Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects

A latex provocation test is needed to clarify the allergic status of patients who present with a positive clinical history for latex allergy and a negative latex skin test and /or serologic test. In the present study, we aimed to optimize and validate the performance and safety of a latex glove prov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 1997-09, Vol.79 (3), p.266-272
Hauptverfasser: Hamilton, Robert G, Adkinson, N Franklin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 272
container_issue 3
container_start_page 266
container_title Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology
container_volume 79
creator Hamilton, Robert G
Adkinson, N Franklin
description A latex provocation test is needed to clarify the allergic status of patients who present with a positive clinical history for latex allergy and a negative latex skin test and /or serologic test. In the present study, we aimed to optimize and validate the performance and safety of a latex glove provocation protocol and to employ it to verify the barrier properties of the Dermapor expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) glove liner (liner) for latex glove allergen. Twenty-one skin test positive latex-allergic subjects donned goggles and a silicone mask, washed their hands and then put high allergen-containing latex gloves (mean = 15,072 AU/mL) on a moist, bare and liner-covered hand. Due to an absence of verifiable reactions on the bare hand in the first five subjects, the protocol was modified to puncture the skin in the three sites on the hand prior to donning the liner/glove or latex glove alone. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes for localized allergic symptoms (pruritus and hives). Lined and unlined hands were compared for reactions. Application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the bare hands of five skin test-positive, latex-allergic subjects produced some mild pruritus but no visually detectable dermatitis. In contrast, all 17 latex-allergic subjects who underwent the modified glove challenge protocol involving a puncture prior to glove application experienced intense pruritus with measurable wheals and erythema at sites where their skin was punctured. Equivalent wheal and erythema reactions were observed at a site where a puncture was performed directly through the glove. These same subjects experienced no pruritus or hives on their opposite hands that received a liner prior to latex glove application. Direct application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the hands of skin test-positive, latex-allergic individuals does not commonly produce localized allergic symptoms after minutes, especially if the subject has successfully avoided latex and has no evidence of dermatitis. By puncturing the skin prior to latex glove donning, quantifiable hives are produced within 15 minutes following glove application. A Dermapore ePTFE liner prevents the transfer of allergen from gloves onto the skin and therefore can serve to minimize contact exposure as part of avoidance therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63013-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16312493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S108112061063013X</els_id><sourcerecordid>16165619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f6c322664a08689f84c10f49f3664159258794b2dc5fef3c630b5d62f2708fe83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0K1C_4CZUihFA5pIw_45yqqoKCtCpIBdSb5XXG4FU2bu1kBf--3mbpoRdOHs37zGj8EHJC4YwCVR9uKGhaUwbqlMJ7xYHy-naPHFLJRS0EVy9K_Q85IEc5rwCAasX3yX7LQTKuDsn1T9uHzo4hDlX01fgbq4Ud8U911ccNVt9S3EQ3x6V22E0JqzDMUH3R95h-BVfdTMsVujG_Ii-97TO-3r3H5Menj98vP9eLr1dfLi8WtROiGWuvHGdMKWFBK916LRwFL1rPS4_KlkndtGLJOic9eu7K75ayU8yzBrRHzY_Ju3nvXYr3E-bRrEN22Pd2wDhlQxWnTLS8gG-egas4paHcZhiwRoNgUCA5Qy7FnBN6c5fC2qa_hoLZyjaPss3W5Lb1KNvclrmT3fJpucbuaWpnt-Rvd7nNzvY-2cGF_IQxzaTkTcHOZwyLsU3AZLILOBTZIRWppovhP4c8AIpHmRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202780420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hamilton, Robert G ; Adkinson, N Franklin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Robert G ; Adkinson, N Franklin</creatorcontrib><description>A latex provocation test is needed to clarify the allergic status of patients who present with a positive clinical history for latex allergy and a negative latex skin test and /or serologic test. In the present study, we aimed to optimize and validate the performance and safety of a latex glove provocation protocol and to employ it to verify the barrier properties of the Dermapor expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) glove liner (liner) for latex glove allergen. Twenty-one skin test positive latex-allergic subjects donned goggles and a silicone mask, washed their hands and then put high allergen-containing latex gloves (mean = 15,072 AU/mL) on a moist, bare and liner-covered hand. Due to an absence of verifiable reactions on the bare hand in the first five subjects, the protocol was modified to puncture the skin in the three sites on the hand prior to donning the liner/glove or latex glove alone. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes for localized allergic symptoms (pruritus and hives). Lined and unlined hands were compared for reactions. Application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the bare hands of five skin test-positive, latex-allergic subjects produced some mild pruritus but no visually detectable dermatitis. In contrast, all 17 latex-allergic subjects who underwent the modified glove challenge protocol involving a puncture prior to glove application experienced intense pruritus with measurable wheals and erythema at sites where their skin was punctured. Equivalent wheal and erythema reactions were observed at a site where a puncture was performed directly through the glove. These same subjects experienced no pruritus or hives on their opposite hands that received a liner prior to latex glove application. Direct application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the hands of skin test-positive, latex-allergic individuals does not commonly produce localized allergic symptoms after minutes, especially if the subject has successfully avoided latex and has no evidence of dermatitis. By puncturing the skin prior to latex glove donning, quantifiable hives are produced within 15 minutes following glove application. A Dermapore ePTFE liner prevents the transfer of allergen from gloves onto the skin and therefore can serve to minimize contact exposure as part of avoidance therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63013-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9305236</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANAEA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>McLean, VA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergic diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - immunology ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Gloves, Protective - adverse effects ; Humans ; Immunopathology ; Latex - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Polytetrafluoroethylene - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies ; Skin Tests</subject><ispartof>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology, 1997-09, Vol.79 (3), p.266-272</ispartof><rights>1997 American College of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American College of Allergy and Immunology Sep 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f6c322664a08689f84c10f49f3664159258794b2dc5fef3c630b5d62f2708fe83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f6c322664a08689f84c10f49f3664159258794b2dc5fef3c630b5d62f2708fe83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63013-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2825537$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9305236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adkinson, N Franklin</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects</title><title>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</title><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><description>A latex provocation test is needed to clarify the allergic status of patients who present with a positive clinical history for latex allergy and a negative latex skin test and /or serologic test. In the present study, we aimed to optimize and validate the performance and safety of a latex glove provocation protocol and to employ it to verify the barrier properties of the Dermapor expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) glove liner (liner) for latex glove allergen. Twenty-one skin test positive latex-allergic subjects donned goggles and a silicone mask, washed their hands and then put high allergen-containing latex gloves (mean = 15,072 AU/mL) on a moist, bare and liner-covered hand. Due to an absence of verifiable reactions on the bare hand in the first five subjects, the protocol was modified to puncture the skin in the three sites on the hand prior to donning the liner/glove or latex glove alone. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes for localized allergic symptoms (pruritus and hives). Lined and unlined hands were compared for reactions. Application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the bare hands of five skin test-positive, latex-allergic subjects produced some mild pruritus but no visually detectable dermatitis. In contrast, all 17 latex-allergic subjects who underwent the modified glove challenge protocol involving a puncture prior to glove application experienced intense pruritus with measurable wheals and erythema at sites where their skin was punctured. Equivalent wheal and erythema reactions were observed at a site where a puncture was performed directly through the glove. These same subjects experienced no pruritus or hives on their opposite hands that received a liner prior to latex glove application. Direct application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the hands of skin test-positive, latex-allergic individuals does not commonly produce localized allergic symptoms after minutes, especially if the subject has successfully avoided latex and has no evidence of dermatitis. By puncturing the skin prior to latex glove donning, quantifiable hives are produced within 15 minutes following glove application. A Dermapore ePTFE liner prevents the transfer of allergen from gloves onto the skin and therefore can serve to minimize contact exposure as part of avoidance therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergic diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - immunology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gloves, Protective - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Latex - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><issn>1081-1206</issn><issn>1534-4436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0K1C_4CZUihFA5pIw_45yqqoKCtCpIBdSb5XXG4FU2bu1kBf--3mbpoRdOHs37zGj8EHJC4YwCVR9uKGhaUwbqlMJ7xYHy-naPHFLJRS0EVy9K_Q85IEc5rwCAasX3yX7LQTKuDsn1T9uHzo4hDlX01fgbq4Ud8U911ccNVt9S3EQ3x6V22E0JqzDMUH3R95h-BVfdTMsVujG_Ii-97TO-3r3H5Menj98vP9eLr1dfLi8WtROiGWuvHGdMKWFBK916LRwFL1rPS4_KlkndtGLJOic9eu7K75ayU8yzBrRHzY_Ju3nvXYr3E-bRrEN22Pd2wDhlQxWnTLS8gG-egas4paHcZhiwRoNgUCA5Qy7FnBN6c5fC2qa_hoLZyjaPss3W5Lb1KNvclrmT3fJpucbuaWpnt-Rvd7nNzvY-2cGF_IQxzaTkTcHOZwyLsU3AZLILOBTZIRWppovhP4c8AIpHmRk</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Hamilton, Robert G</creator><creator>Adkinson, N Franklin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Allergy, Asthma, &amp; Immunology</general><general>American College of Allergy and Immunology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects</title><author>Hamilton, Robert G ; Adkinson, N Franklin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f6c322664a08689f84c10f49f3664159258794b2dc5fef3c630b5d62f2708fe83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergic diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - immunology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gloves, Protective - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Latex - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adkinson, N Franklin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, Robert G</au><au>Adkinson, N Franklin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects</atitle><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>266-272</pages><issn>1081-1206</issn><eissn>1534-4436</eissn><coden>ANAEA3</coden><abstract>A latex provocation test is needed to clarify the allergic status of patients who present with a positive clinical history for latex allergy and a negative latex skin test and /or serologic test. In the present study, we aimed to optimize and validate the performance and safety of a latex glove provocation protocol and to employ it to verify the barrier properties of the Dermapor expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) glove liner (liner) for latex glove allergen. Twenty-one skin test positive latex-allergic subjects donned goggles and a silicone mask, washed their hands and then put high allergen-containing latex gloves (mean = 15,072 AU/mL) on a moist, bare and liner-covered hand. Due to an absence of verifiable reactions on the bare hand in the first five subjects, the protocol was modified to puncture the skin in the three sites on the hand prior to donning the liner/glove or latex glove alone. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes for localized allergic symptoms (pruritus and hives). Lined and unlined hands were compared for reactions. Application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the bare hands of five skin test-positive, latex-allergic subjects produced some mild pruritus but no visually detectable dermatitis. In contrast, all 17 latex-allergic subjects who underwent the modified glove challenge protocol involving a puncture prior to glove application experienced intense pruritus with measurable wheals and erythema at sites where their skin was punctured. Equivalent wheal and erythema reactions were observed at a site where a puncture was performed directly through the glove. These same subjects experienced no pruritus or hives on their opposite hands that received a liner prior to latex glove application. Direct application of highly allergenic latex gloves onto the hands of skin test-positive, latex-allergic individuals does not commonly produce localized allergic symptoms after minutes, especially if the subject has successfully avoided latex and has no evidence of dermatitis. By puncturing the skin prior to latex glove donning, quantifiable hives are produced within 15 minutes following glove application. A Dermapore ePTFE liner prevents the transfer of allergen from gloves onto the skin and therefore can serve to minimize contact exposure as part of avoidance therapy.</abstract><cop>McLean, VA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9305236</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63013-X</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-1206
ispartof Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 1997-09, Vol.79 (3), p.266-272
issn 1081-1206
1534-4436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16312493
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Allergic diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology
Dermatitis, Occupational - immunology
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Gloves, Protective - adverse effects
Humans
Immunopathology
Latex - adverse effects
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Polytetrafluoroethylene - standards
Reproducibility of Results
Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies
Skin Tests
title Validation of the Latex Glove Provocation Procedure in Latex-Allergic Subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A13%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Latex%20Glove%20Provocation%20Procedure%20in%20Latex-Allergic%20Subjects&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20allergy,%20asthma,%20&%20immunology&rft.au=Hamilton,%20Robert%20G&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=266-272&rft.issn=1081-1206&rft.eissn=1534-4436&rft.coden=ANAEA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63013-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16165619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202780420&rft_id=info:pmid/9305236&rft_els_id=S108112061063013X&rfr_iscdi=true