GDNF - Back in the clinic

This paper aims to evaluate in PD the efficacy and safety of intermittent GDNF intra-putaminal infusions administered by Convection Enhanced Delivery. In animal models of PD and in open label studies in PD patients, continuous intra-putaminal GDNF infusions have been shown to improve motor symptoms...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroreport 2014-02, Vol.25 (3), p.142-143
Hauptverfasser: Gill, Steven S, Barque, Neil, Bienemann, Alison, Woolly, Max, Patel, Nik, Luz, Matthias, Barclay, Lyn, Mohr, Eric, Mooney, Lucy, Coulthard, Elizabeth, Lawrence, Andrew, Marshall, Chis, Whone, Alan L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 3
container_start_page 142
container_title Neuroreport
container_volume 25
creator Gill, Steven S
Barque, Neil
Bienemann, Alison
Woolly, Max
Patel, Nik
Luz, Matthias
Barclay, Lyn
Mohr, Eric
Mooney, Lucy
Coulthard, Elizabeth
Lawrence, Andrew
Marshall, Chis
Whone, Alan L
description This paper aims to evaluate in PD the efficacy and safety of intermittent GDNF intra-putaminal infusions administered by Convection Enhanced Delivery. In animal models of PD and in open label studies in PD patients, continuous intra-putaminal GDNF infusions have been shown to improve motor symptoms and, as assessed by 18F-dopa PET and post-mortem assessments, restore dopamine terminals. However, in 2003, a placebo-controlled multi-centre trial reported failure to demonstrate clinical benefit, despite improvements in PET end-points. In addition, a concurrent study in monkeys raised questions over safety. Since that point no further human investigations have been performed. In significant part, we believe, the above issues were due to a failure in the way GDNF was surgically delivered. We have now developed an in-house device which animal model studies suggest will allow GDNF to be given much more reliably to the putamen. We feel this allows for definitive testing of GDNFs effects in humans. This will be the first clinical study of intermittent GDNF infusions delivered by CED in man.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635040221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1635040221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16350402213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31jU1tYhgYeA0sDS11DWxNDPlYOAqLs4yMDCwNDC04GSQdHfxc1PQVXBKTM5WyMxTKMlIVUjOyczLTOZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awabq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfGGZsamBiYGRkaGxiQoBQCiIi5F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635040221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GDNF - Back in the clinic</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Gill, Steven S ; Barque, Neil ; Bienemann, Alison ; Woolly, Max ; Patel, Nik ; Luz, Matthias ; Barclay, Lyn ; Mohr, Eric ; Mooney, Lucy ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Lawrence, Andrew ; Marshall, Chis ; Whone, Alan L</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, Steven S ; Barque, Neil ; Bienemann, Alison ; Woolly, Max ; Patel, Nik ; Luz, Matthias ; Barclay, Lyn ; Mohr, Eric ; Mooney, Lucy ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Lawrence, Andrew ; Marshall, Chis ; Whone, Alan L</creatorcontrib><description>This paper aims to evaluate in PD the efficacy and safety of intermittent GDNF intra-putaminal infusions administered by Convection Enhanced Delivery. In animal models of PD and in open label studies in PD patients, continuous intra-putaminal GDNF infusions have been shown to improve motor symptoms and, as assessed by 18F-dopa PET and post-mortem assessments, restore dopamine terminals. However, in 2003, a placebo-controlled multi-centre trial reported failure to demonstrate clinical benefit, despite improvements in PET end-points. In addition, a concurrent study in monkeys raised questions over safety. Since that point no further human investigations have been performed. In significant part, we believe, the above issues were due to a failure in the way GDNF was surgically delivered. We have now developed an in-house device which animal model studies suggest will allow GDNF to be given much more reliably to the putamen. We feel this allows for definitive testing of GDNFs effects in humans. This will be the first clinical study of intermittent GDNF infusions delivered by CED in man.