Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin

Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River basin have declined dramatically since the late 1990s, and detailed information on the spawning distribution, stock structure, and stock timing is needed to better manage the run and facilitate conservation efforts. A total of 2,860...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2014-11, Vol.143 (6), p.1476-1507
Hauptverfasser: Eiler, John H, Masuda, Michele M, Spencer, Ted R, Driscoll, Richard J, Schreck, Carl B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1507
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1476
container_title Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)
container_volume 143
creator Eiler, John H
Masuda, Michele M
Spencer, Ted R
Driscoll, Richard J
Schreck, Carl B
description Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River basin have declined dramatically since the late 1990s, and detailed information on the spawning distribution, stock structure, and stock timing is needed to better manage the run and facilitate conservation efforts. A total of 2,860 fish were radio-tagged in the lower basin during 2002–2004 and tracked upriver. Fish traveled to spawning areas throughout the basin, ranging from several hundred to over 3,000 km from the tagging site. Similar distribution patterns were observed across years, suggesting that the major components of the run were identified. Daily and seasonal composition estimates were calculated for the component stocks. The run was dominated by two regional components comprising over 70% of the return. Substantially fewer fish returned to other areas, ranging from 2% to 9% of the return, but their collective contribution was appreciable. Most regional components consisted of several principal stocks and a number of small, spatially isolated populations. Regional and stock composition estimates were similar across years even though differences in run abundance were reported, suggesting that the differences in abundance were not related to regional or stock-specific variability. Run timing was relatively compressed compared with that in rivers in the southern portion of the species’ range. Most stocks passed through the lower river over a 6-week period, ranging in duration from 16 to 38 d. Run timing was similar for middle- and upper-basin stocks, limiting the use of timing information for management. The lower-basin stocks were primarily later-run fish. Although differences were observed, there was general agreement between our composition and timing estimates and those from other assessment projects within the basin, suggesting that the telemetry-based estimates provided a plausible approximation of the return. However, the short duration of the run, complex stock structure, and similar stock timing complicate management of Yukon River returns. Received March 5, 2014; accepted August 27, 2014
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00028487.2014.959997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635025312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1635025312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3596-2ea7b24406d3e26b30c3bd2d38e4521aec810ecc965c36a013fb88227104529d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFP3DAQhSNEpcLCP6iEjxw227EdOw43unRbpJUqsYs4Wo4zCS5JvLWzRfyB_u5mSZE49jRvZt73Di9JPlFYUFDwGQCYylS-YECzRSGKosiPkhMqMpUqKYrjd_pjchrjz5EQuVQnyZ8bF4fgyv3gfD8nm8HbJ7L03c5HdzgR01dk6zrXN_NJm6YZF3KHcef7iMTX5MG1FVk-ut77J7IxbTdydzjsQ39wDp4YsjahwTlZBcR01frn1wj3GwP5YqLrz5IPtWkjnv-bs-R-9XW7_J6uf3y7XV6vU8tFIVOGJi9ZloGsODJZcrC8rFjFFWaCUYNWUUBrCykslwYor0ulGMspjP-i4rPkcsrdBf9rj3HQnYsW29b06PdRU8kFMMEpG63ZZLXBxxiw1rvgOhNeNAV9qF2_1a4Pteup9hG7mrBn1-LLfzF6e73a0CyXI3wxwbXx2jTBRX2_GZ0SgAIHyPlf1kmO-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635025312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Eiler, John H ; Masuda, Michele M ; Spencer, Ted R ; Driscoll, Richard J ; Schreck, Carl B</creator><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H ; Masuda, Michele M ; Spencer, Ted R ; Driscoll, Richard J ; Schreck, Carl B</creatorcontrib><description>Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River basin have declined dramatically since the late 1990s, and detailed information on the spawning distribution, stock structure, and stock timing is needed to better manage the run and facilitate conservation efforts. A total of 2,860 fish were radio-tagged in the lower basin during 2002–2004 and tracked upriver. Fish traveled to spawning areas throughout the basin, ranging from several hundred to over 3,000 km from the tagging site. Similar distribution patterns were observed across years, suggesting that the major components of the run were identified. Daily and seasonal composition estimates were calculated for the component stocks. The run was dominated by two regional components comprising over 70% of the return. Substantially fewer fish returned to other areas, ranging from 2% to 9% of the return, but their collective contribution was appreciable. Most regional components consisted of several principal stocks and a number of small, spatially isolated populations. Regional and stock composition estimates were similar across years even though differences in run abundance were reported, suggesting that the differences in abundance were not related to regional or stock-specific variability. Run timing was relatively compressed compared with that in rivers in the southern portion of the species’ range. Most stocks passed through the lower river over a 6-week period, ranging in duration from 16 to 38 d. Run timing was similar for middle- and upper-basin stocks, limiting the use of timing information for management. The lower-basin stocks were primarily later-run fish. Although differences were observed, there was general agreement between our composition and timing estimates and those from other assessment projects within the basin, suggesting that the telemetry-based estimates provided a plausible approximation of the return. However, the short duration of the run, complex stock structure, and similar stock timing complicate management of Yukon River returns. Received March 5, 2014; accepted August 27, 2014</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2014.959997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>basins ; fish ; information management ; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ; radio frequency identification ; rivers ; spawning ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2014-11, Vol.143 (6), p.1476-1507</ispartof><rights>2014 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3596-2ea7b24406d3e26b30c3bd2d38e4521aec810ecc965c36a013fb88227104529d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3596-2ea7b24406d3e26b30c3bd2d38e4521aec810ecc965c36a013fb88227104529d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080%2F00028487.2014.959997$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F00028487.2014.959997$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ted R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreck, Carl B</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River basin have declined dramatically since the late 1990s, and detailed information on the spawning distribution, stock structure, and stock timing is needed to better manage the run and facilitate conservation efforts. A total of 2,860 fish were radio-tagged in the lower basin during 2002–2004 and tracked upriver. Fish traveled to spawning areas throughout the basin, ranging from several hundred to over 3,000 km from the tagging site. Similar distribution patterns were observed across years, suggesting that the major components of the run were identified. Daily and seasonal composition estimates were calculated for the component stocks. The run was dominated by two regional components comprising over 70% of the return. Substantially fewer fish returned to other areas, ranging from 2% to 9% of the return, but their collective contribution was appreciable. Most regional components consisted of several principal stocks and a number of small, spatially isolated populations. Regional and stock composition estimates were similar across years even though differences in run abundance were reported, suggesting that the differences in abundance were not related to regional or stock-specific variability. Run timing was relatively compressed compared with that in rivers in the southern portion of the species’ range. Most stocks passed through the lower river over a 6-week period, ranging in duration from 16 to 38 d. Run timing was similar for middle- and upper-basin stocks, limiting the use of timing information for management. The lower-basin stocks were primarily later-run fish. Although differences were observed, there was general agreement between our composition and timing estimates and those from other assessment projects within the basin, suggesting that the telemetry-based estimates provided a plausible approximation of the return. However, the short duration of the run, complex stock structure, and similar stock timing complicate management of Yukon River returns. Received March 5, 2014; accepted August 27, 2014</description><subject>basins</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>information management</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</subject><subject>radio frequency identification</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>spawning</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFP3DAQhSNEpcLCP6iEjxw227EdOw43unRbpJUqsYs4Wo4zCS5JvLWzRfyB_u5mSZE49jRvZt73Di9JPlFYUFDwGQCYylS-YECzRSGKosiPkhMqMpUqKYrjd_pjchrjz5EQuVQnyZ8bF4fgyv3gfD8nm8HbJ7L03c5HdzgR01dk6zrXN_NJm6YZF3KHcef7iMTX5MG1FVk-ut77J7IxbTdydzjsQ39wDp4YsjahwTlZBcR01frn1wj3GwP5YqLrz5IPtWkjnv-bs-R-9XW7_J6uf3y7XV6vU8tFIVOGJi9ZloGsODJZcrC8rFjFFWaCUYNWUUBrCykslwYor0ulGMspjP-i4rPkcsrdBf9rj3HQnYsW29b06PdRU8kFMMEpG63ZZLXBxxiw1rvgOhNeNAV9qF2_1a4Pteup9hG7mrBn1-LLfzF6e73a0CyXI3wxwbXx2jTBRX2_GZ0SgAIHyPlf1kmO-A</recordid><startdate>20141102</startdate><enddate>20141102</enddate><creator>Eiler, John