Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany
Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
container_volume | 170 |
creator | Petersen, Juliana J Paulitsch, Michael A Hartig, Johannes Mergenthal, Karola Gerlach, Ferdinand M Gensichen, Jochen |
description | Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635030181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032714005424</els_id><sourcerecordid>1635030181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUs2KFDEQbkRxx9UH8CK5CF56rKST7jSCIIu7KyyoqOdQk65m0_bPmHSvzLv4sFYzo4IH8ZSC-n5S9VWWPZWwlSDLl922w2arQOot2C2Y4l62kaYqcmVkdT_bMMbkUKjqLHuUUgcAZV3Bw-xMGaXBathkPy7Rz1MUaY6Ln5dIAsdGDISJ64HGWYTxDmPA0ZOYWjHfkviAc1g714T9fCs-LpTmMI0jhkh5LVqWa2nA_qS1FvsYBowH4ZEd9kd-Et8D0wfsmNDQPlJKLMOG4origOPhcfagxT7Rk9N7nn25fPv54jq_eX_17uLNTe51JeecqFRoQKMp0RgAsqVFaXfKl2jBKLtrjSo06bIsSXG31gRopKptJVsyxXn24qi7j9O3dRo3hOSp73GkaUlOloWBAqSV_wFVdW1qpTRD5RHq45RSpNadtuAkuDU_1znOz635ObCO82POs5P8shuo-c34FRgDnp8AmDz2beRgQvqDs9ZCoVfzV0cc8d7uAkWXPC_dU8Mh-dk1U_jnN17_xfZ9GAMbfqUDpW5a4siBOOmScuA-rYe23pnUAEbz7D8B-_7N4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629959224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25240840</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Family Practice ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Major depression ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Mood disorders ; Primary Health Care ; Primary healthcare ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms) ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28880344$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulitsch, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergenthal, Karola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Major depression</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Primary healthcare</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms)</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUs2KFDEQbkRxx9UH8CK5CF56rKST7jSCIIu7KyyoqOdQk65m0_bPmHSvzLv4sFYzo4IH8ZSC-n5S9VWWPZWwlSDLl922w2arQOot2C2Y4l62kaYqcmVkdT_bMMbkUKjqLHuUUgcAZV3Bw-xMGaXBathkPy7Rz1MUaY6Ln5dIAsdGDISJ64HGWYTxDmPA0ZOYWjHfkviAc1g714T9fCs-LpTmMI0jhkh5LVqWa2nA_qS1FvsYBowH4ZEd9kd-Et8D0wfsmNDQPlJKLMOG4origOPhcfagxT7Rk9N7nn25fPv54jq_eX_17uLNTe51JeecqFRoQKMp0RgAsqVFaXfKl2jBKLtrjSo06bIsSXG31gRopKptJVsyxXn24qi7j9O3dRo3hOSp73GkaUlOloWBAqSV_wFVdW1qpTRD5RHq45RSpNadtuAkuDU_1znOz635ObCO82POs5P8shuo-c34FRgDnp8AmDz2beRgQvqDs9ZCoVfzV0cc8d7uAkWXPC_dU8Mh-dk1U_jnN17_xfZ9GAMbfqUDpW5a4siBOOmScuA-rYe23pnUAEbz7D8B-_7N4g</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Petersen, Juliana J</creator><creator>Paulitsch, Michael A</creator><creator>Hartig, Johannes</creator><creator>Mergenthal, Karola</creator><creator>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creator><creator>Gensichen, Jochen</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><author>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Major depression</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Primary healthcare</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms)</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulitsch, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergenthal, Karola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Juliana J</au><au>Paulitsch, Michael A</au><au>Hartig, Johannes</au><au>Mergenthal, Karola</au><au>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</au><au>Gensichen, Jochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>138</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>138-142</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25240840</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142 |
issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635030181 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Depression Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis Factor Analysis, Statistical Family Practice Female Germany Humans Major depression Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Mood disorders Primary Health Care Primary healthcare Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms) Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychopathology. Psychiatry Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A08%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20structure%20and%20measurement%20invariance%20of%20the%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-9%20for%20female%20and%20male%20primary%20care%20patients%20with%20major%20depression%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Petersen,%20Juliana%20J&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=138-142&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635030181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629959224&rft_id=info:pmid/25240840&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165032714005424&rfr_iscdi=true |