The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department
In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Population health management 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 371 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 366 |
container_title | Population health management |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ku, Bon S. Fields, J. Matthew Santana, Abbie Wasserman, Daniel Borman, Laura Scott, Kevin C. |
description | In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. (
Population Health Management
2014;17:366–371) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/pop.2013.0118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637563093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1637563093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRVcIRCBQ0iKXNA77fkCFQiBIkShI6tWuPYYgv9i1i_w9tpLQ0syMro7uSAehG4JnBGtz3zbtjGLCZpgQfYIuiOE0VQaL0-OtDZmgyxi_MZZcYnGOJpRrKbiiF-hx_QXJJnhXJ8umghJifEg--hZC2kcIMWmKpBuQRQXhE-pslzxD60JXQd1dobPClRGuD3uKNi-L9XyZrt5f3-ZPqzRjTHUp1ZAbA07luRH58DXTnmbYE-BCS8mJN0JpTUmuh0md4lwQKo1zHhNX5GyK7va9bWh-eoidrbYxg7J0NTR9tEQyJSTDhg1oukez0MQYoLBt2FYu7CzBdvRlB1929GVHXwN_e6jufQX5H30UNABsD4yxq-tyCx5C90_tLygddcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637563093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. (
Population Health Management
2014;17:366–371)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/pop.2013.0118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24865472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Female ; Homeless Persons ; Hospital Charges ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Medical Records ; Middle Aged ; Original Articles ; Philadelphia ; Retrospective Studies ; Urban Population</subject><ispartof>Population health management, 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371</ispartof><rights>2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24865472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, J. Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><title>Population health management</title><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><description>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. (
Population Health Management
2014;17:366–371)</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Homeless Persons</subject><subject>Hospital Charges</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Philadelphia</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><issn>1942-7891</issn><issn>1942-7905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRVcIRCBQ0iKXNA77fkCFQiBIkShI6tWuPYYgv9i1i_w9tpLQ0syMro7uSAehG4JnBGtz3zbtjGLCZpgQfYIuiOE0VQaL0-OtDZmgyxi_MZZcYnGOJpRrKbiiF-hx_QXJJnhXJ8umghJifEg--hZC2kcIMWmKpBuQRQXhE-pslzxD60JXQd1dobPClRGuD3uKNi-L9XyZrt5f3-ZPqzRjTHUp1ZAbA07luRH58DXTnmbYE-BCS8mJN0JpTUmuh0md4lwQKo1zHhNX5GyK7va9bWh-eoidrbYxg7J0NTR9tEQyJSTDhg1oukez0MQYoLBt2FYu7CzBdvRlB1929GVHXwN_e6jufQX5H30UNABsD4yxq-tyCx5C90_tLygddcA</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Ku, Bon S.</creator><creator>Fields, J. Matthew</creator><creator>Santana, Abbie</creator><creator>Wasserman, Daniel</creator><creator>Borman, Laura</creator><creator>Scott, Kevin C.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</title><author>Ku, Bon S. ; Fields, J. Matthew ; Santana, Abbie ; Wasserman, Daniel ; Borman, Laura ; Scott, Kevin C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-28ed99ea7dd95d472c8b2c0b1e4586641b9578821d88822a74451269aab01afd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Homeless Persons</topic><topic>Hospital Charges</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Philadelphia</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ku, Bon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, J. Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ku, Bon S.</au><au>Fields, J. Matthew</au><au>Santana, Abbie</au><au>Wasserman, Daniel</au><au>Borman, Laura</au><au>Scott, Kevin C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>366-371</pages><issn>1942-7891</issn><eissn>1942-7905</eissn><abstract>In the United States, patient usage of costly emergency departments (EDs) has been portrayed as a major factor contributing to health care expenditures. The homeless are associated with ED frequent users, a population often blamed for inappropriate ED use. This study examined the characteristics and costs associated with homeless ED frequent users. A retrospective cross-sectional review of hospital records for ED visits in 2006 at an urban academic medical center was performed. Frequent users were defined as having greater than 4 ED visits in one year. Homeless status was determined by self-report and review by an interdisciplinary team. A total of 5440 (8.9%) ED visits were made by 542 frequent users, 74 (13.7%) of whom were homeless and made 845 ED visits. Homeless frequent users had a median age of 47 years (39–56 interquartile range), were predominantly male (85.1%), and insured by Medicaid (59.5%). Most (44.2%) visits by homeless frequent users occurred between 1500–2259 hours and had an Emergency Severity Index of Level 3 (55.5%). Sixty-four percent of visits resulted in homeless patients being discharged back to the street; only 4.0% had a specific discharge plan addressing homelessness. Total charges and payments for all homeless frequent users were $4,812,615 and $802,600, respectively. The single top frequent user accrued charges of $482,928. ED frequent users are disproportionately homeless and their costs are significant. ED discharge planning should address the additional risks faced by homeless individuals. ED-based interventions that specifically target the most expensive homeless frequent users may prove to be cost-effective. (
Population Health Management
2014;17:366–371)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>24865472</pmid><doi>10.1089/pop.2013.0118</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-7891 |
ispartof | Population health management, 2014-12, Vol.17 (6), p.366-371 |
issn | 1942-7891 1942-7905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637563093 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization Female Homeless Persons Hospital Charges Humans Insurance, Health Male Medical Records Middle Aged Original Articles Philadelphia Retrospective Studies Urban Population |
title | The Urban Homeless: Super-users of the Emergency Department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Urban%20Homeless:%20Super-users%20of%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Population%20health%20management&rft.au=Ku,%20Bon%20S.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=366-371&rft.issn=1942-7891&rft.eissn=1942-7905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/pop.2013.0118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1637563093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637563093&rft_id=info:pmid/24865472&rfr_iscdi=true |