Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change

Abstract Introduction Research consistently showed that stress and organizational change are closely related. Objective This study was conducted to identify the psychosocial job characteristics that are responsible for psychological stress in a context of organizational change. Method An expanded 30...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 2014-11, Vol.64 (6), p.299-306
Hauptverfasser: Chauvin, B, Rohmer, O, Spitzenstetter, F, Raffin, D, Schimchowitsch, S, Louvet, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 6
container_start_page 299
container_title Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée
container_volume 64
creator Chauvin, B
Rohmer, O
Spitzenstetter, F
Raffin, D
Schimchowitsch, S
Louvet, E
description Abstract Introduction Research consistently showed that stress and organizational change are closely related. Objective This study was conducted to identify the psychosocial job characteristics that are responsible for psychological stress in a context of organizational change. Method An expanded 30-item version of the Job Content Questionnaire was used to measure psychological demands, decision latitude, supervisor support, coworker support, and organizational difficulties. Online survey responses from 973 employees from the university of Strasbourg were analyzed. Results Confirmatory Factor Analyses indicated a poor fit of the five-factor model based on 30 items but an acceptable to good fit of a reduced five-factor model based on 26 items. Results from a stepwise regression showed that the organizational difficulties dimension was the second most important predictor of psychological stress. Conclusion The implications of these findings for further work on health outcomes of organizational changes closed this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635029937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1162908814000796</els_id><sourcerecordid>1635029937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-15ad834c6437733503307d01b887fdbeb2e244320932eb4be4dda83c5f4061a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEEqXlBVhlg8Qm6fgnsS0hpKqiFKkSi7Zry3EmxSHXvnhyEeXpcbgVCxasZjT6zhnNmap6w6BlwPrzucXs9i0HJlswLUD3rDphWulGyE49Lz3reWNA65fVK6IZgJse1El1dUGERDuMa52mek5DTWsuk3pyfk2Z6hBrV_sUV_z5B0n5wcXwy60hRbfU_quLD3hWvZjcQvj6qZ5W91cf7y6vm5svnz5fXtw0XjK9NqxzoxbS91IoJUQHQoAagQ1aq2kccODIpRQcjOA4yAHlODotfDdJ6JnrxGn17ui7z-n7AWm1u0Ael8VFTAeyrC-m3BihCsqPqM-JKONk9znsXH60DOwWmp3tFprdQrNgbAmtiN4--Tvybpmyiz7QXyXXWndGmMK9P3JYjv0RMFvyAaPHMWT0qx1T-P-aD__I_RJiKBu_4SPSnA65ZFvOscQt2Nvte9vzmAQAZXrxG6pElnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635029937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chauvin, B ; Rohmer, O ; Spitzenstetter, F ; Raffin, D ; Schimchowitsch, S ; Louvet, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chauvin, B ; Rohmer, O ; Spitzenstetter, F ; Raffin, D ; Schimchowitsch, S ; Louvet, E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Research consistently showed that stress and organizational change are closely related. Objective This study was conducted to identify the psychosocial job characteristics that are responsible for psychological stress in a context of organizational change. Method An expanded 30-item version of the Job Content Questionnaire was used to measure psychological demands, decision latitude, supervisor support, coworker support, and organizational difficulties. Online survey responses from 973 employees from the university of Strasbourg were analyzed. Results Confirmatory Factor Analyses indicated a poor fit of the five-factor model based on 30 items but an acceptable to good fit of a reduced five-factor model based on 26 items. Results from a stepwise regression showed that the organizational difficulties dimension was the second most important predictor of psychological stress. Conclusion The implications of these findings for further work on health outcomes of organizational changes closed this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1162-9088</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lisse: Elsevier SAS</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Changements organisationnels ; Facteurs de stress au travail ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Internal Medicine ; Job Content Questionnaire ; Job stress factors ; Occupational psychology ; Organizational change ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Questionnaire de Satisfaction au Travail ; Work condition. Job performance. Stress</subject><ispartof>Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 2014-11, Vol.64 (6), p.299-306</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-15ad834c6437733503307d01b887fdbeb2e244320932eb4be4dda83c5f4061a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-15ad834c6437733503307d01b887fdbeb2e244320932eb4be4dda83c5f4061a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908814000796$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28885939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chauvin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohmer, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzenstetter, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schimchowitsch, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louvet, E</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change</title><title>Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée</title><description>Abstract Introduction Research consistently showed that stress and organizational change are closely related. Objective This study was conducted to identify the psychosocial job characteristics that are responsible for psychological stress in a context of organizational change. Method An expanded 30-item version of the Job Content Questionnaire was used to measure psychological demands, decision latitude, supervisor support, coworker support, and organizational difficulties. Online survey responses from 973 employees from the university of Strasbourg were analyzed. Results Confirmatory Factor Analyses indicated a poor fit of the five-factor model based on 30 items but an acceptable to good fit of a reduced five-factor model based on 26 items. Results from a stepwise regression showed that the organizational difficulties dimension was the second most important predictor of psychological stress. Conclusion The implications of these findings for further work on health outcomes of organizational changes closed this study.