Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus
Gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene are primary tools for preventing transmission of pathogens in health care settings. The CDC recommends that these approaches be used for all patients as a part of standard precautions, which include hand hygiene on room entry and exit and after touching the environmen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2014-10, Vol.312 (14), p.1395-1396 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1396 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 14 |
| container_start_page | 1395 |
| container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
| container_volume | 312 |
| creator | Morgan, Daniel J Kaye, Keith S Diekema, Daniel J |
| description | Gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene are primary tools for preventing transmission of pathogens in health care settings. The CDC recommends that these approaches be used for all patients as a part of standard precautions, which include hand hygiene on room entry and exit and after touching the environment or before touching a sterile site, and the addition of gloves, gowns, or both for patient care that involves risk for exposure to body fluids, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin. Despite the widespread use of contact precautions, there is little evidence these measures prevent methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic, nonoutbreak settings (the current situation in most US hospitals). No interventional study has compared MRSA or VRE acquisition rates with contact precautions vs standard precautions. Here, Morgan et al discuss reconsidering isolation precautions for endemic MRSE and VRE. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.2014.10142 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635013600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>1911334</ama_id><sourcerecordid>3470051561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-bd4930da028c35537d7c78092f30f71cd77214876f64a66b45a0f02c1ff3deea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT1P5DAQhi0EgmW5GokCRaKhCYxjO05KtFo-JBAI7q6NvP4ArxJ7sZNiy_vn57AL0l2Fm7GlZ16N50HoGMMFBsCXS9GJiwIwTU9Mix00wYxUOWF1tYsmAHWVc1rRA3QY4xLSwYTvo4OCFTVmHE_Qn2ctvYtW6WDda3YXfSt66132FLQUw3iNmfEhmzulOyuzB92_WWnb1rr8WUcbe-H67KUXq7d166WXcoiZGIIei1PZb-Gk79byH3zueh228BHaM6KN-se2TtGv6_nP2W1-_3hzN7u6zwXhvM8XitYElICikoQxwhWXvIK6MAQMx1JxXmBa8dKUVJTlgjIBBgqJjSFKa0Gm6HyTuwr-fdCxbzobpW5b4bQfYoNLwtJ6SoBvoFAz4GVNE3r2H7r0Q3DpI4lKKy45TXNP0eWGksHHGLRpVsF2IqwbDM0oshlFNqPI5kNk6jjd5g6LTqsv_tNcAk42wNj4lVZjTAglfwF3kqOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615767449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Morgan, Daniel J ; Kaye, Keith S ; Diekema, Daniel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Daniel J ; Kaye, Keith S ; Diekema, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><description>Gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene are primary tools for preventing transmission of pathogens in health care settings. The CDC recommends that these approaches be used for all patients as a part of standard precautions, which include hand hygiene on room entry and exit and after touching the environment or before touching a sterile site, and the addition of gloves, gowns, or both for patient care that involves risk for exposure to body fluids, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin. Despite the widespread use of contact precautions, there is little evidence these measures prevent methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic, nonoutbreak settings (the current situation in most US hospitals). No interventional study has compared MRSA or VRE acquisition rates with contact precautions vs standard precautions. Here, Morgan et al discuss reconsidering isolation precautions for endemic MRSE and VRE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.10142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25291571</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Antiviral drugs ; Bacterial infections ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Disease control ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Endemic Diseases ; Enterococcus ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - transmission ; Hand Hygiene ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Patient Isolation ; Patient safety ; Protective Clothing ; Safety management ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2014-10, Vol.312 (14), p.1395-1396</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Oct 8, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-bd4930da028c35537d7c78092f30f71cd77214876f64a66b45a0f02c1ff3deea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2014.10142$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2014.10142$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25291571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Keith S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekema, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>Gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene are primary tools for preventing transmission of pathogens in health care settings. The CDC recommends that these approaches be used for all patients as a part of standard precautions, which include hand hygiene on room entry and exit and after touching the environment or before touching a sterile site, and the addition of gloves, gowns, or both for patient care that involves risk for exposure to body fluids, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin. Despite the widespread use of contact precautions, there is little evidence these measures prevent methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic, nonoutbreak settings (the current situation in most US hospitals). No interventional study has compared MRSA or VRE acquisition rates with contact precautions vs standard precautions. Here, Morgan et al discuss reconsidering isolation precautions for endemic MRSE and VRE.