Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events
Summary Laboratory research and field research have reliably shown that the cognitive interview (CI) enhances eyewitness recall in comparison with standard interview protocols in a criminal investigation context. To address some of the major criticisms of the existing CI literature, the current expe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.917-925 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 925 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 917 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Rivard, Jillian R. Fisher, Ronald P. Robertson, Belinda Hirn Mueller, Dana |
| description | Summary
Laboratory research and field research have reliably shown that the cognitive interview (CI) enhances eyewitness recall in comparison with standard interview protocols in a criminal investigation context. To address some of the major criticisms of the existing CI literature, the current experiment compared the CI with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's five‐step interview protocol in an intelligence‐gathering context using experienced interviewers and adult interviewees. The CI elicited significantly more event‐relevant information from the interviewees than the five‐step model, the standard training offered at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.3026 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635039195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3531379341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-ac3029373f521d7091daafb4609de18de913430312aabe79fd4a63fba6ed1b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1LwzAUBuAgCs4P8CcEvPGm86Rp08Y7mVMnouIHgjchS09ctLYz6Tb3721VFAWvDpzz8MLhJWSHQZ8BxPvaTPscYrFCegykjCCLYZX0IM_zKIEc1slGCE8AIAWLe-TtFkPjqkfaTJAO6sfKNW6OdFQ16OcOF3Thmgm98rXFEFxd6fLnhj4c0GE10ZXpEq7R6LKktaU3UzTOOkOPsNGuDN2uvc6879xwjlUTtsia1WXA7a-5Se6Oh7eD0-j88mQ0ODyPTMITEWnTPiN5xm0asyIDyQqt7TgRIAtkeYGS8YQDZ7HWY8ykLRItuB1rgQUbs4Jvkr3P3KmvX2fts-rFBYNlqSusZ0ExwVPgksm0pbt_6FM98-3LHyqTOU_a-R1ofB2CR6um3r1ov1QMVFeBaitQXQUtjT7pwpW4_Nepw8HVb-9Cg2_fXvtnJTKeper-4kTF6dlxKo4elOTvQ2qXTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637983416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rivard, Jillian R. ; Fisher, Ronald P. ; Robertson, Belinda ; Hirn Mueller, Dana</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Jillian R. ; Fisher, Ronald P. ; Robertson, Belinda ; Hirn Mueller, Dana</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Laboratory research and field research have reliably shown that the cognitive interview (CI) enhances eyewitness recall in comparison with standard interview protocols in a criminal investigation context. To address some of the major criticisms of the existing CI literature, the current experiment compared the CI with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's five‐step interview protocol in an intelligence‐gathering context using experienced interviewers and adult interviewees. The CI elicited significantly more event‐relevant information from the interviewees than the five‐step model, the standard training offered at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.3026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognitive psychology ; Intelligence gathering ; Law enforcement ; Police training ; Questioning ; Recall</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.917-925</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov-Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-ac3029373f521d7091daafb4609de18de913430312aabe79fd4a63fba6ed1b1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-ac3029373f521d7091daafb4609de18de913430312aabe79fd4a63fba6ed1b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.3026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.3026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Jillian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Ronald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirn Mueller, Dana</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>Summary
Laboratory research and field research have reliably shown that the cognitive interview (CI) enhances eyewitness recall in comparison with standard interview protocols in a criminal investigation context. To address some of the major criticisms of the existing CI literature, the current experiment compared the CI with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's five‐step interview protocol in an intelligence‐gathering context using experienced interviewers and adult interviewees. The CI elicited significantly more event‐relevant information from the interviewees than the five‐step model, the standard training offered at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Intelligence gathering</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Police training</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Recall</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V1LwzAUBuAgCs4P8CcEvPGm86Rp08Y7mVMnouIHgjchS09ctLYz6Tb3721VFAWvDpzz8MLhJWSHQZ8BxPvaTPscYrFCegykjCCLYZX0IM_zKIEc1slGCE8AIAWLe-TtFkPjqkfaTJAO6sfKNW6OdFQ16OcOF3Thmgm98rXFEFxd6fLnhj4c0GE10ZXpEq7R6LKktaU3UzTOOkOPsNGuDN2uvc6879xwjlUTtsia1WXA7a-5Se6Oh7eD0-j88mQ0ODyPTMITEWnTPiN5xm0asyIDyQqt7TgRIAtkeYGS8YQDZ7HWY8ykLRItuB1rgQUbs4Jvkr3P3KmvX2fts-rFBYNlqSusZ0ExwVPgksm0pbt_6FM98-3LHyqTOU_a-R1ofB2CR6um3r1ov1QMVFeBaitQXQUtjT7pwpW4_Nepw8HVb-9Cg2_fXvtnJTKeper-4kTF6dlxKo4elOTvQ2qXTA</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Rivard, Jillian R.</creator><creator>Fisher, Ronald P.</creator><creator>Robertson, Belinda</creator><creator>Hirn Mueller, Dana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events</title><author>Rivard, Jillian R. ; Fisher, Ronald P. ; Robertson, Belinda ; Hirn Mueller, Dana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-ac3029373f521d7091daafb4609de18de913430312aabe79fd4a63fba6ed1b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Intelligence gathering</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Police training</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Recall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Jillian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Ronald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirn Mueller, Dana</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivard, Jillian R.</au><au>Fisher, Ronald P.</au><au>Robertson, Belinda</au><au>Hirn Mueller, Dana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>917-925</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>Summary
Laboratory research and field research have reliably shown that the cognitive interview (CI) enhances eyewitness recall in comparison with standard interview protocols in a criminal investigation context. To address some of the major criticisms of the existing CI literature, the current experiment compared the CI with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's five‐step interview protocol in an intelligence‐gathering context using experienced interviewers and adult interviewees. The CI elicited significantly more event‐relevant information from the interviewees than the five‐step model, the standard training offered at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.3026</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 2014-11, Vol.28 (6), p.917-925 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635039195 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Cognitive psychology Intelligence gathering Law enforcement Police training Questioning Recall |
| title | Testing the Cognitive Interview with Professional Interviewers: Enhancing Recall of Specific Details of Recurring Events |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20Cognitive%20Interview%20with%20Professional%20Interviewers:%20Enhancing%20Recall%20of%20Specific%20Details%20of%20Recurring%20Events&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Rivard,%20Jillian%20R.&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=917-925&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.3026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3531379341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637983416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |