Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery
In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aǧrı 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Aǧrı |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Deniz, Süleyman Atım, Abdulkadir Kürklü, Mustafa Çaycı, Tuncer Kurt, Ercan |
description | In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture.
With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined.
We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups.
We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5505/agri.2014.76993 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641856923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1641856923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctOw0AM3AOIIuiZG9ojl7T2Jps2R1TxkpC4wDlyNt52IS92E6T-CZ9LQgu-2LLGMyOPEFcIC61BL2nr3UIBJotVmmXxiTjHGCACQDUT8xDeYSydpGtMz8RMaa1xjXAuvjdt3ZF3oW1ka2W_Y9m1oW879tS7L5bUULXl4Ixka50hs59w1Mih6j2FdmjKaDu4kktpKRhH0lWODEnzS9zX3PSyqFrzIb_YhyHIWLpG4nE3jjvXyc6PortRJsgw-C37_aU4tVQFnh_7hXi7v3vdPEbPLw9Pm9vnyCQq6yOyJlYZkwWrkgyxyBCsSUtGZTSSLbBQJYNOAVKrWK0SnUChYoZSKW1W8YW4OfCOFj4HDn1eu2C4qqjhdgg5pgmudZqpeIQuD1Azug2ebd55V5Pf5wj5lEI-pZBPKeS_KYwX10fyoai5_Mf__T_-AUXNiEk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641856923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</creator><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture.
With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined.
We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups.
We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5505/agri.2014.76993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25551810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Fascia - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphine - administration & dosage ; Nerve Block ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aǧrı, 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atım, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürklü, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaycı, Tuncer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><title>Aǧrı</title><addtitle>Agri</addtitle><description>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture.
With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined.
We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups.
We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1300-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UctOw0AM3AOIIuiZG9ojl7T2Jps2R1TxkpC4wDlyNt52IS92E6T-CZ9LQgu-2LLGMyOPEFcIC61BL2nr3UIBJotVmmXxiTjHGCACQDUT8xDeYSydpGtMz8RMaa1xjXAuvjdt3ZF3oW1ka2W_Y9m1oW879tS7L5bUULXl4Ixka50hs59w1Mih6j2FdmjKaDu4kktpKRhH0lWODEnzS9zX3PSyqFrzIb_YhyHIWLpG4nE3jjvXyc6PortRJsgw-C37_aU4tVQFnh_7hXi7v3vdPEbPLw9Pm9vnyCQq6yOyJlYZkwWrkgyxyBCsSUtGZTSSLbBQJYNOAVKrWK0SnUChYoZSKW1W8YW4OfCOFj4HDn1eu2C4qqjhdgg5pgmudZqpeIQuD1Azug2ebd55V5Pf5wj5lEI-pZBPKeS_KYwX10fyoai5_Mf__T_-AUXNiEk</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Deniz, Süleyman</creator><creator>Atım, Abdulkadir</creator><creator>Kürklü, Mustafa</creator><creator>Çaycı, Tuncer</creator><creator>Kurt, Ercan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><author>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atım, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürklü, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaycı, Tuncer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aǧrı</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deniz, Süleyman</au><au>Atım, Abdulkadir</au><au>Kürklü, Mustafa</au><au>Çaycı, Tuncer</au><au>Kurt, Ercan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</atitle><jtitle>Aǧrı</jtitle><addtitle>Agri</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>151-157</pages><issn>1300-0012</issn><abstract>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture.
With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined.
We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups.
We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pmid>25551810</pmid><doi>10.5505/agri.2014.76993</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1300-0012 |
ispartof | Aǧrı, 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157 |
issn | 1300-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641856923 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Fascia - diagnostic imaging Female Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging Humans Male Middle Aged Morphine - administration & dosage Nerve Block Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography, Interventional Young Adult |
title | Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A48%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20postoperative%20analgesic%20efficacy%20of%20an%20ultrasound-guided%20fascia%20iliaca%20compartment%20block%20versus%203%20in%201%20block%20in%20hip%20prosthesis%20surgery&rft.jtitle=A%C7%A7r%C4%B1&rft.au=Deniz,%20S%C3%BCleyman&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=151-157&rft.issn=1300-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.5505/agri.2014.76993&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1641856923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641856923&rft_id=info:pmid/25551810&rfr_iscdi=true |