Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education

Objectives Increasing emphasis has been placed on point‐of‐care ultrasound in medical school. The overall effects of ultrasound curriculum implementation on the traditional physical examination skills of medical students are still unknown. We studied the effects on the Objective Standardized Clinica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2015-01, Vol.34 (1), p.43-50
Hauptverfasser: Dinh, Vi Am, Frederick, Jon, Bartos, Rebekah, Shankel, Tamara M., Werner, Leonard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 34
creator Dinh, Vi Am
Frederick, Jon
Bartos, Rebekah
Shankel, Tamara M.
Werner, Leonard
description Objectives Increasing emphasis has been placed on point‐of‐care ultrasound in medical school. The overall effects of ultrasound curriculum implementation on the traditional physical examination skills of medical students are still unknown. We studied the effects on the Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores of year 1 medical students before and after ultrasound curriculum implementation. Methods An ultrasound curriculum was incorporated into the physical diagnosis course for year 1 medical students in the 2012–2013 academic year. We performed a prospective observational study comparing traditional OSCE scores of year 1 medical students exposed to the ultrasound curriculum (post‐ultrasound) versus historic year 1 medical student controls (pre‐ultrasound) with no ultrasound exposure. Questionnaire data were also obtained from year 1 medical students and physical diagnosis faculty to assess attitudes toward ultrasound implementation. Results The final overall OSCE scores were graded with a 5‐point Likert‐type scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. There was a significant increase in outstanding scores in the post‐ultrasound compared to the pre‐ultrasound group (27.0% versus 10.9%; P< .001). The post‐ultrasound group had significantly (P< .05) increased first‐time pass rates on blood pressure measurements, the abdominal examination, and professionalism. Student and physical diagnosis faculty questionnaire data showed an overall positive response, with most agreeing or strongly agreeing that ultrasound should be included in the future year 1 medical student curriculum. Conclusions Ultrasound implementation into a physical diagnosis curriculum for year 1 medical students is feasible and may improve their overall traditional physical examination skills.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/ultra.34.1.43
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1640851901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1640851901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-ba9f50ea474ec80a56fe01d67ab2f6bad7033ebee5c8c842693cc3cc7470fac73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqKMLCl2bMfJiKB8qRUM7cBkOc6ZBuWj2ImgA_8dpymMSCed7vTcY-k1QucET0US06uubK2aUjYlU0YP0JhwjsM0JvQQjXEkkpBFqRihE-feMY4wEewYjSLO_ZomY_Q9MwZ064LGBKte5ZquzoPHalNCBXWr2qKpA18v660rtCqD2ZeqinrYz0HZuqjfAuVvlqD0uh9uO9u3dg3BXWFdG7x6rH9gAfmgyDu9E5yiI6NKB2f7PkGru9ny5iGcP98_3lzPQ82woGGmUsMxKCYY6AQrHhvAJI-FyiITZyoXmFLIALhOdMKiOKVa-xJMYKO0oBN0OXg3tvnowLWyKpyGslQ1NJ2TJGY44STFxKPhgGrbOGfByI0tKmW3kmDZJy53iUvKJJGMev5ir-6yCvI_-jdiD4gB-CxK2P5vk0-rhf8jThnx6h8a0ZDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640851901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dinh, Vi Am ; Frederick, Jon ; Bartos, Rebekah ; Shankel, Tamara M. ; Werner, Leonard</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinh, Vi Am ; Frederick, Jon ; Bartos, Rebekah ; Shankel, Tamara M. ; Werner, Leonard</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Increasing emphasis has been placed on point‐of‐care ultrasound in medical school. The overall effects of ultrasound curriculum implementation on the traditional physical examination skills of medical students are still unknown. We studied the effects on the Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores of year 1 medical students before and after ultrasound curriculum implementation. Methods An ultrasound curriculum was incorporated into the physical diagnosis course for year 1 medical students in the 2012–2013 academic year. We performed a prospective observational study comparing traditional OSCE scores of year 1 medical students exposed to the ultrasound curriculum (post‐ultrasound) versus historic year 1 medical student controls (pre‐ultrasound) with no ultrasound exposure. Questionnaire data were also obtained from year 1 medical students and physical diagnosis faculty to assess attitudes toward ultrasound implementation. Results The final overall OSCE scores were graded with a 5‐point Likert‐type scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. There was a significant increase in outstanding scores in the post‐ultrasound compared to the pre‐ultrasound group (27.0% versus 10.9%; P&lt; .001). The post‐ultrasound group had significantly (P&lt; .05) increased first‐time pass rates on blood pressure measurements, the abdominal examination, and professionalism. Student and physical diagnosis faculty questionnaire data showed an overall positive response, with most agreeing or strongly agreeing that ultrasound should be included in the future year 1 medical student curriculum. Conclusions Ultrasound implementation into a physical diagnosis curriculum for year 1 medical students is feasible and may improve their overall traditional physical examination skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.1.43</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25542938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Curriculum ; education ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; medical student ; Objective Standardized Clinical Examination ; physical examination ; Physical Examination - instrumentation ; Prospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound ; ultrasound education ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2015-01, Vol.34 (1), p.43-50</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><rights>2015 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-ba9f50ea474ec80a56fe01d67ab2f6bad7033ebee5c8c842693cc3cc7470fac73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-ba9f50ea474ec80a56fe01d67ab2f6bad7033ebee5c8c842693cc3cc7470fac73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.7863%2Fultra.34.1.43$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.7863%2Fultra.34.1.43$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25542938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinh, Vi Am</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartos, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankel, Tamara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Leonard</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Objectives Increasing emphasis has been placed on point‐of‐care ultrasound in medical school. The