A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions

Background The outcomes of endovascular interventions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are variable. Completion angiography is typically performed to confirm satisfactory outcomes after SFA angioplasty and/or stenting. However, two-dimensional angiography may not accurately reflect the extent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2015, Vol.29 (1), p.28-33
Hauptverfasser: Hitchner, Elizabeth, Zayed, Mohamed, Varu, Vinit, Lee, George, Aalami, Oliver, Zhou, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 29
creator Hitchner, Elizabeth
Zayed, Mohamed
Varu, Vinit
Lee, George
Aalami, Oliver
Zhou, Wei
description Background The outcomes of endovascular interventions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are variable. Completion angiography is typically performed to confirm satisfactory outcomes after SFA angioplasty and/or stenting. However, two-dimensional angiography may not accurately reflect the extent of residual stenosis. We sought to determine whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can help with residual disease assessment and procedure outcome. Methods Patients with anticipated SFA disease were prospectively recruited to the study. Patients with primary SFA disease on diagnostic angiography were included. After SFA endovascular intervention with angioplasty and/or stenting, a completion angiogram was performed to confirm satisfactory results before IVUS evaluation. IVUS-detected maximal residual stenosis, maximal residual lesion volume, and number of nonconsecutive posttreatment SFA segments with >50% residual stenosis were evaluated. Periprocedural ankle-brachial indexes (ABIs), Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys, and Walking Impairment Questionnaires were also collected. Results Fifty-nine patients were prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received angioplasty only, and 26 received angioplasty and stenting. All patients were men, mean age was 67 years, and major comorbidities included coronary artery disease (53%), active smoking (56%), hypertension (88%), and diabetes (68%). The angioplasty-only cohort had more nonconsecutive areas of >50% residual stenosis ( P  = 0.004), greater residual stenosis ( P  = 0.03), and smaller minimal lumen diameters after treatment ( P  = 0.01) than the angioplasty and stenting cohort. However, there was no significant difference in ABI between the 2 groups and no difference in ABI improvement after intervention. Sixty-four percent of all patients demonstrated a >0.2 increase in postintervention ABI. Improvement in ABI at 1 month after procedure significantly correlated with postintervention SF-36 survey physical scores ( r  = 0.435, P  = 0.007). Conclusions IVUS evaluation provides more-accurate intraprocedural insight on the extent of residual stenosis after SFA interventions. Future studies are warranted to determine whether IVUS-guided postangioplasty and/or stenting can impact long-term interventional outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637571259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0890509614004907</els_id><sourcerecordid>1637571259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d933795b21241779c8005066fb31d94e72b5ef8a9c561cb369dfbbd7a5d34a5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVoSbZpvkAPxcde7I5k_bGgFJaQtAuBBrabq5DlcdDWa28l27DfPjKb9tBDT28O7z1mfkPIBwoFBSo_7ws7x-eCAeUFqAKYvCArKqnIhebqDVlBpSEXoOUVeRfjHoCyileX5IoJqrkQbEXcOnsMQzyiG_2M2d1su8mOfuizoc120ffP2eZpt82aKSzzIwY3jbbHYYrZdjpiaL3ztsvu8TCEpOswYjhlmz7JjP3SFN-Tt63tIt686jXZ3d_9vP2eP_z4trldP-SOKzXmjS5LpUXNKONUKe0qAAFStnVJG81RsVpgW1nthKSuLqVu2rpulBVNya2w5TX5dO49huH3hHE0Bx8ddt15X0NlqYSiTOhkZWerS8fHgK05Bn-w4WQomAWu2ZsFrlngGlAmwU2hj6_9U33A5m_kD81k-HI2YLpy9hhMdB57h40PCbBpBv___q__xF3ne-9s9wtPGPfDFPrEz1ATmQGzXd67fJdyAK5BlS-10aCn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637571259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hitchner, Elizabeth ; Zayed, Mohamed ; Varu, Vinit ; Lee, George ; Aalami, Oliver ; Zhou, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitchner, Elizabeth ; Zayed, Mohamed ; Varu, Vinit ; Lee, George ; Aalami, Oliver ; Zhou, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Background The outcomes of endovascular interventions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are variable. Completion angiography is typically performed to confirm satisfactory outcomes after SFA angioplasty and/or stenting. However, two-dimensional angiography may not accurately reflect the extent of residual stenosis. We sought to determine whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can help with residual disease assessment and procedure outcome. Methods Patients with anticipated SFA disease were prospectively recruited to the study. Patients with primary SFA disease on diagnostic angiography were included. After SFA endovascular intervention with angioplasty and/or stenting, a completion angiogram was performed to confirm satisfactory results before IVUS evaluation. IVUS-detected maximal residual stenosis, maximal residual lesion volume, and number of nonconsecutive posttreatment SFA segments with &gt;50% residual stenosis