. to 1,518 in Denmark. The percentage of ART cycles that utilized SET varied from 8.8% in South Korea to 53.3% in Australia. Reflecting both utilization rates and SET rates, the percentage of multiple-gestation infants in the population attributed to ART ranged from 14.7% in South Korea to 29.0% in Denmark. Conclusion(s) In seven countries, the contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to all multiple-gestation infants varies from 14.7% to 29.0%, a percentage that was influenced by both the SET rate per cycle and ART utilization rates. In the monitoring of safety and efficacy of fertility treatment, registration of the percentage of SET cycles alone might not be sufficient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641857262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028214022109</els_id><sourcerecordid>1641857262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-91290ad93ef3803ea58f5861978d78ef7a72c4690485b33b55ce2a8b603582f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCK6AcuSQd23Fic0CCqkClShzo3fI6k9ZL1g62U2nfps_SJ8NhC0icuIyl0f__4_mGkIpCQ4F257tmxJh9yqU2DGjbgGqA82dkQ4XoatEJ_pxsAKiogUl2Qk5T2gFAR3v2kpww0XIludqQ5Wo_G5urMFYmJVcShyriHMOw2Ozuscpo73yYwu2hCr7Kd1g5b92A3mIxPT7slym7ecL6FlM22RWR86PxOb2rzOPDHOZlOrZnjGnGX6mvyIvRTAlfP71n5ObT5c3Fl_r66-eriw_XtRHAcq0oU2AGxXHkEjgaIUchO6p6OfQSx970zLadglaKLedbISwyI7cdcCHZyM_I22Ns2efHUv6n9y5ZnCbjMSxJ066lUvSsY0Uqj1IbQ0oRRz1HtzfxoCnolbne6b_M9cpcg9KFebG-eZqybPc4_DH-hlwEH48CLKveO4w6WbcCHFwsPPQQ3P9Mef9PiJ2cd9ZM3_GAaReW6AtKTXViGvS39fbr6WkLjFFQ_Cfp_7EI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641857262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scholten, Irma, M.D ; Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D ; van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D ; van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D ; Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D ; Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D ; Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D ; Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D ; Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma, M.D ; Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D ; van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D ; van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D ; Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D ; Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D ; Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D ; Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D ; Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To study the value of a population view in assessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple-gestation infants. Design Descriptive comparison of ART treatment and population statistics in seven developed countries (United States [U.S.], South Korea, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Denmark) with varying ART utilization and single-embryo transfer (SET) rates. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Not applicable. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) The contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to the total number of multiple-gestation infants in a population was calculated in relation to utilization of ART and SET rates. Result(s) The number of ART treatments leading to embryo transfer varied from 304 per million inhabitants in the U.S. to 1,518 in Denmark. The percentage of ART cycles that utilized SET varied from 8.8% in South Korea to 53.3% in Australia. Reflecting both utilization rates and SET rates, the percentage of multiple-gestation infants in the population attributed to ART ranged from 14.7% in South Korea to 29.0% in Denmark. Conclusion(s) In seven countries, the contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to all multiple-gestation infants varies from 14.7% to 29.0%, a percentage that was influenced by both the SET rate per cycle and ART utilization rates. In the monitoring of safety and efficacy of fertility treatment, registration of the percentage of SET cycles alone might not be sufficient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25439839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; assisted reproductive technology ; Europe - epidemiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - utilization ; Humans ; Incidence ; Internal Medicine ; multiple pregnancies ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; outcome measure ; Population Dynamics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea - epidemiology ; Single Embryo Transfer - utilization ; Single-embryo transfer ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - utilization ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2015, Vol.103 (1), p.179-183</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-91290ad93ef3803ea58f5861978d78ef7a72c4690485b33b55ce2a8b603582f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-91290ad93ef3803ea58f5861978d78ef7a72c4690485b33b55ce2a8b603582f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25439839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To study the value of a population view in assessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple-gestation infants. Design Descriptive comparison of ART treatment and population statistics in seven developed countries (United States [U.S.], South Korea, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Denmark) with varying ART utilization and single-embryo transfer (SET) rates. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Not applicable. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) The contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to the total number of multiple-gestation infants in a population was calculated in relation to utilization of ART and SET rates. Result(s) The number of ART treatments leading to embryo transfer varied from 304 per million inhabitants in the U.S. to 1,518 in Denmark. The percentage of ART cycles that utilized SET varied from 8.8% in South Korea to 53.3% in Australia. Reflecting both utilization rates and SET rates, the percentage of multiple-gestation infants in the population attributed to ART ranged from 14.7% in South Korea to 29.0% in Denmark. Conclusion(s) In seven countries, the contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to all multiple-gestation infants varies from 14.7% to 29.0%, a percentage that was influenced by both the SET rate per cycle and ART utilization rates. In the monitoring of safety and efficacy of fertility treatment, registration of the percentage of SET cycles alone might not be sufficient.