Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery

In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aǧrı 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157
Hauptverfasser: Deniz, Süleyman, Atım, Abdulkadir, Kürklü, Mustafa, Çaycı, Tuncer, Kurt, Ercan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 157
container_issue 4
container_start_page 151
container_title Aǧrı
container_volume 26
creator Deniz, Süleyman
Atım, Abdulkadir
Kürklü, Mustafa
Çaycı, Tuncer
Kurt, Ercan
description In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined. We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups. We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.5505/agri.2014.76993
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641856923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1641856923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctOw0AM3AOIIuiZG9ojl7T2Jps2R1TxkpC4wDlyNt52IS92E6T-CZ9LQgu-2LLGMyOPEFcIC61BL2nr3UIBJotVmmXxiTjHGCACQDUT8xDeYSydpGtMz8RMaa1xjXAuvjdt3ZF3oW1ka2W_Y9m1oW879tS7L5bUULXl4Ixka50hs59w1Mih6j2FdmjKaDu4kktpKRhH0lWODEnzS9zX3PSyqFrzIb_YhyHIWLpG4nE3jjvXyc6PortRJsgw-C37_aU4tVQFnh_7hXi7v3vdPEbPLw9Pm9vnyCQq6yOyJlYZkwWrkgyxyBCsSUtGZTSSLbBQJYNOAVKrWK0SnUChYoZSKW1W8YW4OfCOFj4HDn1eu2C4qqjhdgg5pgmudZqpeIQuD1Azug2ebd55V5Pf5wj5lEI-pZBPKeS_KYwX10fyoai5_Mf__T_-AUXNiEk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641856923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</creator><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined. We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups. We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5505/agri.2014.76993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25551810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Fascia - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Nerve Block ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aǧrı, 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atım, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürklü, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaycı, Tuncer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><title>Aǧrı</title><addtitle>Agri</addtitle><description>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined. We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups. We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1300-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UctOw0AM3AOIIuiZG9ojl7T2Jps2R1TxkpC4wDlyNt52IS92E6T-CZ9LQgu-2LLGMyOPEFcIC61BL2nr3UIBJotVmmXxiTjHGCACQDUT8xDeYSydpGtMz8RMaa1xjXAuvjdt3ZF3oW1ka2W_Y9m1oW879tS7L5bUULXl4Ixka50hs59w1Mih6j2FdmjKaDu4kktpKRhH0lWODEnzS9zX3PSyqFrzIb_YhyHIWLpG4nE3jjvXyc6PortRJsgw-C37_aU4tVQFnh_7hXi7v3vdPEbPLw9Pm9vnyCQq6yOyJlYZkwWrkgyxyBCsSUtGZTSSLbBQJYNOAVKrWK0SnUChYoZSKW1W8YW4OfCOFj4HDn1eu2C4qqjhdgg5pgmudZqpeIQuD1Azug2ebd55V5Pf5wj5lEI-pZBPKeS_KYwX10fyoai5_Mf__T_-AUXNiEk</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Deniz, Süleyman</creator><creator>Atım, Abdulkadir</creator><creator>Kürklü, Mustafa</creator><creator>Çaycı, Tuncer</creator><creator>Kurt, Ercan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</title><author>Deniz, Süleyman ; Atım, Abdulkadir ; Kürklü, Mustafa ; Çaycı, Tuncer ; Kurt, Ercan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-afc329eaf0f24911b910fc6de12c51afb1b2de056006f2e274540b23e0d225c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atım, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürklü, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaycı, Tuncer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Ercan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aǧrı</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deniz, Süleyman</au><au>Atım, Abdulkadir</au><au>Kürklü, Mustafa</au><au>Çaycı, Tuncer</au><au>Kurt, Ercan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery</atitle><jtitle>Aǧrı</jtitle><addtitle>Agri</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>151-157</pages><issn>1300-0012</issn><abstract>In this study, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficiency of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block and a 3 in 1 block in patients who underwent hip prosthesis surgery as a result of hip fracture. With approval from the local ethics committee, 70 patients, aged 20 to 80, undergoing hip prosthesis surgery under elective conditions were included in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. They were informed of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were separated randomly into three groups. Anaesthesia induction was standardized for all groups. An ultrasound guidance fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was applied to the first group before anaesthesia induction. For the second group, a 3 in 1 block was applied, while for the control group no block was applied. After incision on all patients, 20 mg tenoxicam and 1 mg/kg tramadol were injected intravenously. Following surgery, IV tramadol PCA was begun on all patients routinely. In our study, the presence of cortisol and ACTH levels, hemodinamical parameters, nausea and sedation were determined. We observed a decrease in VAS values and opioid consumption, no adverse effects on nausea and sedation, and a suppression of stress hormones in both the ultrasound-guided FICB and 3 in 1 block groups. We believe that the safe and efficient application of the ultrasound-guided 3 in 1 block and the FICB is necessary in multimodal analgesic treatment in order to enable postoperative analgesia in hip prosthesis surgery.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pmid>25551810</pmid><doi>10.5505/agri.2014.76993</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1300-0012
ispartof Aǧrı, 2014, Vol.26 (4), p.151-157
issn 1300-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1641856923
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Fascia - diagnostic imaging
Female
Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morphine - administration & dosage
Nerve Block
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Young Adult
title Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A48%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20postoperative%20analgesic%20efficacy%20of%20an%20ultrasound-guided%20fascia%20iliaca%20compartment%20block%20versus%203%20in%201%20block%20in%20hip%20prosthesis%20surgery&rft.jtitle=A%C7%A7r%C4%B1&rft.au=Deniz,%20S%C3%BCleyman&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=151-157&rft.issn=1300-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.5505/agri.2014.76993&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1641856923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641856923&rft_id=info:pmid/25551810&rfr_iscdi=true