Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany

Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142
Hauptverfasser: Petersen, Juliana J, Paulitsch, Michael A, Hartig, Johannes, Mergenthal, Karola, Gerlach, Ferdinand M, Gensichen, Jochen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue
container_start_page 138
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 170
creator Petersen, Juliana J
Paulitsch, Michael A
Hartig, Johannes
Mergenthal, Karola
Gerlach, Ferdinand M
Gensichen, Jochen
description Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635030181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032714005424</els_id><sourcerecordid>1635030181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUs2KFDEQbkRxx9UH8CK5CF56rKST7jSCIIu7KyyoqOdQk65m0_bPmHSvzLv4sFYzo4IH8ZSC-n5S9VWWPZWwlSDLl922w2arQOot2C2Y4l62kaYqcmVkdT_bMMbkUKjqLHuUUgcAZV3Bw-xMGaXBathkPy7Rz1MUaY6Ln5dIAsdGDISJ64HGWYTxDmPA0ZOYWjHfkviAc1g714T9fCs-LpTmMI0jhkh5LVqWa2nA_qS1FvsYBowH4ZEd9kd-Et8D0wfsmNDQPlJKLMOG4origOPhcfagxT7Rk9N7nn25fPv54jq_eX_17uLNTe51JeecqFRoQKMp0RgAsqVFaXfKl2jBKLtrjSo06bIsSXG31gRopKptJVsyxXn24qi7j9O3dRo3hOSp73GkaUlOloWBAqSV_wFVdW1qpTRD5RHq45RSpNadtuAkuDU_1znOz635ObCO82POs5P8shuo-c34FRgDnp8AmDz2beRgQvqDs9ZCoVfzV0cc8d7uAkWXPC_dU8Mh-dk1U_jnN17_xfZ9GAMbfqUDpW5a4siBOOmScuA-rYe23pnUAEbz7D8B-_7N4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629959224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25240840</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Family Practice ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Major depression ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Mood disorders ; Primary Health Care ; Primary healthcare ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms) ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28880344$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulitsch, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergenthal, Karola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Major depression</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Primary healthcare</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms)</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUs2KFDEQbkRxx9UH8CK5CF56rKST7jSCIIu7KyyoqOdQk65m0_bPmHSvzLv4sFYzo4IH8ZSC-n5S9VWWPZWwlSDLl922w2arQOot2C2Y4l62kaYqcmVkdT_bMMbkUKjqLHuUUgcAZV3Bw-xMGaXBathkPy7Rz1MUaY6Ln5dIAsdGDISJ64HGWYTxDmPA0ZOYWjHfkviAc1g714T9fCs-LpTmMI0jhkh5LVqWa2nA_qS1FvsYBowH4ZEd9kd-Et8D0wfsmNDQPlJKLMOG4origOPhcfagxT7Rk9N7nn25fPv54jq_eX_17uLNTe51JeecqFRoQKMp0RgAsqVFaXfKl2jBKLtrjSo06bIsSXG31gRopKptJVsyxXn24qi7j9O3dRo3hOSp73GkaUlOloWBAqSV_wFVdW1qpTRD5RHq45RSpNadtuAkuDU_1znOz635ObCO82POs5P8shuo-c34FRgDnp8AmDz2beRgQvqDs9ZCoVfzV0cc8d7uAkWXPC_dU8Mh-dk1U_jnN17_xfZ9GAMbfqUDpW5a4siBOOmScuA-rYe23pnUAEbz7D8B-_7N4g</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Petersen, Juliana J</creator><creator>Paulitsch, Michael A</creator><creator>Hartig, Johannes</creator><creator>Mergenthal, Karola</creator><creator>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creator><creator>Gensichen, Jochen</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</title><author>Petersen, Juliana J ; Paulitsch, Michael A ; Hartig, Johannes ; Mergenthal, Karola ; Gerlach, Ferdinand M ; Gensichen, Jochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ee62a504a56a5500e868a18b2c6a80528bf5234e4666e2e8694e0a5129871fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Major depression</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Primary healthcare</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms)</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulitsch, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergenthal, Karola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensichen, Jochen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Juliana J</au><au>Paulitsch, Michael A</au><au>Hartig, Johannes</au><au>Mergenthal, Karola</au><au>Gerlach, Ferdinand M</au><au>Gensichen, Jochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>138</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>138-142</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Depression is characterized by gender-specific distinctions, with women being affected more often than men. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is frequently used to assess depression in primary healthcare. Previous research has yielded heterogeneous findings on the factor structure, and little is known of its measurement invariance across gender. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the fit of four previously hypothesized models of PHQ-9 factor structure in patients with major depression in German family practices, and 2) to test the measurement invariance of the best-fitting model across gender. Methods We used the baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The diagnosis of major depression was based on the PHQ-9 and confirmed by the family physician. We calculated Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to assess which of the previously hypothesized factor structures (a one- and three different two-factor solutions) would best fit our data. We also calculated Complex Survey Analyses (CSA) and Multi Sample Analyses (MSA). Results We included 626 participants (75.4% women and 24.6% men). A two-factor model with five ‘somatic’ labeled items and four ‘non-somatic’ labeled items presented the best fit indices. The model measurement was invariant across gender. Limitations The inclusion criteria used in the main trial mean the study sample was not representative of all patients with major depression in German family practices. Conclusions The measurement invariance across gender revealed by this study is a precondition for the use of the PHQ-9 without gender-specific adaptation in patients with major depression in German family practices.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25240840</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2015-01, Vol.170, p.138-142
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635030181
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Family Practice
Female
Germany
Humans
Major depression
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Mood disorders
Primary Health Care
Primary healthcare
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatric status rating scales (MESH terms)
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for female and male primary care patients with major depression in Germany
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A08%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20structure%20and%20measurement%20invariance%20of%20the%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-9%20for%20female%20and%20male%20primary%20care%20patients%20with%20major%20depression%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Petersen,%20Juliana%20J&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=138-142&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635030181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629959224&rft_id=info:pmid/25240840&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165032714005424&rfr_iscdi=true