Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor

Objective To determine whether labor-associated inflammatory markers differ between low-risk, nulliparous women in preactive vs active labor at hospital admission and over time. Study Design Prospective comparative study of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term (n = 118) s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2015, Vol.212 (1), p.68.e1-68.e8
Hauptverfasser: Neal, Jeremy L., PhD, Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS, Lowe, Nancy K., PhD, Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN, Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD, McCarthy, Donna O., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68.e8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 212
creator Neal, Jeremy L., PhD
Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS
Lowe, Nancy K., PhD
Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN
Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD
McCarthy, Donna O., PhD
description Objective To determine whether labor-associated inflammatory markers differ between low-risk, nulliparous women in preactive vs active labor at hospital admission and over time. Study Design Prospective comparative study of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term (n = 118) sampled from 2 large Midwestern hospitals. Circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers were measured at admission and again 2 and 4 hours later: namely, neutrophil, and monocyte counts; and serum inflammatory cytokines (interleukin -1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-10) and chemokines (interleukin-8). Biomarker concentrations and their patterns of change over time were compared between preactive (n = 63) and active (n = 55) labor admission groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in the active labor admission group were significantly higher than concentrations in the preactive labor admission group at all 3 time points. Neutrophil levels were significantly higher in the active group at 2 and 4 hours after admission. The rate of increase in neutrophils and interleukin-10 between admission and 2 hours later was faster in the active group ( P < .001 and P  = .003, respectively). Conclusion Circulating concentrations of several inflammatory biomarkers are higher and their rate of change over time since admission is faster among low-risk, nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in active labor, as compared with those admitted in preactive labor. More research is needed to determine if progressive changes in inflammatory biomarkers might be a useful adjunct to improving the assessment of labor progression and determining the optimal timing of labor admission.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1639983766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937814007996</els_id><sourcerecordid>1639983766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-e379cf3fc6e61d1fc3187245361a13a90838d06b2b53fa8e39fe051cf3d6dfb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozpvRP-BCunTTepO8pg2IIDM6CgMu1HVI0xtNp21qkr7h_XtT39OFCyFwk8s5h9zvEvKCQkWBitdDpQf_vWJA9xU0FdTwiOwoyKYUrWgfkx0AsFLypr0glzEO25NJ9pRcsBpawZp6R5YbZy0GnA3Gws352FFPk04-HItJh3sMsegwPSDOxbyOo1t08GssHvyUO7qfXErYF8kXP3xcXNLj75wloDbJHbA4xOJ8G3XnwzPyxGYNPj_XK_Ltw_uv1x_Lu8-3n67f3ZWmZnUqkTfSWG6NQEF7ag2nbcP2NRdUU64ltLztQXSsq7nVLXJpEWqaLb3obSf4FXl1yl2C_7liTGpy0eA46hnz_xUVXMqWN2KTspPUBB9jQKuW4PLsR0VBbaTVoDbSaiOtoFGZdDa9POev3YT9X8sftFnw5iTAPOXBYVDRuI1z7wKapHrv_p__9h-7Gd3sjB7v8Yhx8GuYMz9FVWQK1Jdtuduq6R6gkVLwX0enppg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1639983766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD ; Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS ; Lowe, Nancy K., PhD ; Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN ; Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD ; McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD ; Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS ; Lowe, Nancy K., PhD ; Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN ; Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD ; McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine whether labor-associated inflammatory markers differ between low-risk, nulliparous women in preactive vs active labor at hospital admission and over time. Study Design Prospective comparative study of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term (n = 118) sampled from 2 large Midwestern hospitals. Circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers were measured at admission and again 2 and 4 hours later: namely, neutrophil, and monocyte counts; and serum inflammatory cytokines (interleukin -1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-10) and chemokines (interleukin-8). Biomarker concentrations and their patterns of change over time were compared between preactive (n = 63) and active (n = 55) labor admission groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in the active labor admission group were significantly higher than concentrations in the preactive labor admission group at all 3 time points. Neutrophil levels were significantly higher in the active group at 2 and 4 hours after admission. The rate of increase in neutrophils and interleukin-10 between admission and 2 hours later was faster in the active group ( P &lt; .001 and P  = .003, respectively). Conclusion Circulating concentrations of several inflammatory biomarkers are higher and their rate of change over time since admission is faster among low-risk, nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in active labor, as compared with those admitted in preactive labor. More research is needed to determine if progressive changes in inflammatory biomarkers might be a useful adjunct to improving the assessment of labor progression and determining the optimal timing of labor admission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25086275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers - blood ; cytokines ; Female ; Humans ; inflammation ; interleukins ; Interleukins - blood ; labor onset ; Labor Onset - blood ; nulliparity ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Parity ; Patient Admission ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - blood ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015, Vol.212 (1), p.68.e1-68.e8</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-e379cf3fc6e61d1fc3187245361a13a90838d06b2b53fa8e39fe051cf3d6dfb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-e379cf3fc6e61d1fc3187245361a13a90838d06b2b53fa8e39fe051cf3d6dfb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937814007996$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25086275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Nancy K., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective To determine whether labor-associated inflammatory markers differ between low-risk, nulliparous women in preactive vs active