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-558X</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neuroreport, 2014-02, Vol.25 (3), p.142-143</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barque, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienemann, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolly, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barclay, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Chis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whone, Alan L</creatorcontrib><title>GDNF - Back in the clinic</title><title>Neuroreport</title><description>This paper aims to evaluate in PD the efficacy and safety of intermittent GDNF intra-putaminal infusions administered by Convection Enhanced Delivery. In animal models of PD and in open label studies in PD patients, continuous intra-putaminal GDNF infusions have been shown to improve motor symptoms and, as assessed by 18F-dopa PET and post-mortem assessments, restore dopamine terminals. However, in 2003, a placebo-controlled multi-centre trial reported failure to demonstrate clinical benefit, despite improvements in PET end-points. In addition, a concurrent study in monkeys raised questions over safety. Since that point no further human investigations have been performed. In significant part, we believe, the above issues were due to a failure in the way GDNF was surgically delivered. We have now developed an in-house device which animal model studies suggest will allow GDNF to be given much more reliably to the putamen. We feel this allows for definitive testing of GDNFs effects in humans. This will be the first clinical study of intermittent GDNF infusions delivered by CED in man.</description><issn>0959-4965</issn><issn>1473-558X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDE31jU1tYhgYeA0sDS11DWxNDPlYOAqLs4yMDCwNDC04GSQdHfxc1PQVXBKTM5WyMxTKMlIVUjOyczLTOZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awabq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfGGZsamBiYGRkaGxiQoBQCiIi5F</recordid><startdate>20140212</startdate><enddate>20140212</enddate><creator>Gill, Steven S</creator><creator>Barque, Neil</creator><creator>Bienemann, Alison</creator><creator>Woolly, Max</creator><creator>Patel, Nik</creator><creator>Luz, Matthias</creator><creator>Barclay, Lyn</creator><creator>Mohr, Eric</creator><creator>Mooney, Lucy</creator><creator>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Lawrence, Andrew</creator><creator>Marshall, Chis</creator><creator>Whone, Alan L</creator><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140212</creationdate><title>GDNF - Back in the clinic</title><author>Gill, Steven S ; Barque, Neil ; Bienemann, Alison ; Woolly, Max ; Patel, Nik ; Luz, Matthias ; Barclay, Lyn ; Mohr, Eric ; Mooney, Lucy ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Lawrence, Andrew ; Marshall, Chis ; Whone, Alan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16350402213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barque, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bienemann, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolly, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barclay, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Chis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whone, Alan L</creatorcontrib><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, Steven S</au><au>Barque, Neil</au><au>Bienemann, Alison</au><au>Woolly, Max</au><au>Patel, Nik</au><au>Luz, Matthias</au><au>Barclay, Lyn</au><au>Mohr, Eric</au><au>Mooney, Lucy</au><au>Coulthard, Elizabeth</au><au>Lawrence, Andrew</au><au>Marshall, Chis</au><au>Whone, Alan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GDNF - Back in the clinic</atitle><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle><date>2014-02-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>142-143</pages><issn>0959-4965</issn><eissn>1473-558X</eissn><abstract>This paper aims to evaluate in PD the efficacy and safety of intermittent GDNF intra-putaminal infusions administered by Convection Enhanced Delivery. In animal models of PD and in open label studies in PD patients, continuous intra-putaminal GDNF infusions have been shown to improve motor symptoms and, as assessed by 18F-dopa PET and post-mortem assessments, restore dopamine terminals. However, in 2003, a placebo-controlled multi-centre trial reported failure to demonstrate clinical benefit, despite improvements in PET end-points. In addition, a concurrent study in monkeys raised questions over safety. Since that point no further human investigations have been performed. In significant part, we believe, the above issues were due to a failure in the way GDNF was surgically delivered. We have now developed an in-house device which animal model studies suggest will allow GDNF to be given much more reliably to the putamen. We feel this allows for definitive testing of GDNFs effects in humans. This will be the first clinical study of intermittent GDNF infusions delivered by CED in man.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-4965
ispartof Neuroreport, 2014-02, Vol.25 (3), p.142-143
issn 0959-4965
1473-558X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635040221
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title GDNF - Back in the clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GDNF%20-%20Back%20in%20the%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Neuroreport&rft.au=Gill,%20Steven%20S&rft.date=2014-02-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=142-143&rft.issn=0959-4965&rft.eissn=1473-558X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1635040221%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635040221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true