A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography
A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics in medicine & biology 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6635 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 6621 |
container_title | Physics in medicine & biology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Maki Bloomquist, A K Mainprize, J G Mawdsley, G E Yaffe, M J |
description | A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635009562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1635009562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKyBLis3NOIqYK8SVVYoHZshO7pCR1aidD_z2JWjoynXR63vd0DyG3QB-A5nlCKYe4AMQEi4RBIgSDMzIHLiAWKOg5mZ-QGbkKYUMpQM7SSzJjyBmKjM7J4zLqVfiJtQqminaDaup-H5Vu23vXRK3pfV1G1vmoqtd1r8aValu39qr73l-TC6uaYG6Oc0G-Xp4_n97i1cfr-9NyFZc8zftYQ5UWIAosBC2x0sDzjGtArg0VuuACmdCGsQyMQquNBSMEVhwyazFPLV-Q-0Nv591uMKGXbR1K0zRqa9wQJAiOlBYo2IimB7T0LgRvrOx83Sq_l0DlpE1OTuTkRGIhGchJ2xi7O14YdGuqU-jP0wjQA1C7Tm7c4Lfjw_93_gJH_HUj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635009562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</creator><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><description>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25325670</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Breast - pathology ; detectability index ; digital mammography ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography - standards ; model observer ; Models, Theoretical ; modulation transfer function ; noise power spectrum ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Quality Control ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine & biology, 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635</ispartof><rights>2014 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,53845,53892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25325670$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainprize, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><title>Physics in medicine & biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</description><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>detectability index</subject><subject>digital mammography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>model observer</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>modulation transfer function</subject><subject>noise power spectrum</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKyBLis3NOIqYK8SVVYoHZshO7pCR1aidD_z2JWjoynXR63vd0DyG3QB-A5nlCKYe4AMQEi4RBIgSDMzIHLiAWKOg5mZ-QGbkKYUMpQM7SSzJjyBmKjM7J4zLqVfiJtQqminaDaup-H5Vu23vXRK3pfV1G1vmoqtd1r8aValu39qr73l-TC6uaYG6Oc0G-Xp4_n97i1cfr-9NyFZc8zftYQ5UWIAosBC2x0sDzjGtArg0VuuACmdCGsQyMQquNBSMEVhwyazFPLV-Q-0Nv591uMKGXbR1K0zRqa9wQJAiOlBYo2IimB7T0LgRvrOx83Sq_l0DlpE1OTuTkRGIhGchJ2xi7O14YdGuqU-jP0wjQA1C7Tm7c4Lfjw_93_gJH_HUj</recordid><startdate>20141107</startdate><enddate>20141107</enddate><creator>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creator><creator>Mainprize, J G</creator><creator>Mawdsley, G E</creator><creator>Yaffe, M J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141107</creationdate><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><author>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>detectability index</topic><topic>digital mammography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>model observer</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>modulation transfer function</topic><topic>noise power spectrum</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainprize, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maki Bloomquist, A K</au><au>Mainprize, J G</au><au>Mawdsley, G E</au><au>Yaffe, M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2014-11-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>6621</spage><epage>6635</epage><pages>6621-6635</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>25325670</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9155 |
ispartof | Physics in medicine & biology, 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635 |
issn | 0031-9155 1361-6560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635009562 |
source | MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | Breast - pathology detectability index digital mammography Female Humans Mammography - methods Mammography - standards model observer Models, Theoretical modulation transfer function noise power spectrum Phantoms, Imaging Quality Control Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards X-Rays |
title | A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20task-based%20quality%20control%20metric%20for%20digital%20mammography&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Maki%20Bloomquist,%20A%20K&rft.date=2014-11-07&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=6621&rft.epage=6635&rft.pages=6621-6635&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635009562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635009562&rft_id=info:pmid/25325670&rfr_iscdi=true |