Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness
The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical ecology 1991-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2539-2551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2539 |
container_title | Journal of chemical ecology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA) Bean, N.J Shah, P.S Clark, L |
description | The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00994601 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16417582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16417582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-8d3c59bec5e2f7eaf06ed57118a94456af676c124ee86bc6b86a2e77ec1f0f733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuHDkgHJACCEF7Pgz3KCigFSJA-05mjjj1igbB0-ywN_gF-N2t-XGyZb9-LXHw9hTwd8Izu3bD6ect60yXNxjG6GtrIU24j7blGVXcynFEXtE9J1z3hinH7KjRjXaGWU27M85_EpTTTP6GKKvhhgCZpw8UhWnKiPNaaK4wwmJqiVVHmaC6MseTENFuMMMY5nDmC5XpHeVTznjCEsJ6HH5iThV_gq30RdGS179sma8OdzjFexiujlfYm5vecweBBgJnxzGY3Zx-vH85HN99vXTl5P3Z7WXRi21G6TXbY9eYxMsQuAGB22FcNAqpQ0EY40XjUJ0pvemdwYatBa9CDxYKY_Zy33unNOP8vSl20byOI4wYVqpE0YJq11T4Kv_Q2WEM7axptDXe-pzIsoYujnHLeTfneDddbO6f80q-Pkhd-23ONzR2-4U8OIAgMr3hQyTj3TntOClxOtCnu1ZgNTBZS7k4lureKulkn8B_i6nnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461867276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA) ; Bean, N.J ; Shah, P.S ; Clark, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA) ; Bean, N.J ; Shah, P.S ; Clark, L</creatorcontrib><description>The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-0331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00994601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24258646</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCECD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; CAPSAICINA ; CAPSAICINE ; CHIMIORECEPTEUR ; CONTROL DE PAJAROS ; CONTROL DE PLAGAS ; CONTROL DE ROEDORES ; ESTORNINO ; ETOURNEAU ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrates ; LUTTE ANTIAVIAIRE ; LUTTE ANTIRAVAGEUR ; LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR ; QUIMIORECEPTORS ; RAT ; RATA ; REPELENTES ; REPULSIF ; Sturnus vulgaris</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical ecology, 1991-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2539-2551</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-8d3c59bec5e2f7eaf06ed57118a94456af676c124ee86bc6b86a2e77ec1f0f733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-8d3c59bec5e2f7eaf06ed57118a94456af676c124ee86bc6b86a2e77ec1f0f733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5106763$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24258646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, N.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, L</creatorcontrib><title>Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness</title><title>Journal of chemical ecology</title><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><description>The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CAPSAICINA</subject><subject>CAPSAICINE</subject><subject>CHIMIORECEPTEUR</subject><subject>CONTROL DE PAJAROS</subject><subject>CONTROL DE PLAGAS</subject><subject>CONTROL DE ROEDORES</subject><subject>ESTORNINO</subject><subject>ETOURNEAU</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>LUTTE ANTIAVIAIRE</subject><subject>LUTTE ANTIRAVAGEUR</subject><subject>LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR</subject><subject>QUIMIORECEPTORS</subject><subject>RAT</subject><subject>RATA</subject><subject>REPELENTES</subject><subject>REPULSIF</subject><subject>Sturnus vulgaris</subject><issn>0098-0331</issn><issn>1573-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuHDkgHJACCEF7Pgz3KCigFSJA-05mjjj1igbB0-ywN_gF-N2t-XGyZb9-LXHw9hTwd8Izu3bD6ect60yXNxjG6GtrIU24j7blGVXcynFEXtE9J1z3hinH7KjRjXaGWU27M85_EpTTTP6GKKvhhgCZpw8UhWnKiPNaaK4wwmJqiVVHmaC6MseTENFuMMMY5nDmC5XpHeVTznjCEsJ6HH5iThV_gq30RdGS179sma8OdzjFexiujlfYm5vecweBBgJnxzGY3Zx-vH85HN99vXTl5P3Z7WXRi21G6TXbY9eYxMsQuAGB22FcNAqpQ0EY40XjUJ0pvemdwYatBa9CDxYKY_Zy33unNOP8vSl20byOI4wYVqpE0YJq11T4Kv_Q2WEM7axptDXe-pzIsoYujnHLeTfneDddbO6f80q-Pkhd-23ONzR2-4U8OIAgMr3hQyTj3TntOClxOtCnu1ZgNTBZS7k4lureKulkn8B_i6nnw</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA)</creator><creator>Bean, N.J</creator><creator>Shah, P.S</creator><creator>Clark, L</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness</title><author>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA) ; Bean, N.J ; Shah, P.S ; Clark, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-8d3c59bec5e2f7eaf06ed57118a94456af676c124ee86bc6b86a2e77ec1f0f733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CAPSAICINA</topic><topic>CAPSAICINE</topic><topic>CHIMIORECEPTEUR</topic><topic>CONTROL DE PAJAROS</topic><topic>CONTROL DE PLAGAS</topic><topic>CONTROL DE ROEDORES</topic><topic>ESTORNINO</topic><topic>ETOURNEAU</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>LUTTE ANTIAVIAIRE</topic><topic>LUTTE ANTIRAVAGEUR</topic><topic>LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR</topic><topic>QUIMIORECEPTORS</topic><topic>RAT</topic><topic>RATA</topic><topic>REPELENTES</topic><topic>REPULSIF</topic><topic>Sturnus vulgaris</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bean, N.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, J.R. (USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA)</au><au>Bean, N.J</au><au>Shah, P.S</au><au>Clark, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2539</spage><epage>2551</epage><pages>2539-2551</pages><issn>0098-0331</issn><eissn>1573-1561</eissn><coden>JCECD8</coden><abstract>The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>24258646</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00994601</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-0331 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical ecology, 1991-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2539-2551 |
issn | 0098-0331 1573-1561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16417582 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences CAPSAICINA CAPSAICINE CHIMIORECEPTEUR CONTROL DE PAJAROS CONTROL DE PLAGAS CONTROL DE ROEDORES ESTORNINO ETOURNEAU Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Invertebrates LUTTE ANTIAVIAIRE LUTTE ANTIRAVAGEUR LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR QUIMIORECEPTORS RAT RATA REPELENTES REPULSIF Sturnus vulgaris |
title | Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxon-specific%20differences%20in%20responsiveness%20to%20capsaicin%20and%20several%20analogues:%20correlates%20between%20chemical%20structure%20and%20behavioral%20aversiveness&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20ecology&rft.au=Mason,%20J.R.%20(USDA,%20Animal%20and%20Plant%20Health%20Inspection%20Service,%20Science%20and%20Technology,%20Philadelphia,%20PA)&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2539&rft.epage=2551&rft.pages=2539-2551&rft.issn=0098-0331&rft.eissn=1573-1561&rft.coden=JCECD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00994601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16417582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461867276&rft_id=info:pmid/24258646&rfr_iscdi=true |