were evaluated. Periprocedural ankle-brachial indexes (ABIs), Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys, and Walking Impairment Questionnaires were also collected. Results Fifty-nine patients were prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received angioplasty only, and 26 received angioplasty and stenting. All patients were men, mean age was 67 years, and major comorbidities included coronary artery disease (53%), active smoking (56%), hypertension (88%), and diabetes (68%). The angioplasty-only cohort had more nonconsecutive areas of &gt;50% residual stenosis ( P  = 0.004), greater residual stenosis ( P  = 0.03), and smaller minimal lumen diameters after treatment ( P  = 0.01) than the angioplasty and stenting cohort. However, there was no significant difference in ABI between the 2 groups and no difference in ABI improvement after intervention. Sixty-four percent of all patients demonstrated a &gt;0.2 increase in postintervention ABI. Improvement in ABI at 1 month after procedure significantly correlated with postintervention SF-36 survey physical scores ( r  = 0.435, P  = 0.007). Conclusions IVUS evaluation provides more-accurate intraprocedural insight on the extent of residual stenosis after SFA interventions. Future studies are warranted to determine whether IVUS-guided postangioplasty and/or stenting can impact long-term interventional outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25194552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty - adverse effects ; Angioplasty - instrumentation ; Angioplasty - methods ; Ankle Brachial Index ; Comorbidity ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Punctures ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2015, Vol.29 (1), p.28-33</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d933795b21241779c8005066fb31d94e72b5ef8a9c561cb369dfbbd7a5d34a5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d933795b21241779c8005066fb31d94e72b5ef8a9c561cb369dfbbd7a5d34a5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9936-3789</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509614004907$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitchner, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayed, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varu, Vinit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalami, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background The outcomes of endovascular interventions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are variable. Completion angiography is typically performed to confirm satisfactory outcomes after SFA angioplasty and/or stenting. However, two-dimensional angiography may not accurately reflect the extent of residual stenosis. We sought to determine whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can help with residual disease assessment and procedure outcome. Methods Patients with anticipated SFA disease were prospectively recruited to the study. Patients with primary SFA disease on diagnostic angiography were included. After SFA endovascular intervention with angioplasty and/or stenting, a completion angiogram was performed to confirm satisfactory results before IVUS evaluation. IVUS-detected maximal residual stenosis, maximal residual lesion volume, and number of nonconsecutive posttreatment SFA segments with &gt;50% residual stenosis were evaluated. Periprocedural ankle-brachial indexes (ABIs), Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys, and Walking Impairment Questionnaires were also collected. Results Fifty-nine patients were prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received angioplasty only, and 26 received angioplasty and stenting. All patients were men, mean age was 67 years, and major comorbidities included coronary artery disease (53%), active smoking (56%), hypertension (88%), and diabetes (68%). The angioplasty-only cohort had more nonconsecutive areas of &gt;50% residual stenosis ( P  = 0.004), greater residual stenosis ( P  = 0.03), and smaller minimal lumen diameters after treatment ( P  = 0.01) than the angioplasty and stenting cohort. However, there was no significant difference in ABI between the 2 groups and no difference in ABI improvement after intervention. Sixty-four percent of all patients demonstrated a &gt;0.2 increase in postintervention ABI. Improvement in ABI at 1 month after procedure significantly correlated with postintervention SF-36 survey physical scores ( r  = 0.435, P  = 0.007). Conclusions IVUS evaluation provides more-accurate intraprocedural insight on the extent of residual stenosis after SFA interventions. Future studies are warranted to determine whether IVUS-guided postangioplasty and/or stenting can impact long-term interventional outcome.