Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile

The laboratory diagnostic methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) include toxigenic culture, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the toxins of C. difficile, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect C. difficile toxin genes, but each of these methods has disadvantages; toxige...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiology and immunology 2014-11, Vol.58 (11), p.615-620
Hauptverfasser: Senoh, Mitsutoshi, Kato, Haru, Murase, Tomoko, Hagiya, Hideharu, Tagashira, Yasuaki, Fukuda, Tadashi, Iwaki, Masaaki, Yamamoto, Akihiko, Shibayama, Keigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 620
container_issue 11
container_start_page 615
container_title Microbiology and immunology
container_volume 58
creator Senoh, Mitsutoshi
Kato, Haru
Murase, Tomoko
Hagiya, Hideharu
Tagashira, Yasuaki
Fukuda, Tadashi
Iwaki, Masaaki
Yamamoto, Akihiko
Shibayama, Keigo
description The laboratory diagnostic methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) include toxigenic culture, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the toxins of C. difficile, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect C. difficile toxin genes, but each of these methods has disadvantages; toxigenic cultures require a long time to produce results, EIAs have low sensitivity, and NAATs that target DNA cannot distinguish vegetative cells from spores and dead cells. Here we report a new detection method that uses reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to target the toxin‐gene transcripts. This method was able to specifically detect the vegetative cells of toxigenic C. difficile in fecal samples in spike tests, with a minimum detection limit of 5 × 102 colony‐forming units per 100 mg of stool specimen. The performance of this method was also demonstrated in a pilot scale evaluation using clinical fecal specimens, which showed that this method may be more sensitive than EIA and requires a shorter time than toxigenic culture. This method could potentially be applied in the clinical laboratory to detect C. difficile in fecal specimens. The ability of this method to discriminate the presence of vegetative cells from spores and dead cells could help to further the understanding of CDI.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1348-0421.12189
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635033158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3479151441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-5daf61333239eec97e218b2aedbdf25b8c201dd2522190362f226b401823b65d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhzA1Z4sIlrT2O8-eIVmVb1C0SAnG0HHuydUnixU6W7lfgU-Ow7R64gC-2Zn7z5DePkNecnfF0zrnIq4zlwM848Kp-QhbHylOyYKKSmSwYOyEvYrxjDEqo8ufkBCTPZVXnC_LrM-4wRKRj0EM0wW1H5we69d2-x6BTw9xqN9CA2sydrEk1S3scb72lrQ80YoeptcNuTy2O83vY0B1ucNRzmRrsukh9S0d_7zY4OEOXnY9jcNZNPbWubZ1xHb4kz1rdRXz1cJ-Srx8uviwvs-tPq6vl--vMJCd1Jq1uCy6EAFEjmrrE5LwBjbaxLcimMsC4tSABeM1EAS1A0eSMVyCaQlpxSt4ddLfB_5gwjqp3cf6kHtBPUfFCSCYEl9V_oJCWCnWRJ_TtX-idn8KQjCSK15BLVopEnR8oE3yMAVu1Da7XYa84U3Oias5PzfmpP4mmiTcPulPToz3yjxEmQB6An2mH-3_pqfXV-lE4O8y5OOL9cU6H76ooRSnVt5uVWt18XK-rS6mY-A3awrs3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1619245073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Senoh, Mitsutoshi ; Kato, Haru ; Murase, Tomoko ; Hagiya, Hideharu ; Tagashira, Yasuaki ; Fukuda, Tadashi ; Iwaki, Masaaki ; Yamamoto, Akihiko ; Shibayama, Keigo</creator><creatorcontrib>Senoh, Mitsutoshi ; Kato, Haru ; Murase, Tomoko ; Hagiya, Hideharu ; Tagashira, Yasuaki ; Fukuda, Tadashi ; Iwaki, Masaaki ; Yamamoto, Akihiko ; Shibayama, Keigo</creatorcontrib><description>The laboratory diagnostic methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) include toxigenic culture, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the toxins of C. difficile, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect C. difficile toxin genes, but each of these methods has disadvantages; toxigenic cultures require a long time to produce results, EIAs have low sensitivity, and NAATs that target DNA cannot distinguish vegetative cells from spores and dead cells. Here we report a new detection method that uses reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to target the toxin‐gene transcripts. This method was able to specifically detect the vegetative cells of toxigenic C. difficile in fecal samples in spike tests, with a minimum detection limit of 5 × 102 colony‐forming units per 100 mg of stool specimen. The performance of this method was also demonstrated in a pilot scale evaluation using clinical fecal specimens, which showed that this method may be more sensitive