H</creator><creator>Masuda, Michele M</creator><creator>Spencer, Ted R</creator><creator>Driscoll, Richard J</creator><creator>Schreck, Carl B</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141102</creationdate><title>Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin</title><author>Eiler, John H ; Masuda, Michele M ; Spencer, Ted R ; Driscoll, Richard J ; Schreck, Carl B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3596-2ea7b24406d3e26b30c3bd2d38e4521aec810ecc965c36a013fb88227104529d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>basins</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>information management</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</topic><topic>radio frequency identification</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>spawning</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ted R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreck, Carl B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eiler, John H</au><au>Masuda, Michele M</au><au>Spencer, Ted R</au><au>Driscoll, Richard J</au><au>Schreck, Carl B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2014-11-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1476</spage><epage>1507</epage><pages>1476-1507</pages><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River basin have declined dramatically since the late 1990s, and detailed information on the spawning distribution, stock structure, and stock timing is needed to better manage the run and facilitate conservation efforts. A total of 2,860 fish were radio-tagged in the lower basin during 2002–2004 and tracked upriver. Fish traveled to spawning areas throughout the basin, ranging from several hundred to over 3,000 km from the tagging site. Similar distribution patterns were observed across years, suggesting that the major components of the run were identified. Daily and seasonal composition estimates were calculated for the component stocks. The run was dominated by two regional components comprising over 70% of the return. Substantially fewer fish returned to other areas, ranging from 2% to 9% of the return, but their collective contribution was appreciable. Most regional components consisted of several principal stocks and a number of small, spatially isolated populations. Regional and stock composition estimates were similar across years even though differences in run abundance were reported, suggesting that the differences in abundance were not related to regional or stock-specific variability. Run timing was relatively compressed compared with that in rivers in the southern portion of the species’ range. Most stocks passed through the lower river over a 6-week period, ranging in duration from 16 to 38 d. Run timing was similar for middle- and upper-basin stocks, limiting the use of timing information for management. The lower-basin stocks were primarily later-run fish. Although differences were observed, there was general agreement between our composition and timing estimates and those from other assessment projects within the basin, suggesting that the telemetry-based estimates provided a plausible approximation of the return. However, the short duration of the run, complex stock structure, and similar stock timing complicate management of Yukon River returns. Received March 5, 2014; accepted August 27, 2014</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00028487.2014.959997</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1548-8659
ispartof Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2014-11, Vol.143 (6), p.1476-1507
issn 1548-8659
0002-8487
1548-8659
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635025312
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects basins
fish
information management
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
radio frequency identification
rivers
spawning
watersheds
title Distribution, Stock Composition and Timing, and Tagging Response of Wild Chinook Salmon Returning to a Large, Free-Flowing River Basin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution,%20Stock%20Composition%20and%20Timing,%20and%20Tagging%20Response%20of%20Wild%20Chinook%20Salmon%20Returning%20to%20a%20Large,%20Free-Flowing%20River%20Basin&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Eiler,%20John%20H&rft.date=2014-11-02&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1476&rft.epage=1507&rft.pages=1476-1507&rft.issn=1548-8659&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00028487.2014.959997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635025312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635025312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true