Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice

Point-of-care ultrasonography with a pocket ultrasound device, General Electric Medical Systems Vscan (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), has been shown to be effective and easy to learn. However, no studies to date have evaluated its use in the military primary care setting where its portability and value in b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2014-12, Vol.179 (12), p.1474-1477
Hauptverfasser: Bornemann, Paul, Bornemann, Gina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1477
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1474
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 179
creator Bornemann, Paul
Bornemann, Gina
description Point-of-care ultrasonography with a pocket ultrasound device, General Electric Medical Systems Vscan (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), has been shown to be effective and easy to learn. However, no studies to date have evaluated its use in the military primary care setting where its portability and value in bedside diagnosis would be especially beneficial. We tested the feasibility of the Vscan in the day-to-day care of patients by family physicians in their clinic, inpatient wards, and its potential for use in the military-deployed setting. Participants were trained and credentialed in the use of the point-of-care ultrasonography. Then, participants were provided with a pocket ultrasound device to use in their normal day-to-day practice. Additionally, participants completed surveys and provided ratings on their perceptions regarding the use of the device. According to the survey analysis, participants found the devices to be easy to use, valuable in discerning a diagnosis, and were not prohibitively time consuming. Moreover, patients were perceived by the participants to have been satisfied with the use of the device. Overall, participants had high satisfaction with the Vscan and perceived that the device would be highly valuable in the military-deployed setting.
doi_str_mv 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634285318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1634285318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43024222e225f98c226a72fb3318a8361fd7822c676e3b8eef09450adfc32433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPwzAQhC0EgvL4AVyQJQ5wMXhtx0mOiPKSWnHpgZvlOrYwpHGwE6T-e1wKHDiNtPp2tDuD0CnQq5LR4nr-NJvfTcmUgCCUMgE7aAI1p0QCf9lFkzyTRNCyOECHKb1RCqKuYB8dsELIui5hgl7nvvWDjmvs9Mq3a9y_rpM3XnfpAvc2GtsPPnQJB4c17oN5t0MW3w0kOGJ0tHhsh6hTGLsGN_bTG4t9h03rO290i_uozZCHx2jP6TbZkx89Qov7u8XtI5k9Pzzd3syI4SUbiOD5D8aYZaxwdWUYk7pkbsk5VLriElxTVowZWUrLl5W1jtaioLpxhjPB-RG63Nr2MXyMNg1q5ZOxbas7G8akQHLBqiK7ZfT8H_oWxtjl4zaUhBqgqDMFW8rEkFK0TvXRr3JgCqjatKC2LaipAqG-W8g7Zz_O43Jlm7-N39j5F5yhgs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1636191159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Bornemann, Paul ; Bornemann, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Paul ; Bornemann, Gina</creatorcontrib><description>Point-of-care ultrasonography with a pocket ultrasound device, General Electric Medical Systems Vscan (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), has been shown to be effective and easy to learn. However, no studies to date have evaluated its use in the military primary care setting where its portability and value in bedside diagnosis would be especially beneficial. We tested the feasibility of the Vscan in the day-to-day care of patients by family physicians in their clinic, inpatient wards, and its potential for use in the military-deployed setting. Participants were trained and credentialed in the use of the point-of-care ultrasonography. Then, participants were provided with a pocket ultrasound device to use in their normal day-to-day practice. Additionally, participants completed surveys and provided ratings on their perceptions regarding the use of the device. According to the survey analysis, participants found the devices to be easy to use, valuable in discerning a diagnosis, and were not prohibitively time consuming. Moreover, patients were perceived by the participants to have been satisfied with the use of the device. Overall, participants had high satisfaction with the Vscan and perceived that the device would be highly valuable in the military-deployed setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25469971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Diagnostic tests ; Family Practice - instrumentation ; Federal regulation ; Humans ; Medicine ; Military Medicine ; Military Personnel - psychology ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Physicians ; Physicians, Family ; Point of care testing ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Primary care ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography - instrumentation ; United States</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2014-12, Vol.179 (12), p.1474-1477</ispartof><rights>Reprint &amp; Copyright © 2014 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43024222e225f98c226a72fb3318a8361fd7822c676e3b8eef09450adfc32433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Gina</creatorcontrib><title>Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Point-of-care ultrasonography with a pocket ultrasound device, General Electric Medical Systems Vscan (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), has been shown to be effective