The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study
Background The European Society of Cardiology endorses cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, with separate algorithms for high-risk and low-risk countries. In the 2012 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of preventive cardiology 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.119-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | European journal of preventive cardiology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Jørstad, Harald T Colkesen, Ersen B Minneboo, Madelon Peters, Ron JG Boekholdt, S Matthijs Tijssen, Jan GP Wareham, Nicholas J Khaw, Kay-Tee |
description | Background
The European Society of Cardiology endorses cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, with separate algorithms for high-risk and low-risk countries. In the 2012 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice, the UK has been reclassified as a low-risk country. However, the performance of the SCORE algorithm has not been validated in the UK.
Design
We compared CVD mortality as predicted by SCORE with the observed CVD mortality in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) prospective population study, a cohort representative of the general population.
Methods
Individuals without known CVD or diabetes mellitus, aged 39–65 years at baseline, were included in our analysis. CVD mortality was defined as death due to ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease and aortic aneurysm. Predicted CVD mortality was calculated at baseline using the SCORE high-risk and low-risk algorithms.
Results
A total of 15,171 individuals (57.1% female) with a mean age of 53.9 (SD 6.2) years were included. Predicted CVD mortality was 2.85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80–2.90) with the SCORE high-risk algorithm and 1.55% (95% CI 1.52–1.58) with the low-risk algorithm. The observed 10-year CVD mortality was 1.25% (95% CI 1.08–1.44). Similar results were observed across sex and age subgroups.
Conclusion
In the large EPIC-Norfolk cohort representative of the UK population, the SCORE low-risk algorithm performed better than the high-risk algorithm in predicting 10-year CVD mortality. Our findings indicate that the UK has been correctly reclassified as a low-risk country. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2047487313503609 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637567933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2047487313503609</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1637567933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-414d4ac6b89b86fe7b36099957ae27e1f6ce0ab8a4efeb8ca7fe4df7cd1b44613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0Egqp0Z0IeYQjYsRs7bCgqUFFR1MIcOc4FAmkc7KSo_4EfjUuhQkjc4tP5eV_dB0JHlJxRKsR5SLjgUjDKhoRFJN5BvXUp4FLS3W0u2AEaOPdCfEQkDKXcRwchJySk4bCHPh6eAc9XroWFakuNk6k1tbIrPCvdKx4tVdX5uqnxyTyZzkanuKyxwpWyT4Afb3Fjmq76Ai4wJcEKlMWFqSrzHnTNmm29_eh-nAR3xvqPV9xY4xrQbbmEX2rs2i5fHaK9QlUOBt9vHz1ejR6Sm2AyvR4nl5NAMxG3Aac850pHmYwzGRUgsvX4cTwUCkIBtIg0EJVJxaGATGolCuB5IXROM84jyvroZOPrm3nrwLXponQaqkrVYDqX0oiJYSRixjxKNqj2fTsLRdrYcuEXlFKSrs-Q_j2Dlxx_u3fZAvKt4GfpHgg2gFNPkL6YztZ-2v8NPwEM44_t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637567933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jørstad, Harald T ; Colkesen, Ersen B ; Minneboo, Madelon ; Peters, Ron JG ; Boekholdt, S Matthijs ; Tijssen, Jan GP ; Wareham, Nicholas J ; Khaw, Kay-Tee</creator><creatorcontrib>Jørstad, Harald T ; Colkesen, Ersen B ; Minneboo, Madelon ; Peters, Ron JG ; Boekholdt, S Matthijs ; Tijssen, Jan GP ; Wareham, Nicholas J ; Khaw, Kay-Tee</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The European Society of Cardiology endorses cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, with separate algorithms for high-risk and low-risk countries. In the 2012 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice, the UK has been reclassified as a low-risk country. However, the performance of the SCORE algorithm has not been validated in the UK.
Design
We compared CVD mortality as predicted by SCORE with the observed CVD mortality in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) prospective population study, a cohort representative of the general population.
