Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?
Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the neurological sciences 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Journal of the neurological sciences |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Ansselin, A.D. Pollard, J.D. Davey, D.F. |
description | Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16409204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022510X9290146C</els_id><sourcerecordid>16409204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQnaTZNPGgSPELBC8K3kKaTJdIP9akXfDf23UXvXkahnnel-Eh5IjCBQUqLgEYS2cU3s8UO1dAuUiLLTKhMpfpTMpsm0x-kT2yH-MHAAgp1S7ZHWHFmZwQ9dQ0Q9vFYbEIGKPv2sS3SYthiYmp624eTNX7dn6V-Jj4PnEYfTBljTcHZKcydcTDzZySt_u71-IxfX55eCpun1PLad6nshRQKgEzah03Do0AWuYumxnBFDfSwbgxJyi4XBkqWIXOVlyU3ObIWZZNyem6dxG6zwFjrxsfLda1abEboqaCg2LAR5CvQRu6GANWehF8Y8KXpqBXxvRKh17p0IrpH2O6GGPHm_6hbND9hdaKxvvJ5m6iNXUVTGt9_MV4piDjMGLXawxHF0uPQUfrsbXofEDba9f5___4BrO1hy8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16409204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1469428</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNSCAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Axonal regeneration ; Axons - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cyclosporin A ; Cyclosporine - pharmacology ; Electromyography ; Electrophysiology ; Immunosuppression ; Medical sciences ; Muscles - physiology ; Nerve allografts ; Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Neural Conduction - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurotoxicity ; Peripheral nerve regeneration ; Peripheral Nerves - anatomy & histology ; Peripheral Nerves - physiology ; Peripheral Nerves - transplantation ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the neurological sciences, 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4390340$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1469428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><title>Journal of the neurological sciences</title><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><description>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</description><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Axonal regeneration</subject><subject>Axons - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cyclosporin A</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Nerve allografts</subject><subject>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural Conduction - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity</subject><subject>Peripheral nerve regeneration</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - transplantation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</subject><issn>0022-510X</issn><issn>1878-5883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQnaTZNPGgSPELBC8K3kKaTJdIP9akXfDf23UXvXkahnnel-Eh5IjCBQUqLgEYS2cU3s8UO1dAuUiLLTKhMpfpTMpsm0x-kT2yH-MHAAgp1S7ZHWHFmZwQ9dQ0Q9vFYbEIGKPv2sS3SYthiYmp624eTNX7dn6V-Jj4PnEYfTBljTcHZKcydcTDzZySt_u71-IxfX55eCpun1PLad6nshRQKgEzah03Do0AWuYumxnBFDfSwbgxJyi4XBkqWIXOVlyU3ObIWZZNyem6dxG6zwFjrxsfLda1abEboqaCg2LAR5CvQRu6GANWehF8Y8KXpqBXxvRKh17p0IrpH2O6GGPHm_6hbND9hdaKxvvJ5m6iNXUVTGt9_MV4piDjMGLXawxHF0uPQUfrsbXofEDba9f5___4BrO1hy8</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>Ansselin, A.D.</creator><creator>Pollard, J.D.</creator><creator>Davey, D.F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><author>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Axonal regeneration</topic><topic>Axons - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cyclosporin A</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Nerve allografts</topic><topic>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural Conduction - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity</topic><topic>Peripheral nerve regeneration</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - transplantation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansselin, A.D.</au><au>Pollard, J.D.</au><au>Davey, D.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>160-169</pages><issn>0022-510X</issn><eissn>1878-5883</eissn><coden>JNSCAG</coden><abstract>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>1469428</pmid><doi>10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-510X |
ispartof | Journal of the neurological sciences, 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169 |
issn | 0022-510X 1878-5883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16409204 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Action Potentials - physiology Animals Axonal regeneration Axons - physiology Behavior, Animal - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cyclosporin A Cyclosporine - pharmacology Electromyography Electrophysiology Immunosuppression Medical sciences Muscles - physiology Nerve allografts Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous Neural Conduction - physiology Neurology Neurotoxicity Peripheral nerve regeneration Peripheral Nerves - anatomy & histology Peripheral Nerves - physiology Peripheral Nerves - transplantation Rats Rats, Wistar Sciatic Nerve - transplantation |
title | Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunosuppression%20in%20nerve%20allografting:%20is%20it%20desirable?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Ansselin,%20A.D.&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=160-169&rft.issn=0022-510X&rft.eissn=1878-5883&rft.coden=JNSCAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16409204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16409204&rft_id=info:pmid/1469428&rft_els_id=0022510X9290146C&rfr_iscdi=true |