and easy to learn. However, no studies to date have evaluated its use in the military primary care setting where its portability and value in bedside diagnosis would be especially beneficial. We tested the feasibility of the Vscan in the day-to-day care of patients by family physicians in their clinic, inpatient wards, and its potential for use in the military-deployed setting. Participants were trained and credentialed in the use of the point-of-care ultrasonography. Then, participants were provided with a pocket ultrasound device to use in their normal day-to-day practice. Additionally, participants completed surveys and provided ratings on their perceptions regarding the use of the device. According to the survey analysis, participants found the devices to be easy to use, valuable in discerning a diagnosis, and were not prohibitively time consuming. Moreover, patients were perceived by the participants to have been satisfied with the use of the device. Overall, participants had high satisfaction with the Vscan and perceived that the device would be highly valuable in the military-deployed setting.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Family Practice - instrumentation</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Military Medicine</subject><subject>Military Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Family</subject><subject>Point of care testing</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - instrumentation</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPwzAQhC0EgvL4AVyQJQ5wMXhtx0mOiPKSWnHpgZvlOrYwpHGwE6T-e1wKHDiNtPp2tDuD0CnQq5LR4nr-NJvfTcmUgCCUMgE7aAI1p0QCf9lFkzyTRNCyOECHKb1RCqKuYB8dsELIui5hgl7nvvWDjmvs9Mq3a9y_rpM3XnfpAvc2GtsPPnQJB4c17oN5t0MW3w0kOGJ0tHhsh6hTGLsGN_bTG4t9h03rO290i_uozZCHx2jP6TbZkx89Qov7u8XtI5k9Pzzd3syI4SUbiOD5D8aYZaxwdWUYk7pkbsk5VLriElxTVowZWUrLl5W1jtaioLpxhjPB-RG63Nr2MXyMNg1q5ZOxbas7G8akQHLBqiK7ZfT8H_oWxtjl4zaUhBqgqDMFW8rEkFK0TvXRr3JgCqjatKC2LaipAqG-W8g7Zz_O43Jlm7-N39j5F5yhgs0</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Bornemann, Paul</creator><creator>Bornemann, Gina</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice</title><author>Bornemann, Paul ; Bornemann, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43024222e225f98c226a72fb3318a8361fd7822c676e3b8eef09450adfc32433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Family Practice - instrumentation</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Military Medicine</topic><topic>Military Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Family</topic><topic>Point of care testing</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - instrumentation</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornemann, Gina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bornemann, Paul</au><au>Bornemann, Gina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1474</spage><epage>1477</epage><pages>1474-1477</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Point-of-care ultrasonography with a pocket ultrasound device, General Electric Medical Systems Vscan (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), has been shown to be effective and easy to learn. However, no studies to date have evaluated its use in the military primary care setting where its portability and value in bedside diagnosis would be especially beneficial. We tested the feasibility of the Vscan in the day-to-day care of patients by family physicians in their clinic, inpatient wards, and its potential for use in the military-deployed setting. Participants were trained and credentialed in the use of the point-of-care ultrasonography. Then, participants were provided with a pocket ultrasound device to use in their normal day-to-day practice. Additionally, participants completed surveys and provided ratings on their perceptions regarding the use of the device. According to the survey analysis, participants found the devices to be easy to use, valuable in discerning a diagnosis, and were not prohibitively time consuming. Moreover, patients were perceived by the participants to have been satisfied with the use of the device. Overall, participants had high satisfaction with the Vscan and perceived that the device would be highly valuable in the military-deployed setting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25469971</pmid><doi>10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00241</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2014-12, Vol.179 (12), p.1474-1477
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634285318
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Diagnostic tests
Family Practice - instrumentation
Federal regulation
Humans
Medicine
Military Medicine
Military Personnel - psychology
Patients
Perceptions
Physicians
Physicians, Family
Point of care testing
Point-of-Care Systems
Primary care
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography - instrumentation
United States
title Military family physicians' perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Military%20family%20physicians'%20perceptions%20of%20a%20pocket%20point-of-care%20ultrasound%20device%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Bornemann,%20Paul&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1474&rft.epage=1477&rft.pages=1474-1477&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1634285318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1636191159&rft_id=info:pmid/25469971&rfr_iscdi=true