than EIA and requires a shorter time than toxigenic culture. This method could potentially be applied in the clinical laboratory to detect C. difficile in fecal specimens. The ability of this method to discriminate the presence of vegetative cells from spores and dead cells could help to further the understanding of CDI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-5600</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-0421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1348-0421.12189</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25145894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Toxins - biosynthesis ; Bacterial Toxins - genetics ; Bacteriological Techniques - methods ; Clostridium difficile ; Clostridium difficile - genetics ; Clostridium difficile - growth &amp; development ; Detection method ; Feces - microbiology ; Humans ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; RNA, Messenger - analysis ; RNA, Messenger - genetics ; RT-PCR ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Transcription, Genetic ; Vegetative cells</subject><ispartof>Microbiology and immunology, 2014-11, Vol.58 (11), p.615-620</ispartof><rights>2014 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2014 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-5daf61333239eec97e218b2aedbdf25b8c201dd2522190362f226b401823b65d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-5daf61333239eec97e218b2aedbdf25b8c201dd2522190362f226b401823b65d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1348-0421.12189$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1348-0421.12189$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25145894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senoh, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Haru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiya, Hideharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagashira, Yasuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibayama, Keigo</creatorcontrib><title>Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile</title><title>Microbiology and immunology</title><addtitle>Microbiol Immunol</addtitle><description>The laboratory diagnostic methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) include toxigenic culture, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the toxins of C. difficile, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect C. difficile toxin genes, but each of these methods has disadvantages; toxigenic cultures require a long time to produce results, EIAs have low sensitivity, and NAATs that target DNA cannot distinguish vegetative cells from spores and dead cells. Here we report a new detection method that uses reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to target the toxin‐gene transcripts. This method was able to specifically detect the vegetative cells of toxigenic C. difficile in fecal samples in spike tests, with a minimum detection limit of 5 × 102 colony‐forming units per 100 mg of stool specimen. The performance of this method was also demonstrated in a pilot scale evaluation using clinical fecal specimens, which showed that this method may be more sensitive than EIA and requires a shorter time than toxigenic culture. This method could potentially be applied in the clinical laboratory to detect C. difficile in fecal specimens. The ability of this method to discriminate the presence of vegetative cells from spores and dead cells could help to further the understanding of CDI.</description><subject>Bacterial Toxins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Detection method</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - analysis</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - genetics</subject><subject>RT-PCR</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><subject>Vegetative cells</subject><issn>0385-5600</issn><issn>1348-0421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhzA1Z4sIlrT2O8-eIVmVb1C0SAnG0HHuydUnixU6W7lfgU-Ow7R64gC-2Zn7z5DePkNecnfF0zrnIq4zlwM848Kp-QhbHylOyYKKSmSwYOyEvYrxjDEqo8ufkBCTPZVXnC_LrM-4wRKRj0EM0wW1H5we69d2-x6BTw9xqN9CA2sydrEk1S3scb72lrQ80YoeptcNuTy2O83vY0B1ucNRzmRrsukh9S0d_7zY4OEOXnY9jcNZNPbWubZ1xHb4kz1rdRXz1cJ-Srx8uviwvs-tPq6vl--vMJCd1Jq1uCy6EAFEjmrrE5LwBjbaxLcimMsC4tSABeM1EAS1A0eSMVyCaQlpxSt4ddLfB_5gwjqp3cf6kHtBPUfFCSCYEl9V_oJCWCnWRJ_TtX-idn8KQjCSK15BLVopEnR8oE3yMAVu1Da7XYa84U3Oias5PzfmpP4mmiTcPulPToz3yjxEmQB6An2mH-3_pqfXV-lE4O8y5OOL9cU6H76ooRSnVt5uVWt18XK-rS6mY-A3awrs3</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Senoh, Mitsutoshi</creator><creator>Kato, Haru</creator><creator>Murase, Tomoko</creator><creator>Hagiya, Hideharu</creator><creator>Tagashira, Yasuaki</creator><creator>Fukuda, Tadashi</creator><creator>Iwaki, Masaaki</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Akihiko</creator><creator>Shibayama, Keigo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile</title><author>Senoh, Mitsutoshi ; Kato, Haru ; Murase, Tomoko ; Hagiya, Hideharu ; Tagashira, Yasuaki ; Fukuda, Tadashi ; Iwaki, Masaaki ; Yamamoto, Akihiko ; Shibayama, Keigo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-5daf61333239eec97e218b2aedbdf25b8c201dd2522190362f226b401823b65d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Toxins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Detection method</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - analysis</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - genetics</topic><topic>RT-PCR</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><topic>Vegetative cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senoh, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Haru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiya, Hideharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagashira, Yasuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibayama, Keigo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Microbiology and immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senoh, Mitsutoshi</au><au>Kato, Haru</au><au>Murase, Tomoko</au><au>Hagiya, Hideharu</au><au>Tagashira, Yasuaki</au><au>Fukuda, Tadashi</au><au>Iwaki, Masaaki</au><au>Yamamoto, Akihiko</au><au>Shibayama, Keigo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology and immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Microbiol Immunol</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>615-620</pages><issn>0385-5600</issn><eissn>1348-0421</eissn><abstract>The laboratory diagnostic methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) include toxigenic culture, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the toxins of C. difficile, and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect C. difficile toxin genes, but each of these methods has disadvantages; toxigenic cultures require a long time to produce results, EIAs have low sensitivity, and NAATs that target DNA cannot distinguish vegetative cells from spores and dead cells. Here we report a new detection method that uses reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to target the toxin‐gene transcripts. This method was able to specifically detect the vegetative cells of toxigenic C. difficile in fecal samples in spike tests, with a minimum detection limit of 5 × 102 colony‐forming units per 100 mg of stool specimen. The performance of this method was also demonstrated in a pilot scale evaluation using clinical fecal specimens, which showed that this method may be more sensitive than EIA and requires a shorter time than toxigenic culture. This method could potentially be applied in the clinical laboratory to detect C. difficile in fecal specimens. The ability of this method to discriminate the presence of vegetative cells from spores and dead cells could help to further the understanding of CDI.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25145894</pmid><doi>10.1111/1348-0421.12189</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-5600
ispartof Microbiology and immunology, 2014-11, Vol.58 (11), p.615-620
issn 0385-5600
1348-0421
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635033158
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; Open Access Titles of Japan; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bacterial Toxins - biosynthesis
Bacterial Toxins - genetics
Bacteriological Techniques - methods
Clostridium difficile
Clostridium difficile - genetics
Clostridium difficile - growth & development
Detection method
Feces - microbiology
Humans
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
RNA, Messenger - analysis
RNA, Messenger - genetics
RT-PCR
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
Transcription, Genetic
Vegetative cells
title Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A13%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reverse%20transcription%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction-based%20method%20for%20selectively%20detecting%20vegetative%20cells%20of%20toxigenic%20Clostridium%20difficile&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20and%20immunology&rft.au=Senoh,%20Mitsutoshi&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=615-620&rft.issn=0385-5600&rft.eissn=1348-0421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1348-0421.12189&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3479151441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1619245073&rft_id=info:pmid/25145894&rfr_iscdi=true