Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the performance and cost of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting the presence of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Ninety-two Enterobacteriaceae and 19 P. aeruginosa strains were used in this stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2014-12, Vol.33 (12), p.2237-2240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2237 |
container_title | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Yusuf, E. Van Der Meeren, S. Schallier, A. Piérard, D. |
description | The purpose of this investigation was to compare the performance and cost of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting the presence of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Ninety-two Enterobacteriaceae and 19
P. aeruginosa
strains were used in this study. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to determine whether these microorganisms harboured
bla
VIM
,
bla
IMP
,
bla
NDM
,
bla
KPC
and
bla
OXA-48
. The Carba NP test and Rapid CARB Screen Kit were used on the strains according to the standardised protocols. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the tests were calculated. The cost of performing one test was also calculated. Forty-five Enterobacteriaceae and six
P. aeruginosa
were found to harbour carbapenemase-encoding genes. The Carba NP test had sensitivities of 91.1 % and 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The Rapid CARB Screen Kit had sensitivities of 73.3 % and 66.7 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The specificity of both tests was 100 %. The approximated price for performing one Carba NP test was 0.31 Euros and for CARB Screen Kit, it was 1.25 Euros. The Carba NP test performed better than the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
. The cost to perform both tests is reasonable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1639990215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1623291795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-ca5b7393797572d1b34620e58b6d8846257a11cc2f162bfeb129c618cc5e85a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBlhASm4B_kthelqjQigqqAuto4kxuXd3Yt3YixKPwtjjN5UdISGw8luc7xzM6hDzl7BVnTL1O-TR1wXhZCG5MIe-RDS9lVZRSyftkw4wsC6OEPCKPUrphWaOVekiORMWYrhTbkO9NGPcQXQqehoFO10gbiB3QD5d0wjTRr266vnu-gr3raXNy9YZ-shHR0_duokOId90eJ7STW13s4rBHjyMkLPYx9LN1fktP_YQxdGBzcWARkILv6WXCuQ9j8JAoYJy3zocEj8mDAXYJnxzqMfny9vRzc1ZcfHx33pxcFLas9VRYqDoljVRGVUr0vJNlLRhWuqt7rfO9UsC5tWLgtegG7Lgwtuba2gp1BUIek5erb57zds4rt6NLFnc78Bjm1PJaGmOY4NV_oEIKw5VZ0Od_oTdhjj4vslBLWoLrTPGVsjGkFHFo99GNEL-1nLVLxO0acZsjbhdRK7Pm2cF57kbsfyl-ZpqBFwcAkoXdEMFbl35zJjvqeuHEyqXc8luMf4z4z99_ABqqvc0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622199218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yusuf, E. ; Van Der Meeren, S. ; Schallier, A. ; Piérard, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, E. ; Van Der Meeren, S. ; Schallier, A. ; Piérard, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to compare the performance and cost of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting the presence of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Ninety-two Enterobacteriaceae and 19
P. aeruginosa
strains were used in this study. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to determine whether these microorganisms harboured
bla
VIM
,
bla
IMP
,
bla
NDM
,
bla
KPC
and
bla
OXA-48
. The Carba NP test and Rapid CARB Screen Kit were used on the strains according to the standardised protocols. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the tests were calculated. The cost of performing one test was also calculated. Forty-five Enterobacteriaceae and six
P. aeruginosa
were found to harbour carbapenemase-encoding genes. The Carba NP test had sensitivities of 91.1 % and 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The Rapid CARB Screen Kit had sensitivities of 73.3 % and 66.7 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The specificity of both tests was 100 %. The approximated price for performing one Carba NP test was 0.31 Euros and for CARB Screen Kit, it was 1.25 Euros. The Carba NP test performed better than the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
. The cost to perform both tests is reasonable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25008570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial Proteins - biosynthesis ; beta-Lactamases - biosynthesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Disease control ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Enterobacteriaceae - enzymology ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Internal Medicine ; Medical Microbiology ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microorganisms ; Phenols ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - drug effects ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - enzymology ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification ; Pseudomonas Infections - diagnosis ; Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2014-12, Vol.33 (12), p.2237-2240</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-ca5b7393797572d1b34620e58b6d8846257a11cc2f162bfeb129c618cc5e85a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-ca5b7393797572d1b34620e58b6d8846257a11cc2f162bfeb129c618cc5e85a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29009860$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25008570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Meeren, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schallier, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piérard, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The purpose of this investigation was to compare the performance and cost of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting the presence of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Ninety-two Enterobacteriaceae and 19
P. aeruginosa
strains were used in this study. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to determine whether these microorganisms harboured
bla
VIM
,
bla
IMP
,
bla
NDM
,
bla
KPC
and
bla
OXA-48
. The Carba NP test and Rapid CARB Screen Kit were used on the strains according to the standardised protocols. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the tests were calculated. The cost of performing one test was also calculated. Forty-five Enterobacteriaceae and six
P. aeruginosa
were found to harbour carbapenemase-encoding genes. The Carba NP test had sensitivities of 91.1 % and 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The Rapid CARB Screen Kit had sensitivities of 73.3 % and 66.7 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The specificity of both tests was 100 %. The approximated price for performing one Carba NP test was 0.31 Euros and for CARB Screen Kit, it was 1.25 Euros. The Carba NP test performed better than the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
. The cost to perform both tests is reasonable.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>beta-Lactamases - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - enzymology</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - drug effects</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - enzymology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBlhASm4B_kthelqjQigqqAuto4kxuXd3Yt3YixKPwtjjN5UdISGw8luc7xzM6hDzl7BVnTL1O-TR1wXhZCG5MIe-RDS9lVZRSyftkw4wsC6OEPCKPUrphWaOVekiORMWYrhTbkO9NGPcQXQqehoFO10gbiB3QD5d0wjTRr266vnu-gr3raXNy9YZ-shHR0_duokOId90eJ7STW13s4rBHjyMkLPYx9LN1fktP_YQxdGBzcWARkILv6WXCuQ9j8JAoYJy3zocEj8mDAXYJnxzqMfny9vRzc1ZcfHx33pxcFLas9VRYqDoljVRGVUr0vJNlLRhWuqt7rfO9UsC5tWLgtegG7Lgwtuba2gp1BUIek5erb57zds4rt6NLFnc78Bjm1PJaGmOY4NV_oEIKw5VZ0Od_oTdhjj4vslBLWoLrTPGVsjGkFHFo99GNEL-1nLVLxO0acZsjbhdRK7Pm2cF57kbsfyl-ZpqBFwcAkoXdEMFbl35zJjvqeuHEyqXc8luMf4z4z99_ABqqvc0</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Yusuf, E.</creator><creator>Van Der Meeren, S.</creator><creator>Schallier, A.</creator><creator>Piérard, D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa</title><author>Yusuf, E. ; Van Der Meeren, S. ; Schallier, A. ; Piérard, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-ca5b7393797572d1b34620e58b6d8846257a11cc2f162bfeb129c618cc5e85a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>beta-Lactamases - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - enzymology</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - drug effects</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - enzymology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Meeren, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schallier, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piérard, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yusuf, E.</au><au>Van Der Meeren, S.</au><au>Schallier, A.</au><au>Piérard, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2237</spage><epage>2240</epage><pages>2237-2240</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to compare the performance and cost of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting the presence of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Ninety-two Enterobacteriaceae and 19
P. aeruginosa
strains were used in this study. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to determine whether these microorganisms harboured
bla
VIM
,
bla
IMP
,
bla
NDM
,
bla
KPC
and
bla
OXA-48
. The Carba NP test and Rapid CARB Screen Kit were used on the strains according to the standardised protocols. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the tests were calculated. The cost of performing one test was also calculated. Forty-five Enterobacteriaceae and six
P. aeruginosa
were found to harbour carbapenemase-encoding genes. The Carba NP test had sensitivities of 91.1 % and 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The Rapid CARB Screen Kit had sensitivities of 73.3 % and 66.7 % for Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
, respectively. The specificity of both tests was 100 %. The approximated price for performing one Carba NP test was 0.31 Euros and for CARB Screen Kit, it was 1.25 Euros. The Carba NP test performed better than the Rapid CARB Screen Kit in detecting carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae and
P. aeruginosa
. The cost to perform both tests is reasonable.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25008570</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-9723 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2014-12, Vol.33 (12), p.2237-2240 |
issn | 0934-9723 1435-4373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1639990215 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics Bacterial Proteins - biosynthesis beta-Lactamases - biosynthesis Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Disease control Enterobacteriaceae Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects Enterobacteriaceae - enzymology Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification Enterobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology Humans Infectious diseases Internal Medicine Medical Microbiology Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Microorganisms Phenols Polymerase chain reaction Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas aeruginosa - drug effects Pseudomonas aeruginosa - enzymology Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification Pseudomonas Infections - diagnosis Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Carba%20NP%20test%20with%20the%20Rapid%20CARB%20Screen%20Kit%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20carbapenemase-producing%20Enterobacteriaceae%20and%20Pseudomonas%20aeruginosa&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Yusuf,%20E.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2237&rft.epage=2240&rft.pages=2237-2240&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1623291795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622199218&rft_id=info:pmid/25008570&rfr_iscdi=true |