overall effects of ultrasound curriculum implementation on the traditional physical examination skills of medical students are still unknown. We studied the effects on the Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores of year 1 medical students before and after ultrasound curriculum implementation. Methods An ultrasound curriculum was incorporated into the physical diagnosis course for year 1 medical students in the 2012–2013 academic year. We performed a prospective observational study comparing traditional OSCE scores of year 1 medical students exposed to the ultrasound curriculum (post‐ultrasound) versus historic year 1 medical student controls (pre‐ultrasound) with no ultrasound exposure. Questionnaire data were also obtained from year 1 medical students and physical diagnosis faculty to assess attitudes toward ultrasound implementation. Results The final overall OSCE scores were graded with a 5‐point Likert‐type scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. There was a significant increase in outstanding scores in the post‐ultrasound compared to the pre‐ultrasound group (27.0% versus 10.9%; P&lt; .001). The post‐ultrasound group had significantly (P&lt; .05) increased first‐time pass rates on blood pressure measurements, the abdominal examination, and professionalism. Student and physical diagnosis faculty questionnaire data showed an overall positive response, with most agreeing or strongly agreeing that ultrasound should be included in the future year 1 medical student curriculum. Conclusions Ultrasound implementation into a physical diagnosis curriculum for year 1 medical students is feasible and may improve their overall traditional physical examination skills.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical student</subject><subject>Objective Standardized Clinical Examination</subject><subject>physical examination</subject><subject>Physical Examination - instrumentation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><subject>ultrasound education</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqKMLCl2bMfJiKB8qRUM7cBkOc6ZBuWj2ImgA_8dpymMSCed7vTcY-k1QucET0US06uubK2aUjYlU0YP0JhwjsM0JvQQjXEkkpBFqRihE-feMY4wEewYjSLO_ZomY_Q9MwZ064LGBKte5ZquzoPHalNCBXWr2qKpA18v660rtCqD2ZeqinrYz0HZuqjfAuVvlqD0uh9uO9u3dg3BXWFdG7x6rH9gAfmgyDu9E5yiI6NKB2f7PkGru9ny5iGcP98_3lzPQ82woGGmUsMxKCYY6AQrHhvAJI-FyiITZyoXmFLIALhOdMKiOKVa-xJMYKO0oBN0OXg3tvnowLWyKpyGslQ1NJ2TJGY44STFxKPhgGrbOGfByI0tKmW3kmDZJy53iUvKJJGMev5ir-6yCvI_-jdiD4gB-CxK2P5vk0-rhf8jThnx6h8a0ZDc</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Dinh, Vi Am</creator><creator>Frederick, Jon</creator><creator>Bartos, Rebekah</creator><creator>Shankel, Tamara M.</creator><creator>Werner, Leonard</creator><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education</title><author>Dinh, Vi Am ; Frederick, Jon ; Bartos, Rebekah ; Shankel, Tamara M. ; Werner, Leonard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-ba9f50ea474ec80a56fe01d67ab2f6bad7033ebee5c8c842693cc3cc7470fac73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical student</topic><topic>Objective Standardized Clinical Examination</topic><topic>physical examination</topic><topic>Physical Examination - instrumentation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><topic>ultrasound education</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinh, Vi Am</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartos, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankel, Tamara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Leonard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinh, Vi Am</au><au>Frederick, Jon</au><au>Bartos, Rebekah</au><au>Shankel, Tamara M.</au><au>Werner, Leonard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>43-50</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Objectives Increasing emphasis has been placed on point‐of‐care ultrasound in medical school. The overall effects of ultrasound curriculum implementation on the traditional physical examination skills of medical students are still unknown. We studied the effects on the Objective Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores of year 1 medical students before and after ultrasound curriculum implementation. Methods An ultrasound curriculum was incorporated into the physical diagnosis course for year 1 medical students in the 2012–2013 academic year. We performed a prospective observational study comparing traditional OSCE scores of year 1 medical students exposed to the ultrasound curriculum (post‐ultrasound) versus historic year 1 medical student controls (pre‐ultrasound) with no ultrasound exposure. Questionnaire data were also obtained from year 1 medical students and physical diagnosis faculty to assess attitudes toward ultrasound implementation. Results The final overall OSCE scores were graded with a 5‐point Likert‐type scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. There was a significant increase in outstanding scores in the post‐ultrasound compared to the pre‐ultrasound group (27.0% versus 10.9%; P&lt; .001). The post‐ultrasound group had significantly (P&lt; .05) increased first‐time pass rates on blood pressure measurements, the abdominal examination, and professionalism. Student and physical diagnosis faculty questionnaire data showed an overall positive response, with most agreeing or strongly agreeing that ultrasound should be included in the future year 1 medical student curriculum. Conclusions Ultrasound implementation into a physical diagnosis curriculum for year 1 medical students is feasible and may improve their overall traditional physical examination skills.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</pub><pmid>25542938</pmid><doi>10.7863/ultra.34.1.43</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2015-01, Vol.34 (1), p.43-50
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1640851901
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data
Curriculum
education
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Male
medical student
Objective Standardized Clinical Examination
physical examination
Physical Examination - instrumentation
Prospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ultrasonography
ultrasound
ultrasound education
Young Adult
title Effects of Ultrasound Implementation on Physical Examination Learning and Teaching During the First Year of Medical Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Ultrasound%20Implementation%20on%20Physical%20Examination%20Learning%20and%20Teaching%20During%20the%20First%20Year%20of%20Medical%20Education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Dinh,%20Vi%20Am&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=43-50&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/ultra.34.1.43&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1640851901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640851901&rft_id=info:pmid/25542938&rfr_iscdi=true