Reimagining Quality Measurement
In a reimagined approach, quality measurement in health care would be integrated with care delivery, address the challenges that confront doctors every day, and reflect individual patients' preferences and goals for treatment and health outcomes. The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. healt...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2014-12, Vol.371 (23), p.2150-2153 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2153 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 23 |
| container_start_page | 2150 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 371 |
| creator | McGlynn, Elizabeth A Schneider, Eric C Kerr, Eve A |
| description | In a reimagined approach, quality measurement in health care would be integrated with care delivery, address the challenges that confront doctors every day, and reflect individual patients' preferences and goals for treatment and health outcomes.
The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. health care is troubled. Physicians, hospitals, and health plans view measurement as burdensome, expensive, inaccurate, and indifferent to the complexity of care delivery. Patients and their caregivers believe that performance reporting misses what matters most to them and fails to deliver the information they need to make good decisions. In an attempt to overcome these troubles, measure developers are creating ever more measures, and payers are requiring their use in more settings and tying larger financial rewards or penalties to performance. We believe that doing more of the same is misguided: the time has come . . . |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMp1407883 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634277464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3517214451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-95e19b952bd7e1a4eb9e186a371198368731fdb425f769f9ce13b806080e9c623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpbMxQCQYGAnb8PaKqfKkFgWC2nPRSpYqT1k6G_ntctSCEuOWWR6_uXoROCb4hmIvbl_HzdEkYlkrRPdQnnNKEMSz2UR_jVCVMatpDRyEscBzC9CHqpZxJLDTto_N3KJ2dl3VZz4dvna3Kdj2cgg2dBwd1e4wOClsFONntAfq8H3-MHpPJ68PT6G6S5JSpNtEciM40T7OZBGIZZBqIEpZKQrSiQklKilnGUl5IoQudA6GZwgIrDDoXKR2gq23u0jerDkJrXBlyqCpbQ9MFQwRlqZRMsEgv_tBF0_k6XrdRmDMqNY_qeqty34TgoTBLHz_1a0Ow2RRnfhcX-dkutMsczH7wd1MRXG6Bc8HUsHD_53wB8DNwIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1630543795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reimagining Quality Measurement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>McGlynn, Elizabeth A ; Schneider, Eric C ; Kerr, Eve A</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Elizabeth A ; Schneider, Eric C ; Kerr, Eve A</creatorcontrib><description>In a reimagined approach, quality measurement in health care would be integrated with care delivery, address the challenges that confront doctors every day, and reflect individual patients' preferences and goals for treatment and health outcomes.
The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. health care is troubled. Physicians, hospitals, and health plans view measurement as burdensome, expensive, inaccurate, and indifferent to the complexity of care delivery. Patients and their caregivers believe that performance reporting misses what matters most to them and fails to deliver the information they need to make good decisions. In an attempt to overcome these troubles, measure developers are creating ever more measures, and payers are requiring their use in more settings and tying larger financial rewards or penalties to performance. We believe that doing more of the same is misguided: the time has come . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1407883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25470693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Decision Support Techniques ; Health care delivery ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Performance evaluation ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Quality of care ; United States</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2014-12, Vol.371 (23), p.2150-2153</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-95e19b952bd7e1a4eb9e186a371198368731fdb425f769f9ce13b806080e9c623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-95e19b952bd7e1a4eb9e186a371198368731fdb425f769f9ce13b806080e9c623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1407883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1630543795?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2759,2760,26103,27924,27925,52382,54064,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25470693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Eve A</creatorcontrib><title>Reimagining Quality Measurement</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>In a reimagined approach, quality measurement in health care would be integrated with care delivery, address the challenges that confront doctors every day, and reflect individual patients' preferences and goals for treatment and health outcomes.
The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. health care is troubled. Physicians, hospitals, and health plans view measurement as burdensome, expensive, inaccurate, and indifferent to the complexity of care delivery. Patients and their caregivers believe that performance reporting misses what matters most to them and fails to deliver the information they need to make good decisions. In an attempt to overcome these troubles, measure developers are creating ever more measures, and payers are requiring their use in more settings and tying larger financial rewards or penalties to performance. We believe that doing more of the same is misguided: the time has come . . .</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpbMxQCQYGAnb8PaKqfKkFgWC2nPRSpYqT1k6G_ntctSCEuOWWR6_uXoROCb4hmIvbl_HzdEkYlkrRPdQnnNKEMSz2UR_jVCVMatpDRyEscBzC9CHqpZxJLDTto_N3KJ2dl3VZz4dvna3Kdj2cgg2dBwd1e4wOClsFONntAfq8H3-MHpPJ68PT6G6S5JSpNtEciM40T7OZBGIZZBqIEpZKQrSiQklKilnGUl5IoQudA6GZwgIrDDoXKR2gq23u0jerDkJrXBlyqCpbQ9MFQwRlqZRMsEgv_tBF0_k6XrdRmDMqNY_qeqty34TgoTBLHz_1a0Ow2RRnfhcX-dkutMsczH7wd1MRXG6Bc8HUsHD_53wB8DNwIQ</recordid><startdate>20141204</startdate><enddate>20141204</enddate><creator>McGlynn, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Schneider, Eric C</creator><creator>Kerr, Eve A</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141204</creationdate><title>Reimagining Quality Measurement</title><author>McGlynn, Elizabeth A ; Schneider, Eric C ; Kerr, Eve A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-95e19b952bd7e1a4eb9e186a371198368731fdb425f769f9ce13b806080e9c623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Eve A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlynn, Elizabeth A</au><au>Schneider, Eric C</au><au>Kerr, Eve A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reimagining Quality Measurement</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2014-12-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>371</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>2150</spage><epage>2153</epage><pages>2150-2153</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>In a reimagined approach, quality measurement in health care would be integrated with care delivery, address the challenges that confront doctors every day, and reflect individual patients' preferences and goals for treatment and health outcomes.
The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. health care is troubled. Physicians, hospitals, and health plans view measurement as burdensome, expensive, inaccurate, and indifferent to the complexity of care delivery. Patients and their caregivers believe that performance reporting misses what matters most to them and fails to deliver the information they need to make good decisions. In an attempt to overcome these troubles, measure developers are creating ever more measures, and payers are requiring their use in more settings and tying larger financial rewards or penalties to performance. We believe that doing more of the same is misguided: the time has come . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>25470693</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1407883</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2014-12, Vol.371 (23), p.2150-2153 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634277464 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine |
| subjects | Chronic illnesses Decision Support Techniques Health care delivery Hospitals Humans Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods Performance evaluation Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards Quality Indicators, Health Care Quality of care United States |
| title | Reimagining Quality Measurement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reimagining%20Quality%20Measurement&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=McGlynn,%20Elizabeth%20A&rft.date=2014-12-04&rft.volume=371&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=2150&rft.epage=2153&rft.pages=2150-2153&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1407883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3517214451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1630543795&rft_id=info:pmid/25470693&rfr_iscdi=true |