Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?

Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the neurological sciences 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169
Hauptverfasser: Ansselin, A.D., Pollard, J.D., Davey, D.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 169
container_issue 1
container_start_page 160
container_title Journal of the neurological sciences
container_volume 112
creator Ansselin, A.D.
Pollard, J.D.
Davey, D.F.
description Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16409204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022510X9290146C</els_id><sourcerecordid>16409204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQnaTZNPGgSPELBC8K3kKaTJdIP9akXfDf23UXvXkahnnel-Eh5IjCBQUqLgEYS2cU3s8UO1dAuUiLLTKhMpfpTMpsm0x-kT2yH-MHAAgp1S7ZHWHFmZwQ9dQ0Q9vFYbEIGKPv2sS3SYthiYmp624eTNX7dn6V-Jj4PnEYfTBljTcHZKcydcTDzZySt_u71-IxfX55eCpun1PLad6nshRQKgEzah03Do0AWuYumxnBFDfSwbgxJyi4XBkqWIXOVlyU3ObIWZZNyem6dxG6zwFjrxsfLda1abEboqaCg2LAR5CvQRu6GANWehF8Y8KXpqBXxvRKh17p0IrpH2O6GGPHm_6hbND9hdaKxvvJ5m6iNXUVTGt9_MV4piDjMGLXawxHF0uPQUfrsbXofEDba9f5___4BrO1hy8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16409204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1469428</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNSCAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Axonal regeneration ; Axons - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cyclosporin A ; Cyclosporine - pharmacology ; Electromyography ; Electrophysiology ; Immunosuppression ; Medical sciences ; Muscles - physiology ; Nerve allografts ; Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Neural Conduction - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurotoxicity ; Peripheral nerve regeneration ; Peripheral Nerves - anatomy &amp; histology ; Peripheral Nerves - physiology ; Peripheral Nerves - transplantation ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the neurological sciences, 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4390340$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1469428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><title>Journal of the neurological sciences</title><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><description>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</description><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Axonal regeneration</subject><subject>Axons - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cyclosporin A</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Nerve allografts</subject><subject>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural Conduction - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity</subject><subject>Peripheral nerve regeneration</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - transplantation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</subject><issn>0022-510X</issn><issn>1878-5883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQnaTZNPGgSPELBC8K3kKaTJdIP9akXfDf23UXvXkahnnel-Eh5IjCBQUqLgEYS2cU3s8UO1dAuUiLLTKhMpfpTMpsm0x-kT2yH-MHAAgp1S7ZHWHFmZwQ9dQ0Q9vFYbEIGKPv2sS3SYthiYmp624eTNX7dn6V-Jj4PnEYfTBljTcHZKcydcTDzZySt_u71-IxfX55eCpun1PLad6nshRQKgEzah03Do0AWuYumxnBFDfSwbgxJyi4XBkqWIXOVlyU3ObIWZZNyem6dxG6zwFjrxsfLda1abEboqaCg2LAR5CvQRu6GANWehF8Y8KXpqBXxvRKh17p0IrpH2O6GGPHm_6hbND9hdaKxvvJ5m6iNXUVTGt9_MV4piDjMGLXawxHF0uPQUfrsbXofEDba9f5___4BrO1hy8</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>Ansselin, A.D.</creator><creator>Pollard, J.D.</creator><creator>Davey, D.F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</title><author>Ansselin, A.D. ; Pollard, J.D. ; Davey, D.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-8b60b96051cd4adea601b7d35a6294a8d0b7d2d610d79a162fedcf46b4c7e4233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Axonal regeneration</topic><topic>Axons - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cyclosporin A</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Nerve allografts</topic><topic>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural Conduction - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity</topic><topic>Peripheral nerve regeneration</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - transplantation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansselin, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, D.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansselin, A.D.</au><au>Pollard, J.D.</au><au>Davey, D.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>160-169</pages><issn>0022-510X</issn><eissn>1878-5883</eissn><coden>JNSCAG</coden><abstract>Immunologically incompatible sciatic nerve grafts were inserted into the severed sciatic nerves of Wistar rats. In an attempt to induce graft tolerance, low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) was administered to some animals for 20 weeks, then gradually withdrawn. Behavioural, electrophysiological and histological studies indicated that some degree of regeneration took place in all animals regardless of treatment. Neither a daily dose of 5 mg/kg nor 10 mg/kg was sufficient to prevent the rejection and subsequent disruption of allograft structure, and as a consequence reinnervation of the distal stump was limited. This was manifest both in the poor functional recovery of the denervated foot, and in the large number of regenerated axons found outside of the perineurial membranes of the transplanted fascicles. Therefore tolerance was not induced at these doses. Furthermore, the significant decrease in the amplitude of electromyographs recorded from experimental and unoperated (control) animals suggests CsA may have a deleterious effect on unlesioned nerve even at these low doses. it would be prudent, therefore, to exercise caution in the combined used of nerve allografts and CsA immunosuppression, until the neurotoxicity of CsA has been investigated further. This is particularly important since CsA is sometimes used in the treatment of certain neuropathic autoimmune diseases.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>1469428</pmid><doi>10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-510X
ispartof Journal of the neurological sciences, 1992-10, Vol.112 (1), p.160-169
issn 0022-510X
1878-5883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16409204
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Action Potentials - physiology
Animals
Axonal regeneration
Axons - physiology
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cyclosporin A
Cyclosporine - pharmacology
Electromyography
Electrophysiology
Immunosuppression
Medical sciences
Muscles - physiology
Nerve allografts
Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous
Neural Conduction - physiology
Neurology
Neurotoxicity
Peripheral nerve regeneration
Peripheral Nerves - anatomy & histology
Peripheral Nerves - physiology
Peripheral Nerves - transplantation
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Sciatic Nerve - transplantation
title Immunosuppression in nerve allografting: is it desirable?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunosuppression%20in%20nerve%20allografting:%20is%20it%20desirable?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Ansselin,%20A.D.&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=160-169&rft.issn=0022-510X&rft.eissn=1878-5883&rft.coden=JNSCAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90146-C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16409204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16409204&rft_id=info:pmid/1469428&rft_els_id=0022510X9290146C&rfr_iscdi=true