A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography

A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635
Hauptverfasser: Maki Bloomquist, A K, Mainprize, J G, Mawdsley, G E, Yaffe, M J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6635
container_issue 21
container_start_page 6621
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 59
creator Maki Bloomquist, A K
Mainprize, J G
Mawdsley, G E
Yaffe, M J
description A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635009562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1635009562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKyBLis3NOIqYK8SVVYoHZshO7pCR1aidD_z2JWjoynXR63vd0DyG3QB-A5nlCKYe4AMQEi4RBIgSDMzIHLiAWKOg5mZ-QGbkKYUMpQM7SSzJjyBmKjM7J4zLqVfiJtQqminaDaup-H5Vu23vXRK3pfV1G1vmoqtd1r8aValu39qr73l-TC6uaYG6Oc0G-Xp4_n97i1cfr-9NyFZc8zftYQ5UWIAosBC2x0sDzjGtArg0VuuACmdCGsQyMQquNBSMEVhwyazFPLV-Q-0Nv591uMKGXbR1K0zRqa9wQJAiOlBYo2IimB7T0LgRvrOx83Sq_l0DlpE1OTuTkRGIhGchJ2xi7O14YdGuqU-jP0wjQA1C7Tm7c4Lfjw_93_gJH_HUj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635009562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</creator><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><description>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25325670</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Breast - pathology ; detectability index ; digital mammography ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography - standards ; model observer ; Models, Theoretical ; modulation transfer function ; noise power spectrum ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Quality Control ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635</ispartof><rights>2014 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,53845,53892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25325670$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainprize, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</description><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>detectability index</subject><subject>digital mammography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>model observer</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>modulation transfer function</subject><subject>noise power spectrum</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKyBLis3NOIqYK8SVVYoHZshO7pCR1aidD_z2JWjoynXR63vd0DyG3QB-A5nlCKYe4AMQEi4RBIgSDMzIHLiAWKOg5mZ-QGbkKYUMpQM7SSzJjyBmKjM7J4zLqVfiJtQqminaDaup-H5Vu23vXRK3pfV1G1vmoqtd1r8aValu39qr73l-TC6uaYG6Oc0G-Xp4_n97i1cfr-9NyFZc8zftYQ5UWIAosBC2x0sDzjGtArg0VuuACmdCGsQyMQquNBSMEVhwyazFPLV-Q-0Nv591uMKGXbR1K0zRqa9wQJAiOlBYo2IimB7T0LgRvrOx83Sq_l0DlpE1OTuTkRGIhGchJ2xi7O14YdGuqU-jP0wjQA1C7Tm7c4Lfjw_93_gJH_HUj</recordid><startdate>20141107</startdate><enddate>20141107</enddate><creator>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creator><creator>Mainprize, J G</creator><creator>Mawdsley, G E</creator><creator>Yaffe, M J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141107</creationdate><title>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</title><author>Maki Bloomquist, A K ; Mainprize, J G ; Mawdsley, G E ; Yaffe, M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b1d491695960c5db13873b153be06b936526be2271ea5fbef1e665d317ff584f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>detectability index</topic><topic>digital mammography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>model observer</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>modulation transfer function</topic><topic>noise power spectrum</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maki Bloomquist, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainprize, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, M J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maki Bloomquist, A K</au><au>Mainprize, J G</au><au>Mawdsley, G E</au><au>Yaffe, M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2014-11-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>6621</spage><epage>6635</epage><pages>6621-6635</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>A reader study was conducted to tune the parameters of an observer model used to predict the detectability index (dʹ ) of test objects as a task-based quality control (QC) metric for digital mammography. A simple test phantom was imaged to measure the model parameters, namely, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function and test-object contrast. These are then used in a non-prewhitening observer model, incorporating an eye-filter and internal noise, to predict dʹ. The model was tuned by measuring dʹ of discs in a four-alternative forced choice reader study. For each disc diameter, dʹ was used to estimate the threshold thicknesses for detectability. Data were obtained for six types of digital mammography systems using varying detector technologies and x-ray spectra. A strong correlation was found between measured and modeled values of dʹ, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Repeated measurements from separate images of the test phantom show an average coefficient of variation in dʹ for different systems between 0.07 and 0.10. Standard deviations in the threshold thickness ranged between 0.001 and 0.017 mm. The model is robust and the results are relatively system independent, suggesting that observer model dʹ shows promise as a cross platform QC metric for digital mammography.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>25325670</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2014-11, Vol.59 (21), p.6621-6635
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1635009562
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Breast - pathology
detectability index
digital mammography
Female
Humans
Mammography - methods
Mammography - standards
model observer
Models, Theoretical
modulation transfer function
noise power spectrum
Phantoms, Imaging
Quality Control
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards
X-Rays
title A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20task-based%20quality%20control%20metric%20for%20digital%20mammography&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Maki%20Bloomquist,%20A%20K&rft.date=2014-11-07&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=6621&rft.epage=6635&rft.pages=6621-6635&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635009562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635009562&rft_id=info:pmid/25325670&rfr_iscdi=true