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>multiple pregnancies</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>outcome measure</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Republic of Korea - epidemiology</subject><subject>Single Embryo Transfer - utilization</subject><subject>Single-embryo transfer</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - utilization</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCK6AcuSQd23Fic0CCqkClShzo3fI6k9ZL1g62U2nfps_SJ8NhC0icuIyl0f__4_mGkIpCQ4F257tmxJh9yqU2DGjbgGqA82dkQ4XoatEJ_pxsAKiogUl2Qk5T2gFAR3v2kpww0XIludqQ5Wo_G5urMFYmJVcShyriHMOw2Ozuscpo73yYwu2hCr7Kd1g5b92A3mIxPT7slym7ecL6FlM22RWR86PxOb2rzOPDHOZlOrZnjGnGX6mvyIvRTAlfP71n5ObT5c3Fl_r66-eriw_XtRHAcq0oU2AGxXHkEjgaIUchO6p6OfQSx970zLadglaKLedbISwyI7cdcCHZyM_I22Ns2efHUv6n9y5ZnCbjMSxJ066lUvSsY0Uqj1IbQ0oRRz1HtzfxoCnolbne6b_M9cpcg9KFebG-eZqybPc4_DH-hlwEH48CLKveO4w6WbcCHFwsPPQQ3P9Mef9PiJ2cd9ZM3_GAaReW6AtKTXViGvS39fbr6WkLjFFQ_Cfp_7EI</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Scholten, Irma, M.D</creator><creator>Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D</creator><creator>van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D</creator><creator>Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective</title><author>Scholten, Irma, M.D ; Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D ; van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D ; van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D ; Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D ; Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D ; Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D ; Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D ; Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-91290ad93ef3803ea58f5861978d78ef7a72c4690485b33b55ce2a8b603582f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>multiple pregnancies</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>outcome measure</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Republic of Korea - epidemiology</topic><topic>Single Embryo Transfer - utilization</topic><topic>Single-embryo transfer</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - utilization</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholten, Irma, M.D</au><au>Chambers, Georgina M., Ph.D</au><au>van Loendersloot, Laura, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>van der Veen, Fulco, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Repping, Sjoerd, Ph.D</au><au>Gianotten, Judith, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Hompes, Peter G.A., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Ledger, William, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Mol, Ben W.J., M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>179-183</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To study the value of a population view in assessing assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple-gestation infants. Design Descriptive comparison of ART treatment and population statistics in seven developed countries (United States [U.S.], South Korea, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Denmark) with varying ART utilization and single-embryo transfer (SET) rates. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Not applicable. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) The contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to the total number of multiple-gestation infants in a population was calculated in relation to utilization of ART and SET rates. Result(s) The number of ART treatments leading to embryo transfer varied from 304 per million inhabitants in the U.S. to 1,518 in Denmark. The percentage of ART cycles that utilized SET varied from 8.8% in South Korea to 53.3% in Australia. Reflecting both utilization rates and SET rates, the percentage of multiple-gestation infants in the population attributed to ART ranged from 14.7% in South Korea to 29.0% in Denmark. Conclusion(s) In seven countries, the contribution of ART multiple-gestation infants to all multiple-gestation infants varies from 14.7% to 29.0%, a percentage that was influenced by both the SET rate per cycle and ART utilization rates. In the monitoring of safety and efficacy of fertility treatment, registration of the percentage of SET cycles alone might not be sufficient.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25439839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.033</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2015, Vol.103 (1), p.179-183 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641857262 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent assisted reproductive technology Europe - epidemiology Female Fertilization in Vitro - utilization Humans Incidence Internal Medicine multiple pregnancies Obstetrics and Gynecology outcome measure Population Dynamics Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data Republic of Korea - epidemiology Single Embryo Transfer - utilization Single-embryo transfer Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - utilization United States - epidemiology |
title | Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20on%20the%20incidence%20of%C2%A0multiple-gestation%20infants:%20a%C2%A0population%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Scholten,%20Irma,%20M.D&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=179-183&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1641857262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641857262&rft_id=info:pmid/25439839&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028214022109&rfr_iscdi=true |