</description><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Endemic Diseases</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Hand Hygiene</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Patient Isolation</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Protective Clothing</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT1P5DAQhi0EgmW5GokCRaKhCYxjO05KtFo-JBAI7q6NvP4ArxJ7sZNiy_vn57AL0l2Fm7GlZ16N50HoGMMFBsCXS9GJiwIwTU9Mix00wYxUOWF1tYsmAHWVc1rRA3QY4xLSwYTvo4OCFTVmHE_Qn2ctvYtW6WDda3YXfSt66132FLQUw3iNmfEhmzulOyuzB92_WWnb1rr8WUcbe-H67KUXq7d166WXcoiZGIIei1PZb-Gk79byH3zueh228BHaM6KN-se2TtGv6_nP2W1-_3hzN7u6zwXhvM8XitYElICikoQxwhWXvIK6MAQMx1JxXmBa8dKUVJTlgjIBBgqJjSFKa0Gm6HyTuwr-fdCxbzobpW5b4bQfYoNLwtJ6SoBvoFAz4GVNE3r2H7r0Q3DpI4lKKy45TXNP0eWGksHHGLRpVsF2IqwbDM0oshlFNqPI5kNk6jjd5g6LTqsv_tNcAk42wNj4lVZjTAglfwF3kqOU</recordid><startdate>20141008</startdate><enddate>20141008</enddate><creator>Morgan, Daniel J</creator><creator>Kaye, Keith S</creator><creator>Diekema, Daniel J</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141008</creationdate><title>Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus</title><author>Morgan, Daniel J ; Kaye, Keith S ; Diekema, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-bd4930da028c35537d7c78092f30f71cd77214876f64a66b45a0f02c1ff3deea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Endemic Diseases</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Hand Hygiene</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Patient Isolation</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Protective Clothing</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Vancomycin - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Keith S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekema, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Daniel J</au><au>Kaye, Keith S</au><au>Diekema, Daniel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2014-10-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>312</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1396</epage><pages>1395-1396</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>Gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene are primary tools for preventing transmission of pathogens in health care settings. The CDC recommends that these approaches be used for all patients as a part of standard precautions, which include hand hygiene on room entry and exit and after touching the environment or before touching a sterile site, and the addition of gloves, gowns, or both for patient care that involves risk for exposure to body fluids, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin. Despite the widespread use of contact precautions, there is little evidence these measures prevent methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic, nonoutbreak settings (the current situation in most US hospitals). No interventional study has compared MRSA or VRE acquisition rates with contact precautions vs standard precautions. Here, Morgan et al discuss reconsidering isolation precautions for endemic MRSE and VRE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>25291571</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2014.10142</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
| ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2014-10, Vol.312 (14), p.1395-1396 |
| issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635013600 |
| source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
| subjects | Antiviral drugs Bacterial infections Cross Infection - prevention & control Disease control Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Bacterial Endemic Diseases Enterococcus Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - transmission Hand Hygiene Humans Infection Control - methods Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Patient Isolation Patient safety Protective Clothing Safety management Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcus aureus Vancomycin - pharmacology |
| title | Reconsidering Isolation Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconsidering%20Isolation%20Precautions%20for%20Endemic%20Methicillin-Resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20Vancomycin-Resistant%20Enterococcus&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Morgan,%20Daniel%20J&rft.date=2014-10-08&rft.volume=312&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1396&rft.pages=1395-1396&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2014.10142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3470051561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615767449&rft_id=info:pmid/25291571&rft_ama_id=1911334&rfr_iscdi=true |