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Changements organisationnels</subject><subject>Facteurs de stress au travail</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Job Content Questionnaire</subject><subject>Job stress factors</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Questionnaire de Satisfaction au Travail</subject><subject>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</subject><issn>1162-9088</issn><issn>1878-3457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEEqXlBVhlg8Qm6fgnsS0hpKqiFKkSi7Zry3EmxSHXvnhyEeXpcbgVCxasZjT6zhnNmap6w6BlwPrzucXs9i0HJlswLUD3rDphWulGyE49Lz3reWNA65fVK6IZgJse1El1dUGERDuMa52mek5DTWsuk3pyfk2Z6hBrV_sUV_z5B0n5wcXwy60hRbfU_quLD3hWvZjcQvj6qZ5W91cf7y6vm5svnz5fXtw0XjK9NqxzoxbS91IoJUQHQoAagQ1aq2kccODIpRQcjOA4yAHlODotfDdJ6JnrxGn17ui7z-n7AWm1u0Ael8VFTAeyrC-m3BihCsqPqM-JKONk9znsXH60DOwWmp3tFprdQrNgbAmtiN4--Tvybpmyiz7QXyXXWndGmMK9P3JYjv0RMFvyAaPHMWT0qx1T-P-aD__I_RJiKBu_4SPSnA65ZFvOscQt2Nvte9vzmAQAZXrxG6pElnY</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Chauvin, B</creator><creator>Rohmer, O</creator><creator>Spitzenstetter, F</creator><creator>Raffin, D</creator><creator>Schimchowitsch, S</creator><creator>Louvet, E</creator><general>Elsevier SAS</general><general>Centre de psychologie appliquée</general><general>Swets &amp; Zeitlinger</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change</title><author>Chauvin, B ; Rohmer, O ; Spitzenstetter, F ; Raffin, D ; Schimchowitsch, S ; Louvet, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-15ad834c6437733503307d01b887fdbeb2e244320932eb4be4dda83c5f4061a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Changements organisationnels</topic><topic>Facteurs de stress au travail</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Job Content Questionnaire</topic><topic>Job stress factors</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Questionnaire de Satisfaction au Travail</topic><topic>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chauvin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohmer, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzenstetter, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schimchowitsch, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louvet, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chauvin, B</au><au>Rohmer, O</au><au>Spitzenstetter, F</au><au>Raffin, D</au><au>Schimchowitsch, S</au><au>Louvet, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change</atitle><jtitle>Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>299-306</pages><issn>1162-9088</issn><eissn>1878-3457</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Research consistently showed that stress and organizational change are closely related. Objective This study was conducted to identify the psychosocial job characteristics that are responsible for psychological stress in a context of organizational change. Method An expanded 30-item version of the Job Content Questionnaire was used to measure psychological demands, decision latitude, supervisor support, coworker support, and organizational difficulties. Online survey responses from 973 employees from the university of Strasbourg were analyzed. Results Confirmatory Factor Analyses indicated a poor fit of the five-factor model based on 30 items but an acceptable to good fit of a reduced five-factor model based on 26 items. Results from a stepwise regression showed that the organizational difficulties dimension was the second most important predictor of psychological stress. Conclusion The implications of these findings for further work on health outcomes of organizational changes closed this study.</abstract><cop>Lisse</cop><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Elsevier SAS</pub><doi>10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1162-9088
ispartof Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 2014-11, Vol.64 (6), p.299-306
issn 1162-9088
1878-3457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635029937
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Changements organisationnels
Facteurs de stress au travail
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Internal Medicine
Job Content Questionnaire
Job stress factors
Occupational psychology
Organizational change
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Questionnaire de Satisfaction au Travail
Work condition. Job performance. Stress
title Assessment of job stress factors in a context of organizational change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20job%20stress%20factors%20in%20a%20context%20of%20organizational%20change&rft.jtitle=Revue%20europ%C3%A9enne%20de%20psychologie%20appliqu%C3%A9e&rft.au=Chauvin,%20B&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=299-306&rft.issn=1162-9088&rft.eissn=1878-3457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635029937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635029937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1162908814000796&rfr_iscdi=true