Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA
Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) of shallow heavy oil by cyclic steam injection or steamflooding is a commercial technology that has evolved over the past 30 years. Although TEOR may have adverse effects on the environment, these can be mitigated by careful management of standard oil field pract...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 1992, Vol.71 (12), p.1493-1498 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1498 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1493 |
| container_title | Fuel (Guildford) |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Johnson, W.I. Olsen, D.K. Sarathi, P.S. |
| description | Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) of shallow heavy oil by cyclic steam injection or steamflooding is a commercial technology that has evolved over the past 30 years. Although TEOR may have adverse effects on the environment, these can be mitigated by careful management of standard oil field practices during TEOR process implementation. Poorly plugged old wells, natural fracturing, vertical communication between oil reservoirs and underground aquifers, and impact on air quality are a few of the environmental factors under consideration that may limit production of the midcontinent heavy oil resources. Air quality conditions and legislation are compared to those in California, which has air quality standards that are more stringent than those of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Early in the life of determining the feasibility of TEOR for a specific site, the combined resources of engineering, geological and economic feasibility, process design, and environmental assessment must be coordinated to determine the environmental impact of process implementation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90224-C |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16392400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>001623619290224C</els_id><sourcerecordid>16392400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-170591bb8c4f5a23156de6053fbcb7942c880b69673d546c05265725e7650ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoI7Tf9CDDiHY0E31rd1LwBi3CUnxoe5ZaLWztZJdyZHWBv_7ruuQY2GYuTzvDPMg9IWSW0qo-kbGVjCu6Kxi84owJorlBzShpeaFppJ_RJN35BO6zPmZEKJLKSboeRUOPsXQQxhsh1vrhpgytm0LbvDhD96CPRxx9B1O4OIB0hH7gIct4N43LoYRGqN49mhDtvkr_ulzjvvksQ0NXr90dht7O8e_fy2u0EVruwyf3-YUbb6vNsv74mn942G5eCocV2ooqCayonVdOtFKyziVqgFFJG9rV-tKMFeWpFaV0ryRQjkimZKaSdBKEgA-RTfntbsUX_eQB9P77KDrbIC4z4YqXjFByAiKM-hSzDlBa3bJ9zYdDSXm5NWcpJmTNFMx88-rWY6x67f9NjvbtckG5_N7Vgii-VhTdHfGYHz14CGZ7DwEB40fRQ6mif7_d_4Cp2eLUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16392400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Johnson, W.I. ; Olsen, D.K. ; Sarathi, P.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W.I. ; Olsen, D.K. ; Sarathi, P.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) of shallow heavy oil by cyclic steam injection or steamflooding is a commercial technology that has evolved over the past 30 years. Although TEOR may have adverse effects on the environment, these can be mitigated by careful management of standard oil field practices during TEOR process implementation. Poorly plugged old wells, natural fracturing, vertical communication between oil reservoirs and underground aquifers, and impact on air quality are a few of the environmental factors under consideration that may limit production of the midcontinent heavy oil resources. Air quality conditions and legislation are compared to those in California, which has air quality standards that are more stringent than those of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Early in the life of determining the feasibility of TEOR for a specific site, the combined resources of engineering, geological and economic feasibility, process design, and environmental assessment must be coordinated to determine the environmental impact of process implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90224-C</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>air emissions ; Applied sciences ; Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products ; Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods ; Energy ; Enhanced oil recovery methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; fractures ; Fuels ; petroleum products ; Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 1992, Vol.71 (12), p.1493-1498</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-170591bb8c4f5a23156de6053fbcb7942c880b69673d546c05265725e7650ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-170591bb8c4f5a23156de6053fbcb7942c880b69673d546c05265725e7650ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(92)90224-C$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,4024,4050,4051,23930,23931,25140,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4407307$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, D.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarathi, P.