Methods
Individuals without known CVD or diabetes mellitus, aged 39–65 years at baseline, were included in our analysis. CVD mortality was defined as death due to ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease and aortic aneurysm. Predicted CVD mortality was calculated at baseline using the SCORE high-risk and low-risk algorithms.
Results
A total of 15,171 individuals (57.1% female) with a mean age of 53.9 (SD 6.2) years were included. Predicted CVD mortality was 2.85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80–2.90) with the SCORE high-risk algorithm and 1.55% (95% CI 1.52–1.58) with the low-risk algorithm. The observed 10-year CVD mortality was 1.25% (95% CI 1.08–1.44). Similar results were observed across sex and age subgroups.
Conclusion
In the large EPIC-Norfolk cohort representative of the UK population, the SCORE low-risk algorithm performed better than the high-risk algorithm in predicting 10-year CVD mortality. Our findings indicate that the UK has been correctly reclassified as a low-risk country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-4873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-4881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2047487313503609</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24002125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Cause of Death ; Coronary Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Disease - mortality ; England ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of preventive cardiology, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.119-126</ispartof><rights>The European Society of Cardiology 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav</rights><rights>The European Society of Cardiology 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-414d4ac6b89b86fe7b36099957ae27e1f6ce0ab8a4efeb8ca7fe4df7cd1b44613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-414d4ac6b89b86fe7b36099957ae27e1f6ce0ab8a4efeb8ca7fe4df7cd1b44613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2047487313503609$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487313503609$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24002125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jørstad, Harald T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ersen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minneboo, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ron JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boekholdt, S Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tijssen, Jan GP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, Kay-Tee</creatorcontrib><title>The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study</title><title>European journal of preventive cardiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</addtitle><description>Background
The European Society of Cardiology endorses cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, with separate algorithms for high-risk and low-risk countries. In the 2012 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice, the UK has been reclassified as a low-risk country. However, the performance of the SCORE algorithm has not been validated in the UK.
Design
We compared CVD mortality as predicted by SCORE with the observed CVD mortality in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) prospective population study, a cohort representative of the general population.
Methods
Individuals without known CVD or diabetes mellitus, aged 39–65 years at baseline, were included in our analysis. CVD mortality was defined as death due to ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease and aortic aneurysm. Predicted CVD mortality was calculated at baseline using the SCORE high-risk and low-risk algorithms.
Results
A total of 15,171 individuals (57.1% female) with a mean age of 53.9 (SD 6.2) years were included. Predicted CVD mortality was 2.85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80–2.90) with the SCORE high-risk algorithm and 1.55% (95% CI 1.52–1.58) with the low-risk algorithm. The observed 10-year CVD mortality was 1.25% (95% CI 1.08–1.44). Similar results were observed across sex and age subgroups.