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Angioplasty - methods</subject><subject>Ankle Brachial Index</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Punctures</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVoSbZpvkAPxcde7I5k_bGgFJaQtAuBBrabq5DlcdDWa28l27DfPjKb9tBDT28O7z1mfkPIBwoFBSo_7ws7x-eCAeUFqAKYvCArKqnIhebqDVlBpSEXoOUVeRfjHoCyileX5IoJqrkQbEXcOnsMQzyiG_2M2d1su8mOfuizoc120ffP2eZpt82aKSzzIwY3jbbHYYrZdjpiaL3ztsvu8TCEpOswYjhlmz7JjP3SFN-Tt63tIt686jXZ3d_9vP2eP_z4trldP-SOKzXmjS5LpUXNKONUKe0qAAFStnVJG81RsVpgW1nthKSuLqVu2rpulBVNya2w5TX5dO49huH3hHE0Bx8ddt15X0NlqYSiTOhkZWerS8fHgK05Bn-w4WQomAWu2ZsFrlngGlAmwU2hj6_9U33A5m_kD81k-HI2YLpy9hhMdB57h40PCbBpBv___q__xF3ne-9s9wtPGPfDFPrEz1ATmQGzXd67fJdyAK5BlS-10aCn</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Hitchner, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Zayed, Mohamed</creator><creator>Varu, Vinit</creator><creator>Lee, George</creator><creator>Aalami, Oliver</creator><creator>Zhou, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-3789</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions</title><author>Hitchner, Elizabeth ; Zayed, Mohamed ; Varu, Vinit ; Lee, George ; Aalami, Oliver ; Zhou, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d933795b21241779c8005066fb31d94e72b5ef8a9c561cb369dfbbd7a5d34a5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Angioplasty - methods</topic><topic>Ankle Brachial Index</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Punctures</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitchner, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayed, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varu, Vinit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalami, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitchner, Elizabeth</au><au>Zayed, Mohamed</au><au>Varu, Vinit</au><au>Lee, George</au><au>Aalami, Oliver</au><au>Zhou, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>28-33</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Background The outcomes of endovascular interventions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are variable. Completion angiography is typically performed to confirm satisfactory outcomes after SFA angioplasty and/or stenting. However, two-dimensional angiography may not accurately reflect the extent of residual stenosis. We sought to determine whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can help with residual disease assessment and procedure outcome. Methods Patients with anticipated SFA disease were prospectively recruited to the study. Patients with primary SFA disease on diagnostic angiography were included. After SFA endovascular intervention with angioplasty and/or stenting, a completion angiogram was performed to confirm satisfactory results before IVUS evaluation. IVUS-detected maximal residual stenosis, maximal residual lesion volume, and number of nonconsecutive posttreatment SFA segments with &gt;50% residual stenosis were evaluated. Periprocedural ankle-brachial indexes (ABIs), Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys, and Walking Impairment Questionnaires were also collected. Results Fifty-nine patients were prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received angioplasty only, and 26 received angioplasty and stenting. All patients were men, mean age was 67 years, and major comorbidities included coronary artery disease (53%), active smoking (56%), hypertension (88%), and diabetes (68%). The angioplasty-only cohort had more nonconsecutive areas of &gt;50% residual stenosis ( P  = 0.004), greater residual stenosis ( P  = 0.03), and smaller minimal lumen diameters after treatment ( P  = 0.01) than the angioplasty and stenting cohort. However, there was no significant difference in ABI between the 2 groups and no difference in ABI improvement after intervention. Sixty-four percent of all patients demonstrated a &gt;0.2 increase in postintervention ABI. Improvement in ABI at 1 month after procedure significantly correlated with postintervention SF-36 survey physical scores ( r  = 0.435, P  = 0.007). Conclusions IVUS evaluation provides more-accurate intraprocedural insight on the extent of residual stenosis after SFA interventions. Future studies are warranted to determine whether IVUS-guided postangioplasty and/or stenting can impact long-term interventional outcome.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25194552</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.026</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-3789</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2015, Vol.29 (1), p.28-33
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637571259
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Angioplasty - adverse effects
Angioplasty - instrumentation
Angioplasty - methods
Ankle Brachial Index
Comorbidity
Constriction, Pathologic
Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnostic imaging
Peripheral Arterial Disease - therapy
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Punctures
Risk Factors
Stents
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Walking
title A Prospective Evaluation of Using IVUS during Percutaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective%20Evaluation%20of%20Using%20IVUS%20during%20Percutaneous%20Superficial%20Femoral%20Artery%20Interventions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Hitchner,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=28-33&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1637571259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637571259&rft_id=info:pmid/25194552&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0890509614004907&rfr_iscdi=true