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) of shallow heavy oil by cyclic steam injection or steamflooding is a commercial technology that has evolved over the past 30 years. Although TEOR may have adverse effects on the environment, these can be mitigated by careful management of standard oil field practices during TEOR process implementation. Poorly plugged old wells, natural fracturing, vertical communication between oil reservoirs and underground aquifers, and impact on air quality are a few of the environmental factors under consideration that may limit production of the midcontinent heavy oil resources. Air quality conditions and legislation are compared to those in California, which has air quality standards that are more stringent than those of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Early in the life of determining the feasibility of TEOR for a specific site, the combined resources of engineering, geological and economic feasibility, process design, and environmental assessment must be coordinated to determine the environmental impact of process implementation.</description><subject>air emissions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products</subject><subject>Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Enhanced oil recovery methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>fractures</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>petroleum products</subject><subject>Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoI7Tf9CDDiHY0E31rd1LwBi3CUnxoe5ZaLWztZJdyZHWBv_7ruuQY2GYuTzvDPMg9IWSW0qo-kbGVjCu6Kxi84owJorlBzShpeaFppJ_RJN35BO6zPmZEKJLKSboeRUOPsXQQxhsh1vrhpgytm0LbvDhD96CPRxx9B1O4OIB0hH7gIct4N43LoYRGqN49mhDtvkr_ulzjvvksQ0NXr90dht7O8e_fy2u0EVruwyf3-YUbb6vNsv74mn942G5eCocV2ooqCayonVdOtFKyziVqgFFJG9rV-tKMFeWpFaV0ryRQjkimZKaSdBKEgA-RTfntbsUX_eQB9P77KDrbIC4z4YqXjFByAiKM-hSzDlBa3bJ9zYdDSXm5NWcpJmTNFMx88-rWY6x67f9NjvbtckG5_N7Vgii-VhTdHfGYHz14CGZ7DwEB40fRQ6mif7_d_4Cp2eLUQ</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Johnson, W.I.</creator><creator>Olsen, D.K.</creator><creator>Sarathi, P.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA</title><author>Johnson, W.I. ; Olsen, D.K. ; Sarathi, P.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-170591bb8c4f5a23156de6053fbcb7942c880b69673d546c05265725e7650ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>air emissions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products</topic><topic>Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Enhanced oil recovery methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>fractures</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>petroleum products</topic><topic>Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, D.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarathi, P.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, W.I.</au><au>Olsen, D.K.</au><au>Sarathi, P.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1493</spage><epage>1498</epage><pages>1493-1498</pages><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) of shallow heavy oil by cyclic steam injection or steamflooding is a commercial technology that has evolved over the past 30 years. Although TEOR may have adverse effects on the environment, these can be mitigated by careful management of standard oil field practices during TEOR process implementation. Poorly plugged old wells, natural fracturing, vertical communication between oil reservoirs and underground aquifers, and impact on air quality are a few of the environmental factors under consideration that may limit production of the midcontinent heavy oil resources. Air quality conditions and legislation are compared to those in California, which has air quality standards that are more stringent than those of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Early in the life of determining the feasibility of TEOR for a specific site, the combined resources of engineering, geological and economic feasibility, process design, and environmental assessment must be coordinated to determine the environmental impact of process implementation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0016-2361(92)90224-C</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0016-2361 |
| ispartof | Fuel (Guildford), 1992, Vol.71 (12), p.1493-1498 |
| issn | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16392400 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | air emissions Applied sciences Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods Energy Enhanced oil recovery methods Exact sciences and technology fractures Fuels petroleum products Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands |
| title | Environmental factors affecting heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent (Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma) USA |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A46%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20factors%20affecting%20heavy%20oil%20recovery%20in%20the%20midcontinent%20(Kansas,%20Missouri%20and%20Oklahoma)%20USA&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Johnson,%20W.I.&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1493&rft.epage=1498&rft.pages=1493-1498&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0016-2361(92)90224-C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16392400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16392400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=001623619290224C&rfr_iscdi=true |