Clearing the Past
The ruling, which cannot be appealed, highlights how seriously the E.U. asserts a right to privacy for individuals. Because the U.S. does not have a right to privacy written into its constitution, privacy experts claim that U.S. citizens and journalists are not likely to see a "right to be forg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The News media & the law 2014-07, p.22 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | The News media & the law |
container_volume | |
creator | Keeton-Olsen, Danielle |
description | The ruling, which cannot be appealed, highlights how seriously the E.U. asserts a right to privacy for individuals. Because the U.S. does not have a right to privacy written into its constitution, privacy experts claim that U.S. citizens and journalists are not likely to see a "right to be forgotten" in the near future. Based on the legislative history of the E.U. regarding privacy issues, Bennett said he was not surprised by the ruling, but he thought it was a little odd that the court interpreted an existing directive to define the right to be forgotten, rather than creating it as part of a new directive. Because the incident leading to the ruling occurred entirely within E.U. boundaries, the Court of Justice was able to pass its interpretation relatively smoothly, Bennett said. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637040778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3529600621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16370407783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQ21DUwszDhYOAqLs4yMDA0MjMx5WQQdM5JTSzKzEtXKMlIVQhILC7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMGm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhmbG5gYmBubmFsYkKAUAY_AqqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1637040778</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Clearing the Past</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</creatorcontrib><description>The ruling, which cannot be appealed, highlights how seriously the E.U. asserts a right to privacy for individuals. Because the U.S. does not have a right to privacy written into its constitution, privacy experts claim that U.S. citizens and journalists are not likely to see a "right to be forgotten" in the near future. Based on the legislative history of the E.U. regarding privacy issues, Bennett said he was not surprised by the ruling, but he thought it was a little odd that the court interpreted an existing directive to define the right to be forgotten, rather than creating it as part of a new directive. Because the incident leading to the ruling occurred entirely within E.U. boundaries, the Court of Justice was able to pass its interpretation relatively smoothly, Bennett said.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1931-0684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</publisher><subject>Court decisions ; Editorials ; International relations ; Internet ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Legislation ; Right of privacy ; Search engines</subject><ispartof>The News media & the law, 2014-07, p.22</ispartof><rights>Copyright Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Summer 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</creatorcontrib><title>Clearing the Past</title><title>The News media & the law</title><description>The ruling, which cannot be appealed, highlights how seriously the E.U. asserts a right to privacy for individuals. Because the U.S. does not have a right to privacy written into its constitution, privacy experts claim that U.S. citizens and journalists are not likely to see a "right to be forgotten" in the near future. Based on the legislative history of the E.U. regarding privacy issues, Bennett said he was not surprised by the ruling, but he thought it was a little odd that the court interpreted an existing directive to define the right to be forgotten, rather than creating it as part of a new directive. Because the incident leading to the ruling occurred entirely within E.U. boundaries, the Court of Justice was able to pass its interpretation relatively smoothly, Bennett said.</description><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><issn>1931-0684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQ21DUwszDhYOAqLs4yMDA0MjMx5WQQdM5JTSzKzEtXKMlIVQhILC7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMGm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhmbG5gYmBubmFsYkKAUAY_AqqA</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</creator><general>Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Clearing the Past</title><author>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16370407783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The News media & the law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keeton-Olsen, Danielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clearing the Past</atitle><jtitle>The News media & the law</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><spage>22</spage><pages>22-</pages><eissn>1931-0684</eissn><abstract>The ruling, which cannot be appealed, highlights how seriously the E.U. asserts a right to privacy for individuals. Because the U.S. does not have a right to privacy written into its constitution, privacy experts claim that U.S. citizens and journalists are not likely to see a "right to be forgotten" in the near future. Based on the legislative history of the E.U. regarding privacy issues, Bennett said he was not surprised by the ruling, but he thought it was a little odd that the court interpreted an existing directive to define the right to be forgotten, rather than creating it as part of a new directive. Because the incident leading to the ruling occurred entirely within E.U. boundaries, the Court of Justice was able to pass its interpretation relatively smoothly, Bennett said.</abstract><cop>Arlington</cop><pub>Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1931-0684 |
ispartof | The News media & the law, 2014-07, p.22 |
issn | 1931-0684 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1637040778 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Court decisions Editorials International relations Internet Journalism Journalists Legislation Right of privacy Search engines |
title | Clearing the Past |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A48%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clearing%20the%20Past&rft.jtitle=The%20News%20media%20&%20the%20law&rft.au=Keeton-Olsen,%20Danielle&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.spage=22&rft.pages=22-&rft.eissn=1931-0684&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3529600621%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637040778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |