Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care

BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hospital medicine 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.750-755
Hauptverfasser: Schaffer, Adam C., Puopolo, Ann Louise, Raman, Supriya, Kachalia, Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 755
container_issue 12
container_start_page 750
container_title Journal of hospital medicine
container_volume 9
creator Schaffer, Adam C.
Puopolo, Ann Louise
Raman, Supriya
Kachalia, Allen
description BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risks and outcomes of malpractice claims against hospitalists in internal medicine. DESIGN Retrospective observational analysis. MEASUREMENTS Using claims data from a liability insurer‐maintained database of over 52,000 malpractice claims, we measured the rates of malpractice claims against hospitalists compared to other physician specialties, types of allegations against hospitalists, contributing factors, and the severity of injury in and outcomes of these claims. RESULTS Hospitalists had a malpractice claims rate of 0.52 claims per 100 physician coverage years (PCYs), which was significantly lower than that of nonhospitalist internal medicine physicians (1.91 claims per 100 PCYs), emergency medicine physicians (3.50 claims per 100 PCYs), general surgeons (4.70 claims per 100 PCYs), and obstetricians‐gynecologists (5.56 claims per 100 PCYs) (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jhm.2244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634270426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3513920091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-692869dae926c46db0919ce8e8cc1af1276485e3fbc744960985431ba17a37483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMobk7BXyAFX3zpzHeaRx1uc8wpfuBjSLOUZbZrbVp0_96OdRMEn-6FezhcDgDnCPYRhPh6ucj6GFN6ALqIMRIyDvnhbmcSd8CJ90sIKYkYPQYdzAhBMpJdgKZOxy511TpwWaFNFeRJUC1ssMh94SqdOl8FWT636eZgdGlPwVGiU2_P2tkDb8O718E4nD6O7gc309CQSNCQSxxxOddWYm4on8dQImlsZCNjkE4QFpxGzJIkNoJSyaFsXiMo1khoImhEeuBq6y3K_LO2vlKZ88amqV7ZvPYKcUKxgBTzBr38gy7zulw13zUUlgxDQcmv0JS596VNVFG6TJdrhaDaZFRNRrXJ2KAXrbCOMzvfg7tuDRBugS-X2vW_IjUZP7TClm9y2u89r8sPxQURTL3PRuqFjGa3k6dnNSQ_ahKHgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629520743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Schaffer, Adam C. ; Puopolo, Ann Louise ; Raman, Supriya ; Kachalia, Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, Adam C. ; Puopolo, Ann Louise ; Raman, Supriya ; Kachalia, Allen</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risks and outcomes of malpractice claims against hospitalists in internal medicine. DESIGN Retrospective observational analysis. MEASUREMENTS Using claims data from a liability insurer‐maintained database of over 52,000 malpractice claims, we measured the rates of malpractice claims against hospitalists compared to other physician specialties, types of allegations against hospitalists, contributing factors, and the severity of injury in and outcomes of these claims. RESULTS Hospitalists had a malpractice claims rate of 0.52 claims per 100 physician coverage years (PCYs), which was significantly lower than that of nonhospitalist internal medicine physicians (1.91 claims per 100 PCYs), emergency medicine physicians (3.50 claims per 100 PCYs), general surgeons (4.70 claims per 100 PCYs), and obstetricians‐gynecologists (5.56 claims per 100 PCYs) (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). The most common allegation types made against hospitalists were for errors in medical treatment (41.5%) and diagnosis (36.0%). The most common contributing factors underlying claims were deficiencies in clinical judgment (54.4%) and communication (36.4%). Of the claims made against hospitalists, 50.4% involved the death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Despite fears of increased liability from the hospitalist model of care, hospitalists in internal medicine are subject to medical malpractice claims less frequently when compared to other internal medicine physicians and specialties. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:750–755. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-5592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25331989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Databases, Factual - trends ; Female ; Hospitalists ; Humans ; Internal Medicine - economics ; Internal Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Internal Medicine - trends ; Male ; Malpractice - economics ; Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Malpractice - trends ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of hospital medicine, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.750-755</ispartof><rights>2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</rights><rights>2014 Society of Hospital Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-692869dae926c46db0919ce8e8cc1af1276485e3fbc744960985431ba17a37483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-692869dae926c46db0919ce8e8cc1af1276485e3fbc744960985431ba17a37483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhm.2244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhm.2244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25331989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puopolo, Ann Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachalia, Allen</creatorcontrib><title>Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care</title><title>Journal of hospital medicine</title><addtitle>J. Hosp. Med</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risks and outcomes of malpractice claims against hospitalists in internal medicine. DESIGN Retrospective observational analysis. MEASUREMENTS Using claims data from a liability insurer‐maintained database of over 52,000 malpractice claims, we measured the rates of malpractice claims against hospitalists compared to other physician specialties, types of allegations against hospitalists, contributing factors, and the severity of injury in and outcomes of these claims. RESULTS Hospitalists had a malpractice claims rate of 0.52 claims per 100 physician coverage years (PCYs), which was significantly lower than that of nonhospitalist internal medicine physicians (1.91 claims per 100 PCYs), emergency medicine physicians (3.50 claims per 100 PCYs), general surgeons (4.70 claims per 100 PCYs), and obstetricians‐gynecologists (5.56 claims per 100 PCYs) (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). The most common allegation types made against hospitalists were for errors in medical treatment (41.5%) and diagnosis (36.0%). The most common contributing factors underlying claims were deficiencies in clinical judgment (54.4%) and communication (36.4%). Of the claims made against hospitalists, 50.4% involved the death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Despite fears of increased liability from the hospitalist model of care, hospitalists in internal medicine are subject to medical malpractice claims less frequently when compared to other internal medicine physicians and specialties. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:750–755. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalists</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malpractice - economics</subject><subject>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Malpractice - trends</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1553-5592</issn><issn>1553-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMobk7BXyAFX3zpzHeaRx1uc8wpfuBjSLOUZbZrbVp0_96OdRMEn-6FezhcDgDnCPYRhPh6ucj6GFN6ALqIMRIyDvnhbmcSd8CJ90sIKYkYPQYdzAhBMpJdgKZOxy511TpwWaFNFeRJUC1ssMh94SqdOl8FWT636eZgdGlPwVGiU2_P2tkDb8O718E4nD6O7gc309CQSNCQSxxxOddWYm4on8dQImlsZCNjkE4QFpxGzJIkNoJSyaFsXiMo1khoImhEeuBq6y3K_LO2vlKZ88amqV7ZvPYKcUKxgBTzBr38gy7zulw13zUUlgxDQcmv0JS596VNVFG6TJdrhaDaZFRNRrXJ2KAXrbCOMzvfg7tuDRBugS-X2vW_IjUZP7TClm9y2u89r8sPxQURTL3PRuqFjGa3k6dnNSQ_ahKHgg</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Schaffer, Adam C.</creator><creator>Puopolo, Ann Louise</creator><creator>Raman, Supriya</creator><creator>Kachalia, Allen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Frontline Medical Communications</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care</title><author>Schaffer, Adam C. ; Puopolo, Ann Louise ; Raman, Supriya ; Kachalia, Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3874-692869dae926c46db0919ce8e8cc1af1276485e3fbc744960985431ba17a37483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalists</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malpractice - economics</topic><topic>Malpractice - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Malpractice - trends</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puopolo, Ann Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachalia, Allen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hospital medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaffer, Adam C.</au><au>Puopolo, Ann Louise</au><au>Raman, Supriya</au><au>Kachalia, Allen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hospital medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J. Hosp. Med</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>750-755</pages><issn>1553-5592</issn><eissn>1553-5606</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risks and outcomes of malpractice claims against hospitalists in internal medicine. DESIGN Retrospective observational analysis. MEASUREMENTS Using claims data from a liability insurer‐maintained database of over 52,000 malpractice claims, we measured the rates of malpractice claims against hospitalists compared to other physician specialties, types of allegations against hospitalists, contributing factors, and the severity of injury in and outcomes of these claims. RESULTS Hospitalists had a malpractice claims rate of 0.52 claims per 100 physician coverage years (PCYs), which was significantly lower than that of nonhospitalist internal medicine physicians (1.91 claims per 100 PCYs), emergency medicine physicians (3.50 claims per 100 PCYs), general surgeons (4.70 claims per 100 PCYs), and obstetricians‐gynecologists (5.56 claims per 100 PCYs) (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). The most common allegation types made against hospitalists were for errors in medical treatment (41.5%) and diagnosis (36.0%). The most common contributing factors underlying claims were deficiencies in clinical judgment (54.4%) and communication (36.4%). Of the claims made against hospitalists, 50.4% involved the death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Despite fears of increased liability from the hospitalist model of care, hospitalists in internal medicine are subject to medical malpractice claims less frequently when compared to other internal medicine physicians and specialties. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:750–755. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25331989</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhm.2244</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-5592
ispartof Journal of hospital medicine, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.750-755
issn 1553-5592
1553-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1634270426
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Databases, Factual - trends
Female
Hospitalists
Humans
Internal Medicine - economics
Internal Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence
Internal Medicine - trends
Male
Malpractice - economics
Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence
Malpractice - trends
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
title Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T11%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liability%20impact%20of%20the%20hospitalist%20model%20of%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hospital%20medicine&rft.au=Schaffer,%20Adam%20C.&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=750-755&rft.issn=1553-5592&rft.eissn=1553-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhm.2244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3513920091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629520743&rft_id=info:pmid/25331989&rfr_iscdi=true