labor at hospital admission and over time. Study Design Prospective comparative study of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term (n = 118) sampled from 2 large Midwestern hospitals. Circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers were measured at admission and again 2 and 4 hours later: namely, neutrophil, and monocyte counts; and serum inflammatory cytokines (interleukin -1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-10) and chemokines (interleukin-8). Biomarker concentrations and their patterns of change over time were compared between preactive (n = 63) and active (n = 55) labor admission groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in the active labor admission group were significantly higher than concentrations in the preactive labor admission group at all 3 time points. Neutrophil levels were significantly higher in the active group at 2 and 4 hours after admission. The rate of increase in neutrophils and interleukin-10 between admission and 2 hours later was faster in the active group ( P &lt; .001 and P  = .003, respectively). Conclusion Circulating concentrations of several inflammatory biomarkers are higher and their rate of change over time since admission is faster among low-risk, nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in active labor, as compared with those admitted in preactive labor. More research is needed to determine if progressive changes in inflammatory biomarkers might be a useful adjunct to improving the assessment of labor progression and determining the optimal timing of labor admission.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>cytokines</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inflammation</subject><subject>interleukins</subject><subject>Interleukins - blood</subject><subject>labor onset</subject><subject>Labor Onset - blood</subject><subject>nulliparity</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - blood</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozpvRP-BCunTTepO8pg2IIDM6CgMu1HVI0xtNp21qkr7h_XtT39OFCyFwk8s5h9zvEvKCQkWBitdDpQf_vWJA9xU0FdTwiOwoyKYUrWgfkx0AsFLypr0glzEO25NJ9pRcsBpawZp6R5YbZy0GnA3Gws352FFPk04-HItJh3sMsegwPSDOxbyOo1t08GssHvyUO7qfXErYF8kXP3xcXNLj75wloDbJHbA4xOJ8G3XnwzPyxGYNPj_XK_Ltw_uv1x_Lu8-3n67f3ZWmZnUqkTfSWG6NQEF7ag2nbcP2NRdUU64ltLztQXSsq7nVLXJpEWqaLb3obSf4FXl1yl2C_7liTGpy0eA46hnz_xUVXMqWN2KTspPUBB9jQKuW4PLsR0VBbaTVoDbSaiOtoFGZdDa9POev3YT9X8sftFnw5iTAPOXBYVDRuI1z7wKapHrv_p__9h-7Gd3sjB7v8Yhx8GuYMz9FVWQK1Jdtuduq6R6gkVLwX0enppg</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD</creator><creator>Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS</creator><creator>Lowe, Nancy K., PhD</creator><creator>Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN</creator><creator>Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD</creator><creator>McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor</title><author>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD ; Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS ; Lowe, Nancy K., PhD ; Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN ; Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD ; McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-e379cf3fc6e61d1fc3187245361a13a90838d06b2b53fa8e39fe051cf3d6dfb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>cytokines</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inflammation</topic><topic>interleukins</topic><topic>Interleukins - blood</topic><topic>labor onset</topic><topic>Labor Onset - blood</topic><topic>nulliparity</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - blood</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Nancy K., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neal, Jeremy L., PhD</au><au>Lamp, Jane M., MS, RN-BC, CNS</au><au>Lowe, Nancy K., PhD</au><au>Gillespie, Shannon L., MS, RN</au><au>Sinnott, Loraine T., PhD</au><au>McCarthy, Donna O., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68.e1</spage><epage>68.e8</epage><pages>68.e1-68.e8</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine whether labor-associated inflammatory markers differ between low-risk, nulliparous women in preactive vs active labor at hospital admission and over time. Study Design Prospective comparative study of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term (n = 118) sampled from 2 large Midwestern hospitals. Circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers were measured at admission and again 2 and 4 hours later: namely, neutrophil, and monocyte counts; and serum inflammatory cytokines (interleukin -1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-10) and chemokines (interleukin-8). Biomarker concentrations and their patterns of change over time were compared between preactive (n = 63) and active (n = 55) labor admission groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Concentrations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in the active labor admission group were significantly higher than concentrations in the preactive labor admission group at all 3 time points. Neutrophil levels were significantly higher in the active group at 2 and 4 hours after admission. The rate of increase in neutrophils and interleukin-10 between admission and 2 hours later was faster in the active group ( P &lt; .001 and P  = .003, respectively). Conclusion Circulating concentrations of several inflammatory biomarkers are higher and their rate of change over time since admission is faster among low-risk, nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in active labor, as compared with those admitted in preactive labor. More research is needed to determine if progressive changes in inflammatory biomarkers might be a useful adjunct to improving the assessment of labor progression and determining the optimal timing of labor admission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25086275</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.050</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015, Vol.212 (1), p.68.e1-68.e8
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1639983766
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biomarkers - blood
cytokines
Female
Humans
inflammation
interleukins
Interleukins - blood
labor onset
Labor Onset - blood
nulliparity
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Parity
Patient Admission
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - blood
Young Adult
title Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20inflammatory%20markers%20between%20nulliparous%20women%20admitted%20to%20hospitals%20in%20preactive%20vs%20active%20labor&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Neal,%20Jeremy%20L.,%20PhD&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68.e1&rft.epage=68.e8&rft.pages=68.e1-68.e8&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1639983766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1639983766&rft_id=info:pmid/25086275&rft_els_id=S0002937814007996&rfr_iscdi=true