The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department

In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Population health management 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371
Hauptverfasser: Ku, Bon S., Fields, J. Matthew, Santana, Abbie, Wasserman, Daniel, Borman, Laura, Scott, Kevin C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 371
container_issue 6
container_start_page 366
container_title Population health management
container_volume 17
creator Ku, Bon S.
Fields, J. Matthew
Santana, Abbie
Wasserman, Daniel
Borman, Laura
Scott, Kevin C.
description In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. ( Population Health Management 2014;17:366–371)
doi_str_mv 10.1089/pop.2013.0118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637563093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1637563093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRVcIRCBQ0iKXNA77fkCFQiBIkShI6tWuPYYgv9i1i_w9tpLQ0syMro7uSAehG4JnBGtz3zbtjGLCZpgQfYIuiOE0VQaL0-OtDZmgyxi_MZZcYnGOJpRrKbiiF-hx_QXJJnhXJ8umghJifEg--hZC2kcIMWmKpBuQRQXhE-pslzxD60JXQd1dobPClRGuD3uKNi-L9XyZrt5f3-ZPqzRjTHUp1ZAbA07luRH58DXTnmbYE-BCS8mJN0JpTUmuh0md4lwQKo1zHhNX5GyK7va9bWh-eoidrbYxg7J0NTR9tEQyJSTDhg1oukez0MQYoLBt2FYu7CzBdvRlB1929GVHXwN_e6jufQX5H30UNABsD4yxq-tyCx5C90_tLygddcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637563093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. ( Population Health Management 2014;17:366–371)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/pop.2013.0118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24865472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Female ; Homeless Persons ; Hospital Charges ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Medical Records ; Middle Aged ; Original Articles ; Philadelphia ; Retrospective Studies ; Urban Population</subject><ispartof>Population health management, 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371</ispartof><rights>2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24865472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, J. Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><title>Population health management</title><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><description>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. ( Population Health Management 2014;17:366–371)</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Homeless Persons</subject><subject>Hospital Charges</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Philadelphia</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><issn>1942-7891</issn><issn>1942-7905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRVcIRCBQ0iKXNA77fkCFQiBIkShI6tWuPYYgv9i1i_w9tpLQ0syMro7uSAehG4JnBGtz3zbtjGLCZpgQfYIuiOE0VQaL0-OtDZmgyxi_MZZcYnGOJpRrKbiiF-hx_QXJJnhXJ8umghJifEg--hZC2kcIMWmKpBuQRQXhE-pslzxD60JXQd1dobPClRGuD3uKNi-L9XyZrt5f3-ZPqzRjTHUp1ZAbA07luRH58DXTnmbYE-BCS8mJN0JpTUmuh0md4lwQKo1zHhNX5GyK7va9bWh-eoidrbYxg7J0NTR9tEQyJSTDhg1oukez0MQYoLBt2FYu7CzBdvRlB1929GVHXwN_e6jufQX5H30UNABsD4yxq-tyCx5C90_tLygddcA</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Ku, Bon S.</creator><creator>Fields, J. Matthew</creator><creator>Santana, Abbie</creator><creator>Wasserman, Daniel</creator><creator>Borman, Laura</creator><creator>Scott, Kevin C.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><author>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Homeless Persons</topic><topic>Hospital Charges</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Philadelphia</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, J. Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ku, Bon S.</au><au>Fields, J. Matthew</au><au>Santana, Abbie</au><au>Wasserman, Daniel</au><au>Borman, Laura</au><au>Scott, Kevin C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>366-371</pages><issn>1942-7891</issn><eissn>1942-7905</eissn><abstract>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. ( Population Health Management 2014;17:366–371)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>24865472</pmid><doi>10.1089/pop.2013.0118</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7891
ispartof Population health management, 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371
issn 1942-7891
1942-7905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637563093
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Academic Medical Centers
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization
Female
Homeless Persons
Hospital Charges
Humans
Insurance, Health
Male
Medical Records
Middle Aged
Original Articles
Philadelphia
Retrospective Studies
Urban Population
title The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Urban%20Homeless:%20Super-users%20of%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Population%20health%20management&rft.au=Ku,%20Bon%20S.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=366-371&rft.issn=1942-7891&rft.eissn=1942-7905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/pop.2013.0118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1637563093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637563093&rft_id=info:pmid/24865472&rfr_iscdi=true