Conclusion
In the large EPIC-Norfolk cohort representative of the UK population, the SCORE low-risk algorithm performed better than the high-risk algorithm in predicting 10-year CVD mortality. Our findings indicate that the UK has been correctly reclassified as a low-risk country.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - mortality</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>2047-4873</issn><issn>2047-4881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0Egqp0Z0IeYQjYsRs7bCgqUFFR1MIcOc4FAmkc7KSo_4EfjUuhQkjc4tP5eV_dB0JHlJxRKsR5SLjgUjDKhoRFJN5BvXUp4FLS3W0u2AEaOPdCfEQkDKXcRwchJySk4bCHPh6eAc9XroWFakuNk6k1tbIrPCvdKx4tVdX5uqnxyTyZzkanuKyxwpWyT4Afb3Fjmq76Ai4wJcEKlMWFqSrzHnTNmm29_eh-nAR3xvqPV9xY4xrQbbmEX2rs2i5fHaK9QlUOBt9vHz1ejR6Sm2AyvR4nl5NAMxG3Aac850pHmYwzGRUgsvX4cTwUCkIBtIg0EJVJxaGATGolCuB5IXROM84jyvroZOPrm3nrwLXponQaqkrVYDqX0oiJYSRixjxKNqj2fTsLRdrYcuEXlFKSrs-Q_j2Dlxx_u3fZAvKt4GfpHgg2gFNPkL6YztZ-2v8NPwEM44_t</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Jørstad, Harald T</creator><creator>Colkesen, Ersen B</creator><creator>Minneboo, Madelon</creator><creator>Peters, Ron JG</creator><creator>Boekholdt, S Matthijs</creator><creator>Tijssen, Jan GP</creator><creator>Wareham, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Khaw, Kay-Tee</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study</title><author>Jørstad, Harald T ; Colkesen, Ersen B ; Minneboo, Madelon ; Peters, Ron JG ; Boekholdt, S Matthijs ; Tijssen, Jan GP ; Wareham, Nicholas J ; Khaw, Kay-Tee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-414d4ac6b89b86fe7b36099957ae27e1f6ce0ab8a4efeb8ca7fe4df7cd1b44613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - mortality</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jørstad, Harald T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ersen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minneboo, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ron JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boekholdt, S Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tijssen, Jan GP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, Kay-Tee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of preventive cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jørstad, Harald T</au><au>Colkesen, Ersen B</au><au>Minneboo, Madelon</au><au>Peters, Ron JG</au><au>Boekholdt, S Matthijs</au><au>Tijssen, Jan GP</au><au>Wareham, Nicholas J</au><au>Khaw, Kay-Tee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of preventive cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>119-126</pages><issn>2047-4873</issn><eissn>2047-4881</eissn><abstract>Background
The European Society of Cardiology endorses cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, with separate algorithms for high-risk and low-risk countries. In the 2012 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice, the UK has been reclassified as a low-risk country. However, the performance of the SCORE algorithm has not been validated in the UK.
Design
We compared CVD mortality as predicted by SCORE with the observed CVD mortality in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) prospective population study, a cohort representative of the general population.
Methods
Individuals without known CVD or diabetes mellitus, aged 39–65 years at baseline, were included in our analysis. CVD mortality was defined as death due to ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease and aortic aneurysm. Predicted CVD mortality was calculated at baseline using the SCORE high-risk and low-risk algorithms.
Results
A total of 15,171 individuals (57.1% female) with a mean age of 53.9 (SD 6.2) years were included. Predicted CVD mortality was 2.85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80–2.90) with the SCORE high-risk algorithm and 1.55% (95% CI 1.52–1.58) with the low-risk algorithm. The observed 10-year CVD mortality was 1.25% (95% CI 1.08–1.44). Similar results were observed across sex and age subgroups.
Conclusion
In the large EPIC-Norfolk cohort representative of the UK population, the SCORE low-risk algorithm performed better than the high-risk algorithm in predicting 10-year CVD mortality. Our findings indicate that the UK has been correctly reclassified as a low-risk country.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24002125</pmid><doi>10.1177/2047487313503609</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-4873 |
ispartof | European journal of preventive cardiology, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.119-126 |
issn | 2047-4873 2047-4881 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637567933 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Algorithms Cause of Death Coronary Disease - diagnosis Coronary Disease - mortality England Female Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Middle Aged Prognosis Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Risk Factors Time Factors |
title | The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in a large UK population: 10-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Systematic%20COronary%20Risk%20Evaluation%20(SCORE)%20in%20a%20large%20UK%20population:%2010-year%20follow-up%20in%20the%20EPIC-Norfolk%20prospective%20population%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20preventive%20cardiology&rft.au=J%C3%B8rstad,%20Harald%20T&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=119-126&rft.issn=2047-4873&rft.eissn=2047-4881&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2047487313503609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1637567933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637567933&rft_id=info:pmid/24002125&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2047487313503